User talk:Didym/Archives/2023

Pliki Commons..

O co chodzi z tym plikiem ? File:Skanowanie 2017-11-03 13-46.jpg Jakich warunków nie spełnia? Jest Autor , czyja praca i licencja wpisana automatyczne przez program . Nazwa pliku ? Co miałem zrobić ze zdjęciem z przed 46 lat ? Narysować czy zeskanować by zamieścić . Tak samo z plikiem Żołnierz File:Żołnierz NJW MSW w latach 1974-76.jpg.Tak był zamieszczony ponownie ale już zgodnie z licencją i autorstwem . Nie ma żadnego powodu by je usuwać z Commons.. Pamulab (talk) 06:39, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

This is all completely irrelevant, the file was deleted after a DR, so you can not reupload, but have to file an undeletion request instead. Reuploading will result in a block of your account. --Didym (talk) 12:34, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for removing the photo that I uploaded, it was only a test. Gooze1989 (talk) 18:03, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

SEGA MEGA DRIVE & MEGA-CD.png

Hello, first of all, sorry for the conversation using Google Translate. This is the main topic, but I took a picture and uploaded it for the first time in order to edit the page of the Sega game console. However, according to the translation, it was removed as it is not free content. The photo itself was taken by me and I think there was no problem. I think the problem is that I neglected to do something. what should i have done? 軍事用懐中電灯 (talk) 19:34, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Are you sure you did take that image yourself instead if copying it from somewhere? I did a reverse image search before deleting that resulted in a lot of exact matches. --Didym (talk) 19:43, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but there is a big mistake in your claim.

The photo was definitely taken by me, it's a mistake that the matching image was already uploaded.

For example, that image has traces of correction in the upper right part. This is the price tag when I bought that game console at a secondhand store.

There must have been other visible injuries. If you still have an exact match image, please let us know. 軍事用懐中電灯 (talk) 20:11, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

As your claims seem to be plausible, I have restored the image now. This might be one of those rare cases where the reverse search finds a very similar image that is not the same one. --Didym (talk) 20:25, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Regarding photos of Jisho Warner

Hi!

This is regarding my edits to this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jisho_Warner

Please let me know how I can avoid having the photos deleted.

Both photos of Jisho were provided to me by her. Photos that photographers take at her behest, for this page and for the Stone Creek website, are often donated and thus (c)Stone Creek Zen Center. (We’re very informal.)

I think the photo of her alone, at the top of page, was already part of the Wikipedia page when I started editing, long ago. But I'm now getting this warning and don't know what to do.

The new one of her and Meg was taken by John Martin. I'm also sending e-mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org and cc'ing him to see if he wants to retain copyright, or is donating the photo to Stone Creek Zen Center.

So, I don’t know what to do to prevent these photos from being auto-deleted. Many thanks for your assistance!

@RobMyersAI RobMyersAI (talk) 23:27, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

If the photographers send an e-mail with permisssion, the images can be kept (or undeleted if already deleted, which may happen in a week from now). --Didym (talk) 16:26, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Żołnierz NJW MSW w latach 1974-76.jpg

I was asked to help uploader with adding proper license/source information. I restored this file because date was fixed and it is in line with several of his other army service photos. Looks like uploader understood past mistakes and fixed them whenever applicable. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:33, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

After those uploads, I don't think we can believe any of the user's authorship claims, but I won't oppose if you trust the uploader. --Didym (talk) 18:44, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Show now the description in the file

Hi, I don't speak (and write) English... But... I'm try more explanation about the File:Hotel Caetité (Espaço INB) 2023 2.jpg. Can You see now to information is correct? The file shows a permanent exhibition in the INB Museum of the nuclear fuel cycle... Thanks, and sorry my bad, bad English. André Koehne ^{TALK TO ME} 21:23, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Who is the creator of the exhibition panels? Do you have their permission? --Didym (talk) 21:27, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Oh, Yes... This is the contact in the INB local: Jane Dantas: 55 (77) 3454-4724 / 3454-3600 janedantas@inb.gov.br. She (Jane) stay with me all the time, include she photographs... me, in this moment! I don't should upload their photos here, but I can send You, in e-mail... Can I? André Koehne ^{TALK TO ME} 22:20, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

This needs to be verified using the VRTS. As that page is very incomplete in portuguese, you may want to ask DarwIn for assistance. --Didym (talk) 14:34, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

I'll talk to him, yes, thank you. Or, in the case of OTRS, I can talk to Jane myself, mabe she would send an email to the Wiki. But for me it's very sui generis: how could someone copyrighted an ancient Greek statue photo, or a piece of uranium rock? lol... Oh, meine Familie stammt aus dem kleinen Dahlenwarsleben! Vielen Danke, Didym! (and the Google translate, of course! he, he...) André Koehne ^{TALK TO ME} 15:23, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Help me.

Please, whatever you can do, please help. BananaBreadPie12 (talk) 20:16, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Do you still need help after reading COM:L? --Didym (talk) 23:07, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Different

It was a different image the size was different. DarionGray (talk) 23:27, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

This does not make it a different image. The copyright status is the same for all sizes. --Didym (talk) 23:28, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Can you least make it into a real public domain image? DarionGray (talk) 23:29, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Impossible, we have to wait until 2027. --Didym (talk) 23:31, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

If you want I can download more images for you and you can upload them as public domain images because I don't know how. DarionGray (talk) 23:32, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

2027 really? DarionGray (talk) 23:33, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

You can't make an image public domain, it either is or it isn't. If you start uploading unfree files again, your account will be blocked. --Didym (talk) 23:36, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

I'm sorry I just wanted my images to exist. DarionGray (talk) 23:38, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Does this mean the Frankenstein and Wolf Man images I made would have to go too? DarionGray (talk) 23:43, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Unfortunately yes. You can expect the copyright to last 95 years from publication. --Didym (talk) 00:15, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

95 years we be dead by then. DarionGray (talk) 00:22, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Images

If I make images can they just be for Wikicommons nowhere else? DarionGray (talk) 00:24, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Just read COM:L. Taking a screenshot does not make it your own work. Your next copyright violation will result in a block. --Didym (talk) 19:24, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Can't you download them and make them your own? DarionGray (talk) 19:38, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Why Content?

Can you speek Vietnames? Karmapakhyenha (talk) 22:02, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

No. --Didym (talk) 22:11, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Wikipedia Stuttgart 2023-03.jpg

Kannst Du bitte die Freigabe eintragen?

Ich wünsche Dir einen schönen Sonntag! Mussklprozz (talk) 10:04, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

ticket:2023031210007691 --Didym (talk) 19:58, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Fotos eliminadas

Por qué se sacaron las fotos ilustrativas de los productos detallados en los artículos? No se entiende, ya solo son las fotos de los productos sobre los que es el artículo? 2800:A4:16E6:4700:E4F9:56C5:88:4C89 21:40, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

What photos are you referring to? --Didym (talk) 15:27, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Fariba Hachtroudi Picture

Hello, You erased my picture of Fariba Hachtroudi. I am the photographer. Why did you erase before inquiring? Laurent Philodendron38 (talk) 15:27, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

The image is widely available on the internet, also a colored version, so I have to assume you are not the author. If you are, please contact the VRT to have the file restored. --Didym (talk) 15:33, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Gay Magazine "Adventures in..." header image

Greetings! You erased a picture I uploaded. The picture is newsworthy; it's part of an article that falsely accused someone of plagiarism, and in fact depicts someone stealing art. (In other words, it's materially relevant to such allegation and newsworthy controversy.) Is there any way I/we could revisit this?

Thanks! Michelmybell (talk) 17:58, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

This is all completely irrelevant, as the image was never published under a free license. --Didym (talk) 18:07, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

There's no exemption for pictures that became part of noteworthy stories? (I'm not trying to be provocative. I'm just asking!) Michelmybell (talk) 18:13, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

For example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Casket Michelmybell (talk) 18:14, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

COM:L is pretty clear on this. --Didym (talk) 22:00, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Löschung mehrerer Bilder in Bernhard Walke

Der Wikipedia Eintrag für Bernhard Walke enthält im Text Referenzen auf Bilder, die neuerdings gelöscht worden sind. Das Copyright für die betreffenden Bilder liegt bei Bernhard Walke. Zu Beginn des Textes hatte ich ein Foto von Bernhard Walke hochgeladen, dessen Copyright ebenfalls bei Bernhard Walke liegt. Es wurde ebenfalls gelöscht. Es macht keinen Sinn Fotos zu löschen, ohne die Referenzen darauf zu korrigieren. Mir ist unklar, weshalb die Fotos gelöscht wurden. Sie sind wesentlich für den Text. Beste Grüsse Hutuc 15. April 2023 heide.bruecher@bluewin.ch (talk) 15:44, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Ob eine Datei verwendet wird oder nicht spielt für die Löschung als Urheberrechtsverletzung keine Rolle. Nach dem Stellen des Löschantrags wären noch mehr als zwei Wochen Zeit gewesen, die Löschung durch eine Freigabe zu verhindern. Auch jetzt ist weiterhin eine Wiederherstellung nach Eingang einer Freigabe möglich. --Didym (talk) 21:36, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2023 - Deutschland

Hallo Didym,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2023 findet zum elften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2022 – Landschaft
• 
  Hohes Ufer zwischen Ahrenshoop und Wustrow, Fischland
• 
  Biotop Nördliche Lothdorfer Wiese
• 
  Aisch bei Willersdorf im FFH Aischgrund

• Sieger WLE 2022 – Detail
• 
  Gemeine Goldwespe im NSG Wittenberge Rühstädter Elbniederung
• 
  Libellen-Schmetterlingshaft im Naturschutzgebiet Badberg (Kaiserstuhl)
• 
  Blüte eines Schmalblättrigen Weidenröschens im Naturpark Taunus

Der Wettbewerb ist zweigeteilt, das heißt wir unterscheiden zwischen den beiden Wettbewerbskategorien Landschaft und Detail/Makro. Zu Landschaft zählen auch geschützte Einzelbäume. In der Wettbewerbskategorie Detail/Makro werden Pflanzen, Tiere und Pilze bewertet.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen – zum Beispiel in Sachsen die Liste der Naturdenkmale in Wurzen.

Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2023 – Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung.

Damit der Upload für dich einfacher ist, haben wir in diesem Jahr die einzelnen Hochladeseiten für die Bundesländer abgeschafft, alle Fotos werden über dasselbe Formular hochgeladen. Außerdem haben wir das Layout unserer WLE-Seiten geändert.

Damit es ab 1. Mai mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos for WLE 

Außerdem laden wir dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2023 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2023 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool 

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb 2023 wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 16:52, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Wieder da

Hallo Didym, nur zu Deiner Kenntnis: Dieses von Dir gelöschte Bild ist wieder da. Laut Hochladendem läuft die VRT-Anfrage; er hat sie auch auf seiner Benutzerdisk. eingestellt. Ich habe dort eine Rückfrage gestellt, weil ich es unklar finde, wer das "ich" in seiner Formulierung ist. Anders gesagt: wer diese Lizenz nun erteilt hat: er - der nur das Nutzungsrecht besitzt - oder tatsächlich der Fotograf. Gruß, --2003:C0:8F42:1C00:B581:B71F:B691:570C 09:14, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Die Freigabe ist mittlerweile bearbeitet, auch wenn ich da immer noch gewisse Probleme sehe. Der Rest sollte aber über das VRT laufen. --Didym (talk) 15:01, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

No permission since

Please don't mark older uploads with "no permission since", as a week is all to short a period for an inactive user to note them. The last edit of Roland.h.bueb was in February. Also, as there is a permission stated on his files, this is the wrong path. We might need confirmation, but please either just post at the user page or collect such worries in a single deletion request, as they probably should all be kept or deleted. With "no permission since" different admins will delete them and there is a mess in keeping track of them. (I haven't checked your the other users' uploads.) –LPfi (talk) 18:59, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

