User talk:Dhatfield
Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
--SieBot 23:31, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello Dhatfield!
Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.
To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.
You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.
The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!
Thank you. Dhatfield (talk) 13:23, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Coat_of_Arms_of_Johannesburg_v3.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Lokal_Profil 17:59, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
- Ahhh, the innocent days before I understood copyleft. It had to go. Dhatfield (talk) 22:30, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
RE:Polar bear nursing author
[edit]Hi,Dhatfield.
I responded on my talk page. Let's keep it there in one place. It is going to be easier to follow.--Mbz1 (talk) 14:47, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
- I should not have changed the author information without notifying you first. Please accept my apology, Doug.--Mbz1 (talk) 13:21, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Please link images
[edit]
Hello Dhatfield!
Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.
To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.
You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.
The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!
Thank you. BotMultichill (talk) 12:41, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Protein images
[edit]Hey, thanks for the compliment. All were made from PDB files available here (or here for membrane-associated proteins, though I don't use it as often as I should). Most were made with Accelrys DS Visualizer, but I've been trying to get the hang of PyMOL since late last year and I mostly use Accelrys for molecular models now. There is a dearth of 3D imagery over here, but at least we have plenty of high-quality photography. The heraldry area (a personal favorite of mine) is pretty much covered as well, which I think is quite impressive. I used to be quite handy with Blender, but it's all gone now—shame, I could be helping out with 3D goodness in other areas :) Fvasconcellos (t·c) 14:09, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Image:Standard Model of Elementary Particles.svg
[edit]Hi Dhatfield! Your image Image:Standard Model of Elementary Particles.svg seems to be achieving widespread use on Wikipedia. However, the masses in the lepton sector are not correct. Please fix this as soon as possible, or I think we need to remove this image from the articles which link to it. -- 129.57.115.159 18:46, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
- I'm on it. Dhatfield (talk) 19:30, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
- Done. Next time, please follow the link to the Graphics Lab that I placed on the discussion page of every article where I placed the image, and join the discussion of the image there. Thanks. Dhatfield (talk) 19:57, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
teapot
[edit]You're welcome! And no, I don't have a bot (otherwise the edits would be marked as such), but I am kind of a categorization maniac :P I am sure you'll learn about it soon. Should you have any questions, feel free to ask, I'll try to help as much as I can. Cheers, Waldir talk 22:37, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
why dont you upload the image Image:Plant cell structure svg 2.svg on top of the Image:Plant cell structure svg.svg that way there is no need for 2 images, dont you think? -LadyofHats (talk) 12:18, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Sz-iwbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot (talk) 02:31, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
TUSC token 56fc517638d8ddf89f906a774d0ad0b4
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Non-public-domain component in M1 Abrams Tank image.
[edit]I found a texture called "Sand" in the M1 Abrams Tank image. It's under CC Attribution license, not public domain as the rest of your image. I put a note in the Wikimedia page to that effect. I think my note satisfies the attribution requirement :-) Please watch out for these, if you have used them in other images the info page for the image should note that they are included, their license, and their source.
On further examination, it may be that this is a stock Inkscape texture, and Inkscape didn't mention its ownership through the GUI, although it put the ownership information in the text of the SVG file. If that's the case, it's probably happening to other image authors too. Bruce Perens (talk) 00:23, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- I have no idea what Inkscape places in the source automatically, but I can assure you that there is nothing but pure, standards compliant SVG in this image and I certainly did not put a "Sand" texture in it. If you can see it, call me. Wikilawyering is so unattractive. Dhatfield (talk) 22:49, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
[edit]
Hola! te felicito por esta imagen Molecular_Modeling.png, quisiera saber si me podrías decir con qué programa la hiciste, por favor, y disculpa por escribirte en español, que no me es fácil escribir en inglés, no me hubieras entendido. Ojalá puedas decirme para yo también poder usar ese programa (me gusta mucho la química, y la calidad de la mayoría de las imágenes en 3D que se encuentran de sus moléculas)para hacer nuevas imágenes de moléculas para aportar a wikipedia y commons...De antemano gracias
- Google translate:"Hello! I congratulate you on this picture Molecular_Modeling.png, I wondered if I could say which program you made, please write and apology in Spanish, I do not write in English is easy, you had not understood. May you also tell me I could use that program (I like the chemistry and the quality of most 3D images that are of their molecules) to make new images of molecules to contribute to wikipedia and commons ... thanks in advance"
- I made this with POVray, after getting the source file from Ed Boas. POVray is very powerful, but takes more time than I have these days. If you are starting out with modelling and rendering I would recommend "Blender", it is probably available in Spanish. Best if luck with your modelling efforts! Dhatfield (talk) 21:45, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Schrodinger's cat
[edit]Doug,
I would like to use your figure "Schrodinger's Cat" in a forthcoming book. Can I have your permission to do so, and what is your preferred wording for the attribution?
Thanks,
David Griffiths Physics Department Reed College
File source is not properly indicated: File:P4M1.png
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:P4M1.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:13, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi ; new level 4 for you ?
VG-4 | This user is able to contribute with an expert level on vector graphics. |
--Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 14:37, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ludopedia (talk • contribs) 20:36, 08 October 2015 (UTC)
Flotation cell.jpg
[edit]Hello. I need to do a similar job of this image: File:Flotation cell.jpg, myself. May I please ask you what 3D software you used to make the model and the Renderer you used afterwards ? Thanks a lot in advance if you can reply. -- — Ludopedia(Talk) 20:35, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
File:P2M-1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Geek3 (talk) 23:28, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
File:P2M1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Geek3 (talk) 23:28, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:T34 2.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:T34 2.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:T34 2.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Alex Spade (talk) 09:37, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Orbital diagrams available in SVG?
[edit]Hi Doug, really love your orbital diagrams as shown on [Atomic orbitals]. Do you have them available in SVG, or could I hire you to create 3-D animated SVGs? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucent (talk • contribs) 23:09, 29 June 2020 (UTC)