User talk:DerHexer/archive02/archive01

My RfA

Hi, DerHexer. I deeply appreciate your support in my recent nomination. Finally, I've been appointed and I'm ready to go on working (this time with some extra buttons). If you need anything from me, don't hesitate to contact me. I'll be glad to help. Best regards and thank you again. --Ecemaml (talk to me/habla conmigo) 21:30, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. :) DerHexer 20:06, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RFA

Thank you
Thank you for voting on my request for adminship. The result was unanimously in support, which really surprised and overwhelmed me. I'll do everything I can to make sure that it was justified.

-Adam Cuerden

You're welcome. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 23:38, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo DerHexer,
zu deiner Info: User:XDepiclulz hat 2 verunstaltete Versionen deines Userfotos hochgeladen. Ich habe ihn darauf wegen attack-images für 1 Tag (nach Empfehlung von Spacebirdy: indef) gesperrt. Spacebirdy hat die Bilder gelöscht. --Túrelio (talk) 16:34, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

o_O Danke für die Information! Grüße, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:48, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, DerHexer/archive02!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:45, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ancient Greek theatre in Dodona 5.jpg is uncategorized since 13 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:45, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Paderborn townhall concordia.png is uncategorized since 26 May 2009.
Image:DerHexer 2010.jpg was uncategorized on 19 June 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:38, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Malbork (DerHexer) 2010-07-14 273 ungestürzt.jpg was uncategorized on 1 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:38, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Medientag Großbeeren DerHexer Metaversa e.V..jpg was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:09, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:DerHexer.png was uncategorized on 23 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:35, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reporting this vandalism to me. :P —DerHexer (Talk) 22:04, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Hanover

Hallo, ich bitte Dich, die Bilder von Hannover nicht einfach im Hauptverzeichnis abzuladen, sondern möglichst sauber in die passenden Unterverzeichnisse einzuordnen. Danke! -- Ies (talk) 17:33, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, das mache ich noch. Bis dahin wird auf de:Wikipedia_Diskussion:Hannover/CeBIT#Einfach_klasse... noch über die genaue Bezeichnung, die dann in die Beschreibung übertragen wird, philosophiert. Motto in diesem Projekt ist dennoch: Besser eine (Über)kategorie als keine Kategorie. Ansonsten würde das Bild vermutlich nie wiedergefunden. Grüße, —DerHexer (Talk) 17:41, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Xanthoproteinreaction.png

Hallo DerHexer, ich bin da auf ein Relikt von dir gestoßen ;-). Hast du die Möglichkeit eine verbesserte Version hochzuladen? Gruß, --NEUROtiker ^⇌ 18:49, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Die guten alten Zeiten. ;o) —DerHexer (Talk) 22:40, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token a95c8746eaf018ea110aa58bd0c93f3b

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Nochmal Category:Hanover

Hallo Hexer, ich bitte Dich nochmals, Deine Bilder von Hannover nicht einfach im Hauptverzeichnis abzuladen, sondern möglichst sauber in die passenden Unterverzeichnisse einzuordnen. Voriges mal hast Du es zwar versprochen („Ja, das mache ich noch“), aber nicht getan. Also habe ich hinter Dir hergeräumt. Da nun schon wieder seit einigen Wochen neue Bilder von Dir im Hauptverzeichnis stehen, weiß ich nicht so recht, was ich davon halten soll. Möchtest Du wirklich, dass andere hinter Dir herräumen oder kennst Du Commons:Categories nicht? Dann lese es Dir bitte mal durch. Wie Du vielleicht schon bemerkt hast, wirkt das Nichtaufräumen ansteckend. So wie auf einen Dreckhaufen bedenkenlos weiterer Dreck geworfen wird, werden auch unsaubere Kategorien bald bedenkenlos zugemüllt. Sei also so nett und gebe nicht weiterhin ein schlechtes Beispiel. Danke und Gruß, -- Ies (talk) 14:50, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Die Präferenz für diese Aufgabe erachte ich in Anbetracht der anderen Tätigkeiten, die ich ausübe, als äußerst gering; allein deswegen habe ich dies noch nicht getan; weitere Bilder habe ich im Übrigen nicht hochgeladen. Wie du selbst schreibst, sollten sich diese Dateien „möglichst“ nicht im Hauptverzeichnis befinden. Ein Besucher, der Bilder aus Hannover sucht, wird zwangsläufig auch die Hauptkategorie durchkämmen. Wenn er gründlich ist, muss er so oder so jedes Bild einmal begutachten; darauf sich zu verlassen, dass die Bilder jeweils in der richtigen Sub-Kategorie sind, mag nicht immer sinnvoll sein. Letztendlich könnte man sich aber auch eine Category:Hanover komplett ersparen und nur Sub-Kategorien erstellen, um die Mitarbeiter zum besseren Kategorisieren zu zwingen. Wobei ich bezweifle, dass Zwang der richtige Weg ist. … Den flapsigen Kommentar mit Commons:Categories überlese ich mal. Im Übrigen: Ja, ich habe nichts dagegen, wenn Leute mehr wissen als ich und besser beurteilen können, was ich auf meinem Foto aufgenommen habe. Dies nennt man Wikiprinzip. Genau das gleiche mache ich momentan in w:de:Kategorie:Latein, wo ich Artikel hin- und herschubsen muss, weil sie falsch kategoriert wurden. Ob nun aus mangelnder Kenntnis, Irrtum oder etwas anderem; vorwerfen, dass jemand das so und nicht anders kategoriert hat, werde ich das niemandem. Dazu sind wir ein Gemeinschaftsprojekt, indem einander geholfen wird. Schließlich habe ich keinen Dreck oder Müll hier beigetragen, wie dein hinkender Vergleich mir weismachen will, sondern Bilder zur Verbesserung unserer Projektes, zur Verbesserung der Artikel und Bilddatenbank (und nicht primär der Kategorien). So frage ich dich also, betreffen die Bilder nicht Hannover? Wenn doch, gehören sie in die Kategorie:Hannover; wenn Sub-Kategorien dazu aufgemacht werden (vielleicht ja sogar nach meinem Hochladen), kann man schlecht dazu gezwungen werden, dies ohne die nötige Kenntnis (denn auch jetzt müsste ich mich erst intensiv damit beschäftigen, was ich wie wann genau aufgenommen habe; ein Fachmann für Hannover könnte dies viel schneller beurteilen und korrigieren) möglicherweise noch falsch nachzuholen. Um dem Frieden genüge zu tun, werde ich mal schauen, ob ich in den nächsten Tag eben diese zuvor genannte Beurteilung der Bilder zeitlich bewältigen und diese Bilder dann gleich auf einem adäquaten Namen verschieben kann. Grüße, —DerHexer (Talk) 23:33, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Irgendwann mal gemacht, müssten jetzt noch die Bilder umbenannt werden. Naja … Grüße, —DerHexer (Talk) 22:39, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Peripatos

Hallo DerHexer,

du hast mal das Bild Peripatos Acropolis Athens.jpg hinzugefügt mit der Beschreibung das dies ein Peripatos sei. Wahrscheinlich meinst Du damit, dass es sich hierbei um einen Säulengang handeln würde. Diesen Ausdruck habe ich aber in diesem Zusammenhang noch nie irgendwo gesehen - sie werden dann meist als Stoa bezeichnet. Ich glaube, dass diese Beschriftung auf einer Mauer direkt unterhalb der Akropolis von Athen steht und mit Peripatos nicht die Mauer sondern den Weg daneben meint. Siehe hierzu auch mal in Wikipedia unter Peripatos (Akropolis).

Gruß Schuppi (talk) 16:52, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Das war natürlich richtig. Ist genauer gesagt die Stoa des Eumenes. Danke für den Hinweis! :-) —DerHexer (Talk) 22:37, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krone Inn, Lüneburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Have nothing to oppose. --Niabot 11:09, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skillshare, Alter Hafen Lüneburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments minimal overexposure, but QI though. good composition. --Smial 21:20, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Nicholas Church, Lüneburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment corrected perspective distortion DerHexer 12:56, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Now good. -- Smial 13:02, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alpinia purpurata.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

File:Freiburg im Breisgau (DerHexer) 01.jpg

Please take care about license tag. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your hint. Very strange, I seem to have forgotten to choose that in Commonist. Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:33, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Skillshare, Alter Hafen Lüneburg.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Skillshare, Alter Hafen Lüneburg.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 12:58, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Train SU42 in Hel, part 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- MJJR 20:45, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Królewski and Filharmonia Bałtycka Gdańsk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. -- Der Wolf im Wald 21:55, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pelargonium graveolens in Hel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments imo a bit undersaturated but very nice --Carschten 13:44, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gate of the drawbridge in Malbork Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Carschten 13:44, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cupboard in Malbork.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 19:28, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tombstone of the knight Wolf von der Oelsnitz in Malbork.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Johannes Robalotoff 19:12, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amber-coloured sarcophagus-type casket in Malbork.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I love it --Carschten 13:19, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ZIL-131 in Malbork.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Carschten 13:15, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Circular stairs in Hel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments interesting --Mbdortmund 13:16, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Train SU42 in Hel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Carschten 13:15, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centralne Muzeum Morskie and SS Sołdek in Gdańsk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice comp --Carschten 13:15, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ship

Guten Tag, DerHexer!
Just for information: ship named "Agat". Correct category is MS Agat (added now).
For a ship identification good way is search by IMO number.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:35, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thanks. It was clear on File:Żegluga Gdańska in Hel.jpg but on File:Żegluga Gdańska in Hel, part 2.jpg I neither was able to see the name nor to remember if it was the same ship. But the IMO numbers are the same, shame on me, I could have seen that (but it still could have been the number of ship class or whatsoever, well …). ;o) Thanks again and kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 21:26, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mousetrap in the mill of Malbork.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI. Yann 14:56, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mill in Malbork, part 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI. Yann 15:07, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mill in Malbork.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI. Yann 15:07, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Żegluga Gdańska in Hel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some would miss "crispness" at full resolution, but it is still QI for me. --Johannes Robalotoff 10:37, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Middle keystone in the Chapel of St. Anne in Malbork showing Jesus Christ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Please fix the tilting. Pitke 17:37, 22 August 2010 (UTC) The face of Christ is correct. The columns are irregular. DerHexer 17:41, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I see... but I still think the face is a little tilted. The vertical and horizontal midlines of the face don't meet at right angle, so it's a bit tricky... I'll leave it for others. The image seems tad blurred for me though. Pitke 17:49, 22 August 2010 (UTC) The face is also irregular, and it's imho not too blurred. DerHexer 18:20, 22 August 2010 (UTC) Support (Unimportant) parts away from the center of the image appear a bit blurred, but only at full resulution, and not in a disturbing way. Christ is sharp enough for me. Also I see no tilt or distortion of the round Christ image in the center. --Johannes Robalotoff 10:58, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Żegluga Gdańska in Hel, part 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. Nice atmosphere -- George Chernilevsky 19:08, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Interior of Kościół św. Katarzyny in Gdańsk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Perspective correction needed. --Johannes Robalotoff 10:43, 29 August 2010 (UTC) Comment Better? --DerHexer 11:30, 29 August 2010 (UTC) Support OK now. --Johannes Robalotoff 13:41, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centralne Muzeum Morskie in Gdańsk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, perhaps a bit oversaturated. --Cayambe 17:18, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koszary schronowe in Gdańsk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok to me. --Cayambe 17:25, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wielki Młyn in Gdańsk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good now. --Cayambe 17:59, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Faience vase in Malbork.jpg

Guten Abend.
I really loved this pic. As you said it came from Delft, I add it in the Category:Delftware, I hope it is not wrong to you. Thanks ! --Jebulon (talk) 21:57, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo! That really makes me happy that you love it. :-) The official exhibition guide said that it was made in Delft so it should be correct. ;o) You can see two more images of it here and there. Unluckily I used a quite high ISO each time. :-( I now changed my camera setting so that I can avoid that nowadays. Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 23:03, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tombstone of Family Rump in Malbork.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Readable very well. Question does D really mean Datum, not Domini? --Ikar.us 09:22, 3 September 2010 (UTC) Comment All other word in German and Domini behind the year … well, I removed my interpretation. --DerHexer 10:27, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leaf & light.jpg

