User talk:Christian Ries

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Christian Ries!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Christian Ries!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:50, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gruss

Hallo Christian, es macht Freude, deine wohlkomponierten und illustrativen Bilder zu betrachten. Schade, dass du zu deinem exzellenten Kamerabody ein so schlechtes (im Weitwinkelbereich) Objektiv hast, ich hoffe, du nimmst mir nicht übel, dass ich hier einiges verändert habe.

Ich sehe, dass du als Doktor-Agronome ein Spezialist für Pflanzen bist. Vielleicht kannst du mir helfen, diese beiden Büsche zu taxieren, denn davon habe ich keine blasse Ahnung:

Vielen Dank zum Voraus, --Ikiwaner (talk) 17:12, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Ikiwaner, besten Dank für die Verbesserung des Fotos. Welches Objektiv würdest Du denn empfehlen? Bei der wunderschönen Wüstenpflanze weiss ich leider nicht worum es sich handelt. Ich könnte allerdings die Fotos weiterleiten um das herauszufinden. MfG, --Christian Ries (talk) 10:01, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Das wär natürlich toll. Für eine QI-Nominierung ist die Taxierung notwendig, ausserdem interessieren mich die Hintergründe dessen, was ich fotografiere. Liebe Grüsse aus der Schweiz --Ikiwaner (talk) 18:30, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A propos Objektiv: Ich benutze das EF-S 17-55 und schätze daran, dass es bei 17mm (Architektur, Panoramas) praktisch frei von CA und Verzeichnung ist, trotzdem kann man Zoomen und es kostet weniger als ein L-Profiobjektiv. Der Nachteil ist, dass ihm Namibias Wüsten gar nicht bekommen, es ist nicht so sanddicht wie ein L-Objektiv. Alternativ eignet sich das im robusten Gehäuse verpackte Tamron SD 12-24 für Panoramen. Ich benutze es allerdings weniger, weil es weniger scharf ist als das obige Canon. Panoramakönig wär wohl das Canon EF 14 II, aber der Preis... --Ikiwaner (talk) 23:36, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pettingen Luxembourg 20090918 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Christian Ries!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:45, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Daniel Simberloff Porto 20091027.jpg was uncategorized on 27 October 2009.
Image:Marc Mangen 20091114.jpg was uncategorized on 14 November 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:41, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Youth hostel Wiltz Luxembourg 02.jpg was uncategorized on 10 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Youth hostel Wiltz Luxembourg 03.jpg was uncategorized on 10 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Youth hostel Wiltz Luxembourg 01.jpg was uncategorized on 10 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Nocher-Route Luxembourg 01.jpg was uncategorized on 10 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Paul Scheuer.jpg was uncategorized on 18 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:32, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Organigramm-Arméi.svg was uncategorized on 9 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:30, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Le-Cheslé map.png was uncategorized on 14 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:44, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Jose_eduardo_agualusa_01.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Jose_eduardo_agualusa_01.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jose_eduardo_agualusa_01.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Martin H. (talk) 20:18, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please forward the written release to COM:OTRS, the same image can be found at http://www.ukzn.ac.za/cca/images/tow/TOW2006/img/Agualusa/7agualusa.jpg, so permission is required. Also please correct the author information, that was already wrong for the first upload as it is not own work. --Martin H. (talk) 20:20, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I answered so late, the photo is available online at the following address: http://www.agualusa.info/cgi-bin/baseportal.pl?htx=/agualusa/div&fname=ze_0010&page=fotos&lg=en&cs= . It's from there that I took the photo (I am the webmaster of this website) with the authorization of José Eduardo Agualusa. The author is Jorge Simão, who made these photos for public relation purpuses. --Christian Ries (talk) 16:05, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Centre Pompidou Metz 02 overview.jpg

File:Centre Pompidou Metz 02 overview.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

The structure is copyrighted and French law grants such structures to be protected even in photographs (see Commons:Freedom of panorama#France). --Jappalang (talk) 04:26, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, then delete it. Such buildings should then be hidden behind a giant curtain... --Christian Ries (talk) 06:55, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please, I would appreciate to get explained what difference is there between my photograph with this one:

. Shouldn't it also be deleted? --Christian Ries (talk) 18:16, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ferraris-Lizenz

Moie Christian op enger ongewinnter Plaz. Ech hu grad gesinn, du hues de Ferraris-Kaarten-Ausschnëtter d'Lizenz "PD-self" ginn, dat heescht, du häss déi selwer gemoolt...

