User talk:Berichard/Archive 3
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:
- Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
- State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
- If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
- Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
- Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.
If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.
It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.
You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.
Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.
Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 09:22, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: Image:Pyrrhula nipalensis 1.jpg
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, Image:Pyrrhula nipalensis 1.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:Image:Pyrrhula nipalensis 1.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Ltshears (talk) 16:37, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Image à supprimer J'ai téléchargé par erreur plusieurs photos qu'il faut supprimer
Berichard (talk) 16:48, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Flickr
Hi, just dropping a note to let you know about flickr2commons which makes uploading Flickr images much easier. OSX (talk • contributions) 15:52, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
- Originally posted at User talk:OSX:
- Hello
- I'm French so my English is very bad
- Would you mind having a look on this picture http://www.flickr.com/photos/unforth/3414107492/ that I have downloaded on Commons in :http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Haworthia_attenuata_(1).jpg.
- Thanks
- It is great to see you've started using flickr2commons. This means that the software automatically "reviews" the license so we don't have too. Regarding your above upload, everything is fine, except two things. Once uploaded, you need to remember to fill in the image description and include categories. Thanks OSX (talk • contributions) 10:10, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
- By the way, I actually (wrongly) assumed you were Australian looking at your large number of Australia-related uploads. OSX (talk • contributions) 10:12, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Pademelon_à_pattes_rouges.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 22:12, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Launceston2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 15:45, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Cette photo a été mise par moi sur wikipedia avec l'autorisation de l'auteur, marc Thiebaut. voir [[1]]
File:Alcedo atthis youngs.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--MPF (talk) 12:47, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Misnamed duplicates from Flickr
Hi! According to the file description pages, you ordered User:File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske) to transfer this photo from Flickr here to Commons as File:Eupterycyba jucunda1.jpg, File:Morelia viridis1.jpg and File:Phalaropus fulicarius 2 (1).jpg after you had already transferred it under the more appropriate name, File:Macrolepiota procera by Per Ola Wiberg.jpg. Given that the photo already exists on Commons and does not depict either a cicada, green tree python or a bird, is there a reason for these requests? —LX (talk, contribs) 16:30, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
supprimer si sont en double
Berichard (talk) 17:09, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- You just did it again with File:Ardnamurchan Point Lighthouse.jpg and File:Heteronympha merope.jpg. The photo already exists on Commons. It does not depict a Scottish lighthouse or a butterfly. Please stop doing this. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:16, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
- And again with File:Cervus canadensis 1.jpg. The original photo still exists on Commons. There is no need to upload duplicates. The photo does not depict an elk. What is it that you are trying to do here? —LX (talk, contribs) 11:37, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
- And again with File:Phaenicophaeus tristis (1).jpg. The photo does not depict a green-billed malkoha. I've now asked administrators to intervene. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:11, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
- And again with File:Erithacus rubecula Juvenile1.jpg. The photo does not depict a robin. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:23, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Il faut purement et simplement les supprimer. Je ne peux pas le faire. Il s'agit de bugs dus à des problèmes de connexion Désolé Berichard (talk) 14:43, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- And again and again with File:Asclepias curassavica Flowers3.jpg and File:Junonia evarete 2.jpg. The photo does not depict a tropical flower or a butterfly. I fail to understand how connection problems would cause you to repeatedly upload misnamed duplicates. Whatever it is you're doing to make this happen again and again, please stop doing it. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:41, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
- il se trouve que pour certaines images, le chargement reste bloqué à mi course et n'avance plus; je n'ai plus qu'une possibilité: appuyer à nouveau sur le bouton et pour une raison que je ne comprends pas il met en mémoire des trucs précédents
Je suis certainement aussi ennuyé que toi par ces problèmes et n'y prend aucun plaisir et présente toutes mes excuses Berichard (talk) 07:58, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- And again with File:Macrolepiota procera 1 (1).jpg. At least you used the right name this time. You say that this happens when you get stuck halfway through the submission process and you press the submit button again. In that case, don't press the submit button again when the submission process gets stuck. Obviously, that's not working, so try starting over instead. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:46, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- And again with File:Kalmar slott 25.jpg. The photo does not depict a castle. Again, whatever it is you're doing to make this happen again and again, stop doing it. If you absolutely positively cannot stop making a mess, when you do, at least clean up after yourself by tagging it for {{Speedy}} deletion before moving on to other things. Instead, you've continued to edit for about an hour after uploading this. —LX (talk, contribs) 09:10, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Flickr uploads
Hi Berichard - when uploading pics from Flickr, please check whether it is already on Commons first! This particularly needs to be checked with pics where the Flickr original has a border (e.g. those by 'Tatiana Gerus') which may have been cropped off in the Commons version (e.g. File:Tristaniopsis laurina 2.jpg, File:Tristaniopsis laurina 4.jpg, one of which will have to be deleted as a duplicate). Where a pic has had a border cropped or a watermark removed, the software will not automatically detect the duplication. Also please be careful about over-categorisation; with most plants and animals, the correct category to use is the scientific name (e.g. Category:Tristaniopsis laurina); higher categories that the species is contained in (e.g. Category:Tristaniopsis, Category:Myrtaceae) should not be added. Also please avoid adding categories which are main categories (e.g. Category:Trees) which should only contain subcategories, not files (see the header at the top of Category:Trees!). Thanks! - MPF (talk) 00:05, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
- Je suis désolé mais c'est un problème de connexion qui me pose problème. Je fais tout ce que je peux pour éviter Berichard (talk) 11:44, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:38, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
File:Op hurricane.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
The Evil IP address (talk) 13:41, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Deprecated License
Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Merimbula-aerial NSW Australia.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be be deleted in 7 days.
