User talk:Crowsnest/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Kimsə (talk) 02:50, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
re:Dutch (nl) description
Thanks for correcting my photo caption. I used Babelfish translation, which is why it is so poor. Feel free to make any other changes. Thanks. --Digon3 talk 02:58, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- With the protection removed, I changed the caption. A beautiful photo, to my opinion! -- Crowsnest (talk) 12:51, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Tuple Image
As the sole-source and inventor of tuple images, would you agree that one of those images would enhance the .en article on tuples? If so, I give you, commons, and .en the permission to cut the tuple image from youvan.com and drop it into the .en article on tuples. I can't see that you and I could have any argument over enhancing mathematics articles, and the tuple article is somewhat "dry" without imagery. Thanks Doug youvan (talk) 14:47, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Also, please see: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kraaiennest.tif Doug youvan (talk) 15:19, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Please Comment on this Discussion
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Village_pump&action=edit§ion=50 Doug youvan (talk) 16:09, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Doug youvan
Is there any particular need to dog on him? If one of his files is out of scope, no big deal; why not let someone who has less history mark it for deletion?--Prosfilaes (talk) 11:41, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |