User talk:Chath
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 05:41, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:No poster.svg is uncategorized since 6 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:41, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Явлинский в кабинете.png was uncategorized on 4 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:54, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Явлинский в кабинете.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Artem Korzhimanov (talk) 10:09, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Artur enikeev.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Artur enikeev.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Artur enikeev.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
And also:
Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:10, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.Dear Chath, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, |
Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!Dear Chath, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, |
File:Genshtab izmailovo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Yabloko 1993 2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Solyanik.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Martin H. (talk) 22:04, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
File:Vostrecov sergey.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Martin H. (talk) 22:07, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
File:Goncharov & gudkov jr.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Sealle (talk) 15:58, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
File:Manannikov.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Sealle (talk) 03:03, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
File:Sunovarov.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Sealle (talk) 03:09, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
File:Licey 1501.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sealle (talk) 03:37, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Samodurov.jpg
- File:Shaposhnikov A.jpg
- File:Sergey lebedev3.JPG
- File:Sergey lebedev2.JPG
- File:Kynev.jpg
- File:Galina mikhaleva.jpg
- File:Ivan Bolchakov.jpg
- File:Памятник Курчатову в Челябинске.jpg
- File:Nidresu.jpg
- File:Alex zix.jpg
- File:Yaroslavmartynov.jpg
- File:Kavkazsky.jpg
- File:Masha solovyenko.jpg
- File:Kirill goncharov2013.JPG
- File:Alex gnezdilov.JPG
- File:Anton krasosvki.jpg
- File:LevShlosberg.JPG
- File:Walls and towers of Donskoy Monastery 123.jpg
- File:Pavlovskaya bolnica.JPG
- File:Goncharov flag.jpg
- File:Kirill goncharov.jpg
- File:Pointer from chulym.jpg
- File:Suren gazaryan.jpg
- File:Hram rostoshi.JPG
- File:Газовик орен4.JPG
- File:Mitrokhin.jpg
Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 04:01, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Your account has been blocked
[edit]Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:42, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
File tagging File:Prosvirnin.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Prosvirnin.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Prosvirnin.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Sealle (talk) 10:49, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
- коментарий самого автора "условия использования CC BY-SA 3.0" разве не является информацией о лицензии? --Chath (talk) 04:35, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
File tagging File:Kubyshkin.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Kubyshkin.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kubyshkin.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Sealle (talk) 10:49, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
- коментарий самого автора "условия использования CC BY-SA 3.0" разве не является информацией о лицензии? --Chath (talk) 04:35, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- Вы в состоянии прочитать комментарий разделом ниже и отличить изображённое лицо от автора изображения? Sealle (talk) 04:53, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- фото мне предоставил сам Кубышкин, он хочет чтоб его фото было в википедии, и википедии наверное тоже от этого лучше. не проще вам написать совет как сделать так чтоб картинка имела право быть здесь, а не просто ругаться со мной и стремиться фото удалить? --Chath (talk) 07:45, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- Попытайтесь вникнуть в то, что Вам уже неоднократно поясняли, ничего нового Вы не услышите. Желание изображённого лица увидеть себя в Википедии никак не помогает размещению фото. Требуется разрешение фотографа, оформленное согласно COM:OTRS/ru. Sealle (talk) 10:11, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- объясните плз что было не так с фото Просвирнина? сам автор указал в коментарии к фото лицензию распространения. Если там все ок, ее можно загрузить вновь? --46.188.121.166 10:41, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- Для начала - кто это? Незарегистрированные участники ничего загрузить не могут. Далее, для участника Chath: попробую найти предельно простую, доступную для Вашего понимания аналогию: когда Вы смотритесь в зеркало, Вы понимаете, что с одной стороны человек, а с другой - его отражение? Намного ли сложнее понять, что по одну сторону фотокамеры находится автор изображения, имеющий на него авторские права, а по другую - изображенное лицо, которое этими правами не обладает? Sealle (talk) 11:11, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- вот у меня дома есть фотографии где я изображен, кто автор - уже давно забыли, я выложу и опубликую эту лицензию, и пускай все пользуются, в чем проблема тут? если мы ведем речь о пользе энциклопедии, а не занимаемся формализмом. Как быть если изображенный сам залил фото на свою страницу в соцести и опубликовал лицензию? потому что снимал друг, девушка или жена наконец? как сделать так чтоб фото была в википедии. ннапомню что фото нужно и самой энциклопедии тоже. --Chath (talk) 11:36, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- К Вашим услугам один из форумов: ru:Википедия:Форум/Авторское право и Commons:Форум. Возможно, у кого-то там достанет терпения объяснить Вам очевидные вещи, которых Вы никак не хотите понять. Sealle (talk) 13:22, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- вот у меня дома есть фотографии где я изображен, кто автор - уже давно забыли, я выложу и опубликую эту лицензию, и пускай все пользуются, в чем проблема тут? если мы ведем речь о пользе энциклопедии, а не занимаемся формализмом. Как быть если изображенный сам залил фото на свою страницу в соцести и опубликовал лицензию? потому что снимал друг, девушка или жена наконец? как сделать так чтоб фото была в википедии. ннапомню что фото нужно и самой энциклопедии тоже. --Chath (talk) 11:36, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- Для начала - кто это? Незарегистрированные участники ничего загрузить не могут. Далее, для участника Chath: попробую найти предельно простую, доступную для Вашего понимания аналогию: когда Вы смотритесь в зеркало, Вы понимаете, что с одной стороны человек, а с другой - его отражение? Намного ли сложнее понять, что по одну сторону фотокамеры находится автор изображения, имеющий на него авторские права, а по другую - изображенное лицо, которое этими правами не обладает? Sealle (talk) 11:11, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- объясните плз что было не так с фото Просвирнина? сам автор указал в коментарии к фото лицензию распространения. Если там все ок, ее можно загрузить вновь? --46.188.121.166 10:41, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- Попытайтесь вникнуть в то, что Вам уже неоднократно поясняли, ничего нового Вы не услышите. Желание изображённого лица увидеть себя в Википедии никак не помогает размещению фото. Требуется разрешение фотографа, оформленное согласно COM:OTRS/ru. Sealle (talk) 10:11, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- фото мне предоставил сам Кубышкин, он хочет чтоб его фото было в википедии, и википедии наверное тоже от этого лучше. не проще вам написать совет как сделать так чтоб картинка имела право быть здесь, а не просто ругаться со мной и стремиться фото удалить? --Chath (talk) 07:45, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- Вы в состоянии прочитать комментарий разделом ниже и отличить изображённое лицо от автора изображения? Sealle (talk) 04:53, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
File tagging File:Badamshin.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Badamshin.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Badamshin.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Sealle (talk) 10:50, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
- Лицо, изображённое на снимке, не является автором изображения и не может указывать условия его размещения. Требуется разрешение от фотографа, оформленное согласно COM:OTRS/ru. Sealle (talk) 10:52, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Category:WLM/xxx
[edit]На самом деле, нет никакой необходимости создавать служебные категории вида WLM/xxx, заложенный в них функционал - группировка фотографий по номеру объекта культурного наследия - достигается и при их существовании в виртуальной форме (вот так). Но уж если Вы их делаете, то, пожалуйста, придерживайтесь задуманного для них формата. То есть в описании категории не должно быть написано ничего лишнего и они должны выглядеть как тут. Собственно, такие названия категорий правила Викисклада запрещают, поэтому не надо их бездумно плодить и делать видимыми. И ещё - Вы прописываете такие служебные категории в Викиданные, что совершенно бессмысленно по причине их служебного характера. Извините за беспокойство. -- Ludvig14 (talk) 23:55, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- Замечательно, что Вы теперь делаете служебные категории типа WLM/xxx скрытыми, спасибо большое! Но поскольку, как я пыталась объяснить выше, никакой необходимости в них нет, то было бы гораздо полезнее делать вместо них категории объектов культурного наследия, вроде вот такой, а если ещё выполнить категоризацию всех относящихся к объекту фотографий (часто вместо общей категории Cultural heritage monuments in Russia) и вписать сделанную категорию в соответствующий список, то Ваш вклад станет совершенно бесценным. И вот такие категории в Викиданные уже имеет смысл вносить, вместо полюбившихся Вам WLM/xxx, которые я все равно методично удаляю. Ещё раз извините. -- Ludvig14 (talk) 19:41, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
- я их делаю исключительно с целью подсчета сколько ОКН сфотографировано в рамках WLM. А у вас есть логичное объяснение зачем вы их удаляете? --Chath (talk) 20:00, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
- Мне кажется, подсчет можно как-то автоматизировать с использованием списков Викигида, но на вскидку ничего в голову не приходит. В любом случае ручная работа тут точно не лучшее решение и если это в самом деле зачем-то нужно, то лучше поискать способ сделать это автоматически. Попробуйте поговорить про это в Пивной Викигида. Возможно, найдутся ботоводы, готовые помочь.
