User talk:FlocciNivis/Archive 4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Jakobus Front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:17, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210611 Waldstraße 44 Saarbrücken 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:40, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210611 Denkmal Feuerwache 2 Saarbrücken 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:50, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20201230 Windkraftanlage Freimann 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Nice atmosphere. Good quality. --Cayambe 09:49, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180623Blies-Grenz-Weg 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:46, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200113 Zum Hirsch Saarbrücken 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 13:24, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200705 Vogelsbornkapelle 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 18:43, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200731 Versunkenes Dorf 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 18:43, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20190310Bergehalde Grühlingstraße 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:53, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200725Christkönig-Kirche Luisenthal 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:06, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stellwerk Am Bahnhof Lebach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 16:22, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20201209 Heizkraftwerk Saarbrücken 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:08, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200124 Altes Rathaus Völklingen 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 16:53, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200328 St. Albert Rodenhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good image. But the verticals should be corrected. --Augustgeyler 00:10, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done I looked at the wrong verticals before --FlocciNivis 11:06, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
 Support  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 17:00, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180915Jardin des Deux Rives 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Argenberg 13:50, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20201229 Isarsteg Unterföhring.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Argenberg 12:08, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20201231 Isarsteg Unterföhring 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:19, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200705 Numborn 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 12:06, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20201229 Notauslasskanal Munich 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:54, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Georg Pflaumdorf 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:05, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20201231 Fröttmaninger Berg 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 13:37, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200402 Saar in Saarbrücken 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Cropping out the blue box in the left would make the composition better, IMO. --Draceane 09:56, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done thank you for the feedback! --FlocciNivis 11:31, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. OK now. --Draceane 08:15, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180623Blies-Grenz-Weg 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:21, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20201231 Hypoberg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but please correct the file description. We are looking southward here. --Milseburg 13:35, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done, stupid mistake by me. Thanks --FlocciNivis 21:39, 16 March 2023 (UTC) I also correcedt it here in the nomination.  Support --Milseburg 10:35, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210925 Kondeler Bach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:54, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210925 Gustav-Heinemann-Brücke Saarlouis 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:55, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230211 St-Johann-Nepomuk-Museum Plattling 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Modern primat 20:22, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230211 Herzog Albrecht Brücke Plattling 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 12:21, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210724 Wasserturm am Hauptbahnhof Saarbrücken 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:59, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210619 Sylvensteinspeicher 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:55, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leichenhaus Knappschaftslazaretts Sulzbach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:55, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230211 St-Johann-Nepomuk-Museum Plattling 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180714 Mannheim 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 14:23, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180714 Mannheim 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 14:23, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180828Litermont Gipfel Tour 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:10, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180929 St. Marien Lebach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:57, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230318 Hotel Hafen Hamburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 19:35, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180929 St. Marien Lebach 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Underexposed – fixable? --Augustgeyler 10:16, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done --FlocciNivis 09:28, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:01, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230122 Klinikum Schwabing 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:20, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230122 Klinikum Schwabing 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:20, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230122 Klinikum Schwabing 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:18, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220810 St. Nikolaikirche Potsdam 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:50, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wurmeck Rathaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Combrian 15:05, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230317 Boston Hotel Hamburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment Rotation needs to be corrected ccw. And I am not sure if the verticals are correctable without riuning the image. --Augustgeyler 19:14, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
@Augustgeyler: Thank you for the feedback, I tried to improve the verticals now. For reference see this picture. --FlocciNivis 11:19, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:20, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230122 Klinikum Schwabing 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:53, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230122 Klinikum Schwabing 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 14:25, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230122 Klinikum Schwabing 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:14, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230122 Klinikum Schwabing 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 14:25, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230122 Klinikum Schwabing 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:14, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230105 Hotel Zur Stadt Mainz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:23, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klinik Sulzbach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:23, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180721Eisengießer Brebach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:38, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Am Hauptbahnhof Wittenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:38, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210115 Berliner Promenade Saarbrücken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:32, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210115 Burbacher Schleuse 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 14:13, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210804 Wasserturm Ausbesserungswerk München-Freimann.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Not visually appealing, but technically good. That wiring problem at the top-left must cause unexpected radio transmissions... --Mike Peel 21:01, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

--Pi bot (talk) 07:06, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230315 Hotel Holländer Hof Heidelberg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 07:24, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230315 Hotel Holländer Hof Heidelberg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 07:25, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230214 Triangular Door Handle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 07:28, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230213 Door Handle Steige Mariahilf Passau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 07:28, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221106 Coprinus comatus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:16, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210711 Blasting hall of Völklingen Ironworks.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:30, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210611 Ausbesserungswerk Saarbrücken-Burbach 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:30, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210409 Mühlgasse 2 Blieskastel 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:16, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230222 Doorknob St. Johannes Freising.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 16:30, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210115 Eisenbahnbrücke Malstatt 1908.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 16:30, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230211 Friedhof Plattling 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:22, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220427 Reitergedenkstein Garchinger Heide 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:26, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210627 St. Markus Reinheim 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:20, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:22, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220423 Landschaftsschutzgebiet Würmtal 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 14:55, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180221 Praterwehrbrücke 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Perhaps Under-Categorized but good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:49, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180221Hirschau und Obere Isarau 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 11:22, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20190217 St. Albert Rodenhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 09:52, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180810 Schloss Saarbrücken 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not the best composition but good quality -- Spurzem 16:05, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210611 Alter Malstatter Friedhof 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Too much highlights IMHO; would be better to reduce it. --~~~~ --Halavar 18:39, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done I tried to fix the lighting now --FlocciNivis 09:22, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good now. QI for me. --Halavar 13:00, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210115 Luisenbrücke Saarbrücken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:26, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180907 Astro Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:34, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220921 Fröttmaning 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 18:21, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200115 Alsbach Schacht 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:32, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Left side is unsharp. Add sharpness there or crop that part. --Halavar 10:34, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done I changed to a square crop --FlocciNivis 10:19, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality now. --Halavar 17:45, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180714 Schloss Mannheim 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --SHB2000 06:38, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200408 Schanzenbergbrücke 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good image and good quality -- Spurzem 21:37, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200228Landschaftsschutzgebiet Isar Landkreis München 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice image, good composition, good quality -- Spurzem 21:35, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200119 St. Bonifatius Püttlingen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:31, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180907 Brussels 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Argenberg 13:52, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180915 Europabrücke Kehl Straßburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 07:40, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200304Oberes Isartal02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:53, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2023 - Deutschland

Hallo FlocciNivis,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2023 findet zum elften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Der Wettbewerb ist zweigeteilt, das heißt wir unterscheiden zwischen den beiden Wettbewerbskategorien Landschaft und Detail/Makro. Zu Landschaft zählen auch geschützte Einzelbäume. In der Wettbewerbskategorie Detail/Makro werden Pflanzen, Tiere und Pilze bewertet.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen – zum Beispiel in Sachsen die Liste der Naturdenkmale in Wurzen.

Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2023 – Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung.

Damit der Upload für dich einfacher ist, haben wir in diesem Jahr die einzelnen Hochladeseiten für die Bundesländer abgeschafft, alle Fotos werden über dasselbe Formular hochgeladen. Außerdem haben wir das Layout unserer WLE-Seiten geändert.

Damit es ab 1. Mai mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos for WLE 

Außerdem laden wir dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2023 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2023 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool 

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb 2023 wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 15:25, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180922 Temple neuf de Metz 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 12:07, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20201105 Völklingen Ironworks 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Left side is blurred and not sharp enough. If you crop that part, I will promote your image. --Halavar 19:01, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done I cropped the picture on the left. Is this enough? --FlocciNivis 20:29, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 Support Yes, now looks better. QI for me. --Halavar 22:17, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200621 Bahnhof Merzig Saar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:44, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200713 Teich Heiligengraben 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:33, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200731 Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche Fröttmaning 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:33, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210214 Felsenpfad Kirkel 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:48, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210502 Bombus pascuorum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 21:45, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20191031Spaziergang Ludwigspark 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 18:33, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saarbasar Außen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 06:31, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210508 Allium ursinum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support OK quality. --Charlesjsharp 16:02, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210502 Steinbach Saarbrücken 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:35, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20201031 Bahnhof Püttlingen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:41, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220420 Dipsacus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:22, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210611 Ensemble Obere Grüneichstraße Saarbrücken 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The verticals are slightly off, needs a small PC or rotation? --Mike Peel 07:29, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done thank you for the feedback --FlocciNivis 19:22, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. Better, thanks! --Mike Peel 19:35, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210409 Landschaftsschutzgebiet Blieskastel 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
I would clone out the branches in the top left corner. Otherwise good --MB-one 07:17, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done Thank you for the feedback! --FlocciNivis 09:55, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:17, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180907 Brussels 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 20:13, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210616 Südliche Fröttmaninger Heide 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 18:53, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210619 Landschaftsschutzgebiet Sylvensteinsee 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 18:38, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210619 Landschaftsschutzgebiet Sylvensteinsee 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 18:38, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210619 Sylvensteinspeicher 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Technically clean --PantheraLeo1359531 20:12, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:13, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210626 Burg Frankenstein Pfalz 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης 15:43, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210328 Kleiner Stiefel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 06:49, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230409 St. Lorenz Oberföhring 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:54, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230213 Wegkapelle Mühltalstraße Passau 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 14:33, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 Comment. But not a good angle for a quality picture. I would have tried to photograph the chapel more from the left to see something from the front as well. In addition, the warning beacon would attract less attention. -- Spurzem 17:23, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230216 Grenzstein 27 Mühldorf am Inn Süd 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 14:56, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230216 Natur INN Bewegung 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 12:11, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210802 Munich Nordfriedhof Friedhofsmauer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:05, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210627 St. Markus Reinheim 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:18, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230317 Beim Grünen Jäger 11-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 18:03, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230315 Reutax Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:28, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230213 Mühltalstraße 22 Passau 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:30, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230213 Mühltalstraße 20 Passau 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 18:03, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230302 U-Bahnhof Fröttmaning 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:28, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210802 Ausbesserungswerk München-Freimann 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:31, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230304 Notauslasskanal Munich 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:37, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230304 Notauslasskanal Munich 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:10, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230304 Notauslasskanal Munich 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:10, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230304 Notauslasskanal Munich 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:10, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210619 Sylvensteinspeicher 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
White stripe in the lower left corner; also little bit tilted CW. --Halavar 18:38, 25 April 2023 (UTC) <br / ✓ Done Thank you, I fixed that now --FlocciNivis 10:05, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality now. --Halavar 12:16, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220505 Apis mellifera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:48, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220505 Apis mellifera 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:48, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230423 Unterer Wehrbach 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment Nice image, but the location should be described more accurate or a geolocation should be given here. --Augustgeyler 23:21, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done I added the camera and object location. Probably at some point I'll add a Wikidata item for the bridge --FlocciNivis 19:59, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 Question Very good. The last thing I am not sure about is the white balance. It looks a bit off. Did it look like this on location or is it fixable? --Augustgeyler 06:33, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
I don't not really understand what's the issue here... Greens are green, browns are brown and sand is sandy. I'm pretty sure that's what I park looks like irl when it's partially clouded. With more clouds and shadows it can of course get more reddish... --FlocciNivis 17:34, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 Support Thank you. --Augustgeyler 20:26, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210703 Metopeurum fuscoviride 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:54, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210710 Metopeurum fuscoviride 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --BigDom 16:27, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230423 Unterer Wehrbach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230304 Leinthalerbrücke 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 18:55, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230304 Leinthalerbrücke 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 18:55, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230423 Unterer Wehrbach 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:00, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230423 Unterer Wehrbach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:00, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221127 Landschaftsteilen entlang der Isar Garching 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:25, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230304 Isarsteg Unterföhring 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:51, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220926 Anax 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Also very detailed photo of the larva, and the blurry thing is not as distracting in this photo. -- Ikan Kekek 01:25, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220522 Branchipus schaefferi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220926 Anax 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Also very detailed photo of the larva, and the blurry thing is not as distracting in this photo. -- Ikan Kekek 01:25, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220522 Branchipus schaefferi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221127 Landschaftsteilen entlang der Isar Garching 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 19:24, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220702 Araschnia levana 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:13, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220702 Aromia moschata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:13, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230304 Isarsteg Unterföhring 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 14:47, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230212 Am Schanzl 6 Passau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:21, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220505 Apis mellifera 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:34, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220802 Formica 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220726 Polyommatus icarus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:20, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200912 Krochhochhaus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 19:30, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221127 Landschaftsteilen entlang der Isar Garching 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 14:13, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221127 Landschaftsteilen entlang der Isar Garching 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 14:13, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230421 Kiteskating Landschaftspark Hachinger Tal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good image. But the description should say something about the consent of shown person. --Augustgeyler 14:59, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
