User talk:Dj-2
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- 17:38, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- Image:MakovNI.jpg was uncategorized on 12 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Nik-Makov-Vseroskomdram(cover).jpg was uncategorized on 30 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Nik-Makov-Rus-un-of-writers(cover).jpg was uncategorized on 30 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Nik-Makov-Russia-union-of-writers.jpg was uncategorized on 30 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Russia-Vseroskomdram-logo.jpg was uncategorized on 30 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Nik-Makov-Vseroskomdram.jpg was uncategorized on 30 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Susuman-Gogolya-str.jpg was uncategorized on 4 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:56, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Nina-Noskovich.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Nina-Noskovich.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Nina-Noskovich.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin H. (talk) 22:23, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi, this media <<Nina-Noskovich.jpg>> should not be deleted because on this page - http://gulagmuseum.org/start.do - placed typed explicit permission in Russian, translated to English as "Free copying" (in the centre of the bottom part of the main page) and shown crossed author's rights logo. Thanks, Dj-2 (talk) 17:03, 30 October 2011 (UTC)Dj-2
File tagging File:Nina-Noskovich-v-shliapke.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Nina-Noskovich-v-shliapke.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Nina-Noskovich-v-shliapke.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin H. (talk) 22:23, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Noskovich-old-2.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Noskovich-old-2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Noskovich-old-2.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin H. (talk) 22:24, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Noskovich-old.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Noskovich-old.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Noskovich-old.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin H. (talk) 22:24, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Lebedev-portr-Lekarenko-1934.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Lebedev-portr-Lekarenko-1934.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Lebedev-portr-Lekarenko-1934.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin H. (talk) 22:25, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Lebedev-portr-Lekarenko.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Lebedev-portr-Lekarenko.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Lebedev-portr-Lekarenko.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin H. (talk) 22:25, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Susuman-Sovetskaya-str.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Susuman-Sovetskaya-str.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
And also:
- File:Susuman-Lenina-str.jpg
- File:Susuman-Gogolya-str.jpg
- File:Nikolai-Makov-Leningrad-poet.jpg
- File:Img455(2).jpg
- File:MakovNI.jpg
Yours sincerely, Kobac (talk) 00:55, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:54, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 13:33, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 13:34, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Коллега, у меня к Вам вопрос по поводу этого фото. Вы указали, что оно сделано в 1988 году. Но при этом Патриарх Алексий II здесь изображён именно как патриарх, что не позволяет датировать фото ранее, чем 1990 годом. ~ Чръный человек (talk) 10:35, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
- Коллега, похоже, что Вы правы. Я нашёл две фотоплёнки, которые отснял сам, на одной плёнке кадры со Смоленского кладбища во время празднования 1000-летия крещения Руси. Там шествие священнослужителей к часовне Св. Ксении Блаженной. А интересующий нас снимок находится на второй плёнке, и сделан, если верить моей надписи на коробочке из-под этой фотоплёнки, 10.08.1990, на празднование 200-летия церкви Смоленской Иконы Божией Матери, там же, на Смоленском кладбище. Постараюсь в ближайшее время внести соотв. правки. Dj-2 (talk) 10:40, 30 April 2014 (UTC)Dj-2
Имеет смысл оформить эти файлы так же, как и File:Nikolai-Makov-Leningrad-poet.jpg - т.е. указать, что автор неизвестен, а источник - ваш семейный фотоархив. --Kaganer (talk) 14:27, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
- Я уже думал об этом, когда помещал фото. Этих людей я знал лично, тот, который справа - главный геолог СуГОКа, отец моего друга Саши. Но если указать, что автор неизвестен, то из этого, скорее всего, автоматически последует удаление фото, поскольку дата - всего лишь 1966 год. А жалко, по-моему, фото в своём роде уникальное. Я в Сусумане прожил 10 лет. Сейчас он уже совсем не тот - остались, в основном, только каменные дома, и зимой вокруг них пустыня. Удручающее зрелище. Во время снимка я был маленьким, но, для объяснения ревнителям авторских прав, вполне мог нажать кнопку фотоаппарата, который мне дали взрослые. Значит, я - автор :) . Тем более, что Советскую улицу и цветные фото я уже сам, без взрослых, снимал, на фотоаппарат "Зенит". Цветные фотоплёнки (немецкие, позитивные) я отсылал в Ленинград, где мой дядя, фотограф, их проявлял.
- Да собственно, похоже, что и это уже не поможет, вот что поместили ниже моего фото (далее, на английском). По-моему, единственное, что осталось, это помещать фото только в российской Вики, как fair use. Потому что в общей вики завтра напишут, что ты нарушаешь права изготовителей фотоаппарата, которым сделан снимок:
- Copyright warning: A subject in this image is protected by copyright.
- This image features an architectural or artistic work, photographed from a public space in Russia. There are no freedom of panorama exemptions in Russia, which means that architectural and artistic work cannot be photographed freely for anything other than personal use. Russia jurisprudence states that no infringement is constituted when the work is an "accessory compared to the main represented or handled subject".
- If a copyrighted architectural or artistic work is contained in this image and it is a substantial reproduction, this photo cannot be licensed under a free license, and will be deleted. Framing this image to focus on the copyrighted work is also a copyright violation.
- Before reusing this content, ensure that you have the right to do so. You are solely responsible for ensuring that you do not infringe someone else's copyrights. See our general disclaimer for more information.
- Конечно, в 1966 году СССР был страшным ревнителем авторских прав архитекторов типовых домов, построенных заключёнными (помню, как зэки строили другие дома в Сусумане, за забором с колючей проволокой). Dj-2 (talk) 23:24, 5 May 2014 (UTC)Dj-2
- Нет, смысл предупреждения не в этом. Это предупреждение тем, кто захочет использовать эти фотографии под свободной лицензией. Сейчас наконец-то приняты поправки в ГК, и уже с 1 сентября такие снимки будут в России официально свободны. --Kaganer (talk) 16:57, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Ru-IossaAN.JPG
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Ru-IossaAN.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 03:21, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Dj-2. You have new messages at Jarekt#Copyright_status:_File:Ru-IossaAN.JPG's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
--Jarekt (talk) 14:18, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
- Dj-2, Your file is perfectly fine, but there is a problem with a tool that I use to tag files without license and out of 22M files this single file is the only one that is being incorrectly tagged as having some issues (plenty more are tagged correctly). I will try to figure out what is unique about this one file, but if you get "{{Autotranslate|1=File:Ru-IossaAN.JPG|base=Image license}}" from me in regard to this file in the future please ignore it. I apologize for the confusion. --Jarekt (talk) 16:54, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
File:Ru-znachok-ROS(smychka).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |