User talk:Alchemist-hp/Archive/2009

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bi-crystal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments clearly QI --Alchemist-hp (talk) 12:27, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:23, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bromine vial in acrylic cube.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Mediocre sharpness and CA, but good lighting and composition.  Request Once you remove the slight left-tilt, it's certainly QI. --Afrank99 08:25, 11 July 2009 (UTC) Done --Alchemist-hp 10:55, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:23, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bromine.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support More documented than the other image (e.g.: scale) --Myrabella (talk) 03:48, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Much better than the first candidate: , Better photografical quality and more information in the photo. HBR (talk) 20:56, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support best of the two concerning crit. 3. Lycaon (talk) 21:59, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I agree that this one is significantly better. -- H005 (talk) 22:03, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Though I have no idea why an acryllic cube is necessary. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:56, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Info it is simple: it is for your security (respectively for the owner). Bromine is a very dangerous substance and now tamed ;-) --Alchemist-hp (talk) 08:59, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support IMHO, better variant --George Chernilevsky (talk) 13:03, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Bromine vial in acrylic cube.jpg: +6 <--
2. Bromine-ampoule.jpg: +2 -2
=>
File:Bromine vial in acrylic cube.jpg: Promoted. <--
File:Bromine-ampoule.jpg: Declined.

--Yann (talk) 19:14, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:23, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Titan-crystal bar.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --kallerna 17:35, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:23, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Titanium.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I took the liberty to amend the scope to remove the second link. --Eusebius (talk) 10:11, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice. The most serious competitor would probably be File:Ti,22.jpg or File:TitaniumMetal jpg.jpg, which are not "parasited" by the illustration of the crystal bar process, but the current competitor is really nicer. Other reviewers might think otherwise, though. --Eusebius (talk) 10:17, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Like all the other Picture of Alchemist-hp the best way to presentat chemical elements. HBR (talk) 22:41, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 07:29, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:23, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silver crystal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice picture. --Marcok 01:01, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:23, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Silver.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support - IMO best image for this scope by far. All relevant criteria met. -- Rastaman3000 (talk) 17:45, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 10:39, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:23, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edelgase in Entladungsroehren.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question Look great, but some of the tubes are tilted, can this be fixed? -- H005 16:20, 19 August 2009 (UTC)) The tilted tubes now fixed. --Alchemist-hp 23:10, 19 August 2009 (UTC) Great, good quality and high educational value. Good work! -- H005 23:14, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:23, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gase-in-Entladungsroehren.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wäre das störend für die Dokumentation, das Bild etwas zu entrauschen? --Mbdortmund 18:29, 20 August 2009 (UTC) now denoised (outside the tubes) --Alchemist-hp (talk) 00:22, 21 August 2009 (UTC) now good --George Chernilevsky 07:29, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:23, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gold-crystals.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --George Chernilevsky 06:27, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:23, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glowing noble gases.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Two+two=4 03:58, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:23, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rhodium.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Good, but could you add a scale please? Yann (talk) 09:55, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

•  Done --Alchemist-hp (talk) 10:51, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Good image, matches the scope. Yann (talk) 11:45, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 19:47, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Europium.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good, best match for this scope. Yann (talk) 14:09, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 19:47, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:23, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hard disk head crash.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very nice shot! If the DOF (Depth Of Field) would have been greater it would have been even better, but as a close-up of the platter, this is IMO certainly good enough for QI. -- NormanB 23:48, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:23, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pentatoma rufipes at a cherry leaf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments DOF can be better but I think the image is good for showing the bug. --Korall 17:42, 18 September 2009 (UTC) This is a maximum of DOF without focus stacking. --Alchemist-hp 17:55, 18 September 2009 (UTC) CommentI did promomte, didnt? I? =) Ive tried to take pictures of these bugs too and I know its hard to get very deep dof. --Korall 11:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:23, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baum frisst Schild.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Can you explain how several letters could move from the sheet of paper to the hungry tree excrescence? :-) --Cayambe 13:16, 9 October 2009 (UTC) It is a painted metal sheet label. --Alchemist-hp 13:47, 9 October 2009 (UTC) Good. -- H005 16:40, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:23, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pano Sendeanlage auf dem Foia Algarve.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice pano - qi to me (in passing some annotation might be good - useful to people on panos?) --Herbythyme 13:07, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:23, 10 August 2012 (UTC)