For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 07:38, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Deprecated License
Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Strzelecki1.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be be deleted in 7 days.
For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 10:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Please . . . just one copy!!
Hi Berichard - please just upload one copy of pics from Flickr! No need to upload 3 copies File:Eucalyptus caesia 5.jpg, File:Eucalyptus caesia 4.jpg (now deleted), File:Eucalyptus caesia 4 (1).jpg (now deleted) . . . someone then has to delete the duplicates! Thanks ;-) MPF (talk) 21:30, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Please do not recreate deleted content
—LX (talk, contribs) 00:08, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Je ne recrée pas de fichiers supprimés . Encore une fois, j'ai toutes les peines à charger des images sur commons et le chargement bloque. Je suis obligé d'appuyer plusieurs fois pour charger une image ce qui fait que certaines fois je la charge 3 ou 4 fois la même image soit il a déja enregistré et il remet systématiquement cette image.
Le principal emmerdé dans l'histoire c'est moi car je perds un temps fou et je fais du mauvais travail
Cela fait x fois que je le signale (je télécharge avec http://toolserver.org/~magnus/flickr2commons.php)
Berichard (talk) 08:43, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:RolfHarris.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:RolfHarris.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:RolfHarris.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
—Angr 19:35, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
File:Loxioides bailleui.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Эlcobbola talk 12:47, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
File:Canberra.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Denniss (talk) 00:38, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Deprecated License
Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Strzelecki1.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.
For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 16:20, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
File:Anthobaphes_violacea_7.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
−ebraminiotalk 08:46, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Holbrook.jpg
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Holbrook.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Holbrook.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Magog the Ogre (talk) 15:52, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Kunzea_pomifera.gif
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Kunzea_pomifera.gif, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Kunzea_pomifera.gif]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:55, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
a propos de la photo sur flickr
[2] est en ccby-nd (no derivative works), elle n'est donc pas compatible avec les usages de Commons, c'est pour ce que le bot la refuse. Il faut chercher les images autorisant les œuvres dérivées et la réutilisation commerciale. Esby (talk) 21:54, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
File:Edmontosaurus_1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
BrokenSphere (Talk) 20:11, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
File:Morganucodon_1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FunkMonk (talk) 02:37, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
File:Morganucodon_3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FunkMonk (talk) 02:37, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:GoncalvesCrespo.jpg
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:GoncalvesCrespo.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:GoncalvesCrespo.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:28, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Image source wikipedia anglaise personne morte en 1883 donc domaine public
BurdekinRiver1.jpg From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hi
can you contact me as I wish to use this image in a book,
contact me via wiki e-mail at Ringpicker (talk) 05:15, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Treron australis 2.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Treron australis 2.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Denniss (talk) 05:35, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Como (Italy) is not Como (Australia) !
Hi Berichard. Thank you for upload wonderful images about animals in the Paruna Reserve. Please pay attention when you give categories. You give Category:Como wich is wrong, because it'a an italian municipality. You have the correct Category:Como, Western Australia. In the meantime I have created the Category:Paruna Reserve (Australia) for all your pictures, which is a subategory of category Como Wester Australia. Plese use this! Thank you very much. Best regards, --DenghiùComm (talk) 12:06, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
File:Phalanger.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Seb az86556 (talk) 02:48, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Pay attention to licensing
|
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.
File:Hibiscus-stages.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file. If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.
|
Stefan4 (talk) 21:55, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Pay attention to licensing
|
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.
File:Eucalyptus gregsoniana.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file. If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.
|
Stefan4 (talk) 23:08, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Pay attention to licensing
|
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.
File:Mildura Airport MQL.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file. If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.
|
Stefan4 (talk) 00:00, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
File:Gare TGV d'Avignon 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
124.149.151.113 15:18, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Castlereagh Highway Nlle Galles du Sud.png
- File:Cooma Nlle Galles du Sud.png
- File:Dubbo,Nlle Galles du Sud..png
- File:Dunedoo-map.jpg
- File:Golden Highway Nlle Galles du Sud.png
- File:Grafton, Nlle Galles du Sud.png
- File:Gwydir Highway .png
- File:Lismore, Nouvelle Galles du Sud.png
- File:Mid-Western Highway Nlle Galles du Sud.png
- File:Monaro Highway Nlle Galles du Sud.png
- File:Newcastle (Australie).png
- File:Newell Highway Nlle Galles du Sud.png
- File:Nlle Galles du Sud.png
- File:Orange, Nlle Galles du Sud.png
- File:Queanbeyan, Nlle Galles du Sud.png
- File:Riverina Highway Nlle Galles du Sud.png
- File:Snowy Mountains Highway.png
- File:Wagga Wagga.png
- File:Wollongong, NSW, Australie.png
Yours sincerely Stefan4 (talk) 20:30, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Pay attention to licensing
|
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.
File:Skyway-at-Blue-Mountains-Katoomba.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file. If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.
|
Stefan4 (talk) 23:31, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Bell Rock (Arizona) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
--Stillwaterising (talk) 13:24, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Uropodes.png
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Uropodes.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Uropodes.png]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
JuTa 22:29, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Hawkesbury River, Australia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Denniss (talk) 09:51, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Acleris variana 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Lymantria (talk) 08:29, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 03:06, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
File:Actinodura ramsayi et souliei by Henrik Grönvold.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 20:39, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
File:Alectoris melanocephala by Henrik Grönvold.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 22:18, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
File:Melbourne Evening Herald flag (red).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
LGA talkedits 20:06, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Cardinal Norman Gilroy visits schoolchildren.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Cube00 (talk) 10:26, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Phare de Cap Borda.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gbawden (talk) 07:34, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Cowell map.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kelly (talk) 22:11, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Kalang Falls Kanangra-Boyd NP.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sardaka (talk) 07:52, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
File:Eulamprus leuraensis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sarshag7 (talk) 02:24, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
File:De saint arnaud.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sreejith K (talk) 21:01, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Pay attention to licensing
|
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.
File:Xanthorrhoea Flowers.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file. If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.
|
Stefan4 (talk) 16:05, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Stefan4 (talk) 16:06, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 21:56, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
File:Port Jackson Fig.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Casliber (talk) 12:27, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
File:Korean War front line July to October 1951.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 22:33, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Tar australia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JNHATCR (talk) 18:20, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
File:York WA church.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—capmo (talk) 17:02, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Canberra Success.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Canberra Success.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Castillo blanco (talk) 07:06, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
File:NarNarGoon 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
B dash (talk) 05:23, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
File:NarNarGoon 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
B dash (talk) 05:24, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
File:NarNarGoon 5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
B dash (talk) 05:24, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
File:NarNarGoon 7.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
B dash (talk) 05:24, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
File:Killifish 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Создательница (talk) 07:50, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Important message for file movers
A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect
user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
- To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
- To perform file name swaps.
- When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect
user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Carpobrotus rossii has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
37.119.252.185 13:40, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Dorrigo.jpg
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Dorrigo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Redtree21 (talk) 11:09, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Kingscanyon.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Kingscanyon.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Redtree21 (talk) 11:25, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
TUSC token 6f1552997b3c61c3e3565cbf493c6e33
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
TUSC token b4a9fd88c0aea088be3721d6900838d9
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
TUSC token fdb9ee5b9e0b47695cfad6e9953bd1c2
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
TUSC token 75bc7a4d7ee2966a068c46fd3141edf3
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
TUSC token 2c3e3254c90555df420f0e010c98971b
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Coracina montana has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Josh (talk) 00:04, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Sighting
may 25 2024 in pittsgrove new jersey 609 594 7981 2601:8C:480:91E0:E5A4:B26B:25B7:1453 14:28, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
File:NarNarGoon 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |