User talk:Espandero/Archives

Archives of User talk:Espandero

Please don't set back!

Hi Espandero, please stop to reset the coat of arms to an unheraldic representation that does not correspond to the shape and type of the coat of arms used.

Look here:

• municipal regulation
• your editing

The version was correct before revert. The agreed and used official representation of the coat of arms counts. 3D effects and shadows are not part of it. -- Gunnar (💬) 19:44, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

I reverted it because the original file was part of the French coats of arms project and differs in style with the new one. I do not care if it is unheraldic, if you want to upload a different stye then do it with a new file instead of undoing other people's work. Espandero (talk) 19:53, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Are you following any kind of quotable Wikipedia policy here? If yes, can you provide a source? You're having a bit of a wild reverting spree all over the place undoing people's correction of coats of arms. If it is indeed official policy that errors in files should not be corrected, but uploaded as a new copy then we can of course do that but that'd seem a bit weird because why would Wikipedia allow people to update files if this was the case? --Taktaal (talk) 21:41, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

I asked the french coats of arms project prior to doing it as I'm not part of it myself. My main problem is that every coat of arms that has been modified is part of this projet, which has a specific way of making them. I feel that by replacing them you are not "correcting" them but imposing your view as how the coats of arms should look on Wikipedia. However I do not see the problem in having two different versions on the site, as it is already the case for some:

I'm sorry if my way of doing it was maybe not as diplomatic as I would have wanted and I hope you understand my point. -- Espandero (talk) 08:32, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dents du midi Champoussin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 16:05, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Category:Château de Beauregard (Valais)

Hi, thank you for uploading the great photos of the Beauregard castle! I took the liberty to propose your category Category:Château de Beauregard (Valais) for deletion. It looks like we had the same idea within minutes ;) --1-Byte (talk) 08:54, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi, yeah I noticed that we had the same idea, but since yours was a little older I decided to go along with it. I wanted to ask to delete mine but wasn't quite sure where to. Thanks! - Espandero (talk) 09:11, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valère et Tourbillon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 22:06, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour de garde sud-est - château de Tourbillon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:58, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val d'Anniviers from Roc de la Vache.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 17:04, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Toûno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, but it would be great if you add coordinates. --Tournasol7 14:51, 11 November 2020 (UTC) I added coordinates (that should be more or less accruate). Thank you for your vote. - Espandero 16:39, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vissoie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 00:55, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Valère from Tourbillon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 01:45, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fortification ouest Château de Tourbillon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 05:23, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Tourbillon depuis Valère.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 19:07, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Est de Valère.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 19:07, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dents du Midi sunset.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Fischer.H 09:30, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cabane Pierre des Marmettes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO the composition is not working. There is too much sky and the left part of the building is in very dark shadow. --Augustgeyler 00:55, 12 November 2020 (UTC) I cropped part of the sky and some darker area out. - Espandero 07:48, 16 November 2020 (UTC)  Support  Support This edit improved it a lot. --Augustgeyler 16:02, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sierre depuis Beauregard (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tesla Delacroix 10:15, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moleson from north-east.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:18, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Top of Roc de la Vache.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 20:39, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sorebois 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 18:22, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dents du Midi - février 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 18:22, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dent de Valère.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 18:22, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bischofsschloss Top.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 17:47, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfyn-Finges Leuk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont bhoutanais.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please add more categories. --Ermell 19:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)  Done I created a category for the Bridge. - Espandero 11:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)  Support Thanks --Ermell 20:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chillon - tour sud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 13:47, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chillon viewed from south 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Great foto --Mike1979 Russia 13:28, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chillon - tour est et drapeaux Savoie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please check verticals at the left. --Tuxyso 14:36, 22 March 2021 (UTC)  Done--Espandero 17:54, 22 March 2021 (UTC) QI now. --Tuxyso 19:24, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Pont-en-Ogoz - rivage - mars 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 13:28, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Pont-en-Ogoz - drone - mars 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality for a drone photo barely ok, but please check the English description (is in French instead of English) --Tuxyso 14:39, 22 March 2021 (UTC) Quality should not be a problem. I belive you're talking about the water, which might look strange because of the relfected clouds that day. - Espandero 15:22, 22 March 2021 (UTC)  Comment If I may, the quality is OK, in my opinion, and I don't think English-language descriptions are required for QI, though it wouldn't be hard to translate this into English and I may do so later. -- Ikan Kekek 19:49, 22 March 2021 (UTC)  Support It was a pain in the neck to add the English description because I kept getting an error message, but it's there now. I think it's time to pass this photo, but if you disagree, oppose. -- Ikan Kekek 16:24, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dents du Midi, south face during winter, Val d'Illiez, Switzerland.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:42, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dents du Midi, south face during summer, Val d'Illiez, Switzerland.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:22, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrage de Moiry (sud-ouest).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:03, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrage de Moiry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:03, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valère et Haut de Cry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition, but IMO not sharp enough for QI. Could be nominated as a Valued Image. --Tagooty 02:55, 12 August 2021 (UTC) I uploaded another version, from a different file taken at the same moment. I reworked directly from the RAF file on Lightroom so the colors are a little different but the composition is the same. Let me know if this is better. --Espandero 11:53, 12 August 2021 (UTC) Sharpness is good. WB seems off compared to the 1st version. Perhaps make the colour temperature a bit cooler? Unless the snow was actually reddish. --Tagooty 15:12, 12 August 2021 (UTC) I uploaded a new version with cooler temperature. Thank you for your feedbacks. There are still some reddish spots in the snow due to sand particles from the Sahara in early February. -Espandero 22:56, 12 August 2021 (UTC)  Support  Thank you. Good quality. --Tagooty 01:18, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valère et Tourbillon depuis l'ouest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Stepro 08:50, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac et glacier de Moiry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It is oversharpened, excessive noise in the lake and the sky. However, plenty of pixels and otherwise nice quality and view. --Kallerna 06:59, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Valère et Haut de Cry.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Valère et Haut de Cry.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valon de Moiry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 02:59, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fletschhorn and Ried-Brig from Riederalp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 02:59, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salanfe et Dents du Midi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:13, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glacier d'Aletsch - 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:13, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glacier d'Aletsch - panorama - 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:10, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de Choëx - Peinture murale de la cure.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:10, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Chillon depuis le sud - lumière et coucher de soleil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:32, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Chillon depuis le nord- Heure rose.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 16:48, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac des Toules 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good Quality. --ADARSHluck 16:15, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de Choëx et cimetière.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspectie correction necessary. --Steindy 12:03, 15 October 2021 (UTC) Not sure what you mean. Perspective is as seen with my eyes. Is it a tilt problem? - Espandero 13:00, 15 October 2021 (UTC) I am amazed that you do not see the errors. I made a few comments. You can even see some of them in the thumbnail. --Steindy 16:48, 15 October 2021 (UTC) I uploaded a new version with a slight tilt, but it doesn't feel to me like there is a "perspective" issue. - Espandero 11:26, 16 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Okay now, good quality. --Steindy 09:58, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac des Toules - Centrale photovoltaïque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chutes du Rhin - Octobre 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good quality, except maybe too blue? -- Ikan Kekek 01:01, 24 October 2021 (UTC) Hi, I checked the original raw file and you are right. I uploaded a new version. Thanks. - Espandero 10:12, 24 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Thanks. Good quality to me, considering the size of the file. -- Ikan Kekek 21:47, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chutes du Rhin - panorama - Octobre 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice one. -- Ikan Kekek 21:49, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vouvry from Corbeyrier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The dark parts nedd more light. --Milseburg 17:49, 31 October 2021 (UTC) Thank you for your feedback. I reworked the image from scratch and I belive it is now lighter and less blue. - Espandero 18:53, 31 October 2021 (UTC) I would lighten the dark areas a lot more and reduce some blue after that. The noise in the sky can also be reduced. --Milseburg 15:00, 1 November 2021 (UTC) Thanks, I uploaded a new version. Let me know if it's okay now. - Espandero 20:18, 2 November 2021 (UTC) QI now, I think. --Milseburg 15:57, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raffinerie de Collombey et centrale thermique de Chavalon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMHO, too bluish and a bit underexposed. Fixable. --C messier 09:08, 7 November 2021 (UTC) Thanks for the feedback. I uploaded a new version. - Espandero 11:13, 8 November 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 14:43, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Valère et Haut de Cry.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valère et Tourbillon depuis l'ouest - hiver.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 16:35, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valère et Tourbillon depuis l'ouest - Panorama - hiver.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:02, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beauregard depuis la route de Vercorin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:34, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niouc depuis la route de Vercorin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:10, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niouc - panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:53, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Autobahn 13 und Windkraftanlage von Haldenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wind turbine and pylon leaning inwards. PC required. --Tagooty 15:26, 29 March 2022 (UTC) @Tagooty:  Done Thank you for your comment. I applied PC and believe it is no longer a problem. Espandero 16:39, 29 March 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:12, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valère et Tourbillon - Heure bleue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tomer T 16:46, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Vaduz - 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Green CA along the roof edges on the tower, to be removed. --Tagooty 15:27, 29 March 2022 (UTC) @Tagooty:  Done Thank you for your comment. I believe I have corrected the CA (not my strongest skill). Could you check if it is alright now? - Espandero 16:39, 29 March 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:12, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de la Bâtiaz - 2022 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 13:14, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martigny - 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:03, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de la Bâtiaz - 2022 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Template {{Cultural property of national significance in Switzerland|nnnn}} would be desirable. --F. Riedelio 05:51, 26 April 2022 (UTC)  Done - Espandero 15:09, 26 April 2022 (UTC) The link to the cultural property protection number does not work (maybe the template is incorrect). --F. Riedelio 16:24, 27 April 2022 (UTC) I think it's an issue with the website or the template because it doesn't work for any link (I tried it with this one and this one too). - Espandero 08:57, 1 May 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:42, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Valère et Haut de Cry - juillet 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and very picturesque. Thanks for your nominations. -- Ikan Kekek 19:51, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château d'Aigle 2022 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 18:13, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château d'Aigle 2022 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 18:13, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château d'Aigle 2022 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 18:13, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vache devant les dents de Morcles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 19:24, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dent de Valerette, Dents du Midi et Dent de Valère - juillet 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:40, 11 July 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 18:01, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Maurice (VS) - juillet 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:39, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dents de Morcles au coucher de soleil - juillet 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:40, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dents du Midi et Dent de Valère - juillet 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:26, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dents Blanches - juillet 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 04:15, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Champéry - juillet 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 13:31, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrage de Moiry depuis Sorebois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 05:59, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pointe de Valère - juillet 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Weak good quality. --F. Riedelio 15:17, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dent de Valerette - juillet 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Something is overprocessed. There are strange edges, particularly visible on the conifers on the right slope. --Milseburg 21:02, 15 July 2022 (UTC) Milseburg: thank you for your feedback, you are right. Those were the hedges of the brush I used to make the sky bluer. I have uploaded a new version. - Espandero 20:49, 17 July 2022 (UTC) GQ now. --Milseburg 13:17, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Troistorrents depuis est - juillet 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:01, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David Silva statue - Etihad Stadium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:36, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sergio Aguero statue - Etihad Stadium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:37, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gold mailbox in Manchester.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:34, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Derborence - août 2022 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 19:42, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peel Memorial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 19:42, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1996 Manchester Bombing mailbox.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please check the verticals --Ermell 19:38, 3 August 2022 (UTC)  Done - Espandero 20:11, 3 August 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:46, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peel Monument - August 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 21:14, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peel Monument - August 2022 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:18, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Chillon - juillet 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:03, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cygne et cygneau - Léman.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:26, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Saint-Maurice et Pont sur le Rhône - juillet 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fischer.H 17:21, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manchester City dressing room 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:19, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scout Moor Wind Farm panorama from Peel Monument.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 05:44, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand Muveran - coucher de soleil - juillet 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 13:43, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vincent Kompany statue - Etihad Stadium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment good photograph but needs better categorization for QI. --MB-one 19:58, 3 August 2022 (UTC) MB-one :  Done (also for the other two). - Espandero 19:37, 4 August 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality now --MB-one 07:24, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dents de Morcles - juillet 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 08:40, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Troistorrents depuis sud-ouest - juillet 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:52, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val-d'Illiez - juillet 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:52, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Château de Valère et Haut de Cry - juillet 2022.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Château de Valère et Haut de Cry - juillet 2022.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de Grimentz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:07, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grimentz - août 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please check the verticals --Ermell 20:08, 9 August 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:45, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raffinerie de Collombey - juillet 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:28, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peel Memorial statue - Burry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:54, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Les Diablerets depuis Derborence.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:46, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Les Diablons depuis Zinal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:04, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Derborence - août 2022 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 09:49, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kílian Jornet - Sierre-Zinal 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:29, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derborence - Forêt primaire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:02, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roc de la Vache - juillet 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:03, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour de Chalais - septembre 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 19:28, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mayoux - septembre 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:12, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grimentz-Zinal - Espace Weisshorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:32, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zinalrothorn - septembre 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 08:40, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour de Chalais - renforcement fondations.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Is there no tilt here? --Poco a poco 09:15, 9 September 2022 (UTC) From this file you can see it with the building in full. I don't think it is tilted. - Espandero 09:26, 9 September 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:17, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chandolin - septembre 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 09:27, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour de Chalais - septembre 2022 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments English description would be helpful. --Ermell 08:38, 10 September 2022 (UTC)  Done --Espandero 09:53, 10 September 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:31, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bourgeoisie de Saint-Luc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Distorted. Needs perspective correction. --Milseburg 09:30, 10 September 2022 (UTC)  Done --Espandero 09:53, 10 September 2022 (UTC)  Not done The verticals on the right side are still tilted ccw. I suggest a vertical correction of -7 It seems there are also CAs to remove at the crane. --Milseburg 18:17, 10 September 2022 (UTC) I've uploaded a new version. I wasn't able to do as you instructed but I hope it's OK this way. Thanks, Espandero 09:37, 13 September 2022 (UTC) QK for QI --Milseburg 13:33, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zinal depuis Le Belvédère - panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs perspective correction. Both sides are leaning out. --Milseburg 13:04, 12 September 2022 (UTC) I've uploaded a new version. - Espandero 09:38, 13 September 2022 (UTC) GQ now in my opinion. --Milseburg 13:38, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sommet de l'Illhorn - septembre 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:48, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Observatoire François Xavier Bagnoud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:48, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Illsee - septembre 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:48, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grimentz - septembre 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:48, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishorn et Zinalrothorn - septembre 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 10:14, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cinq 4000 depuis l'Illhorn - septembre 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments @Espandero: Good quality. Please add a Category for panorama. --Tagooty 06:14, 17 September 2022 (UTC)  Done - Espandero 09:06, 17 September 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality, thank you. --Tagooty 15:20, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anniviers - Protection de la route.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I guess that it needs a category about the subject --Poco a poco 20:12, 10 September 2022 (UTC)  Done I created Category:Protection against natural dangers in Anniviers - Espandero 09:37, 13 September 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:08, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schöllihorn - septembre 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Stepro 17:54, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cinq 4000 depuis l'Illhorn - septembre 2022 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 09:22, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aeropedellus variegatus in Saint-Luc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 12:27, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paravalanches sur l'Illhorn - septembre 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --FlocciNivis 21:03, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dépotoir à laves torrentielles de Défichia - exutoire - Zinal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --FlocciNivis 21:04, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dépotoir à laves torrentielles de Défichia - Zinal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --FlocciNivis 21:04, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dépotoir à laves torrentielles du Péterey - Zinal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:06, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwartzhorn - septembre 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:58, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brunnethorn - septembre 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:58, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roc d'Orzival.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 15:14, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val d'Anniviers depuis Tignousa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 15:14, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrage de l'Illsee - septembre 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 12:59, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Tourbillon - 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:53, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sion depuis Nax - 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:34, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mase - 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Some houses are a bit blurred, but it's a landscape. --Sebring12Hrs 18:57, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arbaz depuis Savièse - 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:42, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grimisuat depuis Savièse - 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:30, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Savièse - 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good to me, but there are several spots to remove in the sky on the very right side. --Milseburg 12:52, 30 October 2022 (UTC) I have uploaded a new version. It is relatively smaller because of reupload restrictions (I can only overwrite with a file smaller than 100 MB). - Espandero 14:14, 31 October 2022 (UTC)  Support Acceptable --Milseburg 14:19, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vex depuis Nax - 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Not very sharp for a 70 Mb file, and there is a bit too much blue. What is this blue ? --Sebring12Hrs 17:04, 30 October 2022 (UTC)  Support I change my opinion, in fact it's ok, because not overprocessed. Due to the distance the lack of sharpness in some areas is acceptable. --Sebring12Hrs 09:22, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erde et Haut de Cry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --SHB2000 04:11, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haut de Cry - Château de la Soie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BigDom 07:13, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Navizence à Chippis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BigDom 07:13, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bendola - septembre 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:22, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour de Chalais - sud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:28, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont sur le Rhône - Chippis-Sierre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please check the verticals, but other than that it's good imo --FlocciNivis 11:29, 14 November 2022 (UTC)  Done - Espandero 12:17, 14 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 13:02, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Défilé des Pontis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 11:48, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Becs de Bosson depuis le Pas de Lona.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:30, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cabane des Becs de Bosson.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:30, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protection contre les avalanches - val d'Anniviers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:53, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val d'Anniviers depuis la cabane des Becs de Bosson.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support There's a bit distortion/unsharpness at the border of the image, but it's imo good enough for QI --FlocciNivis 11:35, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embouchure Navizence-Rhône.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BigDom 06:42, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centrale Navizence.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs perspective correction, the buildings are leaning in. Also the roof isn't quite level. Should both be fixable hopefully. --BigDom 06:42, 14 November 2022 (UTC)  Done --Espandero 09:51, 14 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Thanks. Good quality. --BigDom 10:02, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roc du château de Beauregard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BigDom 16:25, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sensine, Erde et Haut de Cry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:24, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veysonnaz depuis Nendaz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:22, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! L'Ardève depuis Nendaz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:43, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour de Chalais vue du sud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Sharp enough in 6 Mpix. --C messier 21:31, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chermignon depuis Itravers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BigDom 04:20, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardon depuis Nendaz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 15:02, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Pierre-de-Clages depuis Nendaz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 14:57, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bassin de compensation de Mottec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:19, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chamoson depuis Nendaz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:19, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Navizence à Mission.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs PC, the pylon is tilted CCW. Useful to add a Category for the power transmission line. --Tagooty 03:48, 28 November 2022 (UTC)  Done - Espandero 08:47, 28 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:23, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vernamiège depuis Vex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:24, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vernamiège depuis Vex (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 20:30, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nax depuis Vex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 09:15, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Besoins de parler au sujet d'une de tes photos

Hello, je souhaiterai te contacter pour discuter d'une photo que tu as pris. pourrais tu me contacter par mail à celikokan87@gmail.com

Merci d'avance 86.111.136.240 08:22, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aarburg Castle - 2023 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:16, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aarburg Castle - 2023 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:58, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Solothurn 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:58, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val d'Hérens depuis Vex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yeriho 21:45, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Terrains de football de Bramois - 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:25, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passerelle en bois de Bramois - 2023 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:18, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passerelle en bois de Bramois - 2023 (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 19:23, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passerelle en bois de Bramois - 2023 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:24, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cortège du carnaval de Monthey 2023 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:25, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église paroissiale de Saint-Léonard - Extérieur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:27, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passerelle en bois de Bramois - 2023 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:12, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passerelle en bois de Bramois - 2023 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 12:40, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgne à Bramois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit of CR in the branches in the middle, beside of that a QI for me. --Der Angemeldete 12:06, 11 March 2023 (UTC)  Done --Espandero 09:34, 12 March 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 23:37, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Saint-Maurice - juillet 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 19:29, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhône à Aproz - mars 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:27, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de Bramois - est.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carlos yo 18:09, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bramois depuis ses vignobles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de Bramois - sud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 15:08, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de Saint-Romain - Ayent.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:22, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue du château d'Ayent.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:22, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panneau Morges de Conthey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 19:28, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centrale hydroélectrique de Verdan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:38, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Usine électrique de Fully - Turbine Pelton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:38, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Commune d'Ayent - panorama mars 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Ok, but please add geocode of camera location. --Imehling 16:19, 3 April 2023 (UTC) @Imehling:  Done - Espandero 20:57, 4 April 2023 (UTC) Good quality. --Imehling 09:23, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruines du château d'Ayent.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Ok, but please add geocode of camera location. --Imehling 16:19, 3 April 2023 (UTC) @Imehling:  Done - Espandero 20:57, 4 April 2023 (UTC) Good quality. --Imehling 09:23, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colline du château d'Ayent.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Ok, but please add geocode of camera location. --Imehling 16:19, 3 April 2023 (UTC) @Imehling:  Done - Espandero 20:57, 4 April 2023 (UTC) Good quality. --Imehling 09:23, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chemin de croix de Longeborgne - station III.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:05, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermitage de Longeborgne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It needs a tilt and a perspective correction --Poco a poco 06:05, 29 April 2023 (UTC) Poco a poco:  Done. - Espandero 13:28, 29 April 2023 (UTC)  Support The file size is too big for this resolution but ok now --Poco a poco 06:31, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gorges de la Borgne depuis Longeborgne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BigDom 05:22, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour Tavelli - 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:54, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veysonnaz depuis Nendaz - 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:54, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colline du Châtelard depuis Vex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. English description would be nice. --Ermell 07:49, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgne sous Vex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. English description would be nice. --Ermell 07:48, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

