My mistake

I'm sorry. All of them is my mistake. Copyright statuses are unclear.--BezPRUzyn 14:43, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Ukrainian Su-24MP.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ukrainian Su-24MP.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Dual Freq 23:11, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Hungarian MiG-23UB.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Hungarian MiG-23UB.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Dual Freq 03:30, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Crashing Su-27.jpg

Pay attention to copyright

Image:Crashing Su-27.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Dual Freq 03:31, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Schleswig Holstein ostrzeliwuje Gdynie 39 09 13.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Schleswig Holstein ostrzeliwuje Gdynie 39 09 13.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Dual Freq 11:10, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Bulgarian MiG-23MLA.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bulgarian MiG-23MLA.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Dual Freq 11:14, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Puma_SOCAT_Helicopter.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Puma_SOCAT_Helicopter.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Cnyborg 09:36, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Armenian Mi-24P.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Armenian Mi-24P.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Polarlys 11:28, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Armenian BM-21.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Armenian BM-21.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Polarlys 11:28, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Armenian 9K113 Konkurs.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Armenian 9K113 Konkurs.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Polarlys 11:28, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Marasesti frigate.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Marasesti frigate.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Polarlys 11:28, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Mig21 4456.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mig21 4456.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Polarlys 11:28, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:06335029.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:06335029.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

BezPRUzyn 13:43, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AniLorak107.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:AniLorak107.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--88.134.232.95 01:37, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i understood. i'm sorry.--BezPRUzyn 09:52, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:L-39ES-RAZ1.jpg & Image:L-39ES-RAZ2.jpg

Hallo, where is the permission from Estonian Military posted to use these images?

Image:Tsezar'Kunikov2007Sevastopol.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Tsezar'Kunikov2007Sevastopol.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 17:30, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Soryy, I confused. I agree to delete.--BezPRUzyn (talk) 17:41, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A photo of the S-300-SAM-System

Hello!

Do you have mor photos of the MAKS-2007 airshow? On theb left side of this image and in the background of this image you can see part of a SA-20-System. Do you have other photos of the missile? Would be great, if you upload them as well! Thanks... Greetings, High Contrast (talk) 07:59, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for your greetings!

I don't have any fotos of the missile, but I found only two fotos from internet - 1. KrAZ ver. and 2. MAZ ver.. I'm sorry, that I can't upload others because of their licenses.--BezPRUzyn (talk) 16:31, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BezPRUzyn!
Thank you for the two images! But are you sure, that they are under Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 1.0-Licence? Greets, 08:43, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Hello High Contrast!

The author write "You may use the stuff under CC:BY/SA license." And Template:CC-BY-SA is redirected Template:Cc-by-sa-1.0 in Wikimedia. Therefore I think, that it is possible to publish this image under Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 1.0-Licence in Wikimedia. But I'm not sure, that my interpretation is right. What do you think?--BezPRUzyn (talk) 09:18, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I think you are right. When the author of the image is writing, that you cam publish the image under a CC:BY/SA license, the it might be possible. But if you want be 100%-sure you will have to ask him via email. Greets and thanks for your support, High Contrast (talk) 19:10, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your advice.

Not 100%, but I think, that it is enough to believe, that the lisence isn't doubtful. Some other fotos of this author are in Wikimedia already many years. And, I think, that User:Jno is the same person who the creator of the web (but he is off the wikipedia for a while...).

I'm sorry, that I speek English not freely, but I also thanks for your support.--BezPRUzyn ( ) 17:19, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:S-92-1998.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:S-92-1998.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. ChristianBier (talk) 05:55, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your attention. Actually there was some mistake (typo source page adress).

The author write "You may use the stuff under CC:BY/SA license." in this page[1]. In Wikimedia CC:BY/SA is Cc-by-sa-1.0. Please see also the upper part of this note.--BezPRUzyn (talk) 11:06, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:ORP Wladyslawowo 2.JPG

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:ORP Wladyslawowo 2.JPG. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Oczywiście nie ty jesteś winny i nic poradzisz. Ale nie przesyłaj grafik, które nie mają wyraźnie odnotowanej zgody w systemie OTRS (z tymi dziwnymi dopiskami, że zgodę uzyskał Joymaster). Masur (talk) 04:51, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I understood the situation. Thank you for your information.--BezPRUzyn (talk) 10:29, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ar2-6.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Ar2-6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Rlandmann (talk) 18:52, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ukrainian_Su-27.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Ukrainian_Su-27.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 08:26, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Al-Khalid.jpg

File deletion warning

File:Al-Khalid.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Martin H. (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, Image:Pe2-2.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Kam Solusar (talk) 19:06, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Razumnyy1945.jpg

File deletion warning

File:Razumnyy1945.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yuli Klever (talk) 20:43, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gromkiy1945.jpg

File:Likhoy-RegeleFerdinand.jpg

File:Likhoy-i-Letuchiy.jpg

File:Vityaz1914.jpg

File:Shaumyan1925-1942j.jpg

File:Shaumyan1925-1942j.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--sугсго 09:11, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Slavnyy.jpg

File:Slavnyy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--sугсго 12:04, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:LybMi-8.jpg

Category: Military equipment of Ukraine

Hi, BezPRUzyn!

The nuclear weapon not used in Ukraine ( AS-15 Kent = Kh-55, AS-16 Kickback = Kh-15 an some others). It is former USSR and now Russia weapon.

In any case You can ask me.

With best regards,

--George Chernilevsky (talk) 10:59, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, George!

Thank you for telling me about it. I understood, that I confused weapons, that was used by Ukrainian Air Force and that only display in Ukraine.

I also very wait for your photos from the Ukrainian Air Force museum in Vinnitsa! (I love Su-17M3, also like Yak-28PP...)

With best regards too,--BezPRUzyn (talk) 13:03, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

After destruction of the nuclear weapon in Ukraine many exhibits were entered with this museum. It is unique objects, confidential in USSR and not accessible to display earlier.

Few my photos of Soviet Air Defence Forces You can see here: Museum in Vinnitsa

Some will be uploaded in Wikimedia.

I like war history and weapons. :) --George Chernilevsky (talk) 13:34, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I like "Neva" and S-300!! :)--BezPRUzyn (talk) 13:55, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, BezPRUzyn!

You can see my uploads in Category:Ukrainian Air Force Museum in Vinnytsya.
Do You speak russian?

--George Chernilevsky (talk) 14:39, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your beautiful photos!

Да, я говорю по-русски, хоть и плохо говорю.--BezPRUzyn (talk) 07:49, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi now, BezPRUzyn! Это прекрасно!

Многие вещи можно уточнять через перевод on-line: translate.

А это - список основных экспонатов

Uploaded Ракета средней дальности РСД-10 "Пионер"
Uploaded Беспилотный разведчик ВР-2 "Стриж" (Ту-141) на буксируемой пусковой
Uploaded Беспилотный разведчик ВР-3 "Рейс" (Ту-143) на самоходной пусковой
Uploaded 57мм зенитная пушка АЗП-57 (ЗАК С-60)
Uploaded ЗРК "БУК М1"
Uploaded ЗРК "КРУГ"
Uploaded ЗРК "КУБ"
Uploaded ЗРК "ОСА-АКМ"
Uploaded Пусковая ЗРК С-75 Broken :-( in museum
Uploaded Пусковая ЗРК С-125
Uploaded Пусковая ЗРК С-200В
Uploaded ЗРС С-300В1
Uploaded ЗРС С-300ПС
Uploaded Вертолет МИ-2
Uploaded Вертолет МИ-8T
Uploaded Вертолет МИ-24
Uploaded Вертолет Ка-27ПЛ
Uploaded Л-39 "Альбатрос"
Uploaded МиГ-21ПФМ
Uploaded МиГ-23МЛД
Uploaded МиГ-25РБС
Uploaded МиГ-27К
Uploaded МиГ-29
Uploaded Су-15ТМ
Uploaded Су-17М3
Uploaded Су-24
Uploaded Су-25
Су-27
Uploaded Як-28ПП
Uploaded Як-38М
Uploaded ЯК-11 на постаменте
Uploaded Радиолокационная станция 19Ж6
Uploaded Радиолокационная станция ПРВ-17

Авиационное вооружение (бомбы, ракеты): Р-27Р1, Р-23Р, Р-23T, и др.

Если поможете с поиском категорий по данной технике, то это ускорит загрузку.

Help me to find categories of not uploaded objects, please.

С уважением,

--George Chernilevsky (talk) 14:43, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, George!

Су-27 -> Category:Sukhoi Su-27
Авиационное вооружение (бомбы, ракеты): Р-27Р1, Р-23Р, Р-23T, и др. -> например, Category:Vympel R-27 и Category:Missiles of Russia and the Soviet Union

Правильно? Проверите, пожалуйста!

С уважением,

--BezPRUzyn (talk) 15:56, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks You! Excellent work! Little note: in this case used word Проверьте (imperative), not Проверите. Your russian is overall good :))

Спасибо! Отличная работа!

--George Chernilevsky (talk) 16:34, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо за корректировки!

"Проверите" — это не описка, правда ошибочно помнил(:<).

Я понял, что это подобно слову "верьте". Спасибо!--BezPRUzyn (talk) 06:51, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yak-11

Добрый день!

Спасибо за корректировки описания и категорий моих фотографий.

Первоначально самолет разрабатывался как истребитель, поэтому корректны оба варианта описания: истребитель и учебно-тренировочный. Я сохраняю Ваш вариант описания фотографии.

Самолеты Як-11 выполняли и боевые задачи. В ГДР Як-11 использовался для борьбы с агитационными аэростатами.

С уважением,

--George Chernilevsky (talk) 10:10, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Добрый день!

Добрый день!

Я немножко поправил Ваше сообщение для улучшения русского языка.

Я думал, что Як-11 сначала разработался как учебно-тренировочный самолет. Он первоначально разрабатывался как чистый только как истребитель (включая перехватчик, ударный истребитель и т.д.), а не учебный?

Я только почитал статью "Уголок неба" и, честно говоря, я немного знаю о Як-11. Там написано о модификации истребителя Як-3 с АШ-82ФН и учебно-тренировочном истребителе Як-У с двигателем АШ-21. Если считать их в Як-11, то я думаю, что, правда, можно назвать Як-11 не только учебно-тренировочным, также истребителем.

Но, по-моему, Як-3 с АШ-82ФН считатся Як-3, не Як-11, а Як-У — Як-11, но он уже чистым учебно-тренировочным стал, хоть он и назывался каким-то истребителем. А как вы думаете? И каким самолётом его считают на его "родине" (в СССР, России, Украине и т.д.)?

Всё-таки он в ГДР использовался для борьбы с агитационными аэростатами, поэтому, если даже он официально не назывался истребителем, уже является ~~правдивым~~ настоящим (или истинным) истребителем-перехватчиком...

С уважением,

--BezPRUzyn (talk) 06:33, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Источники информации не полные, поэтому история Як-11 плохо изучена.

Он первоначально разрабатывался как боевой самолет, но опоздал - уже началась эра реактивной авиации. У нас его считают боевым, но с очень коротким сроком применения. А у учебной модели потом добавили шасси в носовой части и изменили балансировку - центр тяжести сделали ближе к носу. Посадка учебного самолета стала, как у реактивного.

С уважением,

--George Chernilevsky (talk) 14:29, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Очень интересно. Спасибо вам. Я не знал об этом.

Как он назывался первоначально, когда разрабатывался как боевой самолет?

Вы знаете хорошие источники о нем? Я посмотрел статьи Як-3У и Як-11У, но, наверное, они тоже недостаточные...

И большое спасибо вам снова за корректировки!

С уважением,

--BezPRUzyn (talk) 17:14, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now defined Submarine

Diesel submarine in Sevastopol

Я могу загрузить эти фотографии, но не знаю, что это.

--George Chernilevsky (talk) 14:40, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Прекрасно!

Я предполагаю, что ~~она~~ это плавучая зарядовая станция «ПЗС-50», бывшая ПЛ «С-49».

Смотрите на «С-49, СС-49, ПЗС-50» проекта 633РВ. Точно она или подобная другая?--BezPRUzyn (talk) 17:00, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Точно «ПЗС-50», отличная работа! Фото я делал в Южной бухте Севастополя в 2008.

На фото два раза совпадает дефект окраски. Контур и мелкие детали тоже совпадают.

С уважением,

--George Chernilevsky (talk) 17:32, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now uploaded in category Soviet and Russian Black Sea Fleet in Sevastopol.

--George Chernilevsky (talk) 20:02, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Прекрасно! Отличная работа!

У вас ещё есть другие фотографии подводных лодок или других надводных кораблей?

В ЧФ ещё ~~два~~ две (comment: два - это мужской и средний род) известные лодки — Б-871 «Алроса» и Б-380 «Святой князь Георгий». ~~Особенно у нас нет~~ Очень нужно (или Очень жаль, что у нас нет) фото «Георгия».

Также нет фото украинской подводной лодки U01 «Запоріжжа»:<

С уважением,

--BezPRUzyn (talk) 05:33, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Подлодок больше нет. Проект 775М БДК "Азов" загрузил ранее. Один кадр даже получил статус Quality image. Есть еще несколько кораблей РУ.МОДЕЛИЗМ Флот . Первые 12 разделов - мои фото.

Мои исправления русского языка только по литературному стилю, смысловое значение на 100% понятно.

С уважением,

--George Chernilevsky (talk) 08:35, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Да, я смотрел ваши фото "Азова". Классные фотографии!

Можно попросить загрузить тоже другие фото, которые на РУ.МОДЕЛИЗМ Флот?

Да я их тоже обязательно загружу, просто не успеваю все сразу сделать. Много основной работы, а Википедия - это отдых в свободную минуту.

Я посмотрел ваши фото авиации! Чудесно, что у нас (в Википедии) теперь ~~явились~~ появились такие фото!

Слово явиться используется в торжественных случаях и очень редко. А также иногда с негативно-ироничным оттенком. Примеры: Бог явил чудо. Христос явился народу. Великий князь явился на бал (это торжественно). Иронично: "явился, не запылился" - устойчивая фраза, поговорка о нежелательном появлении какого-либо субъекта. Обычный распространенный синоним появиться.

Качество фотографий не идеальное, но при ограниченных возможностях выбора просто нет. Музей открывают для доступа два раза в год. Время суток, погоду и освещение выбирать не приходится. И много посетителей, часто перекрывают обзор друг другу, дети залезают на технику.

Ваши исправления очень ~~помагают~~ мне. Спасибо большое!

помогают (опечатка).

С уважением,

--BezPRUzyn (talk) 06:15, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Кстати Як-38М в Виннице служил в ВВС или авиации ВМС?--BezPRUzyn (talk) 07:19, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Насколько я знаю, Як-38 использовался только в авиации ВМС. История этого экспоната мне неизвестна.

С уважением,

--George Chernilevsky (talk) 06:09, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Большое спасибо вам за исправления!

А я включил фото Як-38М в Category:Navy of Ukraine!

С уважением,

--BezPRUzyn (talk) 06:39, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Это правильная категория.

Uploaded MiG-29

С уважением,

--George Chernilevsky (talk) 07:40, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Да, я посмотрел! Прекрасно!

С уважением,

--BezPRUzyn (talk) 09:34, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded S-60 57 mm gun

Uploaded Tupolev Tu-143

--George Chernilevsky (talk) 15:02, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо! Прекрасно!

А Ту-143 тоже эксплуатируется (или -ровался) в ВВС?

А С-60 в войсках ПВО? Войска ПВО Украины или СССР? Хоть и все равно нынешние "Повітряні Сили ЗС України"...

С уважением,

--BezPRUzyn (talk) 09:32, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

С-60 - общевойсковое средство ПВО, сейчас на вооружении многих стран

С-60

Комплексы "Рейс" с Ту-143 эксплуатируются до настоящего времени, поставлялись в Чехословакию (1984 г.), Румынию, Ирак и Сирию (1982 г.), использовались в боевых действиях во время Ливанского конфликта. Ту-143 - и ВВС и общевойсковое средство, вот статьи:

На вооружении России есть новая модификация Ту-243

Uploaded Mi-2

Uploaded Mi-8T

Uploaded Mi-24V

Uploaded FAB-500 M62

Uploaded S-75

Uploaded L-39

Uploaded MiG-21PFM

Uploaded MiG-23MLD

Uploaded MiG-25RBS

I really get tired...

С уважением, --George Chernilevsky (talk) 18:25, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded MiG-27K

Uploaded Su-15TM

Uploaded Su-17M3

С уважением, --George Chernilevsky (talk) 19:45, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded Su-24

Uploaded Kh-25ML (AS-10 "Kerry")

С уважением, --George Chernilevsky (talk) 20:08, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте!

Да, вы, правда, хорошо работали! Спасибо за прекрасные ~~фотоки~~ ! фотки

Извините долго не писал ответ. Я чуть-чуть простудился и не занимался викимедией.

С уважением,

--BezPRUzyn (talk) 15:48, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте!

Желаю Вам крепкого здоровья. Загрузил Су-25. Проверьте, пожалуйста ФАБ-500 М62. В музее возле нее стоит табличка, что это зажигательная ЗАБ-500, однако я считаю, что они ошибаются.

С уважением, --George Chernilevsky (talk) 06:36, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо! Уже мне нормально.

Я тоже думаю, что это не ЗАБ-500. Форма (вид?) бомбы на снимке File:Bomb FAB-500 M62 2008 G1.jpg совсем не похожа на толстую и короткую ЗАБ-500. Наверное, это точно ФАБ-500 М62, хотя я только посмотрел по интернету...

С уважением, --BezPRUzyn (talk) 06:59, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ФАБ-500 М62 мало информации

Форма and вид are synonyms in this case. Shape form, view - all variant correct.Внешний вид оften is used.

--George Chernilevsky (talk) 09:22, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Museum in Vinnitsa - finished !

Hi, BezPRUzyn!

I have finished uploading in Category:Ukrainian Air Force Museum in Vinnytsya. Total 310 files.

Also i nominate Commons:Valued_image_candidates/AS-16_Kickback_2008_G1.jpg.

Авиационное вооружение необходимо проверить и дополнить категории.

With best regards, --George Chernilevsky (talk) 10:02, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Я посмотрел! Вы правда хорошо работали! Большое спасибо!

Если нужно, потом дополню категории.

With best regards, --BezPRUzyn (talk) 13:33, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Navy 2008 in Sevastopol now uploaded

Здравствуйте, BezPRUzyn!

Я завершил загрузку своих фотографий ВМФ в Севастополе. Теперь нужна Ваша помощь с дополнением категорий и описанием. Я буду отсутствовать почти месяц (до 12 августа).

С уважением, --George Chernilevsky (talk) 13:46, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WoW! Чудесно!! Хорошо, я посмотрю номера кораблей и дополню их названия и категории. Подождите.

С уважением, --BezPRUzyn (talk) 06:39, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Вы отличный напарник по работе! Я знаю, что могу загрузить большое количество фотографий, а Вы добавите к ним качественное описание и категории. После возвращения, надеюсь, буду загружать Navy 2009

.

Уже вещи собраны, уезжаю. С уважением, --George Chernilevsky (talk) 09:29, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Счастливого пути!

Если вы сможете, то, пожалуйста, тоже найдете украинские корабли!--BezPRUzyn (talk) 13:27, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Molotov_02.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ochakov&Lama1990.jpg

Hello, High Contrast!

I'm sorry, to be honest with you I forgot where I took the photo from. I tried again to find the file on http://www.defenseimagery.mil/index.htm (this already is not http://www.dodmedia.osd.mil), but I can't find.

It may be moved off.--BezPRUzyn (talk) 12:43, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Oh, that's a problem, I tried to find the image, too. Do you know the DN-Code (e.g. DN-ST-84-12345)? If yes, everything would be OK. --High Contrast (talk) 13:18, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I also don't know DN-Code. I didn't write code too.--BezPRUzyn (talk) 13:47, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your help

Hello!

Can you help with this image? Greets and thanks! --High Contrast (talk) 14:30, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ryurik(II)1913.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:01, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

File:T64 21.jpg

File:T64 21.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Sv1xv (talk) 16:13, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:T64_21.jpg

File:T64_21.jpg

:)

Merry Christmas and Happy New year!

Я поздравляю Вас с Рождеством и Новым годом!

George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:43, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Откаты

Просьба не делать массовых откатов правок участника без обсуждения. Там у изображений действительно со статусом всё не совсем чисто. Ведь они переходят в общественное состояние, если автор умер минимум 70 лет назалд, то есть если автор умер после 1940 года (что вполне может быть), то они не в общественном достоянии.--Anatoliy (talk) 20:21, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Я всё понимаю ваш мнение (указание) и можно сказать, что я согласен.

А у меня есть только одна точка зрения (вопрос или, скорее, сомнение); следовало обяъснять повод удаления шаблонов.

Почему User:El1604 удалил шаблоны без всякого объяснения причин? И, несмотря на то, что он (или она?) пользовался шаблоном {{disputed}}, ничего не начал обсуждения. Так поступать довольно не верно и безответственно.

Если он верный автор и правда здесь есть какой-то вопрос в лицензии, то он снова удалит шаблоны (конечно, это можно) и напишет повод его правок (конечно, это нужно). Тогда ничего не будет проблем в правке (зато будет в лицензии..).

С уважением. --BezPRUzyn (talk) 06:47, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Корабли

Доброго времени суток!
Загрузил несколько фото (смотрите в моей галерее). Продолжение следует...
С уважением, --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:41, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Project_320_Yenisey_2009_G1.jpg - Пожалуйста, укажите или создайте категорию для этого корабля --George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо за красивые фотки!--BezPRUzyn (talk) 14:59, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

И Вам спасибо! Я только не уверен насчет английского: Класс Обь это Ob or Ob' ? --George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:55, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Точнее Ob' , проще Ob. Я тоже не знаю, что более подходящая танслитерация. Оба варианта позволяют (Смотрите также ru:Транслитерация русского алфавита латиницей или en:Romanization of Russian). Но, если Ob' , то подобно только Обь, а если Ob, то подобно также Об.--BezPRUzyn (talk) 06:05, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо, буду знать. В Google Earth "Енисей" очень хорошо виден, я добавил координаты объекта к фотографии. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:34, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Он большой, даже из космоса всем виден:) Хорошо!--BezPRUzyn (talk) 16:01, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Взгляните, пожалуйста, на этот вопрос: Soviet and Russian submarines. Суть вопроса: действительно ли это ценные изображения, чтобы получить награду? Мне кажется, они слишком примитвные, и Автор сам этого не отрицает. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:02, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Я тоже думаю, что можно сказать, что они примитивные, так как в Викискладе много есть еще более прекрасные изображения. Но все таки, мне кажется, они (наверное) довольно правильно и подробно нарисованы. Итак я думаю, что, как рисунки (или картины), они чуть-чуть примитивные, а как чертежи, не плахие. Серьезный недостаток для чертежа только отсутствие "указания размера". (Я не знаю как сказать. Это похоже на "линейку" на карте, понимаете? Это необхолимо для чертеж.)

Также проблема, как User:Myrabella указывает, отсутствие источника. Без этого нам сразу не понятно, эти изображения правильные ли. Мне кажется, что они (наверное) довольно правильно и подробно нарисованы, но пока это просто так кажется. Надо хорошо проверять каждые изображения по верному источнику (например, официальный чертеж? но у меня нет такого...). Автору или рукомендующему надо указать такой источник.--BezPRUzyn (talk) 06:55, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Я также написал мой взгляд на данной стринице.--BezPRUzyn (talk) 08:04, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Сметливый, возможно нуждается в уточнениях File:Project_61M_Smetlivyy_2009_G1.jpg

--George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:08, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Soviet and Russian submarines

Hello BezPRUzyn,
George Chernilevsky directed me towards you to take your advice. May I ask your opinion on this set of images nominated as a Valued Image Set for the scope "Soviet and russian submarine classes"? There are two main questions: 1/Do these images illustrate each type of submarine well and in an accurate way, in your opinion? 2/ If they do, must they be divided in two sets? The nominator suggests that the "set can be divided to Soviet submarines and Russian submarines. [...] Second variant is to divide this set into SSN, SSBN and SSGN sets." Thanks a lot in advance for your attention. Feel free to express yourself on the review page of the set if you want. Regards, --Myrabella (talk) 14:06, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thenk you for information, Myrabella!

I wrote an opinionon on this page.--BezPRUzyn (talk) 08:01, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Submarine drawings by Mike1979 Russia

Hello. I changed scope and added sources to images of set Commons:Valued image candidates/Submarine drawings by Mike1979 Russia. Please could you tell your opinion once again? --Rave (talk) 09:22, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moved File:Iraqi BTR-94 in Baghdad, 2004.jpg

Done --High Contrast (talk) 15:12, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!--BezPRUzyn (talk) 05:45, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

KrAZ vehicles

Hello BezPRUzyn!

Thanks for your categorizing work here. Good job! Greets, High Contrast (talk) 08:48, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! But I am nervous about some possible errors.

It is so hard discriminate between 1. some KrAZ-250 series and KrAZ-260 series, 2. KrAZ-260 late series and KrAZ-6322 series, 3. KrAZ-214 and KrAZ-256 or KrAZ-222, and so on. Perhaps there are some mistakes.

Finally I couldn't decide types;

KrAZ-65032 and KrAZ-6140TE - it seems that a KrAZ-6322 series vehicle in outward appearance (especially front body's form), but perhaps they are some subtypes of a KrAZ-250 series (based on some information, but I have no confidence).
KrAZ-6133C6 - today KrAZ-6133 (especially KrAZ-6133M6, but on some source including KrAZ-6133C6) has become a subseries of KrAZ-6322 (I think so), but the vehicle in this file apparently is not so much a KrAZ-6322 as a KrAZ-250 or KrAZ-260.

In former times there was a valuable web source in which were listed all subtypes of KrAZ, but today I couldn't find this page... (It was a page in former official KrAZ web, maybe.)

If you can correct or point out errors, please, help me.

Regards,--BezPRUzyn (talk) 10:00, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd wish to help you but my knowledge about KrAZ vehicles is not that detailed. --High Contrast (talk) 10:08, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, don't worry. If you find some valuable sources, tell me, please!--BezPRUzyn (talk) 10:22, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Naval ensign of Ukraine.svg

Do you have the new regulations so I can fix the image? I will not move the images until I have the new flag up and used. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 17:04, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We can see an image on the Ukrainian president's official page and we have a photo file. But I don't know about the true clour level, although there is not two blue-colour (blue and sky blue) in the ensign, but only one blue-colour on the flag (see photo file). So I think that File:Naval Ensign of Ukraine 2006.svg or File:Naval Ensign of Ukraine 2006.png is better than File:Naval Ensign of Ukraine.svg (2010-04-02 ver.) (the latter has two blue-colour).

We already have the 2006 flag. Your 2010-03-31 file duplicated the image of 1997 flag, then your 2010-04-02 file duplicate the image of 2006 flag.

There are some photos in internet;

A. The Old Ensign ( 1997 dressed ver.)

File:Navy flags.jpg - the 1997 version flag (below one), 1997. Please pay attention; this flag is entirely not such File:Naval Ensign of Ukraine (1997-2006).svg!
Photo A-1 - unknown date, but there are an old ensign.
Photo A-2 - the same flag, 12 March 2005.
Photo A-3 - the same flag, August 2005.
Photo A-4 - the same flag, July 2007.
Photo A-5 - the same flag, 24 September 2007.
Photo A-6 - the same flag, but 6 September 2008.
Photo A-7 - the same flag, unknown date.
File:Флаги ВМСУ.jpg - there is a 1997 version flag (the center one).

B. The New Ensign ( 2006 ver.)

File:Фрегат Cагайдачный.jpg - the 2006 version flag, 9 August 2009.
Photo B-1 - the same flag, 1 July 2007.
Photo B-2 - the new version, June 2008.
Photo B-3 - the same flag, 14 May 2009.

C. The Old Ensign ( 1992 ver.)

I think that there are the 1918 version flags

, but there is writen as a 1993 version

in a source.

Photo C-1 - the ensign of 1993 version, July 1997.
Photo C-2 - the same flag, unknown date.
Photo C-3 - the same flag, 1996.
Photo C-4 (D-1) - the same flag (right) and, perhaps, same date.
Photo C-5 - the same flag, unknouwn date.

D. The Old Ensign ( 1997 undressed ver.)

Photo D-1 (C-4) - the 1997 undressed version flag (left), perhaps, 1996 (from the source mid-1990s).　By the way, the left ship is U423 «Horlivka».

If you need more photos, I will find more.

Regards--BezPRUzyn (talk) 11:08, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Works perfectly for me. Thanks. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 17:38, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now, about the name of the file, we generally have been using the first and last years of when a flag is used. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 06:30, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see, but last date (year) of use is very often　not clear about Ukrainian Navy.--BezPRUzyn (talk) 06:33, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I went with the year of when the decree was issued. We know that actual practice will take forever to phase out the old flags, but we try to focus on the actual legal dates. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 06:37, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"The actual legal dates" - I see. If we can confirm the dates...

So, how about these ensigns?

File:Naval Ensign of Ukraine 1994 and 1997.svg - "1994 and 1997-2006"?
File:Naval Ensign of Ukraine (dress, 1918).PNG - is not "1918_July" but "1918_July-1921"? (but there are some conflicts.)
File:Flag of Ukrainian People's Republic.svg - is not "1917_January" but "1917_January-July"? (although I don't know correct date.)

And how about national flags?

File:Flag of the Ukrainian SSR 1919.png - "1919-1923"?
File:Flag of Ukrainian People's Republic 1917.svg - "1917-1918" or "1917-1921"?? (there are also some conflicts.)

--BezPRUzyn (talk) 06:54, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will look up that iformation in due time and make moves when needed. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 17:53, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Флаги

Добрый день! Только теперь смог Вам ответить. Вы спрашивали об украинском Андреевском флаге . Об этом флаге вспоминает контр-адмирал Сергей Ворожейкин, состоявший в 1918 году на украинской службе. Вот отрывок из его воспоминаний, опубликованных в "Морском журнале", где упоминается подобный флаг: Смотрите здесь Других сведений о нем мне не попадалось. Вероятно, подобный флаг уже существовал, раз его приказывалось поднять, но, по всей видимости, он так нигде не был использован.

Это не единственный украинский андреевский флаг. На этом видео: Смотрите здесь, на 35-36 секунде виден андреевский флаг, но желто-синий и с крестом в центре: Фотография флага.

Однако что это за флаг, и имеет ли он отношение к флоту или флотским организациям сказать сложно. Не знают этого и геральдист Микола Чмир, которого я спрашивал об этом флаге.

Относительно Вашего вопроса о ракетных катерах. По всей видимости катера пр. 206-МР переклассифицировались в "корветы" уже после 2000 года, однако я точно этого так и не узнал. С уважением, --KaiserAdler (talk) 10:02, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте! Спасибо за Ваш ответ!

Большое спасибо за этот документи YouTube. Очень интересно!

А я читал, например, здесь, что 1918 год 23 октября - Передана флоту Украины без права поднимать Андреевский флаг. Но на самом деле "русские" офицеры подняли Андреевский флаг. Может быть, в Севатополе было нальзя поднимать, а в Одессе было можно? (так как Одесса была, несомненно, украинский город.)

Кстати мне любопытно, в коком "русскомъ флотѣ" офицеры служили в Одессе...

Пр. 206-МР сегодня уже корвет? Я проверю...--BezPRUzyn (talk) 13:55, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Приветствую. По подводным лодкам информация везде разная. Ярослав Тинченко пишет что лодки вернули декларативно 17 сентября. Это совпадает с воспоминаниями очевидцев и современников событий Нестора Монастырева и Святослава Шрамченка. Может на том сайте какая-то ошибка или неточность?

Относительно "русского флота" в Одессе. Просто морские офицеры, которые служили у гетмана были проросийски настроеными, и всегда считали флот не украинским, а русским, что особенно видно в их эмиграционной литературе.

Относительно катеров пр. 206-МР я ошибся, корветами их не считают - см. http://mil.in.ua/boyovi-korabli/u-154-raketnyy-kater-kachovka и http://mil.in.ua/boyovi-korabli/blog

Спасибо за дополнения статей в УкрВики--KaiserAdler (talk) 14:15, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Приветствую.

Поскольку Ярослав Тинченко написал, 17 сентября 1918 г. канонерской лодки «Кубанец», а чуть позже — ещё 17 подводных долок. Я не знаю, сколько дней же чуть позже (возможно ли через месяц?), но по крайней мере подлодки возвратились в Украинский флот не 17 сентября.

А подводник Монастырёв пишет, "Обстановка резко переменилась в конце сентября, когда немцы, наконец, поняли, что война ими проиграна. ....., они сняли с кораблей, вернувшихся из Новороссийска, русские экипажи, заменив их своими, а через несколько дней подняли на них немецкие флаги. Особенно они суетились на линкоре «Воля». ....., но тут неожиданно адмирал Клочковский вызвал к себе командира «Тюленя» капитана 2-го ранга Погорецкого и сообщил ему ошеломляющую новость: немцы решили передать прямо сегодня вечером флотилию подводных лодок снова под командование русских офицеров.

Очевидно, что немцы передали подлодки Украине (или русским офицерам) когда-то в октябре, а не 17 сентября, так как мы знаем, что вначале октября немцы зачислили в свой флот линкор «Воля» и после этого они вновь отдали корабль Украине.

(Интересно, что Монастырёв также пишет о других кораблях; "Все прочие корабли были нам тоже возвращены с худо-бедно укомплектованными экипажами." Да, правда, они передали корабли. Кто пишет в интернете, что корабли все время были у немцев и никогда не были в украинсом флоте?:)

Итак, я так предполагаю; официально (значит "на бумаге") 17 сентября 1918 г. передали конлодку и подлодки Украине, а на самом деле когда-то в октябре того же года передали не только лодки, также фактически все корабли. Хотя и это только одна возможность...

Кстати, кто служил в то время ЧФ? Я нашел только 16 (+ 8) лодок. (Наверное, Вы тоже.)

В строе;

«Краб»
«Гагара»
«Утка»
«Буревисник»
«Орлан»
«Тюлень»
«Нерпа»
«Карп»
«Карась»
«Лосось»
«Судак»
«Нарвал»
«Кит»
«Кашалот»
«Скат»
«Налим»

На заводе;

«Пеликан»
«Лебедь»
АГ-21
АГ-22
АГ-23
АГ-24
АГ-25
АГ-26

Откуда пришла в украниский флот 17-я лодка?

С уважением, --BezPRUzyn (talk) 18:01, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Наверное, 17-я лодка пришла в украниский флот (скорее, в ЧФ) из БФ. Подводная лодка «№3» типа «27В» (типа «13» или типа «Голланд 27В») осенью 1915 г. переведена в состав Дунайской флотилии ЧФ в Одессе, а 9 января 1918 г. вошла в состав ЧФ. Хоть и говорят, что она захвачена австрийцами (или румынцами) и включена в состав ВМС Австро-Венгрии (или ВМС Румынии), впоследствии переведена в ВМС Венгрии (или просто раздерана на металл на територии Венгрии), но, всё таки, информация о ней как-то не совсем ясна (вот здесь уже некоторые варианты), т.е. возможно, что когда-то (в сентябре-октябре 1918 г.?) вместе с другими лодками, которые были под контролем немцев, передали её Украине.

Но проблема в том, что, короче говоря, у меня ничего нет подробной информации об этой лодке.

А как вы думаете, кто 17-я лодка?--BezPRUzyn (talk) 06:57, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong sources

Hello BezPRUzyn!

The stated sources of these two images are not correct. I think it happened accidently: File:ChTA-53-1135.jpg with wrong source: http://www.defenseimagery.mil/imagery.html#guid=e0524eddce6dbdc99e85f198a8f7ccffda820ccf and File:Zharkiy1987b.jpg with wrong source: http://www.defenseimagery.mil/imagery.html#guid=e0524eddce6dbdc99e85f198a8f7ccffda820ccf . Thanks for correcting. Greets, High Contrast (talk) 17:23, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello High Contrast!

Yes, it happened accidently. I corrected the source now. Thank you!--BezPRUzyn (talk) 07:16, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! --High Contrast (talk) 20:07, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Могли бы Вы нарисовать флаг?

Вот этот?--KaiserAdler (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Поздравляю с праздником ВМС Украины! (но чуть-чуть поздно...)

А Вы уже сами хорошо нарисовали!

С уважением, --BezPRUzyn (talk) 17:02, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image transfer from Wikipedia to Commons

Hello BezPRUzyn!

Again, thanks a lot for your contributions! If you transfer images from a Wikipedia project to Commons, please use this tool. This tool retains all relevant information with correct sourcing and licencing. And by the way it makes file transfers faster and easier for the uploader.

Thank you for your support! Greets, High Contrast (talk) 07:27, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!--BezPRUzyn (talk) 09:55, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit on File:Kashin_Destroyer_Smetlivy_2009_Sevastopol.jpg

Hi BezPRUzyn. Can you explain why you changed the author and license on the above file (edit). Docu at 09:08, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, my God!

THANK YOU very much for your warning. This is simply a mistake. I apologize to User:Tostan for my inappropriate edit.--BezPRUzyn (talk) 06:05, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User rights

Hello BezPRUzyn!

You have contributed lots of good work in Wikimedia Commons. Are you interested in this? If yes, please leave a note on my talk page. Greetings, High Contrast (talk) 07:42, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BezPRUzyn! You are now autopatroller. All relevant information about this can be found here. Happy editing! Greetings, High Contrast (talk) 08:23, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:SMS_S_107.jpg

File:Hrvatski MiG-21.jpg

MiG-23 MLA

Take care to read the passage about the MLA at en-wp. Thx, --Markscheider (talk) 15:10, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I named en.wp only for convenience, because i assume, that de.wp (i'm german) would not be helpfull. Second, airwar.ru is cited on en.wp as source, though not in particular for the MLA. Third: is airwar.ru still Venik's site? He is to be taken cum grano salis, but i do not completely reject him (as other do). Fourth: Although i've had russian in school, this was many years ago and i'm not longer able to understand long russian texts. And fifth: i'm owning a few books about military a/c, and could not find evidence that the MLA is to be handled as a subtype of it's own anywere in them. But feel free to do whatever you want. About re-categorizing: at least this [2] looks wrong to me. Jagdgeschwader 9 never received MLA's, but ML and MF (if you understand german). --Markscheider (talk) 09:44, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Поздравляю Вас с Новым 2011 годом!

Поздравляю Вас с Новым 2011 годом! --George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:10, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Вопросы по флоту

Здравствуйте!
Спасибо за поздравление.
Вопросы:

Возможно, у Вас есть дополнения к описанию или категория для File:Tugboat SB-36 2009 G1.jpg
Можете ли создать категорию для ПЗС-50? Она все-таки сильно отличается от базового проекта.

С уважением, Георгий --George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:26, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте!

1-й вопрос: сделал Category:MB-15 class ocean tugboat.
2-й вопрос: конечно, можно. Дело в названии категории. "Category:Submarine PZS-50" по сегодняшнему названию или "Category:Submarine S-49" по первоначальному названию. Также можно назвать, как "Category:Project 633RV submarine" (в этот проект входит, кроме головной С-49/СС-49/ПЗС-50, вторая лодка С-11/СС-11). Итак тоже можно назвать, как "Category:S-49 class submarine". Конечно, можно сделать две категории; категории проекта/типа лодок и каждой лодки.

С уважением, --BezPRUzyn (talk) 16:47, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо!

Я думаю, правильнее будет две: "Category:Submarine PZS-50" и "Category:Project 633RV submarine". Фотографий С-11/СС-11 на Commons не имеется?

С уважением, --George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:34, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Кажется, нет фотографий С-11/СС-11 на Commons, хоть и не знаю, какие названия носили ПЛ на фото File:Romeo clsss submarine.JPG и File:Romeo class submarine.jpg.

Я думаю, что "Category:Submarine S-49" правильнее чем "Category:Submarine PZS-50", так как она уже не ПЛ, а ПЗС (плавучая зарядная станция). А в русской википедии статья называют, в принципе, первоначальным названием, хотя я и вижу немало исключения.

Но я в частности не против "Category:Submarine PZS-50", потому что такое название более понятое (наверное, более известно сегодняшнее название лодки и более понятая термин "submarine" чем "плавучая зарядная станция"). "Category:Project 633RV submarine" тоже не плохо постольку, поскольку на Commons нет фотографий С-49 сфотографированы до модернизации в 1970-1972 по проекту 633РВ.--BezPRUzyn (talk) 06:02, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Maksim_Gor'kiy.jpg

File tagging File:БДК Ямал проекта 775 с правого борта.jpg

File:T-34-85-2007.jpg

File:Pr.12411T.jpg

Подскажите, пожалуйста, как вы идентифицировали этот корабль? Здесь [3] указано, что с номером 886 ходил Р-255.--Mike1979 Russia (talk) 13:57, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

С Новым годом, Mike1979 Russia!

Извиняюсь, что я заставил Вас долго ждать. Я не был здесь.

Насколько я помню, когда я посмотрел, там написано, что с номером 886 ходил Р-256. Но в этом не уверен. Так или иначе теперь указано, что Р-225. Я срочно поправлю.--BezPRUzyn (talk) 06:48, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Voroshilov_01.jpg

File:SMS_Pillau.jpg

Happy New Year!

* * * Gutes Neues Jahr 2012! * * *

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:36, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:MiG-29-2008-UkrainianFalcons.jpg

File:Soobrazitelnyy.jpg

File:Gremyashchiy-Pr7.jpg

File:Redkiy.jpg

File:Tashkent 06.jpg

File:Vozrozhdyonnyy(Kiri).jpg

Новые фото

Доброго времени суток!
Можете взглянуть на мои свежие загрузки, наверное, это будет Вам интересно.
С уважением, --George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:49, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо, мне понравились!--BezPRUzyn (talk) 10:50, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:AlmiranteVillar1933-1955.jpg

Copyright status: File:Oslyabya1903Bizerte.jpg

Dana boomer (talk) 20:32, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2013!

		*** * * 2013 !!! * * ***
		Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! С уважением, Георгий -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:22, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Somali navy.PNG

Вікі любить Землю, 1–31 травня / Wiki Loves Earth, May 1–31, 2014

Вітаємо!

З 1 по 31 травня 2014 буде проходити конкурс «Вікі любить Землю», метою якого є фотографування пам'яток природи. Цього року конкурс став міжнародним. Зі списками пам'яток природи України можна ознайомитися тут. Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут. – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю» (in english) 20:54, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Flags of secessionist organizations in Ukraine

Affected:

File:Russian Crimea.png

Yours sincerely, Anatoliy (talk) 01:14, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Naval Ensign of Crimean Regional Government.png

Notification about possible deletion

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Circus of Kiev

Affected:

File:Будинок київського цирку.JPG

Yours sincerely, INeverCry 10:51, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please merge your account with Wikipedia

Hi,

I have noticed that you are using account BezPRUzyn at Commons and in Ukrainian Wikipedia but you have not merged them into a global account yet. Global accounts become mandatory since 15 April 2015, and all non-merged accounts will be renamed.

As of now, most likely you have accounts BezPRUzyn in other projects, notably in Ukrainian Wikipedia, which are not merged with your global account. Please click on Special:MergeAccount and finish the unification process. You can check the state of your account unification at Special:CentralAuth/BezPRUzyn

If you don't merge your accounts by 15 April, your account in Ukrainian Wikipedia can be renamed.

If you have questions you can ask them on my talk page. Best regards — NickK (talk) 18:12, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Naval Ensign of Ukraine 1917.png

File:Naval Jack of Ukraine 1992.png

File:Naval Ensign of Ukraine 2006.png

File:Zsu prapor.jpg

File:Ps flag.jpg

File:Naval Ensign of Ukraine 2006.png

File:Derzkiy1944-1945a.jpg

File:EK-2-1945-1950.jpg

File:HMS Brighton (I08) 1940-1944.jpg

File:HMS Brighton (I08) 1949.jpg

File:HMS Brighton (I08) circa 1942.jpg

File:Zharkiy1944-1949.jpg

File:HMS Georgetown (I40) 1940-1944.jpg

File:Zharkiy1944-1949b.jpg

File:HMS Georgetown (I40) 1943-1944c.jpg

File:HMS Georgetown (I40) 1943-1944a.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:KapitanIrangaMiklukho-Maklay1915-1918.jpg

Notification about possible deletion

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with "allied navy"

Affected:

File:Rastoropny.jpg

And also:

Extended content

Yours sincerely, Underlying lk (talk) 00:25, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dzerzhinskiy 02.jpg

File:Nezamozhnik.jpg

File:Shaumyan 03.jpg

File:Dzerzhinskiy 01.jpg

File:Pospeshnyy02.jpg

File:Pylkiy 02.jpg

File:Nezamozni&Petrovskiy1925Mykolaiv.jpg

File:Nezamozhnik1926-1949b.jpg

File:Nezamozhnik1926-1949h.jpg

File:ChernomorskieNoviki.jpg

File:YakovSverdlov1927-1941a.jpg

File:Letun.jpg

File:Smyshlenyy.jpg

File:Sevastopol1947-1948.jpg

File:Soobrazitelnyy-mod.jpg

File:Storozhevoy(7U).jpg

File:Svirepyy(7U).jpg

File:Svobodnyy(7U).jpg

File:Deyatel'nyy1944-1945.jpg

File:AndreiPervozvannyy1912Reval.jpg

File:Nezamozhnik1926-1949c.jpg

File:Bodrry(7).jpg

File:Dvenadtsat'Apostolov1905Sevastopol.jpg

File:Knyaz'Suvorov1903Sankt-Peterburg.jpg

File:Zhivuchiy1944-1949b.jpg

File:AndreiPervozvannyy1914zamena-macht.jpg

File:ImperatritsaEkaterinaVelikaya1911-1918Sevastopol.jpg

File:SvobodnayaRossiya1911-1918.jpg

File:Fidonisi1917.jpg

File:Imperatritsa Ekaterina Velikaya 02.jpg

File:SvobodnayaRossiya1918.jpg

File:ImperatritsaEkaterinaVelikaya1911-1918.jpg

File:Imperatritsa Ekaterina Velikaya 03.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ilya Muromets1921-1922Bizerte.jpg

Fix for template problem

Hi, your user talk page currently has too many templates in it for the system to cope with transcluding. If you want, this account can be added to the talk page trimmer which "shrinks" standard notifications to reduce the number of templates. Please ping me here or leave a note on my user talk page if you would like to opt-in to this. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 12:16, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adding your talk page to the talk page trimmer

Hi, based on discussion at the administraor's noticeboard and at the village pump, there is a consensus to go ahead with adding user talk pages like this one that have exceeded the maximum transclusion count to be processed by the talk page trimmer. These changes should make your talk page more readable without losing any content, and other users have asked to be added to this housekeeping task for this reason.

Please leave a note on my user talk page if you would like to opt-out. If you revert the changes they are likely to be re-implemented by Faebot unless you opt-out. Thanks --Fæ (User talk:Fæ) 10:27, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kovpak partisanki.jpg

File:Groznyy(EM)1942.jpg

File:Bezuprechnyy1936-1942.jpg

File:Bditelnyy(7)01.jpg

File:Izyaslav1921a.jpg

File:Izyaslav1921a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:50, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Evstafiy1911.jpg

File:Evstafiy1911.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:20, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gromoboy1911.jpg

File:Gromoboy1911.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:27, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bandera plast 1923.jpg

File:Bandera plast 1923.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Kursant504 (talk) 11:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ошибки с файлами и категориями МПК проекта 1124

Коллега BezPRUzyn, вероятно у Вас ошибка в описании файла Project1124-1985-1.jpg. Этот корабль никак не может быть МПК-49 (ныне «Александровец»), так как согласно некоторым источникам, МПК-49 носил бортовой № 057 начиная лишь с 1987 г. — [4] (а загруженное Вами фото датируется 1985 г.). Кроме того (и это главное), МПК-49 — это корабль проекта 1124 поздней постройки: с усиленным зенитным вооружением — с 30-мм АК-630М и РЛСУ МР-123 «Вымпел», которые начали устанавливаться на МПК проекта 1124 начиная с МПК-43 «Одесский комсомолец» (см. список). На загруженном Вами файле мы видим МПК проекта 1124 явно ранней постройки — ещё без 30-мм АК-630М и РЛСУ МР-123 «Вымпел» (вместо последней установлена ещё «старая» РЛСУ МР-103 «Барс»). Можно предположить, что корабль на загруженном Вами фото — это скорее всего МПК-52 (который позже, после раздела Черноморского флота, в 1997 г. вошёл в состав ВМС Украины и стал корветом U209 «Сумы»), так как согласно вышеприведённой ссылке он тоже носил бортовой № 057 где-то примерно в 1980-х годах (вероятно до 1987 г.). Описание файла я исправил.

И да, коллега, наверное надобно что-то сделать с категориями Kherson (ship, 1971) и MPK-43 (ship, 1974), ибо это один и тот же корабль — МПК-43 (а никак не МПК-52, как указано в первой категории), заложенный в 1972 г. на Зеленодольском заводе имени A. M. Горького, спущенный на воду в 1973 г. и сданный заказчику в 1974 г.; с 1983 г. он носил имя «Одесский комсомолец», а в 1997 г. после раздела Черноморского флота — стал корветом U210 «Херсон» ВМС Украины (см. ISBN 5-902863-04-X, с. 63—85, 158, 160; ISBN 978-5-903080-99-1, с. 258, 261). — 178.45.124.129 23:11, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skoryy Class destroyer.jpg

File:Skoryy Class destroyer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

188.123.231.76 21:18, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:BezPRUzyn

My mistake

Image Tagging Image:Ukrainian Su-24MP.jpg

Image Tagging Image:Hungarian MiG-23UB.jpg

Image Tagging Image:Schleswig Holstein ostrzeliwuje Gdynie 39 09 13.jpg

Image Tagging Image:Bulgarian MiG-23MLA.jpg

Image Tagging Image:Puma_SOCAT_Helicopter.jpg

Image Tagging Image:Armenian Mi-24P.jpg

Image Tagging Image:Armenian BM-21.jpg

Image Tagging Image:Armenian 9K113 Konkurs.jpg

Image Tagging Image:Marasesti frigate.jpg

Image Tagging Image:Mig21 4456.jpg

Image:L-39ES-RAZ1.jpg & Image:L-39ES-RAZ2.jpg

A photo of the S-300-SAM-System

Image Tagging Image:S-92-1998.jpg

Image Tagging Image:ORP Wladyslawowo 2.JPG

File source is not properly indicated: File:LybMi-8.jpg

Category: Military equipment of Ukraine

Yak-11

Now defined Submarine

Museum in Vinnitsa - finished !

Navy 2008 in Sevastopol now uploaded

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ochakov&Lama1990.jpg

Your help

:)

Откаты

Корабли

Soviet and Russian submarines

Submarine drawings by Mike1979 Russia

Moved File:Iraqi BTR-94 in Baghdad, 2004.jpg

KrAZ vehicles

Флаги

Wrong sources

Могли бы Вы нарисовать флаг?

Image transfer from Wikipedia to Commons

Edit on File:Kashin_Destroyer_Smetlivy_2009_Sevastopol.jpg

User rights

MiG-23 MLA

Поздравляю Вас с Новым 2011 годом!

Вопросы по флоту

File source is not properly indicated: File:Maksim_Gor'kiy.jpg

File tagging File:БДК Ямал проекта 775 с правого борта.jpg

Happy New Year!

Новые фото

Copyright status: File:Oslyabya1903Bizerte.jpg

2013!

Вікі любить Землю, 1–31 травня / Wiki Loves Earth, May 1–31, 2014

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Please merge your account with Wikipedia

File source is not properly indicated: File:KapitanIrangaMiklukho-Maklay1915-1918.jpg

Notification about possible deletion

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ilya Muromets1921-1922Bizerte.jpg

Fix for template problem

Adding your talk page to the talk page trimmer

Ошибки с файлами и категориями МПК проекта 1124