User talk:Di (they-them)/Archive 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
File:Trollface Emoji.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 08:49, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

File:A Shiba Inu dog wearing a beret and black turtleneck DALLE2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TilmannR (talk) 20:01, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Tierra del Fuego stamp 1994.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 14:16, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Эlcobbola talk 21:40, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

FOP and speedy deletion

Please note that images should not be nominated for speedy deletion because of FOP. See COM:CSD#F3: "This does not apply to photographs taken in a public place, though the photograph itself remains subject to the other speedy criteria if its authorship is in question. Given the complexity of copyright rules like freedom of panorama and de minimis, it is best for such issues to be resolved in a formal deletion request." King of ♥ 00:11, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

I see that you've just categorised the above on Commons as Christian headgear. There is no mention of it being specifically Christian headgear in its WP article? Early Quakers wore them, but they were supposed to wear clothes that blended in, and at that time everybody wore them. Victorian artists adopted them, together with the smock. They are currently on sale in trekking shops in the UK, and I wear one all the time, with flowers on it, and I don't have any religion. It's also a traditional hat in Australia - the one that cartoonists draw corks hanging from, to keep flies away. So do you have evidence that I'm wearing Christian headgear? If not, I'll remove the category. Thanks. Storye book (talk) 20:00, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

@Storye book: The hat is closely associated with Quakers, and is still considered to be "traditional Quaker clothing" and is still worn by conservative sects that wear traditional clothing. It is of course not exclusively religious, but I believe that it counts as Quaker clothing in certain contexts. Di (they-them) (talk) 20:43, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Brothers Bratt, 1860
Ah, that must be an American category, then. Some of my friends are quakers , and there are meeting houses in my two nearest towns, here in the UK, but I have never seen any of them wearing any kind of hat. So that's fine then - the category just doesn't apply to the quakers in my area - though there may be a conservative quaker group in London, I suppose. The picture shows the Brothers Bratt at a Quaker meeting at Devonshire House, London, in 1860. As you see, the other quakers were wearing normal Victorian clothes, so the Bratt bros. were considered eccentric for insisting on wearing their father's clothes, so said the newspapers at the time. I tried to track them down for an article, but could not find enough material. I think they may have been tailors. Storye book (talk) 09:02, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Sketch of American Quakers visiting London, 1860
Update. Ah, hang on - I've just realised. On the cover is a picture of Emilie Dorothy Hilliard Willson (New York c. 1838 - Leeds 18 January 1899) who later became the wife of JJ Willson, the artist. Emilie was the daughter of architect John Hilliard (d. before 1861) of New York. She is with her sister, both wearing headscarves, and the man in the hat is possibly her father or an uncle. (Note the Gilead-type bonnet on the mother/aunt!) But I hadn't realised before, that the father/uncle is wearing a wideawake! But the first picture raises a question about the wideawake hat. Today in the UK, we understand the wideawake to be an Australian hat with a flat brim, as mine is. You can lift one or both sides of the brim and fix it to the crown with press studs (poppers in US), but it's still really a flat brim. That is what the American uncle/father is wearing - you can see him to the left of the Bratt brothers. But seeing the three of them side by side - the Bratt Brothers are wearing a hat with an intentionally curved brim. Side by side, the two styles look quite different. I'm wondering whether they are two named styles of hats, not one style? Just wondering. Storye book (talk) 09:36, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Эlcobbola talk 11:31, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Ryu (Street Fighter Figure).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

King of ♥ 06:12, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

British Middle East Command emblem

Great to see that you created the emblem of the British Middle East Command, but there is a mistake - the lower part of the shield should be dark blue, not black. If you make an image search in Google for "Middle East Command", you will see that almost all badges are blue. Moreover, the Imperial War Museum says it's blue: https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/30072799 188.22.182.206 19:32, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

One addition - red and blue makes more sense because of the British flag. 188.22.182.206 20:42, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
@188.22.182.206: Thank you, I have fixed the file. Di (they-them) (talk) 20:43, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Royal cypher

You were very quick whipping up the new cypher! Will you please make an SVG of the Scottish version too? Same idea, different crown. (I wonder if it will appear on Scottish postboxes, unlike the QEII one?) GPinkerton (talk) 23:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

The elements of the cypher are different from the version here: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/sep/26/king-charles-iiis-official-monogram-design-released-by-palace Can you explain why you think the file should not be amended to match that graphic? Also, do these elements not match the threshold of originality in the UK? Do you own the copyright to this particular arrangement of these elements? —Justin (koavf)TCM 23:26, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

@Koavf: In heraldry, elements do not need to be exactly the same across renditions. Heraldic elements follow what is called a blazon, or a description, and any image that follows that description is correct. For example, the crown used is the Tudor crown, and it doesn't need to have the ermine spots follow the same direction etc as long as it is the same object described. See Template:Coa blazon. As far as copyright, the arrangement of letters is simply an application of text, which cannot be copyrighted in the United States. Wikimedia Commons servers are in the USA, so they follow USA copyright law regarding things such as threshold of originality. See File:Cyberpunk 2077 logo US Copyright Office decision.pdf for how the US doesn't protect text images regardless of complexity under copyright law. Di (they-them) (talk) 23:35, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
"Wikimedia Commons servers are in the USA, so they follow USA copyright law regarding things such as threshold of originality." This is not true, see (e.g.): Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/United_Kingdom#Threshold_of_originality. Please familiarize yourself with our copyright policies, as files must have acceptable licenses or copyright statuses both in the United States and in its place of origin, if that is not the States. —Justin (koavf)TCM 23:38, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Royal cypher of Charles III of the United Kingdom.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Justin (koavf)TCM 23:44, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

House of Savoy coats of arms

Hi Di, how are you? I wish you well. I'll come back to make you an old proposal, that of modernizing some of the Savoy coats of arms. I saw that you made some other coat of arms, as usual very well, and I wanted to reproduce some others below. I hope with this request not to disturb you excessively. Thanks in advance and let me know!

Giorgio Pallavicini (talk) 12:15, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Grogu 3D model.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Grogu, colloquially referred to as Baby Yoda, is a character from the Star Wars Disney+ original television series The Mandalorian. Copyright undoubtedly belongs to Disney.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Headlock0225 (talk) 07:06, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Jreg Guevara.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-M.nelson (talk) 09:30, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Batman and Superman.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 08:45, 10 November 2022 (UTC)