User talk:Demidow

Welcome to the Commons, Demidow!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

SieBot 19:36, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Moin, Demidow und vielen Dank! Tschüß --Ra Boe 22:06, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope

---

Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding. abf /talk to me/ 08:48, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Well, and about which image are we talking here? Demidow, 23. März 2008, 10:58 Uhr (MEZ).

Kornkasten

Hallo! Danke für die Ergänzung der Bildbeschreibungen. Da ich kein Russisch kann möcht ich gar nicht erst mit "rumpfuschen" beginnen, aber das Gebäude hier im Hintergrund ist der Haberkasten und nicht der Kornkasten/die Stadtbücherei, der steht gegenüber. Fotografiert wurde auch nicht von der Fragnergasse aus, ich stand vielmehr Am Stadtwall. Wäre schön wenn du das ändern könntest. Falls etwas unklar ist, gib am besten hier Bescheid, da ich nicht so oft auf Commoms bin. Danke und Gruß --Tafkas 20:49, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Hallo, Tafkas! Danke für den Hinweis, da hatte ich echt Tomaten auf den Augen! Es ist länger her, daß ich in Mühldorf war. Jetzt müßte aber alles stimmen. Ich habe die Beschreibungen des Bildes in allen Sprachen geändert und "Stadtsaal" als neue Nutzung für den Haberkasten angegeben. Sorry, daß ich dein Bild falsch beschriftet habe! Werde in Zukunft mit dem "Bayern Viewer Denkmal" arbeiten, da sind häufig Referenzphotos zu den Gebäuden dabei. Alles Gute und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Photographieren und Forschen! :) --Demidow 17:38, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Du musst dich nicht entschuldigen, ich danke dir, dass du meine Versäumnisse nachgeholt hast. Allerdings muss ich jetzt nochmal nachhaken ;-). Der Stadtsaal steht am Volksfestplatz, der Haberkasten ist eher die ältere und kleinere Ausführung davon (ist auf der Homepage etwas verwirrend erläutert). Ich würde daher eher von "Veranstaltungsort" oder so sprechen, damit keine Missverständnisse aufkommen. Gruß --Tafkas 15:52, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Okay, wird gemacht. Wünsch' dir noch 'nen schönen Sonntag! :) --Demidow 17:59, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Ui, das ging schnell. Danke, dir ebenso --Tafkas 16:08, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Bilder aus Italien

Moin Tafkas

besten Dank für die Bildbeschreibungen meine Bilder und den neuen Cats. Super und falls ich Dir mal einen Stein in den Garten schmeißen kann, nur zu. Tschüß --Ra Boe (talk) 18:44, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Hallo from Italy

Hallo, thank you for the work you have begun to do on Italy. Since I am working at organising italy sinc at least two years ago, I would appreciate a little coordination, to avoid clashes, as those that are emerging with the fact that we are creating sort of parallele categorisations. Especially, I ask you to follow the following grammar: "Category:Nameofthe church (Town)", not "Category:Nameofthechurch in Town". I am changing little by little all of the names that are written in the second way. This is because San Casciano in Val di Pesa (official name) is nota a church to San Casciano which stands in the town of Val di Pesa, but the town of San Casciano which stands in the Pesa Valley. Furthermore, we should start a discussione about whether Architectures are "of" or "in". SOmeone at the beginning created everyting with of, but since then everybody all around the world uses "in" ie Architecture IN Paris (not "of Paris", and so on. The old categories stuck, but perhaps we should urge a vote to uniform everything. While waiting to do so, I'd appreciate a little discussion to avoid further chaos. Thank you in advance. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 02:36, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi, G.dallorto! Thank you for your suggestions. You're perfectly right, setting the placenames in brackets does surely help to avoid missunderstandings. I'll try my best to change the category names I created so far to meet with the pattern you suggested above. The Architecture thing is a real problem. I'd suggest always to use the preposition "in" as this would make clear that the category includes architecture that is situated, for instance, in Italy while not necessarily being of Italian origin (I'm thinking of South Tyrol in particular). Would you be so kind to start a discussion concerning the architecture in/of matter? I'm myself not too familiar with moderating discussions.

Another thing is that the categorization "Architecture by style" and "by period" respectively suck as they cannot be applied to some of the most important buildings because they feature different styles. I have been using that catgorization system as well, but now I've come to the point to avoid it as it doesn't work with a lot of buildings. Do you have any suggestions?

Thank you and all the best for your further work here at Commons! --Demidow 07:41, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Hallo Demidow. If a building is of two mixed styles, just put two categories with each style. It will be helpful for those looking for either style. If it is a piecemeal of several styles, then we cannot talk about a "style" so don't add any category for the style. As you see, it is simple. :-)

As for works of art "in", this is used merely for the physical, geographical location, NOT for the artistic school. Paintings of Italian style in France stay in the Category:Paintings in France, NOT in the Category:Paintings in Italy. In some cases a category "FROM Italy" was started, for those works of art of a certain origin being abroad. See for instance the difference between Category:Ancient Roman frescos in Pompeii and Category:Ancient Roman frescos from Pompeii.

No rule in WikiCommons forbids you to create a category such as [:Category:German paintings in Italy]], if you feel it is useful. Simply, it is a bit too early to sturt scha subcatgorisation, but if you feel like doing it, no one may forbid it to do it. Best wishes. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 20:54, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

San Giacomo

Hello, San Giacomo is usually named Saint James in English, see for example en:San Giacomo. I don't know which saint is in the name of that church (Category:San Giacomo (Capizzi)), but all saints listed at it:San Giacomo have the name James in English Wikipedia. /Ö 16:36, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Ö, you're perfectly right. James, son of Zebedee is the one meant here. I'll change it back in a moment. Bye!--Demidow 16:53, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Please don't overcategorise

Hallo, I noticed that you are not only dividing Italian churches by patron saint, which is fine, and by region, which is fine whenever it is necessary, but also by sub-name of the saint by region, such as "Santa Maria della Vittoria churches in Abruzzo". The result is that each and all of your categories have only one item inside. This is called over-categorisation. Categories are supposed to gather SEVERAL items in order to find them together, not one item each. If you create categories that are too small, none will have more than one item inside.

Please consider splitting categories into subcategories ONLY when they reach, say, 15-20 items at least. Otherwise, rather than helping the user, you make everything more complicate, since he will have to open 50 pages to find just 5 churches overall, which isn't very logical.

Beside it, please use the follow grammar: "Category:Santa Maria della Vittoria (Milan)" rather than "Santa Maria della Vittoria in Milan". "In" should be used for broader categories, such as "Churches IN Abruzzo", or "Churches IN L'Aquila" or "Gothic architecture IN Milan", whereas for single items brackets are normally used.

If we agree about how working together, there will be less work to be undone and redone in the future. Thanks in advance. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 20:43, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Post scriptum; I see that you answered a previous post of mine in your own message page. I answered it now. But pelease remind that messages should be answered in the message page of the original poster, otherwise he will not know you answered! For example, you should answer me in this page: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:G.dallorto :-) BTW, what is your maternal language?

category:Kalkstein

Hallo Demidow, danke für Deine umsichtige Veränderung an einigen Bildern. Ich hatte nicht geprüft und deshalb auch nicht wahrgenommen, dass sich "Kalkstein" auf eine Ortschaft bezieht. Hätte ich nicht für möglich gehalten. grüsse --Lysippos (talk) 11:25, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Category:Saint Mary (Steinwiesen)

Grüß Dich Demidow! Frage: Warum ist es nicht möglich bei der Kategorie einer deutschen Kirche den deutschen Namen zu belassen?? --störfix (talk) 15:39, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Category names of Czech train stations

The discussion about an unification of category names is opened at Commons:Categories for discussion/Current requests/2009/02/Categories of train stations in the Czech Republic. --ŠJů (talk) 11:08, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Careful with renaming categories!

Thanks for your work on rearrranging categories - but please take a look at the note at User_talk:Túrelio#Careful_with_deleting_categories.21. Vmenkov (talk) 10:49, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

I know this problem – see User talk:Foroa#Correct links before a deletion of a category. I hope anybody is working to solution. --ŠJů (talk) 11:19, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments. But please keep in mind that there are two other Makaryev Monasteries in Russia, in Kostroma Oblast and in Tatarstan. Thus renaming the category was necessary to avoid confusion, and I suggest to do the same with the Wikipedia entry (very nice article by the way!). I just forgot to adjust the Wikipedia links to Commons, sorry! :) --Demidow (talk) 15:22, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Category:Romanesque basilicas in Bavaria

Hi Demidow,

I do not see any sense in this "one building category" (just for Ilmmünster), esp. because "Basilica" categories are generally used at wikipedia for the status of roman catholic churches (nominated by the Vatican) and not for the typus of romanesque churches (as in German history of art). When you like to introduce the category Basilicas as an achitectural type, you should rename the category to Basilicas (architecture) (see Basilica).

p.s. geht auch auf deutsch... --Ceterum censeo capitalismum esse delendum (talk) 00:57, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Cool... ;)

Danke! Aber woher weißt du das denn, bist du an der Station mal ausgestiegen? Im Internet hatte ich auch mal versucht die Kirche zu finden, aber vergebens... Gruß --S^[1] 11:54, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Hallo S1! Ich war zwar schön öfter in Russland, allerdings nie in Newerowo oder Woskressenskoje. Wenn ich nach Kirchen in Russland suche, gucke ich immer auf www.sobory.ru, www.temples.ru oder www.russian-church.ru. Da gibt's ziemlich umfangreiche Listen, nach Verwaltungseinheiten geordnet, die ständig erweitert werden. Dort habe ich auch die Kirche von Woskressenskoje gefunden. Das Patrozinium ist dort mit einem "?" gekennzeichnet; ich habe die Kirche aber auch mal in einem Kunstdenkmäler-Inventar für die Oblast Kostroma gesehen und bin mir sicher, dass sie der Auferstehung Christi geweiht ist (ergibt ja auch Sinn). Beste Grüße!--Demidow (talk) 12:10, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

In der Tat. Auf sobory.ru hätte ich auch kommen sollen. Super! Das einzige was ich schade finde ist, dass du in DE so wenig aktiv bist. Aber wenn du hier ein wenig Ordnung in den russischen Kategoriendschungel bringst, ist mir das natürlich auch recht! ;O Gruß --S^[1] 13:00, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Bystraya Sosna River

Hi, is Category:Bystraya Sosna River about ru:Быстрая Сосна? If that's the case, there already is Category:Sosna River (the name based on en:Sosna River). I know there is also ru:Тихая Сосна, but I can't fix that. Erik Warmelink (talk) 21:26, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Eric! Thanks for the information. I changed the category to "Sosna River". Cheers!--Demidow (talk) 12:04, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, but it only answers a part of my question. What should we do with ru:Тихая Сосна? That river is smaller, but not by a wide margin (4350 km² versus 17400 km²). Erik Warmelink (talk) 19:33, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Category:Middle Muscovite period churches

Is there a reliable definition of what falls under this heading? Somehow the sources on my desk completely bypass such categorization. TIA, NVO (talk) 17:24, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Historism

Could I ask you to look in at Commons:Village pump#Category:Historism? Since you created a subcategory, you may have some insight into intent. - Jmabel ! talk 23:06, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Zuordnung von Kategorien "Churches in..." zur Kategorie: "Churches in Diocese of..."

Hallo Demidow, das Problem der pauschalen Zuordnung von Kirchen eines Ortes zu einer Diözese besteht darin, dass das nur für katholische Kirchen gilt. Wenn ich also die Kategorie Churches in Osterhofen als Unterkategorie zu Kategorie Churches in Diocese of Passau stelle, dann ist das nicht ganz korrekt, weil z. B. evangelische Kirchen nicht zur Diözese Passau gehören. Wie könnte man das Problem lösen? Indem man einer Kategorie wie "Churches in Osterhofen" eine Unterkategorie "Catholic Churches in Osterhofen" unterordnet, die dann zugleich Unterkategorie von "Churches in Diocese of Passau" wäre? Grüße! --Konrad Lackerbeck (talk) 07:26, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Category:Flags of districts of Smolensk Oblast

Category:Flags of districts of Smolensk Oblast has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa (talk) 19:56, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Category:Saint_Giles_churches_in_Germany

Category discussion notification

Category:Saint_Giles_churches_in_Germany has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

GFreihalter (talk) 12:33, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Category:Saint_Giles_churches_in_Bavaria

Category discussion notification

Category:Saint_Giles_churches_in_Bavaria has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

GFreihalter (talk) 13:39, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Category:Szent Mihály in Apátfalva

Category:Szent Mihály in Apátfalva has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 09:17, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Schloss Dorfbach / Pfarrkirche Dorfbach

Hallo Demidow,

ich hab gesehen, dass du den Kategoriebaum den ich einst anlegte aufräumst und an Commons anpasst. Dafür erst mal ein herzliches Dankeschön. Aufgrund deiner Fachkenntnisse möchte ich dich dazu etwas fragen. Das einstige Schloss Dorfbach gibt es nicht mehr, allerdings wurde in dessen Überresten (in zwei ehemaligen Flügeln) die heutige Pfarrkirche St. Nepomuk File:Pfarrkirche Dorfbach.JPG errichtet. Theoretisch könnt es damit ja noch in Category:Schloss Dorfbach rein. Kann/Soll man das bei der Einteilung in die Kategorien berücksichtigen? Wie wird sowas in Commons gehandhabt? Und wie "erklärt" man dies den Nutzern? In der Bildbeschreibung?

Danke im Voraus für deine Auskunft.

Beste Grüße --Ortenburger 鼠 10:56, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Category:Saint_Peter's_churches_in_Bavaria

Category:Saint_Peter's_churches_in_Bavaria has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

GFreihalter (talk) 06:47, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Danke

… für die präzisere Kategorisierung meiner Bilder! :-) Grüße, —DerHexer (Talk) 23:22, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Kein Problem, gern geschehen! :-) --Demidow (talk) 11:18, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Nuernberg Straßenbahn-Hauptwerkstaetten 013.JPG

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Nuernberg Straßenbahn-Hauptwerkstaetten 013.JPG, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:48, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Kategorisierung Nürnberger Baudenkmäler

Hallo Demidow, erst einmal vielen Dank für die genaue Kategorisierung Nürnberger Baudenkmäler. Wie Du z. B. hier siehst und wie Dir vielleicht nicht entgangen ist, arbeite ich derzeit an einer neuen Unterteilung der Liste der Baudenkmäler in Nürnberg. Grundsätzlich orientiere ich mich derzeit an den Gemarkungen, nicht an den Statistischen Stadtbezirken. Wie Du weißt, sind einige Stadtteilnamen Gemarkungen, andere sind Statistische Bezirke und wieder andere sind gar nicht offiziell. Zu allem Übel überschneidet sich das ganze auch noch. Da tauchen natürlich immer wieder Ungereimtheiten auf.

Beispiele: 1. Sowohl das Labenwolf-Gymnasium (Labenwolfstraße 10) als auch die Maxfeldstraße 51 befinden sich offiziell in der Gemarkung Gärten hinter der Veste, das Gymnasium ist aber unter Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Nuremberg-Gärten hinter der Veste einsortiert, die Maxfeldstraße 51 unter Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Nuremberg-Maxfeld.

2. Das Schulhaus Schnieglinger Straße 38 / 50 befindet sich in der Gemarkung Wetzendorf, wurde von Dir aber wieder unter Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Nuremberg-St. Johannis einsortiert.

Deshalb wollte ich mal fragen, auf welche Quellen bzw. Daten Du Dich bei der Kategorisierung beziehst. Gruß --Janericloebe (talk) 14:58, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Janericloebe! Danke auch Dir für Deine Arbeit - da war ja echt noch einiges zu tun, aber so langsam sieht das wunderbar aus. Beim Kategorisieren der Baudenkmale habe ich mich an den Stadtteilgrenzen orientiert. Allerdings hast Du Recht: Das ist nicht besonders gut, weil die Grenzen ziemlich verschwommen sind und einander - je nachdem, welche Quelle man heranzieht - überschneiden. Am besten wird sein, man ordnet die Baudenkmale nach den Grenzen der Gemarkungen, so wie es in der Denkmalliste steht. Manch Nürnberger wird sich dann zwar wundern, aber das ist wenigstens eine feststehende Ordnung. Viele Grüße und frohes Schaffen! --Demidow (talk) 15:20, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Danke für Deine schnelle Antwort. Also, wenn die Listen des BLfD fehlerfrei wären, wäre das sicher eine gute Idee. Auch der BayernAtlas spuckt leider oft genug seltsame Dinge aus: So liegt die Meuschelstraße dort komplett im Stadtteil Maxfeld, aber größtenteils in der Gemarkung Gärten hinter der Veste. Die Pirckheimerstraße ist dann wiederum richtig unterteilt. Eine strikte Unterteilung nach Gemarkungen ist auch nicht immer ratsam. Da sich die Nürnberger aber gerade nicht wundern sollen, schlage ich vor, dass wir da schlüssige Grenzziehungen finden sollten, wie das auch schon bei der der Baudenkmäler in München geschehen ist. Beispiel: Maxfeld als Stadtteil (nicht als Stat. Bezirk) liegt sowohl in der Gemarkung Gärten hinter der Veste als auch in der Gemarkung Gärten bei Wöhrd.

Eine genauere Grenzziehung wird sich dann im Laufe meiner neuen Einteilung und anhand der Daten aus dem BayernAtlas und dem Stadtplandienst Nürnberg ergeben, die da immerhin wichtige Anhaltspunkte geben. Sollten noch Fragen offen bleiben, kann ich auch mal beim Vermessungsamt nachfragen. Weil es sich ohnehin um eine länger dauernde Angelegenheit handelt, werde ich die neuen Listen zunächst hier speichern. Bis diese fertig sind und die alte Einteilung ersetzen, sollten die derzeit auf WP stehenden Listen jedoch nicht verändert werden, da sonst evtl. Daten verloren gehen. Ganz am Schluss kann man dann auch die Kategorien auf Commons anpassen und in den Listen verlinken. Gruß --Janericloebe (talk) 16:29, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Genau, das ist eine gute Idee! Hauptsache, es ist einheitlich und man findet sich zurecht! Habe mich auch schon - wie du siehst - viel mit den Grenzziehungen rumgeschlagen. Aber ohne Einteilung wird es in Nürnberg einfach zu unübersichtlich. :-) Viele Grüße! --Demidow (talk) 16:32, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Fein, so kriegen wir das schon hin. Ebenfalls viele Grüße! --Janericloebe (talk) 16:48, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Category:Neo-baroque_churches

Category:Neo-baroque_churches has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Nyttend (talk) 03:39, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Category:Buildings_in_Biburg,_Lower_Bavaria

Category:Buildings_in_Biburg,_Lower_Bavaria has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Sjoerddebruin (talk) 12:47, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Category:Boroughs_of_Olching

Category:Boroughs_of_Olching has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Themightyquill (talk) 21:00, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Silly category moves

If you change categories (from perfectly understandable ones to unintuitive ones, without any reason, by the way), you have to check links. Please change all the red links on Stadtmauer Nürnberg. I'm really angry that my work is mutilated by amateurs like that. --89.247.158.129 15:27, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Nicht in diesem Ton. Wenn du mit mir diskutieren möchtest, wirst du dich eines ordentlichen Umgangstons befleißigen und Beleidigungen wie "Amateur" unterlassen. Solltest du dazu nicht in der Lage sein, erwarte ich, dass du von weiteren Kontaktaufnahmen Abstand nimmst. --Demidow (talk) 09:26, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Hochstift Eichstaett coat of arms.png

File:Hochstift Eichstaett coat of arms.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 23:44, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Heppenheim BW 2014-05-13 14-49-51.jpg

Hallo, du hast der Bildbeschreibung den Link zu einem Kulturdenkmal in Hessen hinzugefügt. Aber da ist dir wohl ein Fehler unterlaufen, das Bild zeigt das Haus "Großer Markt 6" der Link führt aber zu "Großer Markt 2". --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:02, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Hallo, vielen Dank für deinen Hinweis! Ich habe den Fehler ausgebessert.--Demidow (talk) 16:13, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Category:Andrew_Stratelates

Andrew Stratelates has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Zoupan (talk) 08:19, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Hundszell StMaria northern altar.jpg

File:Hundszell StMaria northern altar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AFBorchert (talk) 08:16, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Category:Saint_Leonard

Saint Leonard has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Auntof6 (talk) 05:15, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Category:Saint_Irene_of_Thessaloniki_(Great_Martyr)

Saint Irene of Thessaloniki (Great Martyr) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Fayenatic london (talk) 14:36, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Hundszell StMaria southern altar.jpg

File:Hundszell StMaria southern altar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 13:13, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Niederhöcking St. Martin 003.jpg

File:Niederhöcking St. Martin 003.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 21:08, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Category:Populated_places_in_Russia_by_region

Populated places in Russia by region has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Themightyquill (talk) 15:37, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Ingolstadt St. Joseph 014.JPG

And also:

• File:Ingolstadt St. Joseph 015.JPG
• File:Ingolstadt St. Joseph 018.JPG
• File:Ingolstadt St. Joseph 019.JPG

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 19:18, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

File:Berlin-Niederschönhausen Gästehaus 005.jpg

File:Berlin-Niederschönhausen Gästehaus 005.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:23, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Ingolstadt St. Joseph 001.JPG

And also:

• File:Ingolstadt St. Joseph 002.JPG
• File:Ingolstadt St. Joseph 003.JPG
• File:Ingolstadt St. Joseph 004.JPG
• File:Ingolstadt St. Joseph 005.JPG
• File:Ingolstadt St. Joseph 006.JPG
• File:Ingolstadt St. Joseph 007.JPG
• File:Ingolstadt St. Joseph 008.JPG
• File:Ingolstadt St. Joseph 009.JPG
• File:Ingolstadt St. Joseph 018.JPG

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 19:31, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Ingolstadt St. Konrad 011.JPG

And also:

• File:Ingolstadt St. Konrad 013.JPG
• File:Ingolstadt St. Konrad 015.JPG
• File:Ingolstadt St. Konrad 016.JPG

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 19:43, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Ingolstadt St. Konrad 017.JPG

And also:

• File:Ingolstadt St. Konrad 018.JPG
• File:Ingolstadt St. Konrad 019.JPG
• File:Ingolstadt St. Konrad 020.JPG
• File:Ingolstadt St. Konrad 021.JPG
• File:Ingolstadt St. Konrad 022.JPG
• File:Ingolstadt St. Konrad 023.JPG
• File:Ingolstadt St. Konrad 024.JPG
• File:Ingolstadt St. Konrad 025.JPG
• File:Ingolstadt St. Konrad 028.JPG
• File:Ingolstadt St. Konrad 029.JPG
• File:Ingolstadt St. Konrad 030.JPG

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 19:43, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Nürnberg Innerer Laufer Platz 11 Landauerkapelle 019.JPG

And also:

• File:Nürnberg Innerer Laufer Platz 11 Landauerkapelle 021.JPG
• File:Nürnberg Innerer Laufer Platz 11 Landauerkapelle 022.JPG
• File:Nürnberg Innerer Laufer Platz 11 Landauerkapelle 023.JPG
• File:Nürnberg Innerer Laufer Platz 11 Landauerkapelle 029.JPG
• File:Nürnberg Innerer Laufer Platz 11 Landauerkapelle 030.JPG

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 19:11, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Nürnberg Innerer Laufer Platz 11 Landauerkapelle 018.JPG

File:Nürnberg Innerer Laufer Platz 11 Landauerkapelle 018.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:23, 15 February 2022 (UTC)