- я их делаю исключительно с целью подсчета сколько ОКН сфотографировано в рамках WLM. А у вас есть логичное объяснение зачем вы их удаляете? --Chath (talk) 20:00, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
- Что касается этих категорий, есть пара обсуждений в недрах Викигида (раз и два), откуда ясно, что ни у кого нет никаких сомнений, что им в Викиданных делать нечего. Объяснение простое - мы породили эти служебные категории для обслуживания списков и никакой смысловой нагрузки за ними не стоит. -- Ludvig14 (talk) 22:44, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Зачем убрал категорию?))
[edit]Он секретарь НРО,значит и политик Нижнего Новгорода)) Панн (talk) 16:38, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
File:Vladimir Antokhin.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:10, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
File:Slabunova Emilia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:11, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Старец Илий, Ревва и Лушников.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Старец Илий, Ревва и Лушников.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Старец Илий, Ревва и Лушников.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:12, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Илий и Лушников.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Илий и Лушников.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Илий и Лушников.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:12, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Илий (Ноздрин).jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Илий (Ноздрин).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Илий (Ноздрин).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:12, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Dadin ildar.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Dadin ildar.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Dadin ildar.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:14, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violations
[edit]
Hello Chath.
You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful. This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions. |
--Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:15, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Удаление категорий наград
[edit]Добрый день! Вижу что Вы уже около месяца систематически удаляете категории наград из страниц, посвящённых Героям Советского Союза. В том числе и мой труд. Зачем? Разве Вы не видите, что далеко не все награды дублируются в Wikidata? --Vasyatka1 (talk) 07:08, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- именно чтоб подгружалось из викидаты, потому что например категория "Category:Recipients of the Order of the Patriotic War" вообще должна быть пуста. ради этого удаляю. буду внимательнее. благодарю. --Chath (talk) 08:06, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Chath,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 01:12, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Chath,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Chath,
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 20:01, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Tarnavskiy.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Tarnavskiy.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tarnavskiy.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:44, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:48, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted content
[edit]
File:Kurianovo stroitsya 2.png
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.And also:
Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 14:11, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted content
[edit]
File:Rosenstein house (Ulan-Ude).jpg
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.And also:
Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 18:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Kirill Shulika.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Kirill Shulika.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Kirill Shulika.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:05, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:Galina Davydova.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Galina Davydova.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Galina Davydova.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Trade (talk) 18:48, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
File tagging File:Galina Davydova1.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Galina Davydova1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Galina Davydova1.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Trade (talk) 18:49, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Doclys👨⚕️👩⚕️ 🩺 • 💉 11:13, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Doclys👨⚕️👩⚕️ 🩺 • 💉 08:54, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Doclys👨⚕️👩⚕️ 🩺 • 💉 08:55, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Doclys👨⚕️👩⚕️ 🩺 • 💉 08:58, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Doclys👨⚕️👩⚕️ 🩺 • 💉 09:03, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
File:Anastasia Brukhanova.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : FlorianH76.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 22:37, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Nikolay Mikhaylovsky has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |