User talk:Bodhisattwa/Archive/2014
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 13:40, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
বাংলা উইকিপিডিয়া ফটোগ্রাফি কনটেস্ট-২০১৪-এ আপনি আমন্ত্রিত
সুধী, বাংলা উইকিপিডিয়ার দশ বছর পূর্তি উদযাপনের অংশ হিসেবে কমন্সে বাংলা উইকিপিডিয়া ফটোগ্রাফি কনটেস্ট-২০১৪ শুরু হতে যাচ্ছে। এটি শুরু হবে ১লা সেপ্টেম্বর ২০১৪ তারিখে এবং শেষ হবে ৩১শে অক্টোবর ২০১৪ তারিখে। এই ফটোগ্রাফি প্রতিযোগিতায় অংশগ্রহনের জন্য আপনাকে আমন্ত্রন জানাচ্ছি।
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mount Rathong, Sikkim Himalayas, India.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Frozen Nerak Falls, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Southern face of Mount Kokthang South peak, Sikkim, India.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pancharatna Temple, Garh Panchakot - Southern view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kankali Mata Temple, Garh Panchakot - Eastern view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Musical fountain, Mohor Kunja, Kolkata (night view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Autopatrol given
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you.— revimsg 05:04, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madhyamaheshwar Temple, Uttarakhand, India. Southern view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pancharatna Temple, Garh Panchakot, north-eastern view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ruined Pancharatna Temple, Garh Panchakot, Eastern view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jor Bangla Temple, Garh Panchakot, North-Eastern view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
VI geocoding
Hi,
It is a pity that you withdrew your nominations, because these images are good and useful. I don't know that place, otherwise I would add the geocoding myself. Also I added "Giridih district, Jharkhand, India" to each description. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:34, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Yann, most of the tonks are situated few metres away from each other. The hill has a known coordinate and all of the tonks were situated on the top of the hill. So, obviously the tonks would also have the same coordinates. Because few metres distance from each other corresponds not more than few fractions of seconds in the coordinate system. But I was asked to give exact coordinates to each and every tonks, which was a rather impossible task for me. No data were found anywhere in the internet or literature. So, I had no other choice but to withdraw the nomination. By the way, thanks for your hearty concern and contribution in the description section of the files. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 12:55, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
- Google Maps precision is better than you think, even here in mountains. It has a resolution of less than 1 m, since you can see every single tree. In cities, it is even better: you can even see people walking in the streets (example [1] in the Taj Mahal). Regards, Yann (talk) 15:10, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Yann, I have corrected the coordinates of each and every tonk using Google Map and cancelled the withdrawal of nominations. Thanks for your kind help. I hope, the files will be reviewed again. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 20:22, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
- Google Maps precision is better than you think, even here in mountains. It has a resolution of less than 1 m, since you can see every single tree. In cities, it is even better: you can even see people walking in the streets (example [1] in the Taj Mahal). Regards, Yann (talk) 15:10, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mount Neelkanth, North-eastern face.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sankar Monastery, Western view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rishabhanan Tonk, Eastern view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aranath Tonk, Southern view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chandranan Tonk, Eastern view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dharmanath Tonk, Western view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kunthunath Tonk, Eastern view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mahavir Tonk, Western view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mallinath Tonk, Southern view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Munisuvrata Tonk, Southern view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Naminath Tonk, Southern view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shantinath Tonk, Eastern view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shreyansanath Tonk, Southern view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Subh Swami Ganadhara Tonk, Western view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Suparshwanath Tonk, Eastern view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Varishen Tonk, Eastern view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vasupujya Tonk, Western view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Hello, This renaming is NOT OK. It is not completely meaningless. Please read COM:RENAME. Thank you, --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:16, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Steinsplitter, After your concern, I have stopped renaming such files. Actually the previous name of the files did not contain the name of the person in the photo, thats why the renaming was done. I am also sorry that the criterion of the renaming should be Criterion#3, but I had renamed under Criterion#2. Thanks. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 12:31, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- The RalfR in the filename dos not hurt, is is the photographer. In such cases it is suggested to denied the rename request. Regards --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:36, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Ok, I will keep that in mind. Thanks again. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 12:39, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- The RalfR in the filename dos not hurt, is is the photographer. In such cases it is suggested to denied the rename request. Regards --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:36, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Ashot Yerkat
Hello. For the Ashot Yerkat image, a discussion on Wikipedia decided that the person depicted on it was wrongly cited. Would you please change the name as I requested so I can put the image on the right article? --Steverci (talk) 14:45, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Steverci, I just saw the discussion and followed the link of the book. The picture in the book does not say Ashot II, fine Ok, but it does not say Ashot I also. Your logic about the numeral in the discussion also seems fine to me. Most probably you are right, that Ashot I is in the picture. But still, there is a doubt. You see, lots of pages in different language wiki about Ashot II contains the image. So, I think, I am in no position to rename it. I have reverted my decline and the request for renaming is on again. I am also copying this discussion in the talk page of the file. Lets see, what others say and then act as per the discussion. Thanks. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 15:17, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Indian coins to erase
I've been notified that a couple of files I uploaded some time ago can be erased. Explanations about why I thought I could upload them can be found in their discussion pages. My time is limited so whatever decision you take is fine. It's been a long time since I decided to stop uploading images of coins of the last 50 years or fotographs of public spaces in Luxembourg. I do take note not to upload images of any kind of coins from the Indian Subcontinent of any period of time too. I don't need them: I own the original stuff. B25es (talk) 16:04, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
- Hi B25es, First of all, I really dont want to delete any of your photographs. Actually, the source section was missing, thats all. You have explained that they were the scanned photographs from your collection. Thats what was needed precisely. And so the no source tag has been removed. Thanks. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 04:37, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Thank you
Thanks for your help in my beyaz peynir file. Can you please also have a look here: Category talk:Desserts of Turkey? Thank you very much. --E4024 (talk) 15:29, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Thank you, again
¡Gracias! Thanks for this [2]! --Macarrones (talk) 18:18, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Dear Bodhisattwa,
I've tried to enter "Life expectancy by age in 1900, 1950, and 1997 United States.jpg" as new name for the file, but the wizard can't distinguish it from the old name and refuses to take my request. May you rename it now?--Kopiersperre (talk) 12:25, 26 December 2014 (UTC)