User talk:Botedance
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
File:Portada de hellboy.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Okki (talk) 02:25, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
File tagging Image:El Rojo de Hitler.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:El Rojo de Hitler.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:Image:El Rojo de Hitler.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Túrelio (talk) 17:54, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content.
We do this because Commons is a shared media repository. Downstream wikis have different policies based on local laws. Uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules. In addition, fair use is not compatible with our aim as a collection of freely distributable media files. Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions. Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally if your project allows this.
|
--Justass (talk) 19:49, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
File:Alatriste_2006film_poster.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
—LX (talk, contribs) 17:35, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Copyright violations
[edit]
Hello Botedance.
You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful. This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 17:35, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
File:La_historia_oficial_2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Denniss (talk) 12:47, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content.
We do this because Commons is a shared media repository. Downstream wikis have different policies based on local laws. Uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules. In addition, fair use is not compatible with our aim as a collection of freely distributable media files. Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions. Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally if your project allows this.
|
Martin H. (talk) 16:14, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
File:Afiche nazareno.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Martin H. (talk) 16:16, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Use esta plantilla únicamente para fotos y NO para dibujos u otras obras de arte.! The copyright expiration for this is 50 years, so its not free. --Martin H. (talk) 16:16, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
File:Agora_pelicula.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
—LX (talk, contribs) 14:08, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
File:Torrente_el_brazo_tonto_de_la_ley.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
—LX (talk, contribs) 14:13, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
File:Javier_Fesser.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
—LX (talk, contribs) 14:17, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
File:La_gran_aventura_de_mortadelo_y_filemon.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
—LX (talk, contribs) 14:17, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
- Como veo que me pones todas hago una respuesta al conjunto. Todas las imagenes estan con este derecho {{Cc-by-sa-2.5-es}}. Y muchas imagenes se han hecho mediante esto por lo que yo estoy publicando algo con unos derechos de autor. No se de donde eres pero tiene valided en España ya que muchas imagenes que se han colocado tienen esta plantilla.--Botedance (talk) 14:23, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
- Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started, as this makes conversations easier to follow. I am watching this page, so I will see responses made here.
- I don't speak Spanish, and the Google translation of your message makes no sense. I assume you ask about why your uploads are being identified as copyright violations.
- File:La gran aventura de mortadelo y filemon.jpg is a copyright violation because it is copyrighted by Warner, who have not published it under the terms of {{Cc-by-sa-2.5-es}}.
- File:Torrente el brazo tonto de la ley.jpg and File:Torrente el brazo tonto de la ley.jpg are copyright violations because they are copyrighted by Manga Films, who have not published them under the terms of {{Cc-by-sa-2.5-es}}.
- File:Agora pelicula.jpg is a copyright violation because it is copyrighted by Fox, who have not published it under the terms of {{Cc-by-sa-2.5-es}}.
- When sourcing content from 20minutos.es, note that only content produced by 20minutos.es themselves is published it under the terms of {{Cc-by-sa-2.5-es}}. Content from third parties is explicitly excluded, as explained on http://www.20minutos.es/licencia_20_minutos/.
- File:Javier Fesser.jpg because you falsely claimed that the photograph was your own work and that you were the author and copyright holder, although you actually took it from http://videochat.ozu.es/videochat.php?videochat=Fesser.
- Please note that it is a criminal offense to make fraudulent claims about the authorship and licensing of copyrighted works. —LX (talk, contribs) 14:46, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, yes, I said this. I will upload only images whose author was died before 1940.--Botedance (talk) 15:42, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
- Moving your comment back here where it belongs. Again, please respect my wish to keep discussions where they started. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:44, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
- I'm respect you. Sorry for don't respect you, but this is not my idea.--Botedance (talk) 12:30, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Copyright violations
[edit]
Hello Botedance.
You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful. This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions. |
Lucien (es·m·com) 14:37, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:37, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Plató El internado.jpg was uncategorized on 4 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:37, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:David el Gnomo.jpg was uncategorized on 21 November 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:37, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Camera café.jpg was uncategorized on 8 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Firma de Arturo Moreno.jpg was uncategorized on 29 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:03, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Imágenes
[edit]Hola Botedance, un saludo antes de nada.
Me pasaba por tu página de discusión para darte un consejo que deberías tomarte en serio: en el café has puesto como ejemplo unas imágenes que muestran al equipo de los Serrano y de el Internado, y te quejas porque, mientras esas imágenes permanecen subidas, las tuyas son sistemáticamente borradas. Bueno, te explico: hay una diferencia bastante simple entre esas imágenes y las que tú has subido (o al menos, cuando te las han borrado, me imagino que la hay): mientras que tus imágenes las has sacado de un sitio web al azar y te las has atribuido como trabajo propio (lo hiciste así, ¿verdad?) las imágenes en cuestión están sacadas de 20 minutos, y las imágenes de 20 minutos se publican bajo una licencia libre (mientras que se desconoce qué licencia tienen realmente las imágenes que tú subes), eso quiere decir que, con la debida mención al autor y con la indicación de la URL de donde se sacó la imagen, no hay ningún problema en mantener las imágenes.
Por eso te digo: si quieres subir alguna imagen de Aquí no hay quien viva, sácala de 20 minutos, atribúyela debidamente y pon cc-by-sa-2.1-es como licencia.
Y bueno, si tienes alguna duda me preguntas. Espero haberte ayudado. Luispihormiguero (talk) 12:40, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Por ejemplo: entre tus imágenes no borradas está la de Javier Fesser. ¿Y por qué? ¡Pues porque está sacada de 20 minutos y debidamente atribuida! Así deberías hacerlo con todas. Luispihormiguero (talk) 12:45, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- ¿Y citaste a 20 minutos como autor, pusiste esa licencia y diste ese enlace en la fuente? Luispihormiguero (talk) 13:25, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
Las únicas imágenes válidas de 20 minutos son las firmadas por 20minutos.es como esta. En la licencia se explica claramente: Esta licencia no se aplica a los contenidos publicados por 20minutos procedentes de los terceros siguientes: Textos, gráficos, informaciones e imágenes que vayan firmados o sean atribuidos a Agencias, Reuters, EFE, Europa Press, Korpa, Atlas, France Press, AP, J.M. Nieto o Jorge París. Precisamente de Jorge París son muchas de las imágenes que habías subido. Todas ellas han sido borradas, ahora sabes el motivo, por lo que espero que no vuelvas a cometer el mismo error y antes de subir una imagen leas los términos de uso de la página web. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 18:08, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
- Pues te iba a decir que no te arriesgases, por si acaso, pero Anna te ha dicho el porqué (que yo desconocía).
- Encantado de haber ayudado. Luispihormiguero (talk) 20:39, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
Póster
[edit]Aunque la foto la haya tomado alguien de 20 minutos es el poster de una película de hace dos años y tiene copyright, por lo tanto no se puede relicenciar. Si has leído la sección de lo no permitido habrás visto la mención a los pósters con menos de 70 años. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 17:42, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
File:Spanish_Movie.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
High Contrast (talk) 14:43, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
File:Antonia_San_Juan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Trycatch (talk) 00:12, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
File:La_familia_Mata.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Trycatch (talk) 00:38, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Trycatch (talk) 22:05, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Consejo
[edit]En vista del post File:Aguila Roja.jpg en el café, quisiera decirte una cosa: no uses el café para proponer el borrado de una imagen, propón el borrado de la misma directamente en su página, añadiendo una plantilla. Yo recomiendo usar siempre la de "delete". Es la más fácil de añadir. A la izquierda, en herramientas, verás que pone "Nominate for deletion". Dale ahí si crees tener motivos válidos para borrar una imagen, una página de ayuda o cualquier otra cosa que haya en commons, pon tu motivo (siempre en inglés, muy importante) y ya, automáticamente la imagen tendrá la plantilla, se habrá abierto una discusión de borrado, se habrá avisado al que subió la imagen, etcétera.
Si la imagen es una violación muy evidente de copyright, como un fotograma de algún programa televisivo o algo por el estilo, puedes poner copyvio (entre llaves, preferiblemente encima de la descripción). El copyvio es una variante del speedydelete (también debes ponerlo entre llaves), sólo que éste se usa para imágenes de muy mala calidad, vandalismo o cosas que no merezcan una discusión previa para borrado, aunque yo, en cualquier caso, recomiendo hacer lo primero que he dicho. Es lo mejor que hay, pues permite borrar una imagen con una discusión previa, con lo cual el usuario podrá defenderse, dar sus motivos y aprender del error, cosa que jamás podría suceder si se usase un borrado rápido. El "delete" (que también se puede poner manualmente, poniéndolo entre llaves encima de la descripción, aunque es muy preferible hacerlo como yo he dicho) he visto que lo recomiendan para usuarios novatos, pero la verdad es que todos, en cualquier momento y de cualquier forma, tenemos algo que apreder, por eso yo jamás usaré copyvio o speedydelete.
Para lo que necesites, Luispihormiguero Any problem? 21:21, 24 September 2010 (UTC).
- Uh, qué pena. Lo siento, pero no puedo ver esa imagen. Me dice que "Firefox no ha podido encontrar la página filmaffnity". De todas formas, he visto la copia caché de la página principal de ese sitio y veo que abajo pone "All rights reserved", aunque a lo mejor eso no tiene que ver con las imágenes, o no influye a las imágenes de PD-Shape.
- ¿Podrías describirme detalladamente esa imagen o subirla a picassa o a algún sitio para que la vea? No se me ocurre otra cosa. Luispihormiguero Any problem? 18:18, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Por lo que me dices, no parece que haya ningún problema. Tú tienes dos imágenes similares y no se te han borrado.
- Lo que no sé es qué licencia sería más adecuada: si la de PD-Shape o la de PD-textlogo. Luispihormiguero Any problem? 17:18, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- He estado "googleando" sobre esa comedia, y he llegado a la simple conclusión de que no existe ningún problema con esa imagen. No alcanza en lo más mínimo el umbral de originalidad, ni aparece en ninguna otra página web, además, viendo otras imágenes para las que se ha usado la licencia de PD-textlogo, no parece que vaya a haber problema alguno.
- Sube la imagen, y si te la borran, te doy total libertad para echarme las culpas a mí. Luispihormiguero Any problem? 15:58, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Pues es una pregunta de la que no sé la respuesta. En países como Argentina, no hay problema, pues la ley de copyright establece status especiales para esas obras. Quiero decir: si en Argentina se desconoce el autor de una obra, habría que esperar 50 años de su publicación por parte de una distribuidora para que esa obra pase al dominio público. En el caso de países como España, en los que no ocurren cosas así, pudiera ser que los derechos de autor duraran para siempre, pues una institución o cualquier cosa similar no muere nunca, aunque no creo, pero como no lo sé, lo voy a preguntar en el café. Estate atento, quizá contesten allí a tu pregunta. Luispihormiguero Any problem? 18:48, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Sé_lo_que_hicisteis....jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin H. (talk) 20:41, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
File:Adria Collado.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gunnex (talk) 07:26, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Camera café.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gunnex (talk) 07:44, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Marisa Procel y Pepe Ruiz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gunnex (talk) 18:24, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Quart, el hombre de Roma.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 23:34, 13 December 2014 (UTC)