User talk:Berdea

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Berdea!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Berdea!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Plaque Base sous-marins Stosskopf.jpg was uncategorized on 17 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Catégorie:Lomener

Dear Berdea, I see you've created "Catégorie:Lomener". However, all namespaces on this project are in English (see the language policy). I have added the template {{Speedy}} to request deletion of "Catégorie:Lomener". ;) Please ask any questions you might have. Yours sincerely, Mathonius (talk) 00:09, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I make a mistake and I have asked for the deletion of this "Catégorie:Lomener". Thanks--Berdea (talk) 00:11, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Erreurs

Bonjour, merci pour le signalement, j'ai essayé de revoir la situation en faisant entre autres les renommages. Vérifiez que ce soit ok, sinon dites le moi. Merci. Sebleouf (talk) 10:25, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merci pour les renommages. Apparemment tout a bien fonctionné. Il reste une image à renommer (erreur de chapelle) et depuis votre message, j'ai refait quelques erreurs avec des demandes de renommage à la clef. Merci en tout cas pour votre aide.--Berdea (talk) 10:57, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chapelle Notre-Dame-de-Vie de Mougins - Tableau de Maurice Gottlob 2.jpg

File:Chapelle Notre-Dame-de-Vie de Mougins - Tableau de Maurice Gottlob 2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Merci de vérifier aussi les plans que vous avez photographiés pour cette chapelle, ils sont eux aussi probablement sous droit d'auteur. --Miniwark (talk) 20:47, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment puis-je vérifier que les photos prises des différents plans peuvent versées dans Commons. Ils ont été prises en présence de la conseillère municipale en charge des travaux de restauration. Bien cordialement.--Berdea (talk) 22:05, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Église_Sainte-Catherine_du_Cannet_-_Panneau_de_présentation.jpg

File:Église_Sainte-Catherine_du_Cannet_-_Panneau_de_présentation.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Sebleouf (talk) 14:04, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Berdea,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 20:33, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chapelle Saint-Barthélémy de Mougins - Présentation.jpg

File:Chapelle Saint-Barthélémy de Mougins - Présentation.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Wknight94 ^talk 14:36, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chapelle Notre-Dame-de-Vie de Mougins - Élévation.jpg

File:Chapelle Notre-Dame-de-Vie de Mougins - Élévation.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Wknight94 ^talk 14:36, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chapelle Notre-Dame-de-Vie de Mougins - Projet de restauration 2.jpg

File:Chapelle Notre-Dame-de-Vie de Mougins - Projet de restauration 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Wknight94 ^talk 14:36, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chapelle Notre-Dame-de-Vie de Mougins - Pathologie.jpg

File:Chapelle Notre-Dame-de-Vie de Mougins - Pathologie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Wknight94 ^talk 14:36, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trescat Lorient 1903-1703.gif

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 08:58, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

⧼Wikibase-terms/Berdea⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

Dear Berdea,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Villahermosa del Río.jpg

Bonjour, hélas pour cette nomination je ne suis pas sur que l'on puisse revenir en arrière, moi je n'ai fais que confirmer les résultats du robot. Mais un des administrateur qui fréquente la page (Jee ou A.Savin par exemple) pourrait certainement mieux te répondre. Par contre une solution pourrait etre de la nominer une deuxième fois. Meme processus mais il faut mettre /2 après le nom du fichier comme ceci : Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Villahermosa del Río.jpg/2 tout en expliquant bien la raison qui te pousse à nominer cette image une seconde fois, en l'occurence qu'elle ait toutes ces chances au meme titre que les autres. L'erreur est humaine après tout. J'espère t'avoir aidé. -- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 19:03, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sur ma page de discussion Jee confirme que la solution est une seconde nomination. -- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 04:40, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Maps of Catalonia

Category:Maps of Catalonia es una subcategoría de Category:Geography of Catalonia, que ha su vez es una subcategoría de Category:Catalonia, por lo que añadir en Category:Catalonia a Category:Maps of Catalonia es una inclusión reiterativa.--JT Curses (talk) 15:14, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edicions arbitràries?

Bona tarda, Berdea: He observat que fa unes setmanes estàs fent edicions de pobles de Catalunya com aquesta de la Granada. Et detallo a continuació les incorreccions que hi veig:

Elimines la categoria "Populated places in Alt Penedès". No s'han de treure categories posades per altres editors a no ser que siguin òbviament errònies, que no és el cas. L'editor Jtcurses ha esmerçat molt de temps i esforç per organitzar aquesta categoria. No la destrossis.
Afegeixes la categoria "Municipalities in the province of Barcelona". No cal, perquè ja té la de "Municipalities in Alt Penedès" que penja de l'anterior. Has posat una categoria redundant.
Canvies la posició de les coordenades deixant-les en primer lloc. Per què? No has observat que TOTES les categories de pobles de Catalunya tenen en primer lloc la descripció (amb l'enllaç a la Viquipèdia), ID del monument o espai protegit (si s'escau) i finalment les coordenades? Respecta, si us plau, les edicions dels altres i evita modificacions tan arbitràries com aquesta.

Ja no em poso en la clau d'ordenació de les categories "Cultural heritage monuments in ...". Tu hi poses "Monuments". Jo hi tenia un espai en blanc perquè volia que la categoria quedés en lloc preferent a la categoria del poble. En aquest tema (i en altres) ja no sóc bel·ligerant. He tirat la tovallola.

Tornant a les categories dels pobles, crec que hauries de revertir les edicions que has fet amb anterioritat. De les coordenades ja me n'encarrego jo.--Isidre blanc (talk) 15:31, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

La Category:Municipalities es una subcategoria de Category:Populated places by type, o sigui també subcategoria de Category:Populated places, de manera que, seguint el model de les categories superiors, es correcte que Category:Municipalities in Alt Penedès sugui subcategoria de Category:Populated places in Alt Penedès i, si els municipis són inclosos en les dues categories, seria redundant. Aquí, no només a Catalunya, també a Espanya, les categories de municipis i de "llocs habitats", no s'han fet servir sent una subcategoria una de l'altra, sinó que unes s'han fet servir per als municipis i l'altra per a les entitats menors de població (aldeas, pedanies, etc.), el que no sembla correcte tenint en compte el model de categories principals.--JT Curses (talk) 19:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Les meves edicions no són arbitràries. Per contra, que es poden escoltar bé impugnats (disculpi el meu català que no es mol bo) :

Classificar un municipi (municipality) en la Category:Municipalities in Alt Penedès i en la Category:Populated places in Alt Penedès esta realment redundant. No he previst la supressió de la Category:Populated places in Alt Penedès. Per mi, aquesta categoria auria de contenir la Category:Municipalities in Alt Penedès i localitads (populated places) que no tenen estatut de municipis, ès a dir pobles considerats com ca:Entitat d'Àmbit Territorial Inferior al Municipi.
He afegit a un municipi la categoria Category:Municipalities in the province of Barcelona. De fet, podem considerar que aquesta esmena és redundant, pero si volem saber si un municipi es en la provincia de Barcelona (per exemple), és necessari per veure si està inclòs en 10 subcategories (las 10 comarques). Es complicat, i es mès facile de mirar en una sola categoria.
He conviat la posició de les coordenades, perquè posaria un embenat després del text, me semblava fer llegir un text més difícil, però he d'admetre que aquest era subjectiva. Ara, ja no déplacere aquesta informació.

Sincerament. --Berdea (talk) 09:48, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Les categories no serveixen perquè es pugui veure que un municipi pertany a una província, sinó per classificar. Això, en tot cas es pot fer en el text de descripció (afegint si no existeix). Però no es poden fer inclusions redundants, que un arxiu o categoria estigui inclòs alhora en una categoria i en una subcategoria de la mateixa, encara que estigui diversos nivells per sota. El d'incloure les localitats menors en "Populated places", també és redundant si "Municipalities" és una subcategoria de l'anterior, perquè ja estan incloses en les categories concretes de cada municipi i, per tant, incloses en "Municipalities" i "Populated places".--JT Curses (talk) 19:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ha una altra raó perquè no es pot penjar "Municipalities" de "Populated places": hi ha molts municipis (a la província de Lleida n'he comptat 25) que no són llocs habitats. Per exemple: aquesta edició de Jtcurses de Castellet i la Gornal, no està bé, ja que hi ha posat la categoria de "Populated places.." sense ser-ho (Castellet sí que ho és, i la Gornal, també, però Castellet i la Gornal, no). En canvi, aquesta edició de la Granada és correcta i hauria de ser la definitiva, puig que és una vila i municipi ensems. Encara hi ha el tercer cas: una vila que no és municipi, exemple Category:Sant Genís (Jorba) que va només a "Populated..". Abans d'embolicar la troca, es mantenien les categories de "Municipalities.." i de "Populated.." per cada província per separat. No es barrejaven. En la primera només municipis i en la segona qualsevol ciutat, vila, poble o nucli habitat (fos o no un municipi). Tal com es pot veure encara a les províncies de Tarragona i Lleida. Si es volen desglossar per comarques, penso que caldria mantenir el mateix criteri. Suposo que és el que pretenia fer en Jtcurses.--Isidre blanc (talk) 22:35, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Je me permets d'ajouter un autre argument : les habitants d'une commune sont habitants à la fois d'une comarque (avec le conseil comarqual comme administration locale) et d'une province (avec la députation comme administration locale). Même si toutes les comarques appartiennent à une province (sauf la comarque d'Osona), il peut être intéressant de bien marquer cette double appartenance. Par ailleurs c'est vrai qu'avoir toutes les communes dans une seule catégorie simplifie de travail de recherche et modification sur Commons.
Permetin-me afegir un altre argument: els habitants d'un municipi viuen al mateix temps en una comarca (amb el consell comarqual com el govern local) i en una província (amb la diputació com el govern local). Fins i tot si totes les comarques pertanyen a una província (excepte la comarca d'Osona), és interessant per a marcar clarament aquesta doble pertinença. A més, és cert que tenir totes les ciutats en una categoria de treball simplifica la recerca i la modificació en Commons.--Berdea (talk) 10:14, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

J'ajoute une observation. Considérez-vous utile d'ajouter dans la catégorie liée à une commune (voir par exemple la Category:Mollet del Vallès), un encadré avec le blason, le drapeau et l'emplacement dans la comarque. On trouve ces informations dans l'article sur Wikipédia et cela me semble inutile de les remettre sur Commons, d'autant que blason, drapeau et emplacement sont déjà catégorisés. Qu'en pensez-vous ?
Afegeixo una observació. ¿Es considera útil afegir en la categoria vinculada a un municipi (veure per exemple la Category:Mollet del Vallès), una caixa amb l'escut, la bandera i la ubicació en la comarca. Trobem aquestas informacions en l'article en la Vikipèdia i sembla inútil de tornar los à posar a Commons, especialment pel que el escut, la bandera i la ubicació ja estan categoritzats. Que en penseu ? --Berdea (talk) 10:31, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Si quieres hacer las cosas en Wikmedia según las normas establecidas, no se puede incluir una página o archivo de manera redundante en una categoría y una subcategoría de esta, excepto en categorías especiales consensuadas y anecdóticas, por lo tanto incluir una categoría de municipio en la categoría de la comarca y en la de la provincia, sólo se puede hacer cuando la comarca no está incluida en la provincia por que no hay coincidencia en el territorio, tal como pasa, como tu dices, con Osona, pero tambien con Selva, Cerdanya y alguna más. En cuanto a lo de incluir banderas, escudos, etc. en administraciones territoriales es algo que yo recuerdo se hace desde que yo conocí la Wikimedia. Porque la manera de dar información a quien accede a la wikimedia es a través de los encabezados, no de las categorías, cuya función es clasificar y para que sea funcional no puede contener redundancias. Obviamente, la Wikimedia no es la Wikipedia y esa información tiene que ser básica, no desarrollar temas, pero tampoco puede forzar a navegar a otros lugares, Wikipedia incluida, para obtener un dato básico, como, en el caso de un territorio administrativo, serían la descripción, simbolos y localización, con los enlaces necesarios para acceder a la Wikipedia en caso de querer profundizar en la información. La Category:Mollet del Vallès ¿crees que no cumplía con todo esto? ¿crees qué, desencuadrando la maquetación, situando las descripciones por delante de todo los demás y con otra plantilla, sin encajar con la tabla de los símbolos, y haciendo el encabezado ocupe muchísimas más líneas y escondiendo más las subcategorías y los archivos contenidos debajo de la pantalla (no todo el mundo accede con grandes resoluciones de pantalla), es lo correcto?

--JT Curses (talk) 14:06, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Si us plau , en català ! --Berdea (talk) 15:15, 18 June 2016 (UTC)--Berdea (talk) 15:15, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blason Es famille Beratarrechea (Baztan).svg

c'est quoi le problème avec ce fichier ? --Chatsam (talk) 17:30, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Il n'y a aucun problème avec ce fichier, j'ai simplement rationnalisé les catégories en créant la catégorie Category:Coats of arms of families of Baztan qui permet de distinguer les blasons familiaux des blasons de la commune. Par ailleurs tous les fichiers de type svg sont bien à classer dans une catégorie adéquate Category:SVG coats of arms of families of the Basque Country. Concernant le missing permission, je pense qu'il s'agit d'une erreur de manipulation qui a été corrigée dans ma modification suivante. --Berdea (talk) 22:54, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Vitoria-Gasteiz

Ok, thank you. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 03:23, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Subdivisions the Basque Autonomous Community

Category:Subdivisions the Basque Autonomous Community has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JT Curses (talk) 23:59, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8310 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:36, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Parliament_diagrams_for_Spanish_regional_elections

Parliament diagrams for Spanish regional elections has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:41, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Inventory of languages

hi! i suppose this cat is designed to be a container of all individual languages? but its title is a bit unconventional imho. do you think it might be better named "languages by name", since we also have Category:Ethnic groups by name Category:Countries by name? RZuo (talk) 11:08, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You suppose well. I like "Inventory of languages" but I'm not against "languages by name". Can we have another advise ? --Berdea (talk) 11:13, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Linguistic maps of Central–Eastern Oceanic languages

Don't move this. "Central–Eastern Oceanic languages" is correct and "Central-Eastern Oceanic languages" is not. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:54, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could you explain me why ? The use of other sign than "-" could create ambiguity. --Berdea (talk) 09:58, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you are coming back to my modification when you entered into discussion with me and our discussion was not over. It's not elegant. --Berdea (talk) 10:57, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Inventory_of_languages

Inventory of languages has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Ricky81682 (talk) 03:53, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]

User talk:Berdea

Contents

Tip: Categorizing images

Catégorie:Lomener

Erreurs

File:Chapelle Notre-Dame-de-Vie de Mougins - Tableau de Maurice Gottlob 2.jpg

File:Église_Sainte-Catherine_du_Cannet_-_Panneau_de_présentation.jpg

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

File:Chapelle Saint-Barthélémy de Mougins - Présentation.jpg

File:Chapelle Notre-Dame-de-Vie de Mougins - Élévation.jpg

File:Chapelle Notre-Dame-de-Vie de Mougins - Projet de restauration 2.jpg

File:Chapelle Notre-Dame-de-Vie de Mougins - Pathologie.jpg

File:Trescat Lorient 1903-1703.gif

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Villahermosa del Río.jpg

Category:Maps of Catalonia

Edicions arbitràries?

File:Blason Es famille Beratarrechea (Baztan).svg

Re:Vitoria-Gasteiz

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Category:Subdivisions the Basque Autonomous Community

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !

Category:Parliament_diagrams_for_Spanish_regional_elections

Category:Inventory of languages

Linguistic maps of Central–Eastern Oceanic languages

Category:Inventory_of_languages

Navigation menu

User talk:Berdea

Tip: Categorizing images

Erreurs

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Villahermosa del Río.jpg

Edicions arbitràries?

File:Blason Es famille Beratarrechea (Baztan).svg

Re:Vitoria-Gasteiz

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !

Category:Inventory of languages

Linguistic maps of Central–Eastern Oceanic languages

Navigation menu

Search