Well Lizenze nëmme vun deem, dee se vergëtt, geännert kënne ginn, misst Du se, ier en anere sech dru stéisst (a se vläit geläscht géif) an "PD-old" (d.h.: Domaine public, well Copyright ofgelaf - de Ferraris ass ëmmerhi schonns iwwer 2OO Joer dout) ëmnennen.

Bescht Gréiss,

--Zinneke (talk) 11:57, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merci Zinneke, ech änneren d'Lizenz da bei alle Kaarten. --Christian Ries (talk) 12:52, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PD-self doesn't mean the underlying work is from you. It's perfectly ok to publish a scan or photograph of a PD work under any license, as long as you make a distinction between your work and the original source. Otherwise those licenses would be useless; no photographer could ever publish his photographs of old castle ruins under PD-self for instance, as he didn't design/build those castles... Also remember that publishing those maps as PD allows anyone to use them as they see fit without giving any credits. Cheers. -- Bjung (talk) 06:20, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for these clarifications. --Christian Ries (talk) 08:07, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:José_Eduardo_Agualusa_autoportrait.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:José_Eduardo_Agualusa_autoportrait.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:José_Eduardo_Agualusa_autoportrait.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

-- Docu at 09:09, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I added the following explenation to the image: "The author of the self-portrait José Eduardo Agualusa asked User Christian Ries to upload this file under the license CC BY-SA."

This seems to be a never ending story. Why do you give yourself so much time to react here? Why do you just give me only 7 days? This is voluntary work and you stress people. This is really motivating... --Christian Ries (talk) 11:36, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The permission seems fine, you just need to forward it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org

Then a user from OTRS will add an OTRS-tag to the image and everything is ok.

My above notice is a standard text. I categorize most self-portraits and I came across this upload.

When the script added the notice, I didn't notice that you already received one for other images. Apparently Martin H. left you the same some time ago.

We require an OTRS tag for uploads outlined at Commons:Permission#Where_OTRS_confirmation_is_necessary and yours seem to qualify. Thus, nothing personal. -- Docu at 12:22, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand from the above if there remains something to do or not. --Christian Ries (talk) 12:36, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There are several possibilities:

If you have an email from the copyright holder similar to this, forward it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org
If you don't have, request the copyright holder to send one to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org
If the copyright holder doesn't use email, ask him to sign the text, scan it, and send the scan to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org

Hope this helps. -- Docu at 14:31, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, it will be done, but perhaps it will need more than 7 days. --Christian Ries (talk) 06:43, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Paul_Schroell_Diekirch.png

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Paul_Schroell_Diekirch.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Paul_Schroell_Diekirch.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

–Tryphon ^☂ 13:25, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Centre Pompidou Metz 03 lift roof.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:49, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Centre Pompidou Metz 01 map.jpg was recently deleted

File:Centre Pompidou Metz 01 map.jpg was recently deleted by Magog the Ogre for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in :Category:Centre Pompidou-Metz

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 04:58, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aeroport Findel Luxembourg terminal A 01.jpg

File:Aeroport Findel Luxembourg terminal A 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:16, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Christian Ries

Contents

Tip: Categorizing images

Gruss

Quality Image Promotion

Tip: Categorizing images

File tagging File:Jose_eduardo_agualusa_01.jpg

File:Centre Pompidou Metz 02 overview.jpg

Ferraris-Lizenz

File tagging File:José_Eduardo_Agualusa_autoportrait.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Paul_Schroell_Diekirch.png

Notification about possible deletion

File:Centre Pompidou Metz 01 map.jpg was recently deleted

File:Aeroport Findel Luxembourg terminal A 01.jpg

Navigation menu

User talk:Christian Ries

Tip: Categorizing images

Gruss

Quality Image Promotion

Tip: Categorizing images

File tagging File:Jose_eduardo_agualusa_01.jpg

File:Centre Pompidou Metz 02 overview.jpg

Ferraris-Lizenz

File tagging File:José_Eduardo_Agualusa_autoportrait.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Paul_Schroell_Diekirch.png

Notification about possible deletion

File:Centre Pompidou Metz 01 map.jpg was recently deleted

File:Aeroport Findel Luxembourg terminal A 01.jpg

Navigation menu

Search