User talk:C messier/Archive 7

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amstel Hotel 2034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:25, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magere Brug 2821.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:26, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Academiegebouw Groningen 1224.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:30, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello C messier,

I'm writing you as one of the most active Commons users right now. Since a while now, the idea of a dedicated Commons conference has been floating around. But since the last Wikimania concrete steps have been taken to actually make it happen next year. If you're interested in participation or maybe willing to help organize the first ever Commons Conference, I invite you to check out the project page and leave your comments; or just show your support for the idea, by signing up.

Cheers,

--MB-one (talk) 12:22, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stadsschouwburg, Amsterdam 2333.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:18, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weteringschans 10 Villa 2325.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:19, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Κυβερνητικό Μέγαρο Καταλονίας 2563.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:11, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galleria Vittorio Emanuele II 2382.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Capricorn4049 21:25, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Σαγράδια Φαμίλια 2941.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:28, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weteringschans 10 Villa 7238.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 04:21, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weteringschans 16 Villa 2324.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:48, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Martinitoren 1252.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok, some noise in the sky.--ArildV 20:18, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Συναγωγή Χρόνιγχεν 1245.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 20:23, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oude Lutherse Kerk 2341.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:57, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nieuw Sint Anthonygasthuis 1571.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:21, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sint-Vincentiuskerk, Volendam 7358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:21, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aakerk huismeesters 1456.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:22, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oude Lutherse Kerk 2341.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:57, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nieuw Sint Anthonygasthuis 1571.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:21, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sint-Vincentiuskerk, Volendam 7358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:21, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aakerk huismeesters 1456.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:22, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stolphoevekerkje 7388.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality is high enoough for Q1 but the composition does not really impressed me (especially the Tol-milieu-container) --Michielverbeek 13:33, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oosterkerk, Groningen 1054.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:26, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Martinitoren 1120.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1. However IMO the early morning is the best moment to make a photo from this (church)tower --Michielverbeek 13:41, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drilburg 7402.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 18:48, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Korenbeurs, Groningen 1516.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Marianne Casamance 15:19, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aakerk 1520.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Marianne Casamance 15:19, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scheepvaarthuis 7409.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Marianne Casamance 15:19, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sint-Bonifatiuskerk, Leeuwarden 1642.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good picture of the clock. --Capricorn4049 20:44, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moses and Aaron Church, Amsterdam 2917.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:18, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beurs van Berlage 2508.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:10, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oosterkerk, Groningen 1072.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:38, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oude Rechtbank 1486.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 22:19, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scheepvaarthuis 7417.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI imo.--ArildV 19:09, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sint-Jozefkerk, Delfzijl 1416.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 00:19, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paradiso, Amsterdam 7239.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Please, remove branches in left upper corner. Overall quality is nice, but detached branches not needed here. --Nino Verde 11:37, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done --C messier 14:58, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
QI now--Capricorn4049 19:46, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuschinski Theater 2894.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 09:36, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 22:36, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scheepvaarthuis 7410.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:16, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rijksmuseum from Museumplein 2523.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:16, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria delle Grazie 2457.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:25, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waalse Kerk, Amsterdam 2098.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 13:59, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Concertgebouw from Museumplein 2539.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:37, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meerzijde t.o 9 burg 7361.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 03:36, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Metz Amsterdam 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:03, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brug bij St. Vincentiuskerk 7355.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 11:06, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Metz Amsterdam 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 23:08, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Καθεδρικός της Ουτρέχτης 7097.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality PumpkinSky 00:20, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scheepvaarthuis 7408.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak  Support Sharpness and DoF could be better, cropped sign. --XRay 13:59, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoger de Aa 21-23 1471.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. Description could be improved. --XRay 08:08, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leiden city hall 6908.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:44, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oude Kerk tower 2136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:15, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scheepvaarthuis 7136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:13, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pintohuis 2916.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:13, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scheepvaarthuis 7133.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Question Could you consider to do the same as you did for your Sagrada Familia, regarding the crane ?--Jebulon 19:31, 8 September 2017 (UTC)✓ Done --C messier 12:59, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
