User talk:Alina data
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:52, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
{{Creator:Anonieme meester…}}
[edit]Hello.
Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:23, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
- Добрый день, Pattypan действительно оказался не самый лучший способ автоматически создавать линк с Wikidata-record для creator. В некоторых случаях даже существующие records не были найдены в процессе загрузки. Я действительно могла использовать Creator:Unknown, но это описание не во всех случаях подходит. Именно поэтому я жду результатов проекта Commons:Structured data.
- По поводу мусора: 'Anonieme meester, Zuidelijke Nederlanden, tweede helft 16de eeuw' - это официальное описание creator от источника, то есть самого музея (источник: Q21674146 и 0000_GRO0524_I). Речь идет не о lurkmore-анонимах, а о художниках. Для их описания существуют правила. То что вы не знакомы с правилами описания работ искусства и то что Wikimedia Commons пока ещё не в состоянии эти описания в полной мере принять, ещё не значит что это 'мусор', который 'презирают во всех видах'. Наверное можно было поспокойнее формулировку использовать. Alina data (talk) 11:54, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
- Рад увидеть какой-то ответ по существу дела. Смотрим на d:Q21674146 #P170 (кстати, не мучайтесь со ссылками [http://…/name name] и учите префиксы interwiki) и видим, что значением является эм… аноним. Pattypan смотрит в Викиданные? Если смотрит, то скажите разработчикам, чтобы не вписывал в этом случае в поле artist ерунду типа {{Creator:Anonieme meester…}}, а ставил описание из БД музея чистым текстом, без обрамления в {{Creator:…}}, или (при отсутствии такового) {{Creator:Unknown}}. И проблема решена. Я уважаю музеи и архивы со своими правилами, но у Викисклада тоже есть свои обычаи.Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:17, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Да, и ещё – раз женский род в 1л.ед.ч., то подкрутите нужный флажок в Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-personal, и будет у собеседников меньше когнитивного диссонанса когда ещё придётся по-русски изъясняться.- Да, действительно. Выбор между описанием из БД музея чистым текстом и {{Creator:Unknown}} - это хорошее решение проблемы. В будущем так и буду делать. Alina data (talk)
Copyright status: File:Bloemen in een vaas, Daniël Seghers, MMB.0078.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Bloemen in een vaas, Daniël Seghers, MMB.0078.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Bloemen in een vaas, Daniël Seghers, MMB.0078.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jcb (talk) 21:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Jcb: thank you for the remark. This file was uploaded during a live demo and afterwords I forgot to fix the license from 'cc-by' to 'cc-by-4.0'. It is fixed now.--Alina data (talk) 08:01, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Hoi Alina, File:Madonna, circa 1632 - circa 1700, Groeningemuseum, 0040544001.jpg is een andere afbeelding dan op http://resolver.groeningemuseum.be/collection/work/id/0000_GRO0380_I . Enig idee wat hier fout is gegaan? Multichill (talk) 10:02, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Multichill: Geen idee. Ik denk dat er iets mis is gegaan met de link tussen Lukasweb en het Groeningemuseum. Of het is een voor en achterkant van het object? Ik zal je vraag op mail zetten naar VKC, Lukasweb en Groeningemuseum met u in cc.--Alina data (talk) 19:18, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
bad sources
[edit]File:Kopie naar Grévin, James Ensor, circa 1860-1949, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Antwerpen, 2712 26.001.jpeg and File:Huis, narren, portret, James Ensor, circa 1870-1880, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Antwerpen, 2708 24V.001.jpeg were linked to wrong Wikidata IDs (for other artworks by the same artist). Also listed source seem to be wrong as it shows different images. --Jarekt (talk) 15:37, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Jarekt: Thanks for pointing this out. I will research this and contact the The Royal Museum of Fine Arts Antwerp for an explanation. --Alina data (talk) 08:40, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Jarekt: This was the problem:
- For the file File:Kopie naar Grévin, James Ensor, circa 1860-1949, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Antwerpen, 2712 26.001.jpeg the museum used a wrong image on their partners [website]. [Here on their other platform] they use the right image. I have asked them to make the needed adjustments on the first platform. I have also unmerged the wikidata records d:Q22041658 en d:Q22041653 because these are different objects (tip is always look at the inventory numbers: if they are different then you are dealing with different objects, although in this case the museum created a confusing situation)
- For the file File:Huis, narren, portret, James Ensor, circa 1870-1880, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Antwerpen, 2708 24V.001.jpeg the situation is this:
- the file File:Huis, narren, portret, James Ensor, circa 1870-1880, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Antwerpen, 2708 24R.001.jpeg is the 'recto' view of the page d:Q22041100 - see letter 'R' in the name of the image
- the file File:Huis, narren, portret, James Ensor, circa 1870-1880, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Antwerpen, 2708 24V.001.jpeg is the 'verso' view of the page d:Q22041100 - the other side, see the letter 'V' in the name of the image. This is why I linked both images to one wikidata record d:Q22041100. One could argue if it should be to different wikidata records, but in this case as you don't really see a lot on image 2708 24V.001.jpeg I think it could be possible to link both images to d:Q22041100? What do you think?--Alina data (talk) 12:07, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for looking this up. I think it is quite clear to have verso and recto sides of a drawing. Although, it would be nice if there was some external source with that information, so it is less confusing in the future. I usually like to have one Wikidata item per inventory number, so if the Museum catalog them that way, than that is what we should stick to. If you are talking to The Royal Museum of Fine Arts Antwerp there are few more confusing records of James Ensor works:
- d:Q22076469 inv: 3469/30
- d:Q24288244 inv: ANW19860402/2
- d:Q24288398 inv: ANW20000523
- d:Q24288273 inv: ANW19980415
- d:Q24288319 inv: ANW19990729
- d:Q24288182 inv: ANW19630318
- All those records have creator, institution, inventory number and dead URL. We should either expand those items, add images, etc. or delete them. Perhaps the museum can tell us if there are still objects with such ID or not. --Jarekt (talk) 14:30, 24 February 2020 (UTC)