User talk:32RB17

If I left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|32RB17}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Hello Sir...

I carefully read your letter along with other letter from other Wikimedia Instructor and administrator I received before telling me that you delete my work because it has a copy right violation.

Kindly if you please check the last ten items (for example) I upload to Wikimedia Commons you will find that they are an artwork painting I entirely and pure draw by my self and I upload by my self so they are obviously an (entirely my own work as I read in the upload page software).

I read the Wikimedia instructions and I am a person who is work hard to contribute to the wikimedia and you will not find a person like me in my country nation that has this intention to contribute and help, only have to live up to all human society all around the world and has a strong motive to work hard to develop humanitarian issue and contribute to the renaissance of science and art as mush as I can.

I work hard and all what is I am uploading are my paintings art work and my pure thoughts and new views of ideas and novel insights of my own thoughts production.

Kindly please don’t delete my work. I respect you and I hope you see how mush time I spend to work on this, I have sacrificed my time at the expense of my work and my livelihood and daily living pension in order to work this ideas, Novel insights, new views idea, my own Art work paintings, and I hope that it will benefit people in all Countries.

However I respect your view and promise Free man promise and pledge not to Upload and publish more Work , until you and other administrator & Distinguished colleagues in wikimedia commons give me a permission for that.

Thank you very much & great gratitude

Emad Kayyam

--EMAD KAYYAM (talk) 13:11, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

images refused because of copyrights

hello I'm Maryse Pepin from McGray and the Seyrawyn artist.

You have 2 other images of mine in observation (black list) for copywriting. Im a new user and I just understand really your policy. So, please, refuse them and after, how can I delete those? It is the logo of my books and a photo of our dragon eggs pouch in sale in boutiques.

Either, I put our Lonnar hammer to present it to the community but even if I created it, i have to delete this picture too because of the logo of Calimacil. How can I do it?

thanks

Maryse

File:Grace Huang at the 2014 AACTA Awards.jpg

I attended the AACTA Awards 2014 and was one of the photographers in the Photo Pit with media accreditation grated by Niki White the PR company for The Australian Academy of Cinema and Television Arts (AACTA) Awards.

OTRS request now pending for my photographs for this event.

Hpeterswald (talk) 05:18, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In this case you may ask for your images to be undeleted. See Commons:Undeletion requests for instructions. The Yeti 17:27, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bianca_Ryan_headshot.jpg

	Hello, 32RB17. You have new messages at ATinySliver's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

File:Odbiornik radiowy US-P.jpg and other

Dear 32RB17, US-P, R-311, R-250, R-160, and R-155 are both USSR products and Soviet military radios. There are many sources in Net about it. So, your last edits are incorrect. --KVK2005 (talk) 12:13, 11 September 2014 (UTC) I also think it's completely wrong to include the Wojskowy odbiornik radiowy category in Military radios of the Soviet Union and Russia and USSR products categories, since there are other military radio receivers besides Soviet and Russian. --KVK2005 (talk) 12:43, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, then somehow this category is a problem and files must be re-categorized. The Yeti 17:26, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This category isn't a problem, I think. It must be just renamed to be understandable internationally. --KVK2005 (talk) 20:40, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Airport code

Hello, careful adding that template in your own page with parametres. It ends automatically categorized in Airports by IATA code (flat list) and Airports by ICAO code (flat list) -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 17:00, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I fixed it, thanks for the hint. The Yeti 20:56, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 15:13, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiSymbols

Hey, I saw that you are a vector graphic designer and wanted to ask you for contribution for WikiSymbols, a proposed Wikimedia Foundation Sister Project. The concept is still a raw concept though. Maybe you could help writing it or give feedback?

Cheers, GabrielVogel

https://meta.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiSymbols

"Enabling visual communication"

The proposed WikiSymbols is about symbols/icons that can be understood by people from different cultures and different educational backgrounds as well as illiterate people. WikiSymbols enables (intercultural) communication without words. Contributors to the proposed WikiSymbols design symbols for all kinds of words and upload them with different tags so they can be found. Users worldwide can then download them and use them for websites, presentations, ... simply communication without words. The symbols could also be integrated into other wiki projects.

The contributors can choose whether their symbol/icon has a public domain licence or a creative common licence. The icon can driectly be downloaded in both cases. In the case of public domain, the creator of the icon/symbol has not to be credited. In the case of creative commons, the creator of the icon has to be credited.

Status Quo: There are already a couple of websites that aim to make icons more accessible. To name two successful/popular of them: The Noun Project (https://thenounproject.com/) and iconfinder.com

iconfinder.com recently has reached more than 1,000,000 icons. The most popular sites that sell icons have each 1-7 million unique visitors per month. Estimations are that there are tens of thousands if not hundred thousand contributors to these sites. They are marketplaces with high commission rates. For example, at The Noun Project (a company which started with donations from kickstarter) designers earn an average 0,03$ per sold icon. There are therefore many designers who would rather give them away for free than to sell them at these platforms.

There is already a lot of symbols/icons at Wikimedia Commons. (Maybe someone knows how many?) The symbols at Commons are not that easy to find though. To attract more designers who would contribute it is necessary to present the symbols/icons in a more prominent place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GabrielVogel (talk • contribs) 00:02, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please avoid watermarked pictures

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ español ∙ English ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ +/−

The image File:TraCon-2013 cosplayers.jpg you uploaded contain(s) watermarks. The usage of watermarks is discouraged according to policy. If a non-watermarked version of the image is available, please upload it under the same file name. After removing the watermark, ensure that the removed information is present in the EXIF tags, the image description page, or both. Thank you for understanding.

Elisfkc (talk) 03:48, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Whitney and Alyssa-1045.jpg

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ sicilianu ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ +/−

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Whitney and Alyssa-1045.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (

), No derivative works (

), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as

(CC BY),

(CC BY-SA),

(CC0) and

(PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Ww2censor (talk) 15:34, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beach girl.jpg

File:Beach girl.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Mhhossein ^talk 11:45, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Violet Sparks 2586.jpg

File:Violet Sparks 2586.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.