User talk:Bunks
Babel user information | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Users by language |
Who am I?/¿Quién soy?
[edit]I'm the same admin Bunks on de:. I use this same username on all the projects that I register in. At WWW.flickr.com my user name is "Afrobrasil" At www.fotocommunity.de my user name is also "Bunks" and "Afrobrasil"
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you.--Dear orgullomoore, this foto received a worldwide free license "public Domain" because I have produced the foto. It is also published under my name Bunks Afrobrasil in Flickr. Therefore no Copyright violation possible --Bunks 15 November 2007
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 08:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, PigeonIP (talk) 17:53, 6 May 2013 (UTC) PigeonIP (talk) 17:53, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
- You have doubts that my foto File:CF Saboia.jpg qualify for scientific, educational or cultural purposes. Here is my response:
1. I never take a foto without asking the persons, if it is such a type of portrait. I hate it by myself if somebody takes a foto of me without asking. Therefore I can garantee that for this photo I did ask the persons directly in the moment. This was some time ago (2001). 2. In the backgroud you see a big Azulejo painting (typical portuguese tile artwork). I was informed before in 2001 that this station will be totally renewed and the wall tiles will be taken away. So it was nearly the last oportunity to take a photo of this wonderful tile paintings. For your information some months later the whole south portuguese railway line was renewed (intercity connection) and all old railway station buildings were restructured or demolished. The historic clock shown at the upper side of the photo has also been taken away. This was my main motivation to take the photo and it was worthwhile. It took during these years hundreds of photos from other CF stations in Portugal (if you follow my fotos in Wikimedia), which today do not exist anymore in this shown format. Especially if ornaments (like these tiles) and some architectural structures have been taken away/or were modernized. The only reason for taking the photo with the people was the fact that they were sitting there in front of the tiles. The real object of the photo are the tiles and the historic clock and not the people in front. From a later foto which I found on Flickr it turns out that the above mentioned about 80 years old clock was exchanged agains a modern model lateron. http://www.flickr.com/photos/pgarte/3654777897/ From the above information it is obvious that there is of course a high scientific and cultural purpose to keep this foto in Wikimedia.Bunks (talk) 16:46, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Serra Grandola.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Serra Grandola.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Serra Grandola.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:52, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Serra Grandola.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Serra Grandola.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Serra Grandola.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |