User talk:Agentjoerg
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 11:55, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Categories Roman Legions
[edit]Good Morning: It doesn't seem bad to me, but the drawback is that the images do not appear directly in the category of each legion and there are many links, so that the category becomes a kind of root category. Thus it is not easy to find specific images and even less for non-expert users. --scutum (talk) 07:35, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
- Hello scutum, you are absolutely right about the drawbacks. Unfortunately, I don't have a solution to these disadvantages at the moment. I started grouping and structuring the categories of latin inscriptions (if they are related to roman legions), because it seemed to me quite an unorganized mess. Anyway, if you are unhappy with my changes, feel free to change or undo, whatever suits you. Cheers --Agentjoerg (talk) 08:05, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
- Hello; I also do not see a clear solution and what has been done helps to put order; thank you very much for taking the trouble to try to organize the clutter of categorizations. --scutum (talk) 20:48, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Category:CIL XVI 000048
[edit]Hallo Jörg, eine neue Kategorie, die du, falls du möchtest, weiter kategorisieren kannst: Category:CIL XVI 000048. Ich habe gesehen, dass du das bei anderen Commons-Kategorien zu einzelnen Militärdiplomen sehr ausgiebig gemacht hast. Viele Grüße, DerMaxdorfer (talk) 17:31, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- Servus DerMaxdorfer, danke für die Info, das mache ich. --Agentjoerg (talk) 01:36, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Jetzt ebenfalls neu: Category:CIL XVI 000151 und Category:CIL XVI 000024. Danke für deine Arbeit und viele Grüße, DerMaxdorfer (talk) 22:14, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Eine neue alte Inschrift
[edit]Hallo Agentjoerg, von dieser Inschrift gab es bisher kein Bild auf Commons, aber nun verfügen wir sogar über ein ganz hervorragendes (siehe nebenstehende Datei). Viele Grüße, Edelseider (talk) 08:43, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hallo Edelseider, danke für die Info. Ich habe eine Kat hinzugefügt. Leider sind der Name des Soldaten und seiner Einheit nicht erhalten. MfG --Agentjoerg (talk) 08:54, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
- Wo wir schon dabei sind – hast du dir bereits die Kategorie Ancient Roman inscriptions in Musée archéologique de Strasbourg vollständig angeschaut? Einige Inschriften wurden noch keinem Korpus zugeordnet, z. B. File:Stèle de couple-Dachstein-Musée archéologique de Strasbourg.jpg, oder File:Stèle de Loconius et Crobius-Musée archéologique de Strasbourg.jpg. Viele Grüße, Edelseider (talk) 09:31, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Hallo Edelseider, 1) File:Stèle de Loconius et Crobius-Musée archéologique de Strasbourg.jpg habe ich bei der EDCS (https://db.edcs.eu/epigr/epi.php?s_sprache=de) gefunden. Allerdings sind die zur Inschrift angegebenen Publikationen: ILTG 00432 = Ness-Lieb 00109 = Grabstelen 00182 = CAG-67-01, p 238 als Kategorien bei https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Ancient_Roman_inscriptions_by_publication nicht vorhanden. 2) Dasselbe gilt für File:Stèle de couple-Dachstein-Musée archéologique de Strasbourg.jpg,hier sind es die Publikationen: ILTG 00433 = Grabstelen 00181 = CAG-67-01, p 238. In dem Fall kann man nix machen, außer man legt jetzt eine neue Kategorie für die Publikation ILTG (was immer das ist) oder eine der anderen Publikationen an, wozu ich aber keine Lust habe. :-) MfG --Agentjoerg (talk) 14:03, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category
[edit]When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with {{SD|C2}} if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available or {{SD|C1}} if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused. In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page. ("C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion). This is in reference to your edit on Category:AE 1961, 00142. Best, Clay (talk) 04:05, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Clay, thanks a lot, I didn't know that, but I'll use SD|C2 from now on, if I want to delete an empty category. --Agentjoerg (talk) 04:33, 26 January 2024 (UTC)