A regular DR will probably not last any longer than a no permission tagging (the easy ones are usually closed after exactly 7 days without any discussion), so the 7 days have to be enough in both cases. I can't tell you how other admins process the missing permission categories, but at least my way of handling those is deleting most if not all files at once, so also no difference. Any permission not confirmed by the VRT can be considered non existent, and the no permisson tag is meant for such cases, regardless of the age, except for some really old files. By the way: this is not the first time I have found this problem with this uploader, the last tagging was in January. --Didym (talk) 19:19, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

As there is a documented permission statement at each of these files, I think we can assume there is permission, which just needs to be confirmed. Deleting in 7 days in such cases seems to me as madness. I would hope that Commons administrators would try to arrive at communication in cases like this, rather than just adding templates to the user page. At sv-wp, we regard using templates on established users' talk pages as rude, and I find these templates over here quite disturbing. If a user who keeps track of permission letters doesn't do VRT, then I think there is something wrong also in our end. As German speaker, have you tried to communicate with him? –LPfi (talk) 19:57, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

(I note that the other cases I checked seem to be clear newbie copyvios. Thanks for marking/deleting them.) –LPfi (talk) 19:59, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Nathalie Pohl in 2020.jpg

In the future please don't speedy-delete images that have a {{Permission pending}} template on the file description. It is an indication that permission may be arriving soon via VRT. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:37, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

As this was a reupload of a file already deleted two weeks before, I didn't have a closer look at the description page. --Didym (talk) 16:20, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Weinrich.jpg

Welche Erlaubnis fehlt dir dar? - oder siehst du da eine Urheberrechtsverletzung, dann benütze bitte den richtigen Baustein und trage die Quelle ein. --lg -- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 11:58, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Die Datei stammt von Facebook (eindeutig erkennbar an den Metadaten), ist also eher kein eigenes Werk und benötigt eine Freigabe. --Didym (talk) 18:46, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Rundschlingen-Fotos

Hallo, also das ist wieder genau so ein Fall, wo ich alle Hoffnung an Wikipedia und seine Nutzer verliere... Die Quelle steht explizit da. Vielleicht mal einen Blick hineinwerfen und dann siehst du, dass die Nutzer entsprechend schriftlich und explizit ihr Einverständnis für die Verwendung der Fotos auf Wikipedia in diesem Forum erklärt haben. Mehr noch: Der ganze Forenbeitrag (stammt übrigens von mir) hatte genau DAS zum Ziel. Also bitte nächstes Mal die Quellen prüfen, statt fleißig Schnelllöschanträge zu stellen... Danke! Lhennen (talk) 13:50, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Und wo siehst du da eine Freigabe für CC BY-SA 4.0? CC ist keine Lizenz und "für Wikipedia" nicht ausreichend. --Didym (talk) 15:30, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Ihr macht den Laden hier selbst kaputt. Wenn du dir den Beitrag durchliest, siehst du, dass da schriftlich die Zustimmung gegeben wurde, die Fotos hier zu nutzen. Jetzt muss ich diesen Freiwilligen, die sich den Allerwertesten aufgerissen und sogar eine Schlinge nur für den Wikipedia-Zweck zerschnitten haben, hinterherlaufen und sie mit undurchsichtigen Formularen, die es noch nicht einmal in deutscher Sprache gibt, bombardieren. Ihr habt manchmal echt zu wenig zu tun, ganz ehrlich... Lhennen (talk) 16:36, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Niemand verlangt irgendwelche Formulare. Eine einfache Bestätigung im als Quelle angegebenen Forum reicht völlig aus, diese muss allerdings die konkrete Lizenz enthalten und nicht nur uneindeutige Angaben. Das Ganze sollte dann noch per License review bestätigt werden. --Didym (talk) 16:44, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Need your input on a policy impacting gadgets and UserJS

Dear interface administrator,

This is Samuel from the Security team and I hope my message finds you well.

There is an ongoing discussion on a proposed policy governing the use of external resources in gadgets and UserJS. The proposed Third-party resources policy aims at making the UserJS and Gadgets landscape a bit safer by encouraging best practices around external resources. After an initial non-public conversation with a small number of interface admins and staff, we've launched a much larger, public consultation to get a wider pool of feedback for improving the policy proposal. Based on the ideas received so far, the proposed policy now includes some of the risks related to user scripts and gadgets loading third-party resources, best practices for gadgets and UserJS developers, and exemptions requirements such as code transparency and inspectability.

As an interface administrator, your feedback and suggestions are warmly welcome until July 17, 2023 on the policy talk page.

Have a great day!

Samuel (WMF), on behalf of the Foundation's Security team 23:02, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Thuy Lam 2018.jpg

Hi Didym. I found that this file was tagged with npd template by you a year ago, but it was removed improperly by user Hoangminhloc, so i put it back with the old daytime. Please check if i make it right and delete the file if you could. Thank you. Sửa tào lao là giỏi (talk) 09:08, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Now deleted. --Didym (talk) 11:51, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:American_Actor_&_Film_Director_Cam_McHarg.jpg

Dear Didym, I talked to the source(Alexander Digital Studio) to make this photo File:American Actor & Film Director Cam McHarg.jpg to be freely licensed accordingly they made it to be licensed to the public domain, please check it

https://www.flickr.com/photos/198904497@N04/53097935290/in/dateposted-public/ Eyoab (talk) 13:35, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

That source is useless, see COM:LL. --Didym (talk) 02:58, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

The Deepest Breath poster

You have removed my "The Deepest Breath" poster. I have no issue with that, considering it is in fact a copyright violation. However, I don't understand why this poster is prohibited for being used in a French Wikipedia page but not in the English one. I would be glad if you explain why it is allowed to post the image on the English Wikimedia but not on the French one. The Deepest Breath wikipedia page is using the image without any problem. DiablosGamer (talk) 11:46, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Just have a look at the license of that image and COM:FU. --Didym (talk) 13:42, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

מחיקת קובץ הרב מאיר אליהו

שלום ראיתי שמחקת את התמונה שהעליתי לדף של הרב מאיר אליהו ורציתי לבקש ממך לבטל את המחיקה היות והתמונה שמחקת הייתה בבעלותי ואני העליתי אותה לדף ואין כאן שום הפרת זכויות יוצרים תודה יהונתן כהן 232 (talk) 11:23, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Are you referring to File:הרב מאיר אליהו.jpg. That file was taken from an external source and did not even have a license. If you are the photographer, upload it again in full camera resoultion with intact Exif data. --Didym (talk) 15:31, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Lösung von Dateien

Hallo Didym,

könntest du die folgenden zwei Dateien löschen, der Löschdiskussion schon etwas länger läuft?

• Commons:Deletion requests/File:Antimony-hexafluoride-2D.png
• Commons:Deletion requests/File:Acylsilaan algemeen.png

Vielen Dank, — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 12:52, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Eigentlich sind derartige Anfragen zur bevorzugten Abarbeitung von Löschanträgen nicht unbedingt sinnvoll, die beiden Löschanträge sind jetzt aber trotzdem geschlossen. --Didym (talk) 03:15, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Vielen Dank, ich hatte nur das Gefühl, dass diese übersehen wurden. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 08:32, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 - Deutschland

Hallo Didym,

Sieger 2022 – Kloster Paulinzella

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2023 findet zum dreizehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Vergangenes Jahr hat Radomianin mit einer Gesamtansicht von Kloster Paulinzella gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf oder welche Fotografin tritt dieses Jahr die Nachfolge an?

Nach WLM 2022 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel die Denkmallisten in Waltershausen in Thüringen oder in Fulda.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Für das einfache Auffinden haben wir eine Upload-Karte erstellt, in der viele aber leider noch nicht alle Kulturdenkmale angezeigt werden können. Das Laden der Objekte dauert dort etwas.

Wir haben dieses Jahr „drei Sonderpreise für Bilder von Friedhöfen“ ausgelobt. Zugelassen sind für den Sonderpreis auch Fotos von Friedhöfen, die nicht denkmalgeschützt sind.

Damit es ab 1. September mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos via the new Upload-Map 

Upload your photos for the special price 

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2023 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool 

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 12:19, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Account uploads files copyvio

Tuoitrenews, this account uploads many file copyvio Sử dụng hợp lí (talk) 03:49, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

All nominated for deletion. --Didym (talk) 09:32, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

More file delete

• File:Leducanh2.jpg, still have copyright.

Sử dụng hợp lí (talk) 14:20, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

My uploads

Hello. You’ve deleted all my uploads to this website without a clear reason why. Could you either explain your rationale or reverse your actions? Monerals (talk) 13:44, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

See COM:L. --Didym (talk) 13:45, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Paul Niel headshot.png

See the caption in the source for permission. I'm not sure when it is proper to remove the tag. I am the vengeance you seek (talk) 20:05, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

There is a license, but without a name, the BY part is just impossible. --Didym (talk) 13:11, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

BY part? I updated the source. I am the vengeance you seek (talk) 21:13, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

In that case, you can add the author, remove the tag and add {{Licensereview}}. --Didym (talk) 15:59, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Two files crop from the file copyvio upload by Tuoitrenews

• File:Lê Đức Anh (cropped).jpg
• File:Lê Đức Anh (cropped) (2).jpg

Two files crop from File: Lê Đức Anh.jpg i nominated for deletion earlier Sử dụng hợp lí (talk) 11:55, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Both deleted. Actually, you can use {{Speedydelete}} for such cases. --Didym (talk) 21:16, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Freigabe für File:Wikipedia_Stuttgart_2023-09.jpg

Könntest Du bitte wieder? - Danke! Mussklprozz (talk) 15:45, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

ticket:2023091010003856 --Didym (talk) 16:22, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Danke :-) Mussklprozz (talk) 20:40, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Adding to Commons:Questionable Flickr images/Users

Hi there! Would you mind adding this account to Commons:Questionable Flickr images/Users? This is likely a Flickrwashing account, they uploaded several images that are not original, no author permissions found and presented as their own work (copyright violation). Thanks!!! Đại Việt quốc (talk) 23:21, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

You are probably right, but I don't see enough evidence to do this without a discussion. However, I have added a comment at this DR. --Didym (talk) 23:40, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Your Deletion of photo 9-26-2023

You deleted the photo of Antica Macelleria Ceccini from a page I was editing,

https://depositphotos.com/photos/panzano.html?qview=415415910

but the source of this photo states : "18 Panzano pictures are available under a royalty-free license."

I'm confused. CocoPazzo (talk) 16:57, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

And what makes you believe that "royalty-free license" is equivalent to CC BY-SA 4.0? Also, you did claim the file as own work, which it isn't. --Didym (talk) 21:57, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Imagem deletada indevidamente

Prezado bom dia. Informo que solicitei o imediato restauro do arquivo File:ValidadorMetrôBH pois o mesmo não viola direitos autorais, já que se trata de uma foto tirada por mim mesmo e devidamente sinalizada assim no momento de seu carregamento. Leandro Gonçalves CMB (talk) 13:29, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Taking a screenhot from [1] does not make it your own work. --Didym (talk) 15:29, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

I didn't take a screenshot. I took the photo with my personal phone 2804:33CC:161A:3800:4FF:7A2B:553C:DA13 16:38, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

In that case, you can upload the photo in full camera resoultion with intact Exif data. --Didym (talk) 16:40, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Urheberrwecht Foto Rolf kleinert

Hallo Didym, herzlichen Dank für die Hilfe. Es ist so: Ich habe dieses Foto von der Fotografin Evelin Richter, sie ist gestorben und ihr Bruder Peter Richter ist der Rechteerbe. Ich habe über das Evelin Richter Archiv Leipzig, die mit Peter Richter in Kontakt steht, von ihm die Erlaubnis des auf die Wikipedie-Seite zu stellen. Das reicht aber scheinbar eben nicht aus. Auszug aus meinem Mailverkehr:

Anfrage:

Sehr geehrte Frau Stoschek,

vielen Dank für Ihre Recherche. Ist es möglich, das Bild im Internet ohne weiteres zu veröffentlichen? Oder kann ich einen Kontakt zu Peter Richter in Dresden bekommen? Ich möchte keinen Fehler machen.

Besten Dank noch einmal für Ihre Unterstützung!

Antwort:

Ich hatte Rücksprache mit Herrn Richter und er ist einverstanden, mit herzlichem Gruß, Jeannette Stoschek

Im Auftrag

Dr. Jeannette Stoschek
Leiterin Sammlungen / Stellvertretende Direktorin
_____________________________________
Stadt Leipzig, Der Oberbürgermeister

Kulturamt

Museum der bildenden Künste Leipzig
Katharinenstraße 10
04109 Leipzig

+ 49 (0) 341 216 999 40
jeannette.stoschek@leipzig.de 
www.mdbk.de

www.leipzig.de

So sieht es aus. Besten Dank. ÖstlDwin (talk) 10:59, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Eine Freigabe müsste über das VRT laufen, zudem sagt diese E-Mail noch nichts über die Lizenz aus. --Didym (talk) 16:13, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Account uploads files copyvio

Quynh834 (talk · contribs), this account uploads many file copyvio 183.182.121.140 13:10, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

All nominated for deletion. --Didym (talk) 13:29, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Issue

Have a good time, I'd like you to urgently stay all files nominated for deletion in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Raisa Vasilyeva - Wikimedia Commons.

A nominator alleges that there are "fake licenses" of these photos, but three of four photos are licensed properly, and only one may be disputed. One of the uploaders of the photos is allegedly blocked on ru.wiki, but that has no relation whatsoever to the question of deleting the photos on Wikimedia Commons. All photos depict a Soviet singer who is the member of my family (my aunt).

File:R. Vasilyeva (my own photo).jpg - this file is uploaded by me from my second account, which I created because I had forgotten the password of this account for the few days. The photo is taken by me during the festival and clearly contains the tag "my own photo" and "has no copyright".

File:Vasilyeva.jpg - this photo is taken from my family album and therefore I am the legal owner of copyright for this image. It's uploaded from this account of mine.

File:Sovjet-zangeres Raisa Vasilyeva.jpg - this photo is not uploaded by me but its existence in Commons is proper because 1) it is preserved in Dutch National Archives under the CC license and 2) it is also originally my photo, from my family album, I don't know how it appeared in the national archives but I have no objection against that and I also have no objection against using this photo for public purposes.

The nominator also mentions some unrelated deletion request associated with persons I don't know and who have no relation to my aunt, so this has no sense as well. Based on this, I ask you to urgently stay these pictures as lawfully uploaded to Wikimedia with proper copyright. Nevtreh (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Why? One of the files might be licensed correctly, but the rest certainly is not. You can't put a CC license on material you don't own. --Didym (talk) 00:40, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

But as I've said, I am the legal owner of all three files. Two Soviet pictures are from my album which I own. I agree to delete the fourth file, File:Раиса Никоновна Васильева.jpg, because it is a duplicate + not uploaded by me and with dubious license, and I also can add copyright notes to other three pictures, but the issue is that I own all three of them. Nevtreh (talk) 00:51, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

You may own a copy of those images, but that does not mean you also own the copyright. --Didym (talk) 00:54, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

That's the thing that I do not own the copies, I own the original photos. There's nobody that would own their copyrights, the original photographers are unknown and the only one person who would be in charge of directing how to distribute these pictures is me. Nevtreh (talk) 00:57, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

If you don't even know the photographers, what makes you think they transferred any rights to you? --Didym (talk) 01:00, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

File:Sovjet-zangeres Raisa Vasilyeva.jpg is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Netherlands license, so there's no issue because there are thousands of pictures from the National Archives available on Commons. Speaking of File:Vasilyeva.jpg, it is a public domain because under the Soviet law the pictures whose photographers are publicly unknown went to the public domain. So let me correct myself, it is not my personal photo, it belongs to me but technically is a public domain because remains uncopyrighted by anyone. Nevtreh (talk) 01:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Could you help me to tag the picture in question with Soviet public domain template? Nevtreh (talk) 01:06, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

File:Sovjet-zangeres Raisa Vasilyeva.jpg does not even have a valid source. And if you don't know the photographer, that does not make an image an anonymous work. --Didym (talk) 01:09, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

The law of the Soviet Union dictated that photos whose photographers are publicly unknown remain the public domain. That's not just me not knowing the photographer, it's about the fact that the whole country which loved and listened to my aunt songs did not know the author. I would be more than happy to upload USSR public domain tags to both pictures, but I am not an experienced user so would really appreciate your help in finding them (if you have some time). Nevtreh (talk) 01:16, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Not like own work

• File:Anhcuong3.webp,source https://tuoitre.vn/de-nghi-ky-luat-bi-thu-quang-nam-phan-viet-cuong-20231116150504164.htm

Sử dụng hợp lí (talk) 14:18, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

You can actually use {{Copyvio}} for files like this. --Didym (talk) 16:17, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Fröhliche Weihnachten!

Friedvolle Weihnachten und ein gesundes, glückliches neues Jahr 2024! -- Radomianin (talk) 11:47, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Critical race theory book display

Hi Didym! I noticed that you deleted File:Critical race theory book display.jpg following the nomination in which my keep !vote was the only participation. I think your reading of de minimis is a bit overly restrictive — looking at the de minimis policy, the situation is most analogous to the Copyrighted work X is identifiable and an unavoidable part of the subject, and is essential to the subject (e.g. blacking it out would make the file useless) but the work is shown in insufficient detail and/or with insufficient clarity, so de minimis may apply category, which has two examples of works with a similar level of detail that were ultimately kept. Given this, I'd ask that it be undeleted at least until others have had a chance to weigh in. Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 03:56, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Just imagine removing the book covers from the photo. There would be nothing left in the photo, so you can't apply de minimis. This is actually pretty close to the last example on COM:DM (#7, as you can't see the image on Commons, it's this image). --Didym (talk) 14:16, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

I disagree that it's analogous to #7. In that photo, the copyrighted covers are both clearly large enough to be readable and the only information of value in the photo. Whereas in this one, the book covers are small enough that they're mostly unintelligible unless you squint/zoom in, and the point of the photo is clearly not to let viewers see a copyrighted work but rather to show the ensemble display as a whole. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 17:13, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

The photo only contains copyrighted material, which means you can't apply de minimis, regardless of a higher resolution. --Didym (talk) 23:36, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

That's not true, as the book covers are only one element of the photo. Given that our stances do not seem reconcilable, I'll take it to undeletion to gather further input. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 03:34, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Bildlöschung

Hallo, warum wurden meiner Bilder gelöscht? "Julia Wegner", "Ralf Bruhn", Küstenrebellen". Die Rechte an diesen Bilder gehören mir (Privatfotos). Wer löscht hier willkürlich Bilder von den Seiten?Coastrebel-01 (talk) 15:26, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Zu den Bildern fehlt weiterhin eine Freigabe des Urhebers per VRTS. --Didym (talk) 15:52, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Delete

• File:Tranluuquang1.jpg, source:https://thanhnien.vn/qua-trinh-cong-tac-cua-pho-thu-tuong-tran-luu-quang-post1539088.html

183.182.120.233 14:46, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

You can actually use {{Copyvio}} for files like this. --Didym (talk) 16:10, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

File:Wutha23 Mosbacher Sportverein 1911 eV.JPG

Der an der Parkplatzzufahrt stehende Werbeträger wechselt wöchentlich die Bildmotive. Ich habe das betreffende Foto in Frontalaufnahme durch ein alternatives Foto ersetzt, bei dem nur noch der Werbeträger und die Parkplatzzufahrt zu sehen sind. Ich arbeite für Openstreetmap - das ist jetzt ein Belegfoto für diese Straßeneinmündung und Parkplatzzufahrt. Der Löschhinweis bzgl, Sportverein ist somit gegenstandslos geworden. EACC80 (talk) 13:16, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Die Löschung der ursprünglichen Version ist immer noch notwendig, die aktuelle Version sollte so aber in Ordnung sein. --Didym (talk) 15:56, 29 December 2023 (UTC)