User talk:Aconcagua/Archives/2013

Hello, Aconcagua! I am a curator at Sortland museum in the north of Norway. We are working on a serie of stories which we want to publish in regional papers and broadcasting. The theme is strong and independent women in history. One of these women is Turid Sundfylleren, from the Icelandic Sagas. We would very much like to use your picture from Bolungarvik to illustrate this story. The special shaped stone aat the edge of the mountain is said to be called Thurid still. If you allow us to use the picture and give us your name, the picture will of course be credited you.

Best regards Åsa Elstad Museum Nord - Sortland museum asa.elstad@museumnord.no

Fotos Passau

Hallo Aconcagua,

ich schreibe Ihnen im Auftrag von didactmedia, einer Medienproduktionsfirma mit Sitz in Konstanz am Bodensee. Wir erstellen Filme und didaktische Medien für den Schulunterricht, welche über das Netz der Kommunalen Medienzentren (ehemals Kreisbildstellen) von Schulen und Lehrern ausgeliehen und im Unterricht eingesetzt werden. Weitere Informationen finden sie auf unserer Homepage www.didactmedia.eu. Für unsere aktuelle Produktion "Europa im Überblick - der Westen" benötigen wir Fotos der Donau bei Passau. Da Sie sehr schöne Panoramaaufnahmen geschossen haben, wollten wir einmal fragen, ob Sie uns diese zur Benutzung frei geben. Wir würden ihren Namen im Abspann erwähnen und Sie bekommen ein Belegexemplar des fertigen Films. Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns unter produktion@didactmedia.eu.

Ich würde mich freuen, von Ihnen zu hören.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Lena Rossau

Benutzung Photo

Lieber Aconcagua,

wir möchten für ein Programmheft für eine Tagesveranstaltung in Passau (ca. 200 Teilnehmer) das Photo mit dem Blick auf Ortsspitze und die Veste Niederhaus und Oberhaus verwenden. Wenn Sie so nett wären, mir Ihren Namen zu schicken, so würde ich Sie selbstverständlich als den Photographen aufführen.

Herzlichen Dank. P. Kainz

PS: Sie können mir eine Nachricht schreiben an meinen Nachnamen (at)studienstiftung.de

Permission

Dear Aconcagua

My name is Erika Rosengren and I would like to use your photograph of a stalking wildcat as a base for a drawing. Would this be ok with you? If so please send your affirmation in an email to me: ikis81@hotmail.com

Best regards

Erika Rosengren Norra Skrävlinge Sweden — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.235.151.35 (talk • contribs) 31. Mai 2013, 13:47 Uhr (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lucca San Michele 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Bild Hopfen Alpenpanorama

Servus, wäre an deinem Foto für eine Pension in Hopfen interessiert. Könnte ich dieses einbinden.

www.hotel-alpengluehn.com

Beste Grüße Dominik — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.4.115.105 (talk • contribs) 1. Juni 2013, 17:19 Uhr (UTC)

Using your image: Peggy's Cove

I have used your Peggys Cove image in my blog post 101 things to do in Halifax, NS which can be found at http://101thingstodoinyourcity.blogspot.ca/2012/12/101-things-to-do-in-halifax-nova-scotia.html I also added it to my title image if that's okay. Would you like the image linked to a specific webpage? You can contact me at kristensblog (at) live.ca Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.5.169.56 (talk • contribs) 11. Juni 2013, 03:11 Uhr (UTC)

Common Raven picture

Aconcagua, I really liked your picture of a common raven at the National Park Bavarian Forest, so I posted it on my tumblr (http://baldraven.tumblr.com/post/52807045161/common-raven-by-aconcagua-license), with a link to the original picture on Wikimedia, your user page, and the license conditions. Thanks for sharing your work and please let me know if you have any issue with the post - I'd be happy to edit or remove it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.246.16.164 (talk • contribs) 12. Juni 2013, 21:12 Uhr (UTC)

telling you

i am gonna be useing one of your photos one of 4 cattle very furry .......i am useing it for a scholl project

Image used in English Wikipedia

Hello,

Due to some increased news interest in Highland cattle, especially calves, I used one of your images in the article at: Highland cattle. Thank you for sharing. Jrcrin001 (talk) 15:41, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church steeple Santa Margherita Vernazza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 20:43, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mondsee 080727-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:39, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kloster Vornbach 080809-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 20:07, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groznjan Istria church tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 20:07, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikivoyage:Denmark

Dear Aconcagua, your image File:Aero 110802 Panorama 1.jpg, that you requested to be informed about regarding its further usage, has been used as a Wikivoyage banner for Denmark. We use the 2100x300 format for Wikivoyage banners, so I subsequently resized and edited it, which resulted in File:Denmark Wikivoyage banner.png. In case you do not approve of that, please feel free to replace the banner at Wikivoyage with something more appropriate and, once this is done, nominate the file I created for deletion. Kind regards, PrinceGloria (talk) 17:52, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gartentage Schloss Tüssling 2013-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Some irrelevant CA --Moroder 10:22, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carved birds.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK to me, despite some overexposed pixels. --Myrabella 06:48, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gartentage Schloss Tüssling 2013-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 17:51, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Norge-serien application

Hi Aconcagua, We are createing a factsheet about Tetrao tetrix in our application for iPhone called Norge-serien. The factsheet will containg text from the same Wiki page, as your picture is beeing used.

Any questions, please contact me: trond.tertnes(at)nordeca.com

Best regards Trond Tertnes Nordeca — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.19.19.170 (talk • contribs) 13:58, 16. Jul. 2013 (UTC)

Category:National_parks_of_Alaska

National parks of Alaska has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Jmabel ! talk 18:12, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Gartentage Schloss Tüssling 2013-1.jpg

Hallo,

mein Name ist Martin Jarde und ich bin Redakteur beim Katholischen Sonntagsblatt der Diözese Rottenburg Stuttgart. Bei unserem Sommerrätsel gibt es bei uns dieses Jahr als Hauptpreis eine Reise nach Altötting und Schloß Tüssling zu gewinnen und dafür würde ich gerne Ihr Bild (siehe Betreff) verwenden. Wenn Sie mir Ihren Namen schicken, wird dieser selbstverständlich genannt und Sie bekommen auf Wunsch auch gerne ein Exemplar, falls Sie mir Ihre Adresse schicken. Ich bräuchte die Informationen bis morgen, da die Seite am Mittwoch druckfertig gemacht wird. Meine Email: Martin.Jarde@kathsonntagsblatt.de

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Martin Jarde — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.193.224.234 (talk • contribs) 15:02, 22. Jul. 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grožnjan (Croatia) (view from west).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info Added "view from west" to scope. --Aconcagua (talk) 18:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

 Support : all criteria met. (Scope slightly modified. I hope I'm not too pricky...) --JLPC (talk) 07:20, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Plomin Croatia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Look at the change in the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Buzet (Croatia) (view from west).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment I modified the scope but I think it's not complete. You should add "View from East (or North..)" imo. Can you modify the other scope too, please ?--JLPC (talk) 13:03, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 Info Done! --Aconcagua (talk) 17:59, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

 Support All criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 07:12, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Porlezza.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in scope Poco² 18:07, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Knut und Thomas Dörflein

Hallo Aconcagua, ich würde gern die Bilder in einem Buch benutzen! Bitte um Kontakt über meteorit03(at)yahoo.de!

Beste Grüße — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.68.81.135 (talk • contribs) 23:05, 13. Sep. 2013‎ (UTC)

Hallo, die Mailadresse funktioniert nicht (selbst mit @ nicht ;-)
"This user doesn't have a yahoo.com account (meteorit03@yahoo.com)"
--aconcagua (talk) 05:41, 14 September 2013

Sorry war falsch .de statt .com! Also: meteorit03@yahoo.de!

Danke für den Versuch!

Hallo Aconcagua! Möchte noch einmal um eine Mail bitten, damit wir die Veröffentlichung besprechen können. Wäre sehr schön! Danke! meteorit03@yahoo.de

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Salvator (Passau) (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Good choice. Look at the change in the scope. It is useful for monuments, place "exterior" in scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 Info OK, done! --aconcagua (talk) 06:10, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:23, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Use of Picture

Dear Aconcagua

I have used you great picture in a danish online newspaper regarding a story about Preikestolen in Norway.

Thank you very much

Simon Reenberg

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ponte del Diavolo (Cividale del Friuli).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Look at the change in the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:52, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santuario della Beata Vergine di Castelmonte (Italy) (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:54, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sender Brotjacklriegel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:56, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Klosterkirche Niederaltaich.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:16, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schloss Neuhaus am Inn (from east).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good choice imo. --JLPC (talk) 10:43, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Burg Kaja (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --JLPC (talk) 10:44, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:55, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Melide causeway.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lakefront Lugano.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Michael, in Passau (interior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

File:View of Denali from Fairbanks.jpg

File:View of Denali from Fairbanks.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

137.229.78.6 21:13, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Burg Hardegg (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --JLPC (talk) 17:28, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castle of Lerici exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:56, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mariensteg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:55, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:21, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Conil de la Frontera panorama.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment it is useful to add panorama in "orientation" and in "scope".  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:57, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:22, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Location?

Hi Aconcagua - do you have a location for File:130630 Stieglitz 1.jpg and related pics, please? Location would assist in e.g. subspecies allocation. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 22:42, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi MPF, no problem. Location is added. --aconcagua (talk) 04:02, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! - MPF (talk) 12:24, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statues of Louis XIII by Coustou.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment I'm sorry, the scope is too broad. Whatabout if I prefer this one, for instance ?--Jebulon (talk) 14:25, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

•  Comment This is a problem of scope just add: "by Coustou".--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:28, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

 Info Scope changed acc. to Archaeodontosaurus --aconcagua (talk) 16:45, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:13, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Jakobshorn (mountain station, from West).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment the scope should be modified to differentiate the image that it "Davos Jakobshorn-bahn 03.JPG". Both describe well the building. The orientation of the view taken enough. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 Info Added "from West". --aconcagua (talk) 08:38, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:29, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Piz S-chalambert as seen from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment : please, add "as seen from N" (or W, or S...), as we usually do here and link your scope to a category (it's another must !). --JLPC (talk) 15:37, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 Info Done --aconcagua (talk) 17:25, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 11:37, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Osterbrünnl-Kapelle (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment It will add "exterior" in scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:14, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 Info done. --aconcagua (talk) 10:43, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:20, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:55, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Pfarrkirche Mariä Himmelfahrt (Vornbach) (interior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --JLPC (talk) 09:03, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:56, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Wieder die Standortfrage

Hallo Aconacagua, allem Anschein nach handelt es sich bei den Spatzenbildern Foto 1, Foto 2, Foto 3 um den Italiensperling. Das könntest du selbst ändern, womöglich sogar mit Orts- oder Kamerapositionsangabe. Ich sehe öfters in deiner Dateiliste nach, ob etwas für das RegioWiki dabei ist. Der Gartenrotschwanz und der Balkenschröter wären zum Beispiel interessant, aber leider sind keine Ortsangabe dabei. Eine ungefähre Ortsangabe würde schon genügen. Viele Grüße! --Konrad Lackerbeck (talk) 15:19, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Konrad, sorry, ich hatte schon mal angekündigt, die Standortdaten nachzuliefern. Ist irgendwie untergegangen. Der Italiensperling stimmt wohl. Das war auf der letzten Raststätte vor dem Brenner - auf Italienseite. Ich mach mich gleich mal dran ... --aconcagua (talk) 17:08, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Permission Request 070526 staircase

Dear Aconcagua, I am an online teacher and would like to use your winding staircase (#070526) in an announcement and on my homepage. Thank you, Literacy Link — Preceding unsigned comment added by Literacy Link (talk • contribs) 18. Nov. 2013 (UTC)

Verwendung eines Bildes

Hallo Aconcagua,

wir haben eins Ihrer Bilder im Umweltkalender Berlin verwendet:

http://www.umweltkalender-berlin.de/angebote/details/23325 http://www.umweltkalender-berlin.de/angebote/details/23323

Es ist ein Veranstaltungskalender der Stiftung Naturschutz Berlin.

Vielen Dank für das tolle Bild!

Schöne Grüße aus Berlin Christine Sturm

E-Mail: Christine.Sturm@stiftung-naturschutz.de Web: www.stiftung-naturschutz.de www.facebook.com/umweltkalenderberlin — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.153.197.233 (talk • contribs) 10. Dez. 2013 (UTC)‎

Will use photo for report

Hi,

Will use your photo for a report concerning the Baltic Sea. Thanks, Søren E. Larsen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.226.179.254 (talk • contribs) 13. Dez. 2013‎ (UTC)

Use of a picture

Hi Aconcagua, I am writing an ebook about Koalas and hope to be able to use (with acknowledgement) one of your photographs. You can contact me at steve@bettatrading.com.au.

Steve Challis — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.220.202.60 (talk • contribs) 22. Dez. 2013‎ (UTC)

Deine Email an mich

Hallo!

Sorry, dass ich erst jetzt antworte, aber meine Wikiemails überprüfe ich nach Neueingänge nur sporadisch in letzter Zeit. Zur Sache: Ja, das Problem kann gelöst werden. Du kannst mir die Links via Email schicken und ich kümmere mich darum. Viele Grüße, High Contrast (talk) 12:33, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Danke! Liste ist unterwegs :-) --aconcagua (talk) 17:49, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Das sind wirklich viele Dateien. Kann ich um deine Unterstützung bitten? Bei diesem Bild habe ich bereits begonnen. Vorgehensweise: eine neue Version der Datei darüberladen (via Upload a new version of this file) und ich werde die alte Dateiversion löschen und das entsprechende log in der History nur für admins sichtbar machen (wie geschehen hier; da müsste alles in Frage kommende entfernt sein). So in Ordnung? Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 17:42, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Hallo!, Klar, mach ich. Ich war ehrlich gesagt selbst überrascht, wie viele das doch waren/sind. Ich mach mich mal ans Hochladen in den nächsten Tagen. Meld mich dann bei Dir. Nochmal vielen Dank :-) --aconcagua (talk) 19:49, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Mail ist unterwegs. --aconcagua (talk) 15:08, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

So, nun ist es vollbracht. Ich habe alle alten Dateiversionen und Dateihistorien gelöscht bzw. versteckt. Obwohl ich nach der Arbeit eine stichpunktartige Prüfung durchführte, kann es trotzdem sein, dass irgendetwas bei der ein oder anderen Datei schief ging. Bitte: Wenn du willst, dann kannst du noch einmal über die Dateien schauen. Sollte noch irgendetwas entfernt, dann einfach kurz melden. Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 19:57, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Vielen Dank! Du hast was gut bei mir :-) --aconcagua (talk) 20:50, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

PS: ich glaube, bei File:CabotTower StJohns.jpg ist eine Version zu viel gelöscht worden ... --aconcagua (talk) 20:53, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
... und hier eine zu wenig: File:Bo Diddley Prag 2005 02.jpg --aconcagua (talk) 21:00, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

 Done 100% schafft keiner :-) Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 00:10, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

passt! --aconcagua (talk) 08:28, 27 December 2013 (UTC)