About Doc Taxton

I told Doc Taxton that he is free to overwrite my files as I really don't mind people overwriting my files. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 22:45, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Espandero, what about OW, if only the tinctures mismatch the locally typically used? Or if there are little stroke or join corrections? – Doc Taxon • Talk • 09:27, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

OW states that it is ok to correct unintentional mistakes, like I did yesterday for this file (the line on one of the wings had a little issue). For shape and tincture it's a deliberate choice in most cases so I wouldn't overwrite the file. I would say cases that are ok for tincture is when the author indicates a certain palette and uses a color that isn't from the palette, but I would check with the author first. - Espandero (talk) 09:34, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Urbain - Chippis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nbierma 19:51, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de Chalais - face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:22, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Téléphérique Chalais-Vercorin à Chalais.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:22, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église et cimetière de Chalais.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nbierma 19:51, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Réchy depuis la salle du Stand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:22, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Bienvenu en VI

Je me suis mal exprimé dans ta nomination. En fait il y a plusieurs possibilisées de voir le lac, du sud du nord etc... chaque point de vue est intéressant et peut concourir en VI. Je suggère de ragouter au scope North Exposure ou bien West Exposure... Bonne journée. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:24, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Archaeodontosaurus ah très bien, j'y avais pas pensé. J'ai précisé l'orientation et la saison dans le scope. Merci et salutations, Espandero (talk) 13:46, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhône et passerelle de Vissigen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:14, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rèche à Réchy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:51, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grône - mai 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:58, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colvert sur la Limmat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:58, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gorges de la Morge de Conthey (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:58, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gorges de la Morge de Conthey (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 19:55, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhône et pont de Chandoline.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 12:44, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gorges de la Morge de Conthey (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 18:43, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Vaud tincture

In continuing with the discussion about Vaud's palette on ARK's talk page, this is what I wrote in an email to the Vaud government:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Tincture/drawVD
https://www.lexfind.ch/tolv/132364/fr

Utilisez-vous cette palette de couleurs pour les armoiries des communes ?

In the meantime, I will go ahead and discuss the matter in the French Wikipedia's Portail Suisse. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 23:13, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lac de Moiry during summer (northwest view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It would be good to put the view orientation. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Archaeodontosaurus:  Done --Espandero (talk) 08:50, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

 Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Bernese shield shapes

As you're venturing into the canton of Bern, I would encourage you to take a look at the Wappenbuch des Kantons Bern. Its heraldic artist, Hans Jenni, has a very distinctive style that uses somewhat over-bold contour strokes. Aliman5040's work on the Bernese municipal arms is almost entirely based on Jenni. However, he shoehorned Jenni's arms into the Blason Vide CH 3D.svg template, which doesn't only come with the objectionable "reflet final" layer, it also has an odd aspect ratio that is almost never found in contemporary Swiss heraldry, and certainly not in the Wappenbuch des Kantons Bern. So, when superseding Aliman5040's work, you might want to adjust the shield shape. ARK (talk) 11:04, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi ARK, thanks I'll correct the ones I've uploaded. Is there a place on Commons where you've written all the shapes, sources, etc. per canton? If not I think that'd be a great help and it would allow for new people to understand why some choices were made. We could also upload files like File:Blason Vide CH 3D.svg (without the colour) to illustrate the page and to make it easier to start new files. By the way I'm slowly making new COAs for Valais (Monthey district for now) and I'm using the Armorial valaisan of 1946 for shapes of meubles and shield (only for the lower part, I don't think the pointy top is necessary). - Espandero (talk) 14:49, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

If I were to create a resource on how to create Swiss municipal coats of arms for Commons, I'd probably draw everyone's attention to the fact that Switzerland actually has a modern national heraldic style, and I might recommend that everyone should simply stick to it.

This modern national style was largely created by Paul Boesch, who disseminated it through his work from 1926 to about 1960 for Café HAG's Armorial de la Suisse booklets.

The graphic designer Werner Luzi was asked to continue working in Boesch's style for the three editions of Louis Mühlemann's popular Armoiries et drapeaux de la Suisse, and Alban Wyss did very much the same for the series of booklets that were published by the Stiftung Schweizer Wappen und Fahnen (SWF) from 1987 to 2017 (legally, Mühlemann at first and the SWF later were the copyright holders of the entire heraldic oeuvre published by Café HAG).

The history of Aargau's post-WWII municipal heraldry right up to the eventual publication of the Gemeindewappen Kanton Aargau armorial in 2004 might also be described as a succession of heraldic artists working in Boesch's vein.

Boesch and his followers used a plain "Spanish" escutcheon throughout: see a random example on the SWF website.

Note that the "Swiss" escutcheon among the Projet Blasons' gabarits is narrower and taller than a typical Boesch-style shield.

Contrary to the above, one might argue that cantonal diversity ought to be preserved. The place to look for such diversity would be the cantonal armorials that have been produced over the last hundred years or so.

