User talk:-akko/Archive/2021/Feb

File:Yanethcajahuanca.jpg

I took this picture, which is already in commons since 2010, and has this license as you can see in the information page. As I see it, i have taken a picture in commons (which means that is free), with a license that allows modifications, modificate it and upload it. Total legit. I guess that is enough to take off the mark for deletion. Also, can't we guess that the picture in es.classora.com has been taken from commons and not vice versa? In commons, it was upload in the 2010. --Chalisimo5 (talk) 01:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

@Chalisimo5 Sorry, {{Copyvio}} has been deleted and made some changes. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 01:20, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Images for review

Maybe I'm missing something, but it seems extremely