User talk:Another Believer/Archive 12
Your most memorable shot of 2021
[edit]Happy New Year! As always at the beginning of the new year, I'm inviting you to share your most memorable shot of the past year. Which of your photos stood out in 2021? Which image created special memories that you'd like to share with others? On behalf of the Commons Photographers User Group I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best for 2022. Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:25, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]_-_070.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Salt Lake City, Utah (2021) - 070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]_-_107.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Salt Lake City, Utah (2021) - 107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]_-_149.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico (2021) - 149.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_-_151.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico (2021) - 151.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]_-_104.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Southeast Portland, Oregon (January 23, 2021) - 104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_-_103.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Southeast Portland, Oregon (January 23, 2021) - 103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_-_036.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Southeast Portland, Oregon (January 23, 2021) - 036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_-_071.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Southeast Portland, Oregon (January 23, 2021) - 071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]_-_272.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Salt Lake City, Utah (2021) - 272.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]_-_21_(cropped).JPG) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Malecón, Puerto Vallarta (2014) - 21 (cropped).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_-_36_(cropped).JPG) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Malecón, Puerto Vallarta (2014) - 36 (cropped).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mt. Angel, Oregon - October 2020 - 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_-_120.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oregon City, Oregon (2018) - 120.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]_-_179.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Salt Lake City, Utah (2021) - 179.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_-_149.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Salt Lake City, Utah (2021) - 149.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]_-_339.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Salt Lake City, Utah (2021) - 339.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Save the date: Commons Photographers meeting next week
[edit]Extended content
|
|---|
|
Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group, Please save the date: on Saturday, June 19th, our next virtual Zoom meeting is going to take place. As you know, one goal of these meetings is to share knowledge about different types of photography. This time, we've lined up the following presentations:
If you'd like to participate in this event, please consider signing up on this page. Also, if you'd like to present at one of the next meetings, please send me a quick note. Sharing your experiences and learnings with others can make a huge difference! I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best! Hope to see you on the 19th. Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:13, 8 June 2022 (UTC) |
This Sunday!
[edit]Hi, this is just a quick reminder: the next virtual meeting of our user group is scheduled for Sunday, June 19, 16:00 UTC. Topics are: “Photography in Nigeria”, “Photographing Vehicles”, “Wildlife photography and citizen science”, and “I started printing my images – here’s what I've learned so far…”. I'm thrilled about this great agenda and I'm looking forward to connecting with you again. Stay safe and all the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:08, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Quick update on behalf of the Commons Photographers User Group
[edit]Extended content
|
|---|
|
Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group, I hope you're well and enjoy taking photos for Wikimedia Commons. Here are a couple of quick updates on behalf of our group:
Thanks for being a member of our group and for sharing your works under a free license. Have fun taking pictures! All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:23, 18 August 2022 (UTC) |
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]_-_025.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Portland, Oregon (May 28, 2018) - 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]_-_031.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Portland, Oregon (May 28, 2018) - 031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]_-_032.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Portland, Oregon (May 28, 2018) - 032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]_-_135.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oregon (August 20, 2022) - 135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]_-_134.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oregon (August 20, 2022) - 134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Extended content
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
Extended content
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]_-_298.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Los Angeles, California (September 8, 2022) - 298.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_-_245.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Los Angeles, California (September 8, 2022) - 245.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_-_242.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Los Angeles, California (September 8, 2022) - 242.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
You're invited to provide input…
[edit]Dear fellow member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
At our last meeting end of August, we talked about getting in touch with the Wikimedia Foundation and offering our help for improving Wikimedia Commons. Today, I invite you to provide your input on a draft open letter to the Foundation. Over the course of the next ten days, we'll further improve the text together, before inviting people to sign it. If you're interested in providing input, please engage in the discussion on the talk page of the draft.
In the meanwhile, I hope you're well and have a great time taking photos! All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 08:42, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]
ResolvedExtended content
| ||
|---|---|---|
Affected:
|
Notification about possible deletion
[edit] ResolvedExtended content
| ||
|---|---|---|
Affected: And also:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:45, 28 September 2022 (UTC) |
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 16:35, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit] ResolvedExtended content
| ||
|---|---|---|
Affected:
|
Online workshop this weekend
[edit]Dear Commons Photographers User Group member,
This coming Saturday, October 8, we'll host an online post processing workshop. On behalf of our events coordinator Shreya I invite you to sign up for the event using this Google form.
I hope you're well. All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:50, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit] ResolvedExtended content
| ||
|---|---|---|
Affected: And also: Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 00:44, 8 October 2022 (UTC) |
ResolvedExtended content
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
ResolvedExtended content
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
Extended content
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
File:Sculpture inside Tokyo Metropolitan Government Building No.1 (1991) - Tokyo, 2019 - 217.jpg
[edit] ResolvedExtended content
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]_-_272.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Los Angeles, California (September 10, 2022) - 272.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_-_283.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Los Angeles, California (September 10, 2022) - 283.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_-_285.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Los Angeles, California (September 10, 2022) - 285.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
ResolvedExtended content
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
ResolvedExtended content
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Seattle, Washington - November 2022 - 081.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
ResolvedExtended content
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]_-_092.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta (November 2022) - 092.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]_-_194.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta (November 2022) - 194.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
ResolvedExtended content
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
Question from the CPUG Board
[edit]Dear user group member,
I'm writing you to today on behalf of the board of the Commons Photographers User Group. The past year has been a busy one for us. In 2022, we've had more activities than ever before in the history of our group and you'll find an overview on our group's page.
With that being said, 2022 was also a year of learning for the current board members. Most of us hadn't been involved in running the Photographers User Group and we spent quite some time on getting used to our new roles. We all feel it was a steep learning curve.
That's why, at our last board meeting, we decided to ask our members whether they'd be ok with us serving for another year. Extending our board duties to the end of 2023 would allow us to continue the work we've started this year, and to benefit from the knowledge we've built over the past twelve months.
However, in the end, it's up to you and the other members of our group to decide whether such an extension of our board term should be granted. I invite you to voice your opinion on this page:
Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Board Elections 2022
We'll gather feedback until December 27, and we'll keep you in the loop about the outcomes of this process.
Thanks so much for your ongoing support of our group. I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best.
--Ailura (talk) 12:32, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
Extended content
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
Happy holidays 2022/2023!
[edit]
|
* Happy Holidays 2022/2023, Another Believer! * | |
|
|
_-_959.jpg){kind=link}
_-_958.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Tokyo,_2019_-_217.jpg){kind=link}
_-_164.jpg){kind=link}
_-_5.jpg){kind=link}
_-_959.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_959.jpg){kind=link}
_-_959.jpg){kind=link}
_-_958.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_958.jpg){kind=link}
_-_958.jpg){kind=link}
_-_383.jpg){kind=link}
_-_35.jpg){kind=link}
_-_14.JPG){kind=link}
_-_Tokyo,_2019_-_217.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Tokyo,_2019_-_217.jpg){kind=link}
_-_164.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_164.jpg){kind=link}
_-_164.jpg){kind=link}
_-_5.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_5.jpg){kind=link}
_-_5.jpg){kind=link}