Thank you very much for your help ! Cheers, --Trachemys (talk) 17:12, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. :-) —DerHexer (Talk) 17:14, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brückenbasteien an der Nogat in Malbork.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments a bit dark in shadow, but good (evening ?) light otherwise. Nice place. A geocode would be appreciated. Thanks.--Jebulon 10:26, 4 September 2010 (UTC) Comment See EXIF data: 19:03. ;o) Will try to add geodata. --DerHexer 11:03, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cogwheel in Malbork.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok to me now. --Cayambe 08:31, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panorama of Malbork Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. Please, add geotag. --Cayambe 14:59, 4 September 2010 (UTC) Done --DerHexer 15:03, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faience vase in Malbork.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good to me--Jebulon 21:51, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buttermilch-Bastei in Malbork.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good!--Mbz1 01:34, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand Master’s Palace and Great Refectory in Malbork.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good!--Mbz1 01:34, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dansker und Brückenbasteien an der Nogat in Malbork.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good!--Mbz1 01:34, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panorama of Malbork Castle, part 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good!--Mbz1 01:34, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corridor to Toilet tower in Malbork.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The sharpness in foreground left and right is so-so, but the light is very good, especially on the vault. Il like the green and red (stained glass?) reflection too. QI to me--Jebulon 00:00, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Port authority of Hel, part 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Carschten 14:01, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruins and lighthouse in Hel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment please correct the perspective distortion --Carschten 15:54, 5 September 2010 (UTC) Done --DerHexer 16:55, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support good now --Carschten 17:05, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

garden vase in FPC

Hallo DerHexer

ich denke dass ich alles gut verstanden habe. Kein Problem für mich. Vielen Dank für deinen Arbeit. Freundlich aus Paris--Jebulon (talk) 17:36, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, liebe Grüße zurück aus Berlin. :-) —DerHexer (Talk) 17:47, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Slovenian grapevines in Malbork.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good to me, but please add species information (Vitis vinifera?). --Quartl 11:41, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lighthouse of Hel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment please correct the perspective distortion --Carschten 15:54, 5 September 2010 (UTC) Done --DerHexer 16:55, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment there are still distortions --Carschten 17:05, 5 September 2010 (UTC) Comment I now used ShiftN default correction. --DerHexer 23:23, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think it still keels over but it's better now. Weak Support --Carschten 16:42, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hummer H3 in Hel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --Carschten 12:47, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kitchen of Malbork Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks good. Rama 20:40, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge between High and Middle Castle in Malbork, part 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks good. Rama 20:40, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge between High and Middle Castle in Malbork.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks good. Rama 20:40, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Żuraw in Gdańsk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Informative, Useful, Good technical quality. --MrPanyGoff 10:35, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malbork Castle in the afternoon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments What a place ! What a light ! --Jebulon 23:34, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panorama of Malbork Castle, part 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Question Any particular reason why you call these panoramas? Were they stitched? Look like 'lowish' landscapes to me. Lycaon 14:28, 9 September 2010 (UTC) Comment „A panorama (formed from Greek πᾶν "all" + ὅραμα "sight") is any wide-angle view or representation of a physical space“; the whole side of Malbork Castle can be seen there; not stitched. I could of course rename them, but is that really needed for QIC? Does it harm the quality of the images? --DerHexer 20:11, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nope, no need to rename them, it was just a technical question... Lycaon 22:37, 9 September 2010 (UTC) "Ah, permettez, de grâce, que pour l'amour du grec, Monsieur, on vous embrasse !" Molière, les Femmes Savantes. QI to me--Jebulon 22:48, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! High Castle and bastions in Malbork.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good--Lmbuga 21:53, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dansker und Marienburg neu-Carschten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good cooperation ! --Jebulon 22:27, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrance to High Castle in Malbork.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments okay --Carschten 18:05, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrance to Middle Castle of Malbork Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Das Foto ist ohne Zweifel gut, könnte aber noch etwas verbessert werden, wenn Du die Lichter an einigen Stellen etwas nachbelichten würdest, ich würde sogar insgesamt etwas dunkler belichten. mfg --Mbdortmund 16:57, 3 September 2010 (UTC) Comment Laut Histogramm passt eigentlich alles; Grundtenor eher zu dunkel; teilweise über- oder unterbelichtete Stellen sind reduziert. Wo meinst du, wäre eine Änderung noch sinnvoll? RAW ist noch da. --DerHexer 23:06, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Die Personengruppe (weiße Kleidung) vor dem Haus links und das Pflaster könnte imo etwas Belichtung vertragen; die Personen im Eingang zu stark aufgehellt (Rauschen); weiße Schilder hinter dem Schloss. --Mbdortmund 23:27, 3 September 2010 (UTC) Done --DerHexer 00:12, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK --Mbdortmund 23:41, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panorama of Malbork Castle, part 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice "pan" "orama" ;)--Jebulon 15:27, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Engines in SS Sołdek, Gdańsk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sure thing. Airwolf 22:02, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dansker in Malbork, part 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good - Albertus teolog 08:50, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FPC

Gratias agimus tibi propter magnam operam tuam. Laetatus sum. Te laudamus, te confitemur ! LOL ! Merci !--Jebulon (talk) 14:57, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sed debemus gratias agere propter operam tuam! :D —DerHexer (Talk) 15:18, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Królewski and Filharmonia Bałtycka in Gdańsk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Well chosen point of view, high resolution --Ikiwaner 15:12, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SS Sołdek in Gdańsk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Carschten 18:00, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SS Sołdek in Gdańsk, part 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Carschten 18:00, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jarlaxle attacks

Is it possible for you to protect all of my user and talk pages on wikis other than en.wikipedia? I don't really use them - so although JA's vandalism is therefore rather pointless, it would save you crosswiki sysops some work. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 00:49, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that this would prevent him from doing bad stuff. He would use other pages to link to you. But we of course could protect your pages. Semi? Full? Some pages would need to be created before protecting them. And I don't know if some people would complain that we'd protect on wikis with active sysops (but that would be our problem and not yours). Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 13:50, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please full-protect my user pages and semi the talk pages. I'm not an admin anywhere but en.wiki (if I was, I could take care of this myself), so I doubt anyone will complain. Thanks so much! NawlinWiki (talk) 14:42, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Underwater vehicle LTS-7 “Grześ” in Gdańsk, Poland - 20100715.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --George Chernilevsky 06:07, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Roman Emperor in FPC

