User talk:Dirtsc/Archive/2013
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:07, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Snbw orgel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 1553 gutzkowstr 11 sued.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your recent uploads :)
 | Hi. I noticed that you have uploaded a number of photographs today around an event that could possibly be considered newsworthy. It would be fantastic to see these pictures used on a WMF project. I would like to extend an invitation to you to visit English Wikinews and include these articles in a photo essay. Examples of published photo essays you can use as a model can be found in the photo essays category. English Wikinews allows original reporting, which means you can write about the event you attended where you took the photographs. This would allow you to get 5 to 20 of your newly uploaded photographs used in one place right away. You can also submit photo essays on Spanish Wikinews (writing guide, example), Polish Wikinews and Russian Wikinews. You may also be able to submit photo essays to German Wikinews, Hebrew Wikinews, Norwegian Wikinews, Farsi Wikinews, Portuguese Wikinews and Japanese Wikinews. Feel free to contact me on my Commons or my English Wikinews talk page if you have any questions, or if I can be of further assistance. | |
Hallo Dirtsc, ich habe eine neue Version der Datei hochgeladen. Der Änderungsumfang: Korrektur der Perspective, kleine Drehung und mehr Dynamic Range (Optimierung vom Histogramm). Viele Grüsse! Poco a poco (talk) 17:10, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
- Vielen Dank für die Unterstützung! Ich hoffe, dass ich diese Perspektivkorrekturen demnächst auch selber erledigen kann. Dirtsc (talk) 08:07, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kkga dach detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Adventskirche Hamburg-Schnelsen, Altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Erlk loh gesamt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rö2 eckturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Smt türschliesser.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kko pfeiler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Meilenstein Bordesholm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Erlk loh westeingang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ws31 und ws35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
_at_Port_of_Hamburg_near_Oevelg%C3%B6nne.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! HMCS Iroquois (DDG 280) at Port of Hamburg near Oevelgönne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_at_Port_of_Hamburg_leaving.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! HMCS Iroquois (DDG 280) at Port of Hamburg leaving.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_at_Port_of_Hamburg_near_Waltershof.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! HMCS Iroquois (DDG 280) at Port of Hamburg near Waltershof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tellingstedt kirchplatz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lkwb eingang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Test perspective
Hi Dirtsc You can download my test ou your picture at : http://we.tl/NOQJ0sKglO For information I use Adobe lightroom and for your picture I make that : transformation verticale -6 and transformation horizontale -19 and little crop at the base but less than you. Friendly --Christian Ferrer 04:55, 7 June 2013 (UTC)}}
- Thank you! I'll do that in the afternoon or in the evening and take a look at it. --Dirtsc (talk) 05:09, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
- I didn't had the time to take a look until today. But you're right, your perspective correction is much better. I think it is a matter of the used software. Until some weeks ago, I was only able to do tilt corrections, now I'm using a test version of DxO with is much better then everything I used before. Maybe I should consider using lightroom, it seems to be able of doing more selective perspective corrections. I'll talk to a friend who uses lightroom during the next days. But what to do with the image? Shall I upload the version you send to me? --Dirtsc (talk) 17:47, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
The picture is also a bit noisy, but your perspective corrections are not too bad, I will promote it.
- I didn't had the time to take a look until today. But you're right, your perspective correction is much better. I think it is a matter of the used software. Until some weeks ago, I was only able to do tilt corrections, now I'm using a test version of DxO with is much better then everything I used before. Maybe I should consider using lightroom, it seems to be able of doing more selective perspective corrections. I'll talk to a friend who uses lightroom during the next days. But what to do with the image? Shall I upload the version you send to me? --Dirtsc (talk) 17:47, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Friendly --Christian Ferrer 20:22, 9 June 2013 (UTC)}}
- Thanks! See you in QIC ;-) --Dirtsc (talk) 04:40, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
HMCS Iroquois (DDG 280).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy Trinity Church in Hamburg-Allermöhe, main part of the altar by Hein Baxmann.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ekfa fenster süden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nikolai neu nikolaustuer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nienk süd.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zb kuhwerder deck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kberg choransicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kberg kriegerdenkmal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chro altarraum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clemens Schultz.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ekfa fenster details norden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lkwb turm detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kberg innenraum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
.dt.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Anbetung nikolaikirche (MHG).dt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bk südfenster.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Santa cruz hamburg bukai 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File:VistadelLagoNahuelHuapi.jpg
Hi, I fixed the picture. Regards!!!! --Ezarateesteban 10:34, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
- Do you read this message? Ezarateesteban 13:40, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
- Yes I did. I'm sorry, but there was not much time left for commons during the working days of the week. I'll take a look today. :-) --Dirtsc (talk) 12:29, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
- Do you read this message? Ezarateesteban 13:40, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Neuapostolische tegelweg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Support vessel "Putlos" of the german navy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Royal Dutch Shell oil refinery in Hamburg-Harburg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Phb dt 8056 Öllager Rethe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Phb dt 8030 Schuten Ellerholzhafen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Phb dt 7976 Cap San Diego.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_at_Port_of_Hamburg_near_Oevelg%C3%B6nne.jpg){kind=link}
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Phb dt 7965 Speicherstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Phb dt 8299 Teerhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oderhafen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ellerholzkanal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Phb dt 8241 Deichtorcenter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Phb dt 7964 HTC.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mkq innenraum nord.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Phb dt 8320 St Katharinen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Phb dt 8244 Cityhochhäuser.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Phb dt 8099 CTA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mkq südwestansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mkq orgel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Phb dt 8308 Chilehaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Phb dt 8260 Hbf und Alster.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Marienkirche (Quickborn), exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marienkirche (Quickborn), interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kirchsteinbek hintereingang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kirchsteinbek haupttür.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Good Shepherd Church in Hamburg-Langenfelde, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church in Hamburg-Flottbek, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maria-Magdalena-Church in Hamburg-Osdorf, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Re: Two images of greek islands on QIC
Dear Dirtsc, thank you for commenting my pictures. I developed them from RAW and definitely increased saturation and vibrance. I agree that they became way too oversaturated. In addition, noisy sky was pointed out in another comment. I hope to fix these issues and upload new versions this evening; I will drop you a note here afterwards. Heuschrecke (talk) 14:14, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello again. Sorry, at a first reading I thought you were talking about another pair of the pictures I posted at QIC: File:Neos_Marmaras_Bay_01.jpg and File:Neos_Marmaras_Bay_02.jpg. It's them that I fixed today. As for the pictures you mentioned, I also developed them from a RAW file and so definitely increased saturation from the default level in Lightroom (because not increasing saturation at all results in very dull colors), and played with color curves.
It's now hard to remember what the reality exactly was, but I have another picture similar to File:Kelyfos_sunset.jpg that I shot in JPEG rather than RAW. On that picture, the color of the sky and the sea is the same as on File:Kelyfos_sunset.jpg and the greens are much duller. But again, the greens are always too dull if I shoot in JPEG. To sum it up, I tend to think File:Kelyfos_sunset.jpg is rather ok. Perhaps one could desaturate the greens a little bit.
Next, the color curves in File:Kelyfos sunset boat 01.jpg were specifically adjusted to make the sunset more dramatic. Namely, I increased intensivity of light reds. The real sky was less red. I personally find such color enhancement acceptable if it makes a picture more beautiful; however if you disagree I will be happy to know your opinion here or in the QIC nomination.
Finally, please feel free to modify the pictures and to introduce your version if you wish. I can send you raw files upon your request. Cheers, Heuschrecke (talk) 23:59, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zb kuhwerder heck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stellinger kirche haupttür.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zgh westansicht2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stellinger kirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stellinger kirche eingangsseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stellinger kirche seitenfenster.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oeoemrang hues giebel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mkq fenster süd.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mkq turmspitze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oeoemrang hues.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Smhh Tympanon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sso Eingangstuer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ssevk aussen Glockenturm 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mkq rundbogenfenster 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ssevk aussen 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ssevk aussen 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ssevk aussen Wetterfahne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sjepp fenster süd 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mkq turm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ssevk grabplatten 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Severinkirche
Dein Bild von dem Orgelprospekt kommt ein bißchen düster … was hältst du hiervon? Könnte außerdem etwas perspektivische Entzerrung verkraften, die im Bild rechte Kante stürzt etwas. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 21:15, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- Deine Version ist von der Perspektive her besser. Mit meinen Mitteln habe ich es nicht besser hinbekommen, ohne die linke Seite zu weit nach oben zu verschieben. Aber auf meinem Monitor sieht Deine Version für mich etwas zu hell und bunt aus. --Dirtsc (talk) 21:21, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- Ich habe gerade noch mal was Neues in meinem Tool gefunden. Man lernt doch nie aus. Ich lade eine neue Version hoch. Schau mal bitte drauf. --Dirtsc (talk) 18:10, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Bevor ich es irgendwann vergesse. Vielen Dank für die Tipps und das Beispiel. Ich habe mal wieder was dazu gelernt. --Dirtsc (talk) 05:50, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
- Ich habe gerade noch mal was Neues in meinem Tool gefunden. Man lernt doch nie aus. Ich lade eine neue Version hoch. Schau mal bitte drauf. --Dirtsc (talk) 18:10, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
QIC
Du hast natürlich völlig recht, ich habe bei der Nominierung nicht genau genug hingeschaut. Mag das Bild halt ;-). Das Objektiv ist auch nicht so doll, braucht eher f/11 für taugliche Schärfe. Da ist man aber trotz Sonne bei Verwendung eines Polfilters schnell bei ISO 800 oder höher, wenn man bei 100mm oder länger nicht verwackeln will. Auch ist der Antiwackel bei meiner damals verwendeten k-x nicht so doll, spielt gelegentlich Streiche. Bei dem Rundgang habe ich allerdings ganz bewußt ziemlich viel mit dem Tele in den engen Gassen geknipst und das Weitwinkel in der Tasche gelassen. Inzwischen nehme ich manchmal auch nur die 50mm Festbrennweite dafür, was an der Cropkamera ja auch schon ein kurzes Tele ist. Man muß damit zwar oft sehr viel laufen (Turnschuh-Zoom), gewinnt aber Perspektiven, die keine beknackten Superweitwinkelverzerrungen liefern, dafür aber unnötiges Beiwerk, störende Reklame o.ä. schön ausblenden oder bei relativ offener Blende (das 50er ist so ab f/2 brauchbar, bei 2.8 reht gut) mit Schärfeverläufen arbeiten. Ich kann nur empfehlen, mal längere Brennweiten auszuprobieren. -- Smial (talk) 07:46, 25 September 2013 (UTC) (der sein 12-24mm deswegen aber nicht einmottet)
- Das Motiv fand ich wirklich ganz ausgezeichnet Ich mag solche Detailaufnahmen mit Tele, die sich eine ganz spezielle Ansicht heraus greifen. Hättest du das Bild mit analoger Ausrüstung gemacht, hätte man wahrscheinlich auf dem Abzug gar nichts zu bemängeln gehabt. Heute kann aber jeder die Bilder mal eben auf das Doppelte vergrößern und sieht dann jeden Fehler. Viele Deiner Probleme kenne ich selber nur zu gut. Ich hatte hier auch schon ein Bild nominiert, das in "üblicher" Größe wirklich schön war, beim Review sind aber alle Unschärfen aufgefallen. Ich kämpfe ja selber immer mit der Schärfe und bin da gerade sehr kritisch geworden, weil das hier bei QIC auch immer wieder bemängelt wird. Das ist kein einfaches Thema und ich bin gerade dabei, hier einiges zu lernen. Wahrscheinlich muss ich demnächst mal was an meiner Objektivausstattung tun. --Dirtsc (talk) 15:32, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lotsenstation Seemannshöft NW 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Phb dt 8336 Teerhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lotsenstation Seemannshöft NW 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ssevk innen orgel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sls querhaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grabstein faltings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chro gesamt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chro gesamt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chro gesamt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kapelle Wittduen Dachreiter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kapelle Wittduen Kanzel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.Dear Dirtsc/Archive, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, |
|
Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!Dear Dirtsc/Archive, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, |
|