For instance, Hubert De Vevey's Armorial des communes et des districts du canton de Fribourg (1943) has an endearingly offbeat shield shape as used in this version of the Cottens FR arms. It's far more appealing than the shield shape currently used by the municipality itself, which derives from the Ketty & Alexandre book on Fribourg (1981). Still, the plain Boesch-style version of the arms as published by the SWF might be the most suitable for the encyclopedia.

What shape to use for the canton of Valais?

The écu Français (ancien) en pointe seems oddly out of place, and the shield shapes in the Armorial Valaisan (1946) might be a little too renaissance-y.

The shield shape of the Nouvel Armorial Valaisan (1974) seem a little outlandish at first, but they're more modern, and should probably be recommended if a distinctive cantonal look is desired. This shape is used by the Association valaisanne d'études généalogiques (random example), and Taktaal has uploaded a number of tasteful vectorisations to Commons ( random example). ARK (talk) 08:48, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. I think I'll go with Boesch-style shield shapes from now on then. I'm not a big fan of the Nouvel Armorial Valaisan style and it would be easier to have a national standard. Boesch feels more neutral and simple. I've seen Taktaal's work and I like the azure he's used, for example here. I think I wouldn't mind using this tincture for the rest of the VS COAs. - Espandero (talk) 11:53, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

On reflection, your suggestion of using a simplified version of the municipal shield shape in the Armorial Valaisan (1946) might not be a bad idea either. I've tried this with Finhaut. I've also just added the Armorial Valaisan to the list of Swiss armorials. ARK (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

I don't know from where Taktaal derived his palette. Stylistically, it looks like Taktaal continued from where Gerhard Bräunlich had left off. Gerhard originally referenced an official website as the source for his municipal arms of Zürich. I have since added the now-available digitisation of Die Gemeindewappen des Kantons Zürich|] (1977) as a source reference to some of his file descriptions. The original reference of Gerhard's arms is gone and can't be retrieved from the Wayback Machine.

Sarang takes an interest in formalising the tinctures used in Swiss coats of arms. See for instance his work on the Delta-9's tinctures. Maybe we can get Sarang to take a look at the tinctures of Gerhard Bräunlich and Taktaal. ARK (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

IMHO it is more essential whether Swiss Kantons declare a palette, than tictures that Bräunlich, Taktaal and others are using.

Delta-9 has declared an own palette for himself (and hundreds of coa), therefore I could not ignore it.

When definitively no palettes are existing, we can use CH for default;

just when Bräunlich/Taktaal are consistently using kind of palette, we should adopt it -- sarang♥사랑 10:08, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

@ARK: I just looked a few shields of Bräunlich, for his 'or' tincture. For the six files I checked, he used six different yelllows:

 

Hedingen-blazon.svg

 

CHE Rifferswil COA.svg

 

Maschwanden-blazon.svg

 

Marthalen-blazon.svg

 

Oberstammheim-blazon.svg

 

Bonstetten-blazon.svg

This can never be the base of a palette -- sarang♥사랑 10:32, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, @Sarang: I remember from when I looked at Gerhard Bräunlich's work on the Zürich arms a while ago that the colours weren't entirely consistent. In the above, I was going on the assumption that they may be consistent in the main, and that the inconsistent ones are mere outliers. Further, I assumed that the colours of Bräunlich and Taktaal, which consistently have the same muted feel to them, might be based on the now-lost official source reference given in the Zürich arms. That's a lot of assuming right there, and I should have tested those assumptions a bit before bothering you with them -- sorry about that!

Regarding the CH palette: I don't think anyone among the arms creators-- not even Doc Taxon -- believes any longer that these tinctures might serve as a Swiss "default." That distinction has now passed on to the AG palette, which since the introduction of the Farbkarte Aargau in 2004 has seen a fair amount of usage as a de facto national standard, most notably, outside of Commons, by the (now defunct) Stiftung Schweizer Fahnen und Wappen. There's some recent talk about this issue on my Discussion page. ARK (talk) 11:07, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

@ARK: When tinctures are specified without any palette, the file becomes flagged for maintenance.

To use the great pot of 'generic' (GN) avoids that, but bears no information.

Using CH as kind of default, it gets at least a not so overcrowded category, is tagged to be Swiss, and can later easily be changed when a palette should come up.

You will know when AG fits better - but it seems somehow strange to tag coas of e.g. VS to the AG palette -- sarang♥사랑 11:35, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

@Sarang: I don't share your sense that palette category on Commons can ever be 'overcrowded'. To me, a palette category containing a large number of arms is simply a sign of the palette's success as a viable palette. The aspect I care about, however, is that the arms under a palatte category should actually be instances of that palette. The practice you propose (and engage in) of adding arms to a palette category despite the fact that they are not tinctured in that palette strikes me as egregiously misguided because it diminishes the usefulness of a category as a source of factually correct information. ARK (talk) 08:31, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

@Espandero: In your Valais arms you seem to have decided to go with the Français (ancien) en pointe shield shape, which is of course the default on the French Wikipedia, but strikes me as a very odd choice in Swiss heraldry. You were saying ealier on that you would like to base your shield shape on the escutcheon used for municipal arms in the Armorial valaisan : Walliser Wappenbuch (1946), except for a straight horizontal top rather than a double-arched one. What happened to this idea? I believe a narrower shield would look much more valaisan! ARK (talk) 08:31, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

I cannot remember where I got the shield shape from but I don't think I got it from File:Blason Vide 3D.svg. I usually start a new COA on another COA file so I haven't paid attention to the shape as I thought this was what we discussed. But you're right, the ones on the Wappenbuch are narrower. I'll correct the files I've made before I continue with others. Thanks.

By the way, for File:CHE Cheyres-Châbles COA.svg I made it using the shape from the website of the municipality as I couldn't find a stable shield shape. Someone from the municipality tried to modify the article of the municipality saying that the old file was wrong. Since Cheyres-Châbles is a new municipality this is technically the official COA, but if you start making COAs for Fribourg, or if you've decided on a shape, you can overwrite my file to correct the shape if you'd like. - Espandero (talk) 08:53, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

@Espandero and Sarang: For écussons en pointe to be mathematically well-formed, their Bézier curves require some advanced algorithmicking. Sarang is offering to create such template files. His template shield for the Vaud arms should be based on the Arrêté 175.12.1 sur les armoiries communales. For the Valais template, we might ask for the municipal shield shape in the Armorial valaisan (1946), but with a straight horizontal top line rather than the dated-looking double-dip line (Note to Sarang: the Armorial Valaisan uses different shield shapes for municipalities vs. families). For a Valais shield, the official Val de Bagnes arms might also be a point of reference (see also current discussion in German).

For newly-created Swiss municipal arms, the critiques by Hans Rüegg are always worth looking up, such as Gemeindefusion im Kanton Freiburg: Cheyres-Châbles. Rüegg subscribes to the Paul Boesch school of heraldic design, which is effectively the Swiss gold standard in modern heraldry and strongly favours the Iberian escutcheon style with its square top and rounded base. By contrast, Cheyres-Châbles seem to be taking their inspiration from the Deutschschweizer Jasskarten. I'd say let them! There's a fair bit of hybridisation going on now between public heraldry and corporate design, and the current Cheyres-Châbles logo is one of the more innocuous examples of that. ARK (talk) 13:12, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Veysonnaz depuis Nendaz - 2023.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Veysonnaz depuis Nendaz - 2023.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Administration communale de Veysonnaz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:22, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basse-Nendaz depuis Les Clèves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 13:30, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Les Îles depuis Nendaz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Unfortunately overdone. The two walls on the left and right should be vertical. Sorry mistake.--Ermell 21:30, 15 May 2023 (UTC) --Ermell 21:16, 15 May 2023 (UTC) Slightly overexposed. --Ermell 06:23, 18 May 2023 (UTC) Ermell  Done, also cropped it a bit because the main subject is the lake. - Espandero 09:43, 24 May 2023 (UTC) Support Good in detail and overall above the QI-bar in my eyes. --Milseburg 13:53, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Léonard - 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 16:18, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise paroissiale St‑Léger depuis Veysonnaz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:40, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Massongex depuis Chiètres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted and lacking sharpness --Poco a poco 21:15, 13 June 2023 (UTC) Poco a poco  Done, main focus are the bridge and the first village (center right) so sharpness should be good enough. - Espandero 06:59, 14 June 2023 (UTC)  Support Ok, indeed big enough --Poco a poco 17:03, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marché couvert de Montreux depuis le Léman.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It needs a perspective correction --Poco a poco 21:15, 13 June 2023 (UTC) Poco a poco  Done - Espandero 06:59, 14 June 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:03, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Chillon depuis le nord-ouest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 17:14, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de la Soie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Tagooty 00:53, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de la Soie - Jardin de l'évêque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 16:33, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val de Nendaz depuis le château de la Soie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments noise could be reduced in the sky. Sharp and overall good quality. --Milseburg 16:57, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont des Paluds - 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 21:08, 21 June 2023 (UTC)  Comment fr.wikipedia says that this bridge was constructed in 2016, so this photo violates the copyright of the architect unless it's considered so lacking in originality as not to be protected by copyright. Do you think that's the case? -- Ikan Kekek 22:11, 21 June 2023 (UTC) Ikan Kekek interesting, I never thought of that, although I rarely photograph recent buildings. This source cites all the companies that worked on the bridge. No architect is mentioned. From what I understand that means that there was no "idea of mind" behind the conception of the bridge, thus there should be no architect copyright. The design was chosen merely to withstand the heavy loads and has no artistic value. - Espandero 07:09, 22 June 2023 (UTC) Looks like the bridge is in Switzerland, which has freedom of panorama (COM:FOP Switzerland) so no issues here anyway (for what it's worth if the bridge had been in France, where there is no FoP, I think it would probably be beyond the threshold of originality as it's quite low there). BigDom 04:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de la Soie - Bourg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BigDom 08:36, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de la Soie - Bourg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dust spots should be removed --Ermell 12:45, 22 June 2023 (UTC) Ermell  Done - Espandero 10:06, 23 June 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:07, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torrent de Vella à Saxon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:42, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Saxon - Tour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:42, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Saxon - Chapelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice! --Frank Schulenburg 22:13, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saxon depuis le château de Saxon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 16:33, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de Saxon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 16:37, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Saxon depuis le village.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 00:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embouchure Rhône-Léman (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Noisy background. Try to apply a stronger mask before sharpening. --MB-one 14:26, 29 June 2023 (UTC) MB-one  Done - Espandero 20:17, 29 June 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:29, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Spiez und Hafen Spiez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality ang high resolution. --Milseburg 14:30, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

File:New York City FC logo de lancement.png

File:New York City FC logo de lancement.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 16:50, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aare by Interlaken-Ost.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ThibautRe 21:41, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bönigen from Harderkulm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ThibautRe 21:41, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grimisuat depuis Savièse - panorama - 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:07, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Besso depuis Sorebois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 10:14, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in/contribute to a photo contest

English

Dear Espandero,

We’re excited to share with you our first-ever art and photo contest for this year’s #VisibleWikiWomen, on Unpacking Body Plurality in Sports!