Thanks for reviewing "my" Diocletian. I tried different backgrounds because of your comment, but I didn't find something attractive to me. Reds are impossible because of the base, idem for green variations. Greys are bad, because of the marble... Blues would be a nonsense IMO. Kaki, light marroon, softened yellow ? Then it suffers of lack of contrast... Well, it will stay with the black background I'm afraid... I cannot brighten the statue more, because of the risk of loosing details. I'l trully sorry, because I've some others busts like this one to show to you... Anyway, no worries ! Gruesse aus Paris !--Jebulon (talk) 23:51, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, they are Latine guys, my friend ! In te, DerHexer, speravi, non confundar in aeternum !! --Jebulon (talk) 23:56, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, no problem. I also tried some differently coloured backgrounds but was not satisfied with neither of them. So I accept it and will abstain from those elections, your pictures will pass anyway. ;o) —DerHexer (Talk) 09:08, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Jean Georg Haffner in Sopot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good !--Jebulon 00:01, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Żegluga Gdańska Onyx in Sopot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments gut --Pudelek 08:54, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Daunisch-subgeometrischer Doppelhenkeltopf, Hetjens-Museum Düsseldorf.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice --Carschten 16:35, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Defenders of the Polish Post Office in Gdańsk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and composition. Alofok 17:43, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krzywy Domek in Sopot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments interesting... houses o.O --Carschten 18:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument 21 x tak – Solidarność in Gdańsk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Carschten 19:29, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument to the Fallen Shipyard Workers of 1970 in Gdańsk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Carschten 19:29, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Creation of Marina in Sopot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Maybe a bit light, and I'd prefer it sharpened, but generally good. Mattbuck 13:43, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Duisburg

Hallo Hexer, aktuell statt der viel zu unspezifischen Category:Duisburg: Category:Condolences for Loveparade 2010 victims. -- Ies (talk) 14:33, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Die Spezifierung der Kategorien mach ich meist erst nach Upload, oftmals helfen mir da auch fleißige Kollegen. Danke schonmal dafür, dass du für einen größeren Bereich die Hauptkategorie herausgesucht hast. Gleich kommen noch Bilder vom Zoo. Grüße, —DerHexer (Talk) 14:38, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nymphaea alba in Duisburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good to me--Lmbuga 15:23, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Nymphaea alba in Duisburg.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nymphaea alba in Duisburg.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Panorama of Malbork Castle, part 4.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama of Malbork Castle, part 4.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Malbork

Hi,

wenn du magst, kannst du mir das RAW von File:Panorama of Malbork Castle, part 4.jpg oder einem anderen Bild, was du auf KEB zur Kandidatur stellst zukommen lassen und ich kann mich an die Bearbeitung machen. Ich hätte da noch Ideen, wie man was rauskitzeln könnte. Gruß --Wladyslaw (talk) 10:26, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank für dein Angebot! :-) Ob der fortgeschrittenen Stunde werde ich aber erst morgen Nachmittag/Abend darauf zurückkommen können. Liebe Grüße, —DerHexer (Talk) 01:56, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, danke für die Vorlage. Ich habe mich bei meiner Bearbeitung bemüht, ein möglichst ausgeglichenes und wohl ausgeleuchtetes Bild zu bekommen. Bei den meisten Bearbeitungen wirken mir die Farben etwas überdreht und damit die Schatten auch etwas zu hart. Ich hoffe, dass die Farben nicht zu blass geraten sind. Das könnte man allerdings bei der selben Dynamik sehr leicht noch ändern. Was leider nicht so gut ist: die Schärfe. Das liegt aber sehr wahrscheinlich am verwendeten Objektiv. Ich nehme sehr stark an, dass Du kein 2,8er-Objektiv hast. Lichtschwächere Objektive haben auch bei guten Lichtverhältnissen ofmals ein Problem mit der Schärfe. Das ist hier nicht gravierend aber doch zu bemerken. Wenn du noch weitere Wünsche oder Vorschläfe hast, dann lass es mich wissen. --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:49, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Düsseldorf (DerHexer) 2010-08-13 100.jpg

Was issen dis? --Kürschner (talk) 09:01, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Das ist im Senfmuseum eine Maschine zur Herstellung dieses Produktes. Ganz genau kann ich das leider nicht mehr sagen. Grüße und gesundes neues Jahr, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:17, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ich vermute im Kölner, nicht im Düsseldorfer Senfmuseum? Schon mal danke, gleichfalls beste Wünsche für's laufende Jahr von --Kürschner (talk) 20:25, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Es kristallisiert sich heraus, dass es doch das Düsseldorfer Museum ist? Dachte nicht, dass die dafür Platz haben, hatte es mit dem zweiten, viel älteren Senfladen verwechselt.--Kürschner (talk) 20:44, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fernmeldeturm_mit_geschlossener_Aussichtsplattform.jpg

File:Fernmeldeturm_mit_geschlossener_Aussichtsplattform.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

132.199.33.83 12:48, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Conference

Hallo Hexer, ich war zwar nicht dabei, aber trotzdem vielen Dank für die Bilder. Ich würde allerding empfehlen, noch {{Personality rights}} draufzukleben. Bei Abbildungen von lebenden Personen, die nicht alltäglich im Rampenlicht stehen, macht sich das immer gut. Gruß, De728631 (talk) 18:20, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, als ich gerade vom Essen zurück zum PC kam und den orangenen Balken sah, dachte ich mir, dass genau das noch vermerkt wird. Bei den nächsten Bildern zur Konferenz. Grüße, —DerHexer (Talk) 18:34, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:POL_Lipno_(jezioro_w_województwie_pomorskim)_02.jpg

Hallo DerHexer, File:POL_Lipno_(jezioro_w_województwie_pomorskim)_02.jpg zu überschreiben finde ich keine gute Idee. So ist es nunmal das 10M-Bild. Lade es doch bitte als neue Version hoch (derivativefx). Außerdem hätte ich auch noch eine anzubieten und ich bin mir sicher, dass noch weitere folgen werden. ;) Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 00:54, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nundenn... es machen noch mehr Leute so wie du.. ;-) Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 12:46, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ich hab das mit Leinad abgesprochen, er fand meine Version besser. Wieso dann nicht drüberladen, wenn dadurch das Bild auf den verlinkten Seiten besser zu erkennen ist? Grüße, —DerHexer (Talk) 23:56, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weil es dann nicht die 10M-Datei ist. Sehe ich zumindest so aus wissenschaftlicher Sicht. ;-) Und es ist nicht die Datei, die am Ende des "Countdowns" in NewFiles vorbeigerauscht ist.