@Jebulon: ? --C messier 13:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 Comment Please check your image for CAs at the lamp posts left. IMO the image could be QI, but - sorry - it's not one of your best images. --XRay 08:45, 18 September 2017 (UTC) Support Good enough for me--Jebulon 09:45, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centraal Apotheek 1635.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morschpoort, Leiden 7047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:41, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hooglandse Kerk 6991.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--ArildV 04:38, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dom Quarter 7082.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 10:27, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oude Kerk ceiling 1712.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --KTC 09:04, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oude Kerk Cornelis Janszoon de Haen memorial 1778.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 15:08, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magere Brug 2044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:30, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amsterdam 2841.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  SupportYes, difficult conditions.--Jebulon 16:24, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oude Kerk pillar 1768.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality; could use a bit more contrast in the lit areas, but good enough for me. --Crisco 1492 10:55, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nieuwe Kerk transept organ 2583.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough --Shansov.net 22:09, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nieuwe Kerk organ 2604 - 2607.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 20:31, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leiden lion 6919.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:09, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krijtberg 2856.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:36, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nieuwe Kerk ceiling 2562.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:38, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morschpoort, Leiden 7042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:53, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amsterdam Central station 2144.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for me Sixflashphoto 03:26, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nieuwe Kerk entrance 2609.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 18:40, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nieuwe Kerk 2610.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 18:42, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museum Ons' Lieve Heer op Solder 2462.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 19:55, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nieuwe Kerk - Jan van Galen monument 2585.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Pity the person left. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 14:58, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trippenhuis 2945.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 08:25, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leiden Fort 6924.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:33, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leiden - Hartebrugkerk 6898.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and composition.--ArildV 21:52, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nieuwe Kerk ceiling 2611.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 03:25, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nieuwe Kerk crypt 2571.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 17:35, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museum Ons' Lieve Heer op Solder 2449.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 09:06, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amsterdam Gymnasium 2329.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:34, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montelbaanstoren 7146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moahim 09:08, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amsterdam Royal Palace Atlas 1982.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit much around the main subject, but OK for me. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 14:04, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Munttoren 2085.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok, better --Poco a poco 20:02, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oude Kerk pipe organ 1723.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moahim 09:39, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waag Leiden 6892.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 13:23, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leiden Fort 6961.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 13:23, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rijksmuseum winter 7441.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments some issues, but overall ok for QI --Carschten 01:29, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oude Kerk choir stall 1775.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 08:28, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arc de Triomf, Barcelona 2716.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:34, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amsterdam Royal Palace 7303.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:40, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amsterdam Royal Palace 2701.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 18:42, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amsterdam Royal Palace 2708.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 18:41, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Napoleon's clock - Amsterdam Royal Palace 2822.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak  Support, I wish there were less reflections. --Basotxerri 20:19, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amsterdam Royal Palace 2866.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:22, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amsterdam Royal Palace 2748.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:44, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amsterdam Royal Palace 2807.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, but can be sharper. --Moahim 06:41, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amsterdam Royal Palace 2741.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moahim 14:55, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amsterdam Royal Palace 2868.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Photo could have been a bit sharper, but good enough for me ..--Famberhorst 17:15, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rijnsburgersingel 6844.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moahim 14:55, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schreierstoren 7329.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:09, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dam Amsterdam 7308.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:27, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amsterdam Royal Palace 2863.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 09:57, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amsterdam Royal Palace 2880.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 10:37, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Valk Leiden 6847.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 19:45, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schreierstoren 7332.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. I assume that the uilding to the right is actually leaning IRL. --W.carter 19:45, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amsterdam Royal Palace 7299.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice --Pudelek 10:53, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amsterdam Royal Palace 2855.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:21, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amsterdam Royal Palace 2705.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amsterdam Royal Palace 2829.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:54, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vierschaar Amsterdam 2878.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Bottom part less sharply, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 15:47, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Doelen Hotel 2899.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Good quality, but first please cut the right side of the image (see the note) --Halavar 14:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)✓ Done --C messier 12:53, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 17:48, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beurs van Berlage 2506.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:54, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magna Plaza 2665.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:11, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Παναγία Πορταρέα 3816.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 22:13, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leiden - Gravensteen 7015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak  Support, could be sharper. --Basotxerri 18:37, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Westerkerk tower, Amsterdam 2505.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:39, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Σιδηροδρομικός σταθμός Βόλου 3601.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:38, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Καμπαναριό Αγίου Νικολάου, Πορταριά 3820.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Skelanard 14:38, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Μητροπολιτικός ναός Αγίου Νικολάου, Βόλος 3688.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 20:10, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Begijnhofkapel 2553.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 14:23, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keizersgracht 431-3A 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 14:23, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gijselaarsbank 7027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Had a bit sharper but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 18:25, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brug 44 and 46 Keizersgracht 3022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality considering the conditions. --Dirtsc 07:50, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oosterkerk, Groningen 6822.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 07:50, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Παναγία Πορταρέα 3816.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Παναγία Πορταρέα 3816.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Χάνι Δίκου 3587.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:37, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palau Reial Major 2574.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The perimeter of the building could have been a little sharper. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 16:32, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Παναγία Πορταρέα 3813 - 3815.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 04:09, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Official tourist information - Barcelona 2551.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:21, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Βαρκελώνη 2706.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 20:46, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Μεταμορφώσεως του Σωτήρος, Βόλος 3659.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 20:18, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Σιδηροδρομικός σταθμός Βόλου 3606.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 20:18, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Χαλβαδοποιία Παπαγιανόπουλου 3623.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:32, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oudegracht 7103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 20:19, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Παλιά Βόλου 3595.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 20:19, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Παλιά Βόλου 3593.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:56, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Σιδηροδρομικός σταθμός Βόλου 3599.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Looks abandoned. --Ermell 07:56, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Δικαστικό Μέγαρο Βόλου 3678.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Okay for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:16, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Μητροπολιτικός ναός Αγίου Νικολάου, Βόλος 3686.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Photo could have been a bit sharper. But the quality is good enough for me.--Famberhorst 17:04, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Καπναποθήκες Σπίρερ 3653.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 18:04, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Οικία Τσικρίκη 3512.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:03, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίας Τριάδας, Άνω Βόλος 3757.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:57, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Καμινάδες εργοστασίου Τσαλαπάτα 3742.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:18, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Αργώ Βόλος 3500.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment There's a bit of green CA that could do with removing, I think.--Peulle 20:32, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done Removed a slight one. --C messier 14:27, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Κωνσταντίνου, Βόλος 3720.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 18:30, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Μνημεία μάχης Σαρακηνού και Ογλ 3867.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:16, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Παναγία Πορταρέα 3817.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 19:31, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Σιδηροδρομικός σταθμός Βόλου 3605.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:54, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Lakenhal 6864.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:03, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ταφικό μνημείο Κηφισιάς 3460.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Λευκοχώρι Ηρακλείου 4427.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Παναγία Πορταρέα 3810.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:16, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Πορταριά 3861.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:00, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ίνι Ηρακλείου 4439.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 20:40, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ίνι Ηρακλείου 4442.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 20:40, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Λαογραφικό Μουσείο Ινίου 4437.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Σταυράκια 4453.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 07:19, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Πανασός 4292.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 07:26, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Αστρίτσι 4449.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:00, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Άνω Βόλος 3761.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:57, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Αρχοντικό Τοπάλη 3997.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:52, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Καμπαναριό Αμάρι 4363.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:37, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αρχαγγέλου Μιχαήλ, Πραιτώρια 0281.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp enough, good perspective, focus is well done so the quality is high enoogh for Q1--Michielverbeek 15:09, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Άγιος Θωμάς 0186.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:22, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Βακτιότες 0291.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 11:50, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Χαράκι Ηρακλείου 0304.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The photo could have been sharper (with a tripod?). but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 18:46, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Αχεντριάς 0265.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments How nice of the fog/cloud to hide the potentially unsharp regions of the image! --Daniel Case 05:28, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Φουρφουράς 4309.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice angle; avoided really blowing out the white buildings. --Daniel Case 05:28, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Θωμά Ηρακλείου 0200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice color; noisy up top but that can happen with long exposures. --Daniel Case 21:21, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Τσιφούτ Καστέλι 0299.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Fog hides the parts that would be unsharp --Daniel Case 21:21, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Υδραγωγείο Λύκτου 0752.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:55, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Σαγράδα Φαμίλια 2941.jpg - Image Permission

Dear C messier,
I am a retired proffessor and currently redacting my compiled course notes into a book named "History of Interior Design and Furniture” which will be in turkish language and will be distributed in Turkey. It is a cultural and educational reference book.I would like to use the image from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:%CE%A3%CE%B1%CE%B3%CF%81%CE%AC%CE%B4%CE%B1_%CE%A6%CE%B1%CE%BC%CE%AF%CE%BB%CE%B9%CE%B1_2941.jpg
I kindly ask for your permission and information about terms and conditions of using your image. Your name will be indicated at the end of the book in the photo credits part.
Yours Sincerely
Prof. Mustafa Demirkan
mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com
--Mustidede (talk) 16:22, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Παναγία Πορταρέα 3813 - 3815.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Παναγία Πορταρέα 3813 - 3815.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ελαφονήσι πανόραμα 978 - 985.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Horizon tilts on the right side a bit but overall good quality. An interesting motif. --Milseburg 14:55, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Fotos from Wikipedia to Commons

Καλησπέρα. Είδα ότι ασχολείσαι στα Wikimedia Commons. Θα μπορούσες να με βοηθήσεις σε κάτι; Μετάφερα με το εργαλείο "F.t.C.G." σχεδόν όλες μου τις φωτογραφίες από το λογαριασμό μου στην Ελληνική Βικιπαίδεια, οι οποίες είχαν ξεμείνει εκεί όπου και τις είχα μεταφορτώσει αρχικά, στον αντίστοιχο εδώ στα Wikimedia Commons. Θα μπορούσες να τις διαγράψεις -πλην 6 που δεν έχουν την σχετική σήμανση "Added Template:Now Commons tag (FtCG)"- από εκεί ώστε να παραμείνουν μόνο στα Commons και να μην υπάρχουν διπλότυπα;--Enpatrais (talk) 21:06, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capella de Santa Àgata 2982.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:41, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Άγιος Θωμάς 196.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:41, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear C messier,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Άγιος Ιωάννης Ρεβυθάς 0910.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:22, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Ευαγγελισμού, Άγιος Θωμάς Ηρακλείου 0184.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:22, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Σίβα Ηρακλείου 0162.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:38, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Λότζια Ηρακλείου 0727.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Photo could have been sharper. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:02, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Ταξιαρχών Ντάγλα 1892.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --TheRunnerUp 17:31, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Πλακόστρωτο στο Ανάκτορο Γαλατά 1546.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 19:02, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Παλιά Βουλή των Ελλήνων 1158-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 17:46, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίας Σοφίας, Κορώνη 1342.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:04, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ανάκτορο Γαλατά 1554.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:11, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Μέγαρο Παλαιάς Βουλής 1150-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:11, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίας Σοφίας, Κορώνη 1344.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:11, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Κάστρο Κορώνης 2027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 18:09, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Μονή Τιμίου Προδρόμου Κορώνης 1913.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 22:46, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίας Σοφίας, Κορώνη 2034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 21:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Μονή Τιμίου Προδρόμου Κορώνης 2038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 21:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Άγιος Ανδρέας Λογγά 1495.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 21:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Μονή Αγίων Θεοδώρων, Κορώνη 1506.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI. Dmitry Ivanov 18:14, 12 September 2018 (UTC).

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Κάστρο Κορώνης 2037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 16:37, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Παλαιό Γυμνάσιο Πύλου 1661.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:18, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Υδραγωγείο Πύλου 1657.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:18, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Μονή Αγίων Θεοδώρων, Κορώνη 1501.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It needs additional categories --Poco a poco 17:18, 13 September 2018 (UTC)✓ Done --C messier 15:52, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
I believe that each church deserves an own cat, but ok --Poco a poco 06:29, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:06, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Κυκλικός προμαχώνας Κορώνης 1402.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Interesting textures under moonlight (but you could probably get rid of that stray leaf on the left side --Daniel Case 19:40, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Κάστρο Κορώνης 2046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:55, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Μονή Αγίων Θεοδώρων, Κορώνη 1505.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:55, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Σαγράδα Φαμίλια 3382.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 12:03, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Κάστρο Μονζουίκ 3231 - 3233.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 14:05, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Μονή Αγίων Θεοδώρων, Κορώνη 1500.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:48, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Υδραγωγείο Πύλου 1658.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:15, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Οικία Τσικλητήρα 1662.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:15, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Χαραλάμπου, Κορώνη 1358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:28, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Πέτρου στους Εννέα Πύργους 1838.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
I wonder if it would be ok to remove the "no entry" sign. It's very distracting. --Zinnmann 17:00, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
Good quality. --Tobias ToMar Maier 02:05, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Μεταμόρφωσης Σωτήρος, Κορωπί 1888.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:03, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

A little request

Hello! Sorry for disturbing. I've uploaded a new version of my image that you comented. I hope that I understood you correctly, however I did some modification particularly increasing sharpness and reducing the greenish. So can you rewiev it again and make your remarks if it remains poor for promotion. Thank you:) --Lystopad (talk) 12:05, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

It was nomination for the 3rd of Oct. --Lystopad (talk) 12:08, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Πύλη κάστρου Κορώνης 1948.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Please add a few more categories. --MB-one 19:49, 11 October 2018 (UTC)✓ Done --C messier 15:52, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Πέτρου στους Εννέα Πύργους 1839-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 21:00, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Δημητρίου Σαρωνικού 1869.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 22:36, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Είσοδος κάστρου Μεθώνης 1628.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 22:11, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Παναγιά Μερέντα 1899.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 21:21, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Κάστρο Μεθώνης 1742.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 21:18, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Μεταμόρφωσης Σωτήρος, Κορωπί 1886.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:06, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Μονή Τιμίου Προδρόμου, Κορώνη 1360.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not the sharpest photo, but for me quality is high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:51, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Παναγιά Μερέντα 1897.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:15, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Κάστρο Μεθώνης 1743.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:38, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Μεθώνη 1638.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:29, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Κάστρο Μεθώνης 1745.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:36, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 October 2018 (UTC)