We’re inviting submissions of photos, illustrations, and other forms of art depicting womxn and non-binary people in sports — as athletes, fans, cheerleaders, referees, journalists, and much more. Our #VisibleWikiWomxn contest celebrates the bodies of womxn in sports by centering their voices, images, stories, and experiences in all their diversity, plurality, and glory.

You can find all the information on our landing page: Unpacking Body Plurality in Sports

Spanish

Hola Espandero,

Queremos invitarte a participar de nuestro primer concurso de arte y fotografía "Cuerpos plurales en el deporte" en el marco de la campaña #VisibleWikiWomen de este año.

Estamos convocando a presentar fotos, ilustraciones y otras formas de arte que representen a mujeres y personas no binarias en el deporte - atletas, personas aficionadas, animadoras, árbitras, periodistas y personas ligadas al deporte en todos los aspectos. Nuestro concurso #VisibleWikiWomxn celebra los cuerpos de las mujeres en el deporte centrándose en sus voces, imágenes, historias y experiencias en toda su diversidad, pluralidad y gloria.

Puedes encontrar toda la información en la página del concurso.

Portuguese

Olá Espandero,

Ficamos felizes em convidar você a participar de nossa primeira Wiki-competição de arte e fotografia, como parte da campanha #VisibleWikiWomen deste ano, sobre "Corpos plurais no esporte"!

Estamos recebendo fotos, ilustrações, e outras formas de arte que retratem mulheres e pessoas não-binárias nos esportes — como atletas, torcedoras, juízas, jornalistas, e muito mais. Nossa competição #VisibleWikiWomxn celebra os corpors de mulheres e pessoas não-binárias e coloca ao centro suas vozes, imagens, histórias, e experiências em toda sua pluralidade e glória.

Você pode encontrar todas as informações necessárias em nossa página: Unpacking Body Plurality in Sports.

Sunshine Fionah Komusana (talk) 14:16, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. GPSLeo (talk) 18:18, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

I granted you the requested right. On idea: If you think that the swiss COA project should be allowed to overwrite more than what is covered by the policy you could request a special role for the project at Commons:Village pump/Proposals. GPSLeo (talk) 18:23, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. We'll see if that is necessary in the long run. - Espandero (talk) 18:36, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église romane Saint-Nicolas de Chessel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:41, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de la Porte du Scex - Situation.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:55, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de la Porte du Scex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs slight perspective correction, otherwise good. --Plozessor 04:55, 13 November 2023 (UTC) Plozessor:  Done - Espandero 17:51, 13 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 16:30, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Confluence of the Arve with the Rhône from west..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Espandero, could you link a relevant Commons category? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:43, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek:  Done - Espandero (talk) 20:47, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Support Ok for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Confluence de l'Arve et du Rhône.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrage de Schiffenen - Vue de l'est.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:46, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrage de Schiffenen - Route.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:48, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église paroissiale Saint-Didier de Domdidier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:11, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrage de Schiffenen - Tour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 20:50, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrage de Schiffenen - Vue du sud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:10, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Schiffenen depuis le barrage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:06, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Les Diablerets - décembre 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:39, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhône - Passerelle d'Illarsaz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:21, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Les Jumelles depuis Illarsaz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 19:39, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand et Petit Muveran.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 19:39, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Chamossaire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 19:39, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moleson from south-west.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:58, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haut de Cry Sion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:11, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Legnaro - La Spezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:10, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Joseph de Schmitten - Vue du sud-ouest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The left half a bit unsharp, but given the large resolution, IMHO, OK for QI. --C messier 22:14, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue du Bourg Monthey 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs slight PC, otherwise good. --Plozessor 05:58, 11 December 2023 (UTC) Plozessor  Done -Espandero 06:04, 13 December 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:22, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 13:55, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de Choëx et cure.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This is a bit overcontrasted, with pitch black shadows and almost blown-out church walls. --Plozessor 05:20, 14 December 2023 (UTC) Plozessor:  Done. - Espandero 17:20, 17 December 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:10, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capu Tafunatu depuis le sud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:54, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torra Ghjenuvese d'Erbalonga.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:51, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bassin sur le Golo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:52, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porcu nustrale au col de Vergio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:51, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Citadelle de Bonifacio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 21:20, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrage de Calacuccia - 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:46, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haute vallée du Golo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems overexposed, especially the upper half. Fixable? --Tagooty 03:54, 20 December 2023 (UTC) Tagooty: gave it a try, let me know. - Espandero 18:52, 21 December 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:59, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle du Pont Monthey 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments can you reduce dark areas? --Ezarate 01:31, 16 December 2023 (UTC) Ezarate:  Done. - Espandero 17:20, 17 December 2023 (UTC)  Support OK for me. --Plozessor 09:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Falaises depuis la citadelle de Bonifacio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Huge image, very good quality. --Mike Peel 10:09, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2023 (UTC)