Wer eine verbesserte Version verlinken wollte, könnte sich ja eine der Verbesserten aussuchen. Auch haben wir Commons:Avoid_overwriting_existing_files, was bei solch geringen Änderungen wie deiner oder meiner natürlich im Normal nicht so wichtig wäre.

Wie auch immer - hier nicht der richtige Ort für die Diskussion, wichtig es zu klären wäre es nur bis zur 15 millionsten Datei, nicht jetzt. :-) Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 00:42, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some bubble tea for you!

A kitten for you! Sargoth (talk) 21:26, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dankeschön … —DerHexer (Talk) 23:02, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nürnberg_(DerHexer)_2011-08-27_38.jpg

File:Nürnberg_(DerHexer)_2011-08-27_38.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

AndreasPraefcke (talk) 18:10, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Duisburg (DerHexer) 2010-08-11 038.jpg

Hello! Do you have anover foto of this aggregate? The foto is showing this aggregate from behind. But it is necessary a foto which is showing this aggregate from the front. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 13:35, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, unfortunately that's the only image I have that shows this aggergate. Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 15:11, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

user-namensänderung

hi "hexer", ich schlage dir vor deinen usernamen in "zauberlehrling" ändern zu lassen! weil du nämlich deinen "besen" [1] offenbar keinerlei brauchbare + wiederauffindbare beschreibungen beigefügt hast? oder wie soll man (in diesem zustand) damit etwas sinnvolles anfangen? dontworry (talk) 11:04, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dies betrifft ausschließlich einen Bruchteil der Bilder, die ich für Wiki loves Monuments hochgeladen habe. Alle anderen Fotos können eindeutig auch über die Beschreibung zugeordnet werden. Für die übrigen Bilder trage ich dies nach, für einen gewissen Teil sind korrekte Kategorien auch schon ergänzt. Grüße, —DerHexer (Talk) 13:54, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

na, na, bitte keine drohungen (von wegen: "nur ein bruchteil")! ;-) ich hab nur, z.b. bei deinen wetzlar-bildern [2] festgestellt, dass unter allen nur "Wetzlar (Der Hexer) WLM..." lesbar unter jedem bild steht (ausgeschrieben: z.b.: "File:Wetzlar (DerHexer) WLMMH 24455 2011-09-21 01.jpg" usw.) + frage mich, wie du das so sinnvoll einsortieren willst, dass auch andere darin etwas zu finden imstande sein sollen? geschweige denn, dass jemand anhand des namens auch nur den hauch von assotiationen zum denkmal haben könnte? dontworry (talk) 14:39, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anscheinend hatten wir uns auch falsch verstanden, ich dachte, du meintest die Dateibeschreibung in der Vorlage (da ist nun wirklich nur ein Bruchteil nicht gleich hunderprozentig einzuordnen), gemeint ist aber wohl die Dateibezeichnung selbst. Da ärgere ich mich nun vermutlich am meisten, dass ich mein Standardschema verwendet habe und nicht wie die anderen Kollegen von Wiki loves Monuments Mittelhessen mit der Denkmalnummer den Dateinamen anfangen ließ (File:65684 Lauterbach 06.jpg etc.). So erschwere ich mir ja selbst die Arbeit beim Erstellen der Kategorien und beim Einbinden der Bilder. Das ging sogar so weit, dass ich überlegte, die Dateien in deren Format umzubauen. Letztlich sind die Dateien aber sowohl im Kategorienbaum gut aufzufinden, wie auch in den Artikeln selbst (de:Liste der Kulturdenkmäler in Lauterbach (Hessen), de:Liste der Kulturdenkmäler in Maar etc.). Bin aber für gute Anregungen immer empfänglich! :-) Grüße, —DerHexer (Talk) 17:00, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

P. S.: Meine Ärgernis ist nicht mehr so groß, da ich mir ein Skript geschrieben habe, das die gekürzten Dateinamen komplett ausschreibt. —DerHexer (Talk) 19:31, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear DerHexer/archive02,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 21:03, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bildverwendung

Wie du http://archiv.twoday.net/stories/49590621/ entnehmen kannst bin ich nicht der Ansicht, dass du alle dir zugedachten Preise verdient hast. Ich gehe mal davon aus, dass nicht ohne Ansehen der Person gewertet wurde. --Historiograf (talk) 23:18, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zurzeit zeigt sich mir kein Indiz, den Äußerungen der Juroren zu misstrauten. Meine Reihenfolge wäre sicherlich eine andere gewesen, gerade auch bei meinen eigenen Bildern. Von den zehn Siegern gefällt mir kompositorisch am ehesten File:Krefeld, Egelsbergmühle, 2011-08 CN-01.jpg (auch wenn dies nun ganz klar wie eine Postkarte aussieht), andere haben größere Lichtprobleme (File:HohenrodeWartt.jpg, File:Osterwieck Altstadt by Stepro DSC 5355.JPG). Wieso File:Lauterbach-Frischborn (DerHexer) WLMMH 66500 2011-09-18 02.jpg nun gewählt wurde und nicht die minimal anderen File:Lauterbach-Frischborn (DerHexer) WLMMH 66500 2011-09-18 01.jpg oder File:Lauterbach-Frischborn (DerHexer) WLMMH 66500 2011-09-18 03.jpg, wird sich mir wohl nie erschließen. Dennoch denke ich, dass jedes Jurymitglied nach bestem Wissen und Gewissen ausgewählt hat. Grüße, —DerHexer (Talk) 00:14, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte

Hi Hexer,

ich hab seinerzeit mal auf meiner Commons-Disk die AutoArchiv-Vorlage von Marcus Cyron übernommen und diese entsprechend angepasst, jedoch archiviert der Bot bei mir nicht. Kannst du vielleicht helfen, das Problem zu beheben? Danke und VG, --Niklas 555 (talk) 17:29, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ottava Rima email correspondence

Hi, according to this post of User:Ottava Rima, you are one of 9 users to whom he showed private email correspondence (from me to him). Can you please tell me (i) if this is true, and if it is: (ii) when and how he did this (iii) why you did not feel it necessary to tell me of this breach of trust (iv) what your view of my comments is, since Ottava claims of the 9 users "they agreed that you were defending Fred's action in an inappropriate manner."[3]. Please either email me or respond on my talk page, since I'm asking the other users Ottava has identified and I would prefer not to have discussion scattered on different talk pages. Thank you. Rd232 (talk) 01:28, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ottava asked me on IRC if I could help him with an issue. I told him that I'm currently very busy and will read it later (I haven't read everything till now). Afair, he did not quote mails nor IRC discussions but summarized his problem (afair, he mentioned your name just once but I have no idea what he said). I haven't responded to him much. Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 21:23, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. He's indef-blocked now. If you do follow up the issue some way, feel free to ask me for any clarifications. Rd232 (talk) 22:06, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lauterbach-Frischborn-WLMMH-66500-2011-09-18-02-b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments one of my favorites in WLM --Ralf Roletschek 07:14, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hurra! ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 20:33, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Permission request to use one of your pictures in a textbook

Hi. I would like to include your picture of the Greek fish plate http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Attischer_Fischteller_aus_der_Werkstatt_des_Dareios-Malers,_Hetjens-Museum_Düsseldorf_(DerHexer).JPG in a textbook. This would show at about 4 cm high, and the picture would be credited in the legend immediately below (this being printed text, I would prefer maybe a real name/location --whatever makes sense to you).

I wanted to check that would be OK with you. I can also be contacted at thechabon AT123 hotmail DOT123 com.

Römermuseum Osterburken

Buenas noches:

Encantado de poder colaborar in ordinatio epigraphiae romanae latinae.

A su disposición --scutum (talk) 20:59, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

:-) —DerHexer (Talk) 22:40, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ русский ∙ slovenčina ∙ српски (ћирилица) ∙ srpski (latinica) ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear DerHexer/archive02,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 01:52, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Re: Category:Heritage sites in Israel

Hi DerHexer,

I missed your message earlier... anyway, in regards to the question, I'm really not sure how this works in other countries, but the whole concept of "heritage sites without known IDs" seems very strange. We have a very specific definition of a heritage site, basically it's a site approved by the National Heritage Site Preservation Society, and one major criterion is that at least one major part of the site was built after 1700 AD. Sites from before 1700 AD are under the jurisdiction of the Antiquities Authority and are antiquities site.

Coming back to IDs however, since Wikimedia Israel (more specifically, Deror and myself) invented the ID system and assigned IDs to all the heritage sites officially approved by the Society so far, by definition there cannot be a heritage site without a known ID. This is why the category seems very strange to me in the first place, but I can imagine that for some countries the situation is different.

Having said that, let me be very clear that all the people who saw your images at Wikimedia Israel thought it was awesome, and the fact that you uploaded more pictures than any Israeli (even if it's for an antiquities site) is amazing. To be sure, next year we will do our best to also include antiquities sites, but getting the cooperation of the Antiquities Authority might prove difficult.

Cheers, Ynhockey (talk) 22:32, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that is very disappointing because Caesarea Maritima is indeed a great monument even if it is just recognized but another monument organization. But with these files, you possibly have the largest collection of free photos of the former Roman province capital. It would be great to use these files wherever it is useful. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 10:41, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pics

Hello... You must be talking about File:Römermuseum Osterburken (DerHexer) 2012-09-30 091.jpg... Do you think I could do the same with other pictures of yours ? Which one ? Nonopoly (talk) 23:26, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I've taken some more photos in this museum: User:DerHexer/Limeskongress_2012#R.C3.B6mermuseum_Osterburken. Thanks for your help! Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 10:13, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Typos

I assumed that there are following typos:

File:Harvard Museum of Natural History. Calcopyrite. (Ugo) Yamagata, Honshu, Japan (DerHexer) 2012-07-20.jpg = Chalcopyrite
- Yamagata Prefecture, Tohoku Region, Honshu Island, Japan (mindat.org), chalcopyrite found
File:Harvard Museum of Natural History. Hermatite. Cumbria, England (DerHexer) 2012-07-20.jpg = Hematite
File:Harvard Museum of Natural History. Kidwillite. Baylock Mine, Polk Co., AR (DerHexer) 2012-07-20.jpg = Kidwellite
File:Harvard Museum of Natural History. Vandanite. Mibladen, Marocco (DerHexer) 2012-07-20.jpg = ???
- Mibladen Mining District, Midelt, Khénifra Province, Meknès-Tafilalet Region, Morocco (mindat.org), vanadinite found
Cheers --Chris.urs-o (talk) 08:50, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You can see the description on the first picture. I guess it's wrong. Second and third one moved. The last one is a Vanadinite. Thanks for categorizing! Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 10:53, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you ;) --Chris.urs-o (talk) 11:56, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you check please:

File:Harvard Museum of Natural History. Stibilite. Khadakvasla, Maharashtra, India (DerHexer) 2012-07-20.jpg

Khadokvasia complex (Khadakvasla), Pune District (Poonah District), Maharashtra, India (mindat.org); mineral list: 'stilbite', mesolite, 'apophyllite'

--Chris.urs-o (talk) 18:26, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stilbite is standing on the sign. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 01:42, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Acropolis Museum in Athens.jpg

File:Acropolis Museum in Athens.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Veggies (talk) 12:14, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Reiner Haseloff (Martin Rulsch) 09.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Reiner Haseloff (Martin Rulsch) 09.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christian Heinz (Martin Rulsch) 2013-02-26 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very Good! -- Arcalino 11:00, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It is good (and QI), but there is visible (for sure marginal) noise in the dark areas (e.g. eyes) which need not be the case for such studio shots. Also sharpness and level of detail is not 100% convincing. The same with the other portayals shot with the D90. Which lens was used? --Tuxyso 13:27, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 50 mm, 1:1.4. The image was lightly sharpened and I cannot see visible noise in the eyes. I had to increase the contrast and lights a bit because the images appeared a bit too dark on the PC screen while they haven't been on the camera monitor. Cheers, DerHexer 14:10, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The 50mm/1.4 is a very good lens, max sharpness at f5.6. Probably f5.6 or f8 had been better. Nonetheless nice photo, I appreciate your effort. Keep on shooting! --Tuxyso 14:46, 6 March 2013 (UTC) I would have said the same but our photo profi said that f/11 would be the best aperture. We will check that for our next photo session. Cheers, DerHexer 17:06, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bettina Wiesmann (Martin Rulsch) 2013-02-28 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:43, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alfons Gerling (Martin Rulsch) 2013-02-28 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:30, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	forrocks, minerals and enter's user page Albedo-ukr (talk) 12:50, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! :-) —DerHexer (Talk) 17:09, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tippfehler in File:SUL finalization de 2.0.svg

Hallo Hexer, Media:SUL finalization de 2.0.svg enthält noch einen Tippfehler (bzw. eine c/p-Ruine?): Im untersten gelben Kasten, vorletzte Zeile. Grüße --Schniggendiller (talk) 17:02, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Der Fehler entsteht beim Parsen des SVGs. Ich kann ihn nicht beheben. Grüße, —DerHexer (Talk) 17:04, 4 May 2013 (UTC) P.S.: Hab das Feld noch einmal neu erstellt, was geholfen hat.[reply]

Mittlerweile funktioniert es bei mir auch (in den ersten Tagen nach deiner Änderung nicht (das leidige Cache-Problem)). Danke und Gruß --Schniggendiller (talk) 23:31, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Zur Info: File:Wikimedia Conference 2013 - board meeting 01.JPG. --Túrelio (talk) 15:32, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Danke! Kategorisiert. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:45, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please experiment in the sandbox

{{Test}} -- Rillke^(q?) 18:19, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sehr lustig. Ja, ich bereinige den Fehlimport. —DerHexer (Talk) 18:20, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Magst Du die Versionsgeschichte von Template:Documentation wieder trennen? 51 Versionen zum auseinanderfriemeln. -- Rillke^(q?) 18:23, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, und nicht nur die. —DerHexer (Talk) 18:25, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Falls es dich tröstet, Du bist nicht der erste. Ich muss allerdings zugeben, dass das grün angenehmer für die Augen ist. Werde es gleich mal testen, was die Commons Community dazu sagt. So gesehen hast Du damit vielleicht eine positive Entwicklung angestoßen. Danke fürs saubermachen. -- Rillke^(q?) 18:31, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Das Nervige dabei ist nur, dass ich nicht selbst löschen darf. Aber Steinsplitter kümmert sich darum, der sich den Import von Template:Box2 gewünscht hat, den ich offensichtlich vergeigt habe. —DerHexer (Talk) 18:33, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daniel Mack (Martin Rulsch) 2013-02-27 2.jpg

File:Daniel Mack (Martin Rulsch) 2013-02-27 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 14:00, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daniel Mack (Martin Rulsch) 2013-02-27 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 14:03, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daniel Mack (Martin Rulsch) 2013-02-27 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 14:04, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Petra Pau Die Linke Wahlparty 2013 (DerHexer) 02.jpg

Ich bin ganz und gar kein Freund umfassender Schönheitsoperationen bei Portraits für die Wikipedia. Durch die direkte, harte Beleuchtung kommen in diesem Fall aber die Zähne äußerst unvorteilhaft raus, ähnlich wie bei Angies Schweißflecken (ein älteres Bild von RalfR) halte ich hier eine dezente Abmilderung bzw. Aufhübschung für angebracht. Dezent wie in "NICHT wie auf TV-Movie-Titelblättern"... ;-) -- Smial (talk) 09:41, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neu entwickelt. Besser so? Grüße, —DerHexer (Talk) 12:09, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katja Kipping Die Linke Wahlparty 2013 (DerHexer) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:34, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Huch, okay, danke! ;-) —DerHexer (Talk) 09:32, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heike Hofmann (Martin Rulsch) 2013-02-27 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. es heißt aber MdL und nicht motLoH --Ralf Roletschek 22:40, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franziska Latta (Martin Rulsch).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:59, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angela Gorr (Martin Rulsch) 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. Eyes and face sharp. --XRay 17:37, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anne-Marie Keding (Martin Rulsch) 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. Eyes and face sharp. --XRay 17:37, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jan Hofmann (Martin Rulsch) 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:21, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jens Bullerjahn (Martin Rulsch) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:21, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jörg Felgner (Martin Rulsch) 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:33, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krimhild Niestädt (Martin Rulsch) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:33, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:JuergenHoenscheid-1960-Sylt-Longboards.jpg

File:JuergenHoenscheid-1960-Sylt-Longboards.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Nolispanmo 15:33, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

:P —DerHexer (Talk) 15:48, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People of Berlin

Tolle Fotos Martin! Der einzige Haken: die Herrschaften wurden nicht alle in B geboren, bitte korrigiere die Kategorien. --A.Savin 15:29, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ist wirklich dies mit der Kategorie gemeint? Sie ist mit de:Kategorie:Person (Berlin) verbunden, wo steht „Personen, die ihre Wirkungsstätte in Berlin haben oder hatten und Bedeutendes leisteten“. Ich würde mal behaupten, das triff auf alle Abgeordneten zu. Category:Born in Moscow ist ja auch nur Subkategorie von Category:People of Moscow.
Wie ich aber gerade sehe, ist Category:Member of Abgeordnetenhaus von Berlin‎ eh eine Subkategorie von Politicians in Berlin, was eine Subkategorie von People of Berlin ist, weswegen People of Berlin dennoch, dann aber von allen Kategorien, entfernt werden kann. Grüße, —DerHexer (Talk) 16:25, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Für den Link vielen Dank. Ich sitze gerade und staune nicht schlecht. Von der Kategorie "Born in Moscow" lese ich zum ersten Mal. Da meinte wohl ein Schlauer mal wieder, das bestehende Kategoriensystem auf eigene Faust umkrempeln zu wollen, ohne das mit Kollegen abzusprechen, wie immer. Hat ein paar Kategorien (von über 200) dorthin geschoben, für alles andere ist die Puste ausgegangen oder hat schlichtweg die Intelligenz nicht gereicht. Ansonsten war es hier auf Commons schon immer so, dass "People of..." auch den Geburtsort bedeutet. In russischer WP auch, in englischer (glaube ich) auch, und was in deutscher vor sich geht interessiert mich schon lange nicht. --A.Savin 17:42, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hab beim Kategorienerstellen genau darüber nachgedacht, wäre sicherlich sinnvoller gewesen, bei meiner eigenen Unsicherheit sie denn nicht zu setzen. Hab das Format halt von anderswo kopiert. Grüße, —DerHexer (Talk) 17:56, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

COM:QIC

Please try to refrain to nominate too much pictures at once on COM:QIC, as written in the rules.

Please try to also assess images by other contributors. We are all volunteers, and any help is appreciated.

Pleclown (talk) 12:11, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, 8 nominations are still okay. Anyway, I can participate in reviewing some pictures, too. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 13:20, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angela Lück (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good --Poco a poco 13:23, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Annette Watermann-Krass (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Stepro 00:55, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arif Ünal (Martin Rulsch) 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Top --Poco a poco 13:32, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arndt Klocke (Martin Rulsch) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --A.Savin 14:24, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Astrid Birkhahn (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Endlich ! A CDU member ! Let's celebrate this ! QI !--Jebulon 15:13, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bernhard von Grünberg (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice --Poco a poco 13:23, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gabriele Hammelrath (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--ArildV 12:05, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jens-Peter Nettekoven (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:13, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Birgit Beisheim (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support ok --Christian Ferrer 17:17, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hartmut Ganzke (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 07:14, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heike Gebhard (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 07:14, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Henning Rehbaum (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 07:14, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ingrid Hack (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 07:14, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Josef Hovenjürgen (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. (The hair on his cheek may be removed.) --XRay 07:14, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christian Dahm (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Slight shirt overexposure but otherwise excellent. --Mattbuck 20:53, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dirk Wedel (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 20:53, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frank Börner (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Slight shirt overexposure but otherwise excellent. --Mattbuck 20:53, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jutta Velte (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --P e z i 23:47, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lothar Hegemann (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality--Lmbuga 22:48, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lukas Lamla (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --P e z i 23:47, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manfred Krick (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality--Lmbuga 22:54, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mario Krüger (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 23:11, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marion Warden (Martin Rulsch) 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality--Lmbuga 22:46, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Michael Scheffler (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --A.Savin 17:08, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nicolaus Kern (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 17:12, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Regina Kopp-Herr (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --A.Savin 17:05, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Renate Hendricks (Martin Rulsch) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --P e z i 23:22, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tanja Wagener (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --P e z i 23:22, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Theodor Kruse (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --P e z i 23:22, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marc Lürbke (Martin Rulsch) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:35, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcel Hafke (Martin Rulsch) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:35, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Walburga Benninghaus (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --A.Savin 17:15, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Werner Lohn (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:32, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nadja Lüders (Martin Rulsch) 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --P e z i 00:00, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olaf Wegner (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --P e z i 00:03, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thomas Eiskirch (Martin Rulsch) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 10:14, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ursula Doppmeier (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 10:14, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Werner Jostmeier (Martin Rulsch) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 10:14, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fabio Reinhardt (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --P e z i 00:10, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hakan Taş (Martin Rulsch) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --P e z i 00:10, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harald Moritz (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --P e z i 00:10, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heiko Herberg (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --P e z i 00:10, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Andreas Gram (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 07:19, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Andy Jauch (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 07:19, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anja Schillhaneck (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 07:19, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bruni Wildenhein-Lauterbach (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --A.Savin 17:54, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Irene Köhne (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:10, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jasenka Villbrandt (Martin Rulsch) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 18:02, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jutta Matuschek (Martin Rulsch) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Steinsplitter 21:43, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Daniel Buchholz (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 18:15, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Danny Freymark (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 18:15, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brigitte Lange (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Optograph 23:11, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christian Lindner (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lars Oberg (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:46, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Martin Delius (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:10, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Walter Kern (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:20, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

Thanks! Merry Christmas for you, too. :-) —DerHexer (Talk) 23:05, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavel Mayer (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:52, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Michael Schäfer (Martin Rulsch) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 01:08, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rainer-Michael Lehmann (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:58, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simon Kowalewski (Martin Rulsch) 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A little bit too much softener but can still pass as QI. --Cccefalon 13:06, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stephan Lenz (Martin Rulsch) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:02, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thomas Isenberg (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:02, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turgut Altuğ (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok. --Cccefalon 12:59, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ülker Radziwill (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:04, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jürn Jakob Schultze-Berndt (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:06, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klaus Lederer (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dagmar Neukirch (Martin Rulsch) SPD 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --DXR 21:43, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frank Heidan (Martin Rulsch) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support ok --A.Savin 14:27, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heiner Koch (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments And did His Excellency execute an exorcism against "the sorcerer" (der Hexer ?) :)--Jebulon 16:45, 9 January 2014 (UTC) I used a name tag with just “Martin Rulsch” and thus was not cursed. But anyway, „Der Hexer“ is the German title for Edgar Wallace' book “The Ringer” whose protagonist is a murderer. :-P Nonetheless, I adopted it for sorcery (en:User:TheWizard). DerHexer 00:42, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alexander Krauß (Martin Rulsch) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 15:38, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Andrea Roth (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 15:38, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jens Michel (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 19:34, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karl-Heinz Gerstenberg (Martin Rulsch) Grüne 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:20, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oliver Fritzsche (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:26, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sebastian Gemkow (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 19:34, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stefan Brangs (Martin Rulsch) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 19:34, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sven Liebhauser (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 19:34, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sven Morlok (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 19:34, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uta-Verena Meiwald (Martin Rulsch) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 19:34, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eva-Maria Stange (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:52, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gisela Kallenbach (Martin Rulsch) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:52, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aloysius Mikwauschk (Martin Rulsch) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

User talk:DerHexer/archive02/archive01

My RfA

RFA

Tip: Categorizing images

TUSC token a95c8746eaf018ea110aa58bd0c93f3b

Nochmal Category:Hanover

Peripatos

Quality Image Promotion

FP Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Ship

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

garden vase in FPC

Quality Image Promotion

FPC

Quality Image Promotion

Jarlaxle attacks

Quality Image Promotion

Roman Emperor in FPC

Quality Image Promotion

Duisburg

Quality Image Promotion

FP Promotion

FP Promotion

Malbork

Wikimedia Conference

File:POL_Lipno_(jezioro_w_województwie_pomorskim)_02.jpg

Some bubble tea for you!

user-namensänderung

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Bildverwendung

Bitte

Ottava Rima email correspondence

Quality Image Promotion

Permission request to use one of your pictures in a textbook

Römermuseum Osterburken

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Re: Category:Heritage sites in Israel

Pics

Typos

FP Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

A barnstar for you!

Tippfehler in File:SUL finalization de 2.0.svg

Please experiment in the sandbox

Quality Image Promotion

COM:QIC

Quality Image Promotion

Merry Christmas

Quality Image Promotion

Navigation menu

Search