User talk:De728631/2011
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
|
Cancellazione inappropriata
Salve, spero che sia il modo giusto per comunicare con te.
Ho notato che hai segnalato come violazione del copyright il file Dyandra 01 gennaio 2011.jpg questo è il link: File:Dyandra_01_gennaio_2011.jpg
in realtà Diandra Danieli è sotto mio contratto e ha firmato una liberatoria per la sua immagine, oltre a questo ho discusso con Lei le foto da inserire in Wikimedia
- Sicuramente ho sbagliato qualcosa ma è il primo lavoro che pubblico, e ti prego di dirmi dove ho sbagliato, è tutta la giornata che ci studio
- Cortesemente dimmi se è corretto questo modo di contattarti
Grazie, Alessandro Castagna
Você poderia me ajudar?
Acho tão confuso o processo de carregamento de imagens. Eu quero adicionar fontes, permissões e descrições. Quero adicionar capas de álbuns, como todas as outras capas que estão no Commons.
- But I have seen other album covers on wikipedia! :( I want to help wikipedia :(
- So, why and how can I see a lot of album covers on portuguese wikipedia?
- http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_the_Zone
Hallo,
ich bin jetzt ein wenig verwirrt über die Schnelligkeit der Reaktionen bei Wikipedia. Ich bin gerade dabei, das Formular auszufüllen für die Lizenz des Fotos und möchte es morgen an die zuständige permissions-Stelle schicken.
Es ist kein Problem, wenn Ihr dazwischen das Foto löscht, ich kann es ja nach Genehmigung wieder hochladen.
Ist es möglich, dass Sie in der Zwischenzeit das Bild runternehmen und den Text freischalten mit der Bitte um Info wie ich die Kategorien einfügen kann.
Herzlichen Dank Wikihelena
Re:File:Atlanta - generic 23.JPG
I have no idea what truck it is, which is why it is in the unidentified vehicles cat. And I hate commonist for its error propagation, grrrrr.... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 22:04, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- That's about as good a name as I can think of :) I tend to use descriptions only when I have some additional information that cannot be gleaned from name, categories and obvious picture parts. As an excuse, I will just say that I am off to Commonist-away few dozen pictures from another museum, and then I have few more hundred pics waiting... :> Thanks for the help! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 22:42, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Re:File:Rebeca-chaqueta.jpg
The film is in public domain. See the File:RebeccaTrailer.jpg image. --Pacostein (talk) 18:44, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, my bad. Delete it.--Pacostein (talk) 18:49, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Roter Traktor
Danke für Deine Korrekturen - und ich hatte mich schon gewundert, warum ich den Hersteller hier nicht gefunden habe. Gruß, --4028mdk09 (talk) 16:06, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
FOP in France
Hello,
Please do not request deletion of images if the buildings are not the main subject of the image, e.g. File:SNV87176-Paris 13e - place Henri-Langlois - entrée de métro.JPG. In addition, you need to inform the uploader of the photos, which you didn't. Thanks, Yann (talk) 08:06, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- Also FOP issues are not a valid reason for speedy deletion. Jcb (talk) 10:25, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- Actually I did inform the uploader but accidently on her user page and since FOP is a form of copyright violation, it does very well qualify for speedy deletion (I have seen images being speedily deleted for that). You are right thought that case law permits buildings in a photo as long as they are is "accessory compared to the main represented or handled subject". But can you tell that File:SNV87176-Paris 13e - place Henri-Langlois - entrée de métro.JPG was only meant to show the Métro sign? De728631 (talk) 00:40, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- FOP issues often need a broader view, because there can be various reasons not to delete a file. We have to reckon with the threshold of originality and also the FOP issue may be DM. FOP issues always need a regular DR. I consider you informed of that from now. Jcb (talk) 07:13, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, thank you for clarifying that. De728631 (talk) 10:50, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- FOP issues often need a broader view, because there can be various reasons not to delete a file. We have to reckon with the threshold of originality and also the FOP issue may be DM. FOP issues always need a regular DR. I consider you informed of that from now. Jcb (talk) 07:13, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- Actually I did inform the uploader but accidently on her user page and since FOP is a form of copyright violation, it does very well qualify for speedy deletion (I have seen images being speedily deleted for that). You are right thought that case law permits buildings in a photo as long as they are is "accessory compared to the main represented or handled subject". But can you tell that File:SNV87176-Paris 13e - place Henri-Langlois - entrée de métro.JPG was only meant to show the Métro sign? De728631 (talk) 00:40, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Help me, please
Thank you so much for your last instructions about General Ferrero. Can you, please, delete as soon as possible my recent erroneous uploading file "File:Rossi-300 punti 0005.jpg"? I'm so sorry. The photo is not complete. It was one mistake on mine. Thank you in advance. --Cloj (talk) 21:45, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
Cordulegaster boltonii
Moin De728631, Danke für die Arbeit die du dir mit File:Cordulegaster boltonii Harriehausen_crop.png machst. Hut ab. Gruß
Your Flickr uploads
Hello De728631/2011!
Thanks a lot for your contributions! Thank you for transferring images from Flickr to Commons! Two hints ahead:
- Always upload the highest resolution of a photograph that is available on flickr
- You can use this tool for your flickr uploads. It makes the whole procedure much easier and faster for you!
Thank you for your support! Greetings, High Contrast (talk) 00:04, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- Das ist immer die höchste Auflösung gewesen. De728631 (talk) 00:12, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- Richtig schlimm ist das Vergessen des {{Flickrreview}}-Bausteins. --High Contrast (talk) 00:15, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- Wieso kommt der eigentlich nicht automatisch, wenn ich über die Flickr-Maske hochlade? Absichtlich habe den garantiert nicht "vergessen". De728631 (talk) 00:17, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- Von großer Wichtigkeit ist, dass bei jedem Bild aus der flickr-Mediendatenbank dieser {{Flickrreview}}-Baustein eingefügt ist, sodass eine (routinemäßige) Kontrolle erfolgen kann. Bei nicht-automatischer Einfügung, bitte dies manuell nachholen. --High Contrast (talk) 00:28, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- Danke, ich weiß, wozu dieser Baustein gut ist. De728631 (talk) 00:42, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- Von großer Wichtigkeit ist, dass bei jedem Bild aus der flickr-Mediendatenbank dieser {{Flickrreview}}-Baustein eingefügt ist, sodass eine (routinemäßige) Kontrolle erfolgen kann. Bei nicht-automatischer Einfügung, bitte dies manuell nachholen. --High Contrast (talk) 00:28, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- Wieso kommt der eigentlich nicht automatisch, wenn ich über die Flickr-Maske hochlade? Absichtlich habe den garantiert nicht "vergessen". De728631 (talk) 00:17, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- Richtig schlimm ist das Vergessen des {{Flickrreview}}-Bausteins. --High Contrast (talk) 00:15, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cordulegaster boltonii Harriehausen crop43.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File:Ambulance sis.jpg
Hello
[1] Thanks, I was searching the good template Bloody-libu (talk) 17:31, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
Rossi Image (300)
Hi, thank you for your kind message and proposal about [[File:Rossi-300 punti 0005.jpg]]. A.S.A.P. I'll have in few days a new (and better) image from his daughter (still alive). Bye. --Cloj (talk) 11:54, 9 November 2011 (UTC)