User talk:Deadlyhappen
Kategorisierung
[edit]Hallo Deadlyhappen, im Normalfall sollen Kategorienamen in englisch sein, und nicht zusätzlich in eine andere Sprache, siehe "Flood" und "Überschwemmung". Genauer wäre Category:Flood in Villach. Und folgenden Stadteil gibt es wohl nicht "Villacher Innenstadt", siehe hier zu de:Villach#Gliederung. Unwetter heißt auf englisch storm. Also vielleicht dann besser Category:Storm in Villach. Umd die englischen Wörter zu finden kannst du z.B. translate.google.de benutzen und dann gibts du oben rechts im Suchfeld "Category:" dann das englische Wort und schon wird ergänzt und ca. 10 angzeigt. Also z. B. Category:Flood usw. Korrekte Kategorisierung ist besonders wichtig, wenn man viele Fotos kategorisiert. Gruß --Jean11 (talk) 21:44, 8 July 2015 (UTC) Datum wird eher wie folgt angeben: jjjj-mm-tt -->2015-07-08 für 8. August 2015. Es hat Vorteile wenn man es vorne im Dateinamen angibt, so erfolgt gleich eine automatische Sortierung nach Datum. Gruß --Jean11 (talk) 21:47, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
- Ja du hast recht, ich werde die Kategorien gleich ändern. Stimmt, es sollte Villach-Innere Stadt heißen, da hab ich mich verschrieben. Danke, ich werde deinen Rat beherzigen! :) LG --Deadlyhappen (talk) 22:30, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
File tagging File:Entwurzelterbaum-villach2.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Entwurzelterbaum-villach2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Entwurzelterbaum-villach2.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Smooth_O (talk) 12:55, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
File tagging File:Entwurzelterbaum-villach.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Entwurzelterbaum-villach.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Entwurzelterbaum-villach.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Smooth_O (talk) 12:56, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
File tagging File:Parents-of-sam-berns.png
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Parents-of-sam-berns.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
George Ho (talk) 21:36, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
File:Parents-of-sam-berns.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
George Ho (talk) 19:13, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
File:Libertreeprojektlogo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Taivo (talk) 11:16, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:GLOCKPlakat.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:GLOCKPlakat.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:GLOCKPlakat.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Yann (talk) 16:15, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
File:GLOCKPlakat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |