User talk:Allforrous/Archive 9
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
16th century in Tunisia has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Robby (talk) 01:31, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Category:Panels by country has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
JopkeB (talk) 09:44, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Category:Panels in the Netherlands has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
JopkeB (talk) 09:46, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
16th century in the Ottoman Empire has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Robby (talk) 04:03, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
17th century in the Ottoman Empire has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Robby (talk) 05:01, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Domestic implements has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JopkeB (talk) 10:46, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Bonjour, You deleted this page : Category:Categories of Brest (France) by technique. I don't understand the reason for this deletion. You will find an equivalent category for the city of Paris : Category:Categories of Paris by technique. It is not correct to do this type of deletion without even consulting the persons concerned. --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 10:02, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- Ok Allforrous (talk) 12:37, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hello,
- You don't know what is a category of category? look :
- it is -> Paris: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Categories_of_Paris
- what you do -> Brest: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Categories_of_Brest,_France
- thank you for making your modifications more seriously. S. DÉNIEL (talk) 08:55, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello Allforrous, some days ago you thanked me for my edit on Category:Cables moving it from Category:Plastic objects to Category:Objects made of plastic. So maybe you are interested in a discussion related to this theme, so if, just go to Category talk:Objects by material#Consistent subcategory names.
And: Thank you for this thanks!... and all the others you gave me already the last times for my works!!! A flower for you! Stay enthusiastic! Regards from south East Germany, --W like wiki good to know 17:06, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Roman-era philosophy has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Fayenatic london (talk) 09:12, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Types of journalism has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
RZuo (talk) 14:04, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Category:Weather forecasting
This category is generally a duplicate of Category:Weather services. I suggest you redirect or find some way to marry them properly. Famartin (talk) 02:45, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Applied disciplines has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Josh (talk) 10:21, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
British people of English descent has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Place Clichy 01:16, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Political people from the Ottoman Empire has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Robby (talk) 02:52, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Forests
Dear Allforrous, don't get mad coz of reverts! :) I want to explain: it's a mistake to put Reforestation under Afforestation or vice versa, and as I see there's circle categorization of both. IMHO both should be separated and under Forestry, considering there is not Forestation category. --Orijentolog (talk) 20:53, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Same sortkey prefix
Regarding this edit, I believe
[[Category:Society of the United States by state| ]]
and
[[Category:Society of the United States by state| Ageing]]
are equivalent up to the end of "Ageing". -- DanielPenfield (talk) 08:21, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Retail formats has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JopkeB (talk) 17:04, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Stop editing categories involved in a discussion!
There is a discussion going on: Commons:Categories for discussion/2023/02/Category:Retail formats. Though until now you did not add a usable remark to this discussion, you keep going on changing categories involved in this discussion.
- First you added a lot of subcategories to Category:Retail formats, as a result of which it is now a mess. I asked you in the discussion page to stop doing so.
- But you went on, now you removed the subcategories from Category:Retailers and made a redirect to Category:Shops. That is a change that first should be discussed. There are more types of retailers than shops. I ask you to wind back these changes and start a proper discussion about this change.
I do not know whether I am in the position to give you an official warning, but be aware that if you keep going on, I shall report this on a higher level. JopkeB (talk) 04:31, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Category:Photographs_by_Juan_Ignacio has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Emufarmers (talk) 19:08, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Category:Dominican_Republic_national_baseball_team_players has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Robby (talk) 15:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Germanic vikings?
I don't know what kind of white supremacist neopagan garbage you're trying to pull here, but just revert the mess and don't embarrass yourself. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:13, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Surnames by ethnicity has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
This is regarding Category:Indian surnames and other subcategories. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 03:09, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Place of birth missing (living people) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
RZuo (talk) 13:58, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
People in the 10th century of the United Kingdom has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Ricky81682 (talk) 07:21, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Marketing techniques has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JopkeB (talk) 13:14, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Marketing terminology has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JopkeB (talk) 13:22, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Again: Stop editing categories involved in a discussion!
Allforrous You did it again (see other discussion): moving a lot of subcategories to a category that is under discussion, without adding a constructive contribution to that discussion. This time it is about Commons:Categories for discussion/2023/04/Category:Marketing terminology. Yesterday when I made the discussion page, there were only two subcategories, now there are 28. So please, get really involved in the discussion, answer the questions, give your opinion, but stop editing this category. JopkeB (talk) 07:22, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
- You did it again, now with Commons:Categories for discussion/2023/04/Category:Marketing techniques: after I made the discussion page, you added categories (and files) to the discussed category Category:Types of marketing, but you did not at all participate in the discussion. To me that looks like obstruction, that you try to manipulate the discussion. How can you be stopped to do such things and respond in an honest manner? JopkeB (talk) 09:14, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Rocket engines by country has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 13:34, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Television stations in Michigan has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 05:15, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- Bad named, empty, useless, redundant and now tagged with a speedy delete request. Kind regards, --Bohème (talk) 20:52, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Energy conversion has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JopkeB (talk) 08:45, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
After your movement [1] it's impossible to move subcategories in a normal way. Fix it, please. Wieralee (talk) 13:40, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
- The problem is Wikidata. Allforrous (talk) 14:29, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
Observation hobbies has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
73.223.72.200 21:53, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Retail processes and techniques has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JopkeB (talk) 04:11, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Discussion-notice
Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems
JopkeB (talk) 04:18, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Tax-free shopping has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JopkeB (talk) 04:24, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Category:Product_market has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JopkeB (talk) 08:22, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Product marketing has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JopkeB (talk) 13:03, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Office supply retailing has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JopkeB (talk) 06:43, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Category:Low-end_market has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JopkeB (talk) 13:12, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
6 weeks ago I asked you to "clean up" after you moved the Category:Men of The Gambia by name... but you haven't done anything... just deleted my message and left that category messed up. Now you've broken the next category: Category:Clothed by type of clothing. These categories use quite complicated templates and the files can't be moved into a new category without changes inside the templates. So I'm asking you again: fix it.
If you can't do it yourself, you can always ask the community for help at the Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems page. Bring this movements to the happy end or don't take actions that are beyond your technical skills. Wieralee (talk) 22:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Category:Environmental_impact_of_golf_courses has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 08:41, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Factor market has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |