User talk:Dirtsc/Archive/2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Nachholtermin 17. Fotoworkshop

Im Gedenken an Gnu

Moin von der Küste,
es ist schon so viele Jahre her, dass wir uns in Nürnberg getroffen haben, wir (Ailura und ich) planten deshalb einen Fotoworkshop im Frühjahr 2019. Als wir erfuhren, dass Sebastian ebenfalls in Frühjahr ein BarCamp plant, entschlossen wir uns, zusammen zu arbeiten. Wir gliedern uns organisatorisch an diesem BarCamp an, sprich sind im gleichen Hotel, essen gemeinsam und nutzen ein Raum des Camps für unsere Fotovorträge, ähnlich wie auf der WikiCon 2011 in Nürnberg.
Wie Ihr vielleicht mitbekommen habt, ist Gnu zu seiner letzten Wanderung aufgebrochen, daher möchten auch wir seiner Gedenken.
Die weiteren Tage wollen wir gemeinsam ein Programm aus Fototouren und Vorträgen zusammenstellen, es ist noch viel Luft für Eure Ideen und Vorträge. Den geplanten ausführlichen LR Workshop wird zu einem anderen Zeitpunkt im Frühsommer ( WMDE gibt den Ort vor) stattfinden, da dieser sehr weit in die Tiefe gehen soll. Ich würde mich freuen, Euch in Nürnberg begrüßen zu können, wundere Dich nicht über meine Nachricht auch wenn Du lange nichts mehr editiert hast, ich habe Deinen Namen aus den letzten FWS kopiert. ;)

Tschüß
Euer
-- Ra Boe watt?? 12:38, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Mahira kreuz detail.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 21:51, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Mahira kreuz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 21:51, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2019

Hallo Dirtsc,

vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2019 kannst Du wieder beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland (WLE 2019) teilnehmen. Gesucht sind selbst aufgenommene Landschafts- und Naturfotos aus Schutzgebieten in Deutschland.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg kann diese Übersichtsseite dienen.

WLE 2019 kann nur durchgeführt werden, wenn weitere Mitarbeiter und Mitarbeiterinnen unser Team verstärken. Es geht unter anderem um die Organisation in der Wikipedia und das Sortieren der Bilder auf Commons. Über Art und Umfang der Beteiligung entscheidest Du selbst.

Wie in den Vorjahren übernimmt eine Vorjury ab Anfang Mai die Vorauswahl der Bilder. Auch daran kannst Du Dich gern beteiligen. Bei Interesse trage Dich bitte unter WLE-Vorjury ein, das Passwort kommt per E-Mail.

Besonders engagierte Freiwillige werden für die Jury benötigt. Wenn Du vom 12. bis 14. Juli in Fulda die besten Bilder küren willst, melde Dich auf der Jury-Seite.

Wir wünschen viel Freude beim Fotografieren,

--GPSLeo (talk) (im Auftrag des Organisationsteams) 17:00, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fb kd30925 Siedlung gnadenbergweg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 20:05, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fb kd30925 Siedlung gnadenbergweg 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 20:05, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fb kd30925 Siedlung gnadenbergweg 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 20:05, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fb kd30925 Siedlung gnadenbergweg 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 20:05, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fb kd30925 Siedlung gnadenbergweg 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 20:05, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riverside Geyser 2017 Eruption sequence 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:38, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riverside Geyser 2017 Eruption sequence 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:37, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:38, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riverside Geyser 2017 Eruption sequence 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The dust spot in the middle should be removed. --Ermell 07:35, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
 CommentCan you please mark the spot? I'm currently not able to identify it... --Dirtsc 08:10, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
 Comment I found one! :-) Please check again. --Dirtsc 19:28, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:39, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riverside Geyser 2017 Eruption sequence 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:37, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:38, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pgk bahrenfeld aussen 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:10, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pgk bahrenfeld aussen 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:10, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Pgk bahrenfeld innen 14.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 10:23, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle Geyser 2017 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good qualizy. --Manfred Kuzel 04:48, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grotto Geyser 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:37, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grotto Geyser 2017 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:37, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grotto Geyser 2017 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:37, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grotto Geyser 2017 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:42, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle Geyser 2017 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:50, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle Geyser 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:04, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pgk bahrenfeld aussen 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:57, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riddle Lake and vicinity 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:02, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riddle Lake and vicinity 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:47, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pgk bahrenfeld aussen 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment The tower is leaning --Moroder 10:57, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
 Comment In this image I didn't do a full perspective correction. So everything is leaning slightly inward. If I would have done a full correction the look would have been too unnatural. Greetings --Dirtsc 12:21, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
OK but it looks like an incomplete correction :-) --Moroder 07:45, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Riddle Lake, northern shore.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle Geyser 2017 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 16:30, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shosone Lake and Lewis Lake Trail 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --СССР 19:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shosone Lake and Lewis Lake Trail 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --СССР 19:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shosone Lake and Lewis Lake Trail 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --СССР 19:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vixen Geyser 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:02, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vixen Geyser 2017 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Musicaline 13:11, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steamboat Geyser 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:02, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steamboat Geyser 2017 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:02, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Green Dragon Spring 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:34, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Green Dragon Spring 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 14:14, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Back Basin in Norris Geyser Basin 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 12:29, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Back Basin in Norris Geyser Basin 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 12:29, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Upper Geyser Basin 2017 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:38, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Upper Geyser Basin 2017 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 14:29, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Upper Geyser Basin 2017 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 14:29, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Upper Geyser Basin 2017 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:31, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Upper Geyser Basin 2017 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:31, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Upper Geyser Basin 2017 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:25, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hot Spring near Castle Geyser 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 11:46, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Observation Peak Trail 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Clear detailed image of the Yellowstone NP --PantheraLeo1359531 18:41, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Observation Peak Trail 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:43, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porcelain Basin 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:43, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porcelain Basin 2017 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:02, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porcelain Basin 2017 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 14:49, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porcelain Basin 2017 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 14:49, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porcelain Basin 2017 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 14:49, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porcelain Basin 2017 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 16:45, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porcelain Basin 2017 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 16:45, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rim of Grand Prismatic Spring 2017 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:52, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rim of Grand Prismatic Spring 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:52, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lower Yellowstone Canyon 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 09:07, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lower Yellowstone Canyon 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:22, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lower Yellowstone Canyon 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:14, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lower Yellowstone Canyon 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 09:05, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Punch Bowl spring.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seven Mile Hole Trail 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quakity. --Manfred Kuzel 08:38, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seven Mile Hole Trail 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:41, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seven Mile Hole Trail 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quakity. --Manfred Kuzel 08:41, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Midway Geyser Basin 2017 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PantheraLeo1359531 07:55, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Artist Point view of Yellowstone Canyon 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:52, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seven Mile Hole Trail 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:55, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Artist Point view of Yellowstone Canyon 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 17:05, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Artist Point view of Yellowstone Canyon 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 17:05, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Artist Point view of Yellowstone Canyon 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 17:05, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Artist Point view of Yellowstone Canyon 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 17:05, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hedges Peak.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! West Thumb Geysir Basin 2017 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 15:37, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rim of Grand Prismatic Spring 2017 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 22:12, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seven Mile Hole Trail 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:04, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Smt moderner kreuzweg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 14:58, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! West Thumb Geysir Basin 2017 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:12, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! West Thumb Geysir Basin 2017 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Moroder 05:34, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sizzling Basin 2017 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:25, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sizzling Basin 2017 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:25, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sizzling Basin 2017 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:56, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Midway Geyser Basin 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Could you try to make it a bit brighter and maybe increase contrast a little bit? Seems too dark to me. --Aristeas 08:24, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Please take a look at the new version. Maybe its better now. Greetings --Dirtsc 20:30, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Melberg 14:10, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mammoth Hot Springs Lower Terraces 2017 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:42, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mammoth Hot Springs Lower Terraces 2017 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:52, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cleopatra Terraces 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:52, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cleopatra Terraces 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:42, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mammoth Hot Springs Lower Terraces 2017 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:57, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mammoth Hot Springs Lower Terraces 2017 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 19:24, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mammoth Hot Springs Lower Terraces 2017 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:55, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sizzling Basin 2017 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 11:43, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sizzling Basin 2017 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 11:43, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mammoth Hot Springs Lower Terraces 2017 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:25, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Highline Trail 2017 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 08:58, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Logan Pass 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 08:59, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Highline Trail 2017 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Contrast is a bit too flat IMO. The lens flare should be removed. --Ermell 12:40, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Please take a look at the new version. I don't know if I managed to do a better version. --Dirtsc 21:16, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
 Support Much better. --Ermell 07:34, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Logan Pass 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Hmmm I'm not really a fan of perspective corrections on nature shots, but the trees are leaning in both sides...--Peulle 08:40, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
I did a complete rework. Please take a look. Thanks --Dirtsc 20:59, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:45, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hayden Valley Buffalos 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 22:13, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hayden Valley Yellowstone River 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 22:13, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hayden Valley Buffalos 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 22:13, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Van Damme State Park Fern Canyon 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Ok --Uoaei1 20:33, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Van Damme State Park Fern Canyon 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Ok --Uoaei1 20:33, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Redwood Creek Valley 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:22, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Redwood Creek Valley 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Geo tag would be great --Podzemnik 01:44, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Redwood Creek Valley 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Geo tag would be great --Podzemnik 01:44, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central Oregon 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:14, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central Oregon 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 09:38, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Van Damme State Park Fern Canyon 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Needs more contrast --Ermell 08:07, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Made a new version. Greetings --Dirtsc 19:46, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:46, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoh River Trail 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:32, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoh River Trail 2017 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:33, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoh River Trail 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:31, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoh River Trail 2017 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:30, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019


Hallo Dirtsc,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2019 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Es sind viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die aber in Zukunft unbedingt benötigt wird, dann freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Mitte September 2019 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg bei größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 14:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Angeles und Klahhane Ridge Trail 2017 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 09:12, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Angeles und Klahhane Ridge Trail 2017 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:02, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central Oregon 2017 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good but looks tilted --Poco a poco 17:14, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
 Comment Thank you, I think, you're right. But I didn't noticed that before nomination. I'll correct the tilt during the next days. --Dirtsc 07:32, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
 Comment New version uploaded, please take a look. Greetings --Dirtsc 19:10, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
 Support Looking better --Poco a poco 17:44, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olympic Panorama 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 11:28, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Van Damme State Park Fern Canyon 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp photo, but light is not well developed (it needs also more contrast) --Michielverbeek 06:59, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
 Comment New version uploaded, please take a look. Greetings --Dirtsc 19:09, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
This is much better --Michielverbeek 20:52, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019: it's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!

Hi

You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in the UK. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and help record our local built environment for future generations.

You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments UK website. Or, if you have images taken in other countries, you can check the international options. This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

Many thanks for your help once more! MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:34, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gartenstadt Hohnerkamp 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 15:49, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gartenstadt Hohnerkamp 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:38, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gartenstadt Hohnerkamp 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:38, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gartenstadt Hohnerkamp 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:38, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gartenstadt Hohnerkamp 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:38, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cn kapstadtring 5 abriss 21863 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:47, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cn kapstadtring 5 abriss 21863 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not the most intersting photo but the quality is good --Michielverbeek 18:14, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cn kapstadtring 5 abriss 21863 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:47, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cn kapstadtring 5 abriss 21863 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:53, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cn überseering 4 22054 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:46, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Angeles und Klahhane Ridge Trail 2017 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Borderline sharpness but QI for me. --C messier 14:33, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Angeles und Klahhane Ridge Trail 2017 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 14:33, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cn überseering 4 22054 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Steindy 11:10, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Point Reyes pacific coast 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:08, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cn kapstadtring 2 und 4 21860 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:38, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cn kapstadtring 2 und 4 21860 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:38, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cn kapstadtring 2 und 4 21860 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:09, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cn überseering 4 22054 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:20, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cn kapstadtring 1 und 3 21859 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:42, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cn kapstadtring 1 und 3 21859 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:44, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cn kapstadtring 1 und 3 21859 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:53, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bbkn kd 30886 ruebenkamp 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PantheraLeo1359531 12:31, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bbkn kd 30886 ruebenkamp 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Axel Tschentscher 09:51, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norwegische Seemannskirche Hamburg-Neustadt 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:56, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norwegische Seemannskirche Hamburg-Neustadt 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 08:28, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benediktekirche Hamburg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 08:28, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benediktekirche Hamburg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 08:33, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bs kd 14396 pergamentweg koerber gymn 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:55, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bs kd 14396 pergamentweg koerber gymn 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:55, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwedische Seemannskirche Hamburg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:33, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwedische Seemannskirche Hamburg 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Steindy 13:04, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finnische Seemannskirche Hamburg-Neustadt 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Steindy 13:04, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cn kapstadtring 1 und 3 21859 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Ok. --ArildV 19:09, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Johanneskirche in Ahrensburg 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Axel Tschentscher 18:10, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Johanneskirche in Ahrensburg 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:28, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Köhlbrandbrücke Ansicht Neuhof 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Somewhat soft to the top, probably due to perspective control, but thankfully no oversharpening. --Smial 12:03, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Köhlbrandbrücke Ansicht Neuhof 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Milan Bališin 18:15, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Köhlbrandbrücke Ansicht Neuhof 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 12:03, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Köhlbrandbrücke Ansicht Neuhof 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:56, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Köhlbrandbrücke Ansicht Neuhof 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:56, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Johanneskirche in Ahrensburg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality: straight lines, sharp bricks, realistic weather --Axel Tschentscher 18:51, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bbkn kd 23009 habichtsplatz 8 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 22:14, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cn kapstadtring 1 und 3 21859 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
How strong a perspective correction was used? To my eye the building's perspective looks unnatural. --Bobulous 18:54, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 CommentThis image is intentionally the version without a "full" correction. Please compare it with File:Cn kapstadtring 1 und 3 21859 03.jpg where the verticals are 100% vertical. If you want, I can look up, how strong the applied perspective correction in this image is. Greetings --Dirtsc 08:30, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
 Support Right side of the "my4walls" not quite vertical on this image, but very interesting perspective with building's edge in the center of the sky hole. --Axel Tschentscher 09:01, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche Breitenfelde 2019 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 07:38, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche Breitenfelde 2019 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Hanooz 07:27, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüfter Süd Neuer Elbtunnel Hamburg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:26, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche Breitenfelde 2019 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:23, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Marien Siebenbäumen 2019 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:10, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Marien Siebenbäumen 2019 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:10, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Marien Siebenbäumen 2019 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:10, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Marien Siebenbäumen 2019 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:10, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bbkn kd 30886 ruebenkamp 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 10:07, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Marien Siebenbäumen 2019 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:46, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Marien Siebenbäumen 2019 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:46, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Marien Siebenbäumen 2019 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:03, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche Breitenfelde 2019 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
it will be very good if you correct also the horizontal perspective, what are you think? --Armenak Margarian 18:49, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
 Comment Thanks for the suggestion! I made a new version, please take a look. Greetings --Dirtsc 19:15, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
 Support Very good, thanks. --Armenak Margarian 07:53, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche Breitenfelde 2019 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:08, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cn kapstadtring 2 und 4 21860 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 22:26, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cn kapstadtring 2 und 4 21860 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 22:26, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cn kapstadtring 2 und 4 21860 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 22:28, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche Breitenfelde 2019 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, lines are vertically --PantheraLeo1359531 19:32, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Marien Siebenbäumen 2019 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 14:53, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Marien Siebenbäumen 2019 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:44, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bbkn kd 30954 siedlung otto speckter str 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment The building is good quality, but there seems to be some disturbing CA around the trees, especially the right one. --Domob 09:04, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
 CommentI'm not able to see the mentioned CA at my home PC. I applied a correction for CA. All I notice is an unsharpness of the right tree due to perspective correction. Feel free to decline the nomination, if you find any faults. Greetings --Dirtsc 20:57, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
 Support I think it is ok. --Domob 07:58, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bbkn kd 30954 siedlung otto speckter str 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment Looks good to me in general, but the verticals seem leaning out (e.g. on the tower in the background). Can you please try to fix the perspective accordingly? --Domob 09:04, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
 Comment I'll try to find a perspective correction that fits better. But I checked the verticals of the tower in the background and they are straight and downright vertical. But you're right, it "seems" as if the lines are leaning out, a common problem when one follow the rule of the "straight verticals" as it is interpreted here. ;-) Greetings --Dirtsc 08:01, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
 Comment I personally think that the perspective is overdone; if you reduce it somewhat, I will support this image as QI. But if others think the amount is good as it is, I won't object if they promote the image as it is. --Domob 08:42, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
I made a new version, with a less aggressive perspective correction. Please take a look. --Dirtsc 20:57, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
 Support Thanks, good quality. --Domob 07:58, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bs kd 14398 merkenstrasse 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:48, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Dirtsc/Archive,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Dirtsc/Archive,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

03:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)