As far as I know consent only applies to identifiable people. I would argue that due to the helmet and the sunglasses the person isn't identifiable, but if you feel different, feel free to file a deletion request. I won't challenge it --FlocciNivis 18:29, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. I agree with you. --Augustgeyler 09:14, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210409 Breitfurter Straße 76 Blieskastel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:48, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221127 Landschaftsteilen entlang der Isar Garching 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:49, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220926 Anax 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments If you're referring to the thing in the middle of the picture, that's one larva, and it's really clearly photographed, but would you consider cropping out the big blurs in the near left corner? You'd end up with a much smaller picture, but it would still be big enough. -- Ikan Kekek 01:23, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done I did a square crop now without the blurry algae in the foreground --FlocciNivis 09:01, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
comment: I think a crop with the subject (the insect) close to the centre of the photo would be much better; from the original, crop to e.g. 3,000 x 2,000 pixels with the same centre as the original. As an aside, it isn't a Green Darner (Anax junius) as that is a North American species; I edited it to 'unidentified emperor'. - MPF 00:40, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
That isn't an aside. My understanding is that at least the genus has to be identified for a photo of a living thing to be a QI. Do we know the genus of this creature? -- Ikan Kekek 09:16, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Anax is a genus --FlocciNivis 09:21, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
I see. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 20:24, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230122 Klinikum Schwabing 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:39, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230122 Klinikum Schwabing 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:39, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230128 St. Katharina von Siena Freimann 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:39, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220611 Knautia arvensis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 12:06, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220611 Knautia arvensis 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 12:06, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220505 Apis mellifera 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:07, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220505 Apis mellifera 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:07, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220702 Celastrina argiolus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
These images should be cropped and post-processed before QI --Charlesjsharp 10:46, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Could you please be a bit more specific which post-processing those images are missing in your opinion besides another crop? (They are btw postprocessed...) --FlocciNivis 09:09, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
I would reduce highlights --Charlesjsharp 13:43, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done different crop and redcuation of the highlights --FlocciNivis 19:31, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 09:32, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220702 Celastrina argiolus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
need to crop out grass in foreground and reduce highlights --Charlesjsharp 13:43, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done different crop and redcuation of the highlights --FlocciNivis 19:31, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 09:32, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220702 Bombus pratorum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, displays natural exposure and good sense of lightness, also in accordance with the thirds. --多多123 15:35, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220702 Bombus pratorum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:24, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220702 Bombus pratorum 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:24, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220615 Plebejus idas 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
too dark, not enough crop and id difficult to verify --Charlesjsharp 10:44, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done I adjusted the brightness and cropped the image a bit more. But why do feel that the ID is difficult to verify? The other blue butterfly in this nature reserve is Polyommatus icarus and it is clearly not that one, if you look at the spots on the wing. --FlocciNivis 09:28, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
OK, P. argus is common across Germany but I guess not here --Charlesjsharp 09:48, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. May need further research into the species for better description (i.e. from an expert)? --多多123 15:52, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230425 Arnold Sommerfeld Grab 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 18:34, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230302 Südliche Fröttmaninger Heide 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --BigDom 19:44, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230304 Stone bench Englischer Garten Munich 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:57, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230304 Stone bench Englischer Garten Munich 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:57, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230304 Entenvolierebach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:54, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230430 Bundesautobahn 9 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality, geocoding would be fine. --Palauenc05 09:31, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220608 Plebejus idas 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
blurred and oversaturated --Charlesjsharp 10:46, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
I adjusted white balance (I think that this was the problem not the saturation), made a different crop and sharpened the image. I hope that this is sufficient now --FlocciNivis 09:19, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
blue hue on the butterfly --Charlesjsharp 13:34, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done I decreased the saturation of blue on the butterfly. Thank you for all this feedback 🙏 --FlocciNivis 19:31, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Still falls short for me, but I won't oppose --Charlesjsharp 09:35, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 Support Looks ok. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:42, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230211 St. Jakob Plattling 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Hanooz 14:37, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230128 St. Michael Freimann 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:09, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210409 Heilig-Kreuz-Kapelle Blieskastel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:48, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210409 Heilig-Kreuz-Kapelle Blieskastel 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:48, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230430 Bundesautobahn 9 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:46, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230315 Heiliggeistkirche Heidelberg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:46, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230302 Betriebshof Nord U-Bahn München 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 11:06, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20201229 Allianz Arena 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 22:07, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210328 Bahnhof Scheidt Saar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:43, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210328 Bahnhof Scheidt Saar 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:43, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20190316Quartier Eurobahnhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 02:25, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220713 Larinioides sclopetarius 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:41, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220713 Larinioides sclopetarius 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:42, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 June 2023 (UTC)