User talk:Fossion
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 12:49, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
File:La Libre thèse.pdf has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:13, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Bonjour, je demande à la direction du journal "La Libre" l'autorisation de reprise de l'article en question. Bien à vous. André Fossion --Fossion (talk) 08:40, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
File:Pages de couverture.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:59, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Je vais demander l'autorisation de l'éditeur et vous envoyer cette autorisation.
Bien à vous. André Fossion --Fossion (talk) 13:33, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Je vais demander à l'éditeur l'autorisation de reproduire la couverture du livre. Bien à vous. André Fossion --Fossion (talk) 08:45, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Histoire de l'EEC. Texte Français. Korherr.pdf
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Histoire de l'EEC. Texte Français. Korherr.pdf. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Histoire de l'EEC. Texte Français. Korherr.pdf]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:00, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
onjour, je vous signale encore que le Pr.Dr.Jozef Korherr, qui a sa notice sur Wikipedia et qui a rédigé la note sur l'histoire de l'Equipe Européenne de Catéchèse, est décédé en mai 2015. Le texte est donc libre de droit. Bien à vous. André Fossion--Fossion (d) 09:48, 6 March 2019 (UTC) --Fossion (talk) 13:37, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
--Fossion (talk) 09:28, 11 March 2019 (UTC)== File tagging File:Liste des auteurs de "Un christiianisme infiiniment précieux".pdf ==
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Liste des auteurs de "Un christiianisme infiiniment précieux".pdf. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Liste des auteurs de "Un christiianisme infiiniment précieux".pdf]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:00, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Je vais demander l'autorisation à l'éditeur --Fossion (talk) 13:37, 6 March 2019 (UTC)--Fossion (talk) 09:28, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Routher.pdf
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Routher.pdf. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Routher.pdf]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:01, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Je vais demander l'autorisatin à l'éditeur de publier les 3 pages de G.Routhier ainsi que la permission de l'auteur lui-même. Merci. André Fossion --Fossion (talk) 13:37, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Bonjour Monsieur Rogel , Je puis obtenir la permission de l'éditeur (Lumen Vitae) et des auteurs (Biemmi, Routhier) pour la publication de la couverture et des extraits d'auteurs.
Pour ce qui concerne le texte de Korherr qui donne un aperçu historique de l'Equipe Européenne de Catéchèse, je vais voir si je puis l'atteindre. Je crois que Mr Korherr est décédé. Le texte était à usage interne au sein de l'Equipe Européenne et, à mon avis, n'est pas protégé par un droit.
Pour ce qui concerne la reprise d'un article de la Libre Belgique du 11 juin 1991, l'auteur de l'article est décédé. Faus-il demander la persmission au journal. Je puis le faire si vous le jugez nécessaire.
Merci pour votre attention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fossion (talk • contribs) 00:17, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Merci, Monsieur Rogel, je reprends mon message en le signant.--Fossion (talk) 08:27, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Bonjour Monsieur Rogel , Je puis obtenir la permission de l'éditeur (Lumen Vitae) et des auteurs (Biemmi, Routhier) pour la publication de la couverture et des extraits d'auteurs. Pour ce qui concerne le texte de Korherr qui donne un aperçu historique de l'Equipe Européenne de Catéchèse, je vais voir si je puis l'atteindre. Je crois que Mr Korherr est décédé. Le texte était à usage interne au sein de l'Equipe Européenne et, à mon avis, n'est pas protégé par un droit. Pour ce qui concerne la reprise d'un article de la Libre Belgique du 11 juin 1991, l'auteur de l'article est décédé. Faus-il demander la persmission au journal. Je puis le faire si vous le jugez nécessaire. Merci pour votre attention.
Bonjour, je vous signale encore que le Pr.Dr.Jozef Korherr, qui a sa notice sur Wikipedia et qui a rédigé la note sur l'histoire de l'Equipe Européenne de Catéchèse, est décédé en mai 2015. Le texte est donc libre de droit.
Bien à vous. André Fossion--Fossion (talk) 09:48, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
- Bonjour. Merci de faire valoir votre point de vue dans l'onglet Discussion de la page de description de chaque fichier, sinon il risque d'être supprimé sans préavis par un Administrateur. En France ou en Belgique (et dans la plupart des pays, d'ailleurs), le droit d'auteur court 70 ans après la mort de l'auteur donc, par exemple, le texte du Dr.Jozef Korherr n'est pas libre et vous devez solliciter l'autorisation deses ayant-droits (héritiers) ou de son éditeur si publié. Même chose pour les couvertures d'ouvrages (autorisation de Lumen Vitae) ou l'article (autorisation de Libre Belgique). Cordialement, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:05, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Bonjour Monsieur Rogel, la permission de l'auteur, Gilles Routhier, de mettre en ligne son article "André Fossion une traversée" dans l'ouvrage "Un christianime infiniment précieux" a été envoyée à permission.fr@wikipedia.org . Bien à vous. --Fossion (talk) 15:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Liste des auteurs du livre "Un christianisme infiniment précieux".jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Liste des auteurs du livre "Un christianisme infiniment précieux".jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Merci. Je demande à l'éditeur de l'ouvrage (Un christianisme infiniment précieux) l'autorisation de reproduire cette liste d'auteurs. Bien à vous. André Fossion --Fossion (talk) 08:38, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
File:Bibliographie 1980-2019.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Lumen Vitae en 1996 Fossion.pdf
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Lumen Vitae en 1996 Fossion.pdf, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Ronhjones (Talk) 16:25, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Je demande la permission du directeur de la revue Lumen Vitae d'où est repris le fichier en question.--Fossion (talk) 09:27, 11 March 2019 (UTC) --Fossion (talk) 09:16, 11 March 2019 (UTC)--Fossion (talk) 09:29, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted content
[edit]
File:Lumen Vitae en 1996 Fossion.pdf
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.Yours sincerely, — Racconish 💬 06:54, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
File:1980-2019 Biblio.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 25 March 2019 (UTC)