User talk:EurovisionNim/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
File:FP 2230.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
1989 04:16, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Please do not overwrite files
Natuur12 (talk) 11:27, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block. See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you.
|
Same behavior as always. Violation of COM:OVERWRITE, nominating the file again for deletion. Enough is enough. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:28, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- elcobbola, see this and this. And it seems not his upload; an old file when no {{Information}} available. But I hope he will improve along with his age and if mentored by a wise man. Jee 02:29, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- What is the relevance of those edits, Jkadavoor? Those are both from September 2014, and EurovisionNim was blocked for them (or others like them.) He was last blocked for three months on 19. October 2014; between when that block expired (19. January 2015) and when Steinsplitter indef'ed him (22. January 2015), EurovisionNim made no disruptive edits. Thus, as I say above, this new indef block--the one for which he is requesting an unblock--has no substantiation. You need to pay attention to dates. Эlcobbola talk 02:57, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- Oops; I missed the month, probably Steinsplitter too. :( Jee 04:03, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- @Elcobbola: : I missed the month indeed. But there is still the overwrite issues. But feel free to unblock. Please remember that we are all volunteers and doing this here in our free time, so you can't think that all actions are 100% okay, further we are humans and not robots. I have made ~75000 admin actions here on commons, it isn't' possible to do all without errors... --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:07, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- Unblocked. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:12, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- @Steinsplitter: I'm not sure where this is coming from. I know no one is perfect, least of all me. Nothing above was meant to scold or berate; indeed, "perhaps I missed something" was meant sincerely, not sarcastically. In any case, EurovisionNim is extremely lucky to be unblocked; I hope s/he realizes leeway has now been exhausted and will edit accordingly. Эlcobbola talk 16:16, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- Unblocked. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:12, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- @Elcobbola: : I missed the month indeed. But there is still the overwrite issues. But feel free to unblock. Please remember that we are all volunteers and doing this here in our free time, so you can't think that all actions are 100% okay, further we are humans and not robots. I have made ~75000 admin actions here on commons, it isn't' possible to do all without errors... --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:07, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- Oops; I missed the month, probably Steinsplitter too. :( Jee 04:03, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- What is the relevance of those edits, Jkadavoor? Those are both from September 2014, and EurovisionNim was blocked for them (or others like them.) He was last blocked for three months on 19. October 2014; between when that block expired (19. January 2015) and when Steinsplitter indef'ed him (22. January 2015), EurovisionNim made no disruptive edits. Thus, as I say above, this new indef block--the one for which he is requesting an unblock--has no substantiation. You need to pay attention to dates. Эlcobbola talk 02:57, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Unblock on EN Wikipedia
Hi EurovisionNim, you asked to be unblocked on en.wikipedia and you also removed your request on my talk page. But you did give a big reason to be blocked there at en:User talk:EncMstr. So at this point you need to give me more convincing reasons that you will benefit by being unblocked. Perhaps you need to await a term break. I was going to suggest alternatives, but the best alternative seems to be to concentrate in class! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:21, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
@Graeme Bartlett: Thankyou for your help but I would benefit being unblocked because I want to add my photos onto Wikipedia to be used and I think I can concentrate in class by only making edits during break. I actually would like to make some good faith edits on Wikipedia. Could you please change the block to a maximum of two months if you can with the autoblock disabled please - Nim Bhharathhan (talk) 02:50, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- OK block changed to 2 months and you can edit anonymously in the mean time. You will disclose your IP address, so only do it if you have no concerns about this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:44, 4 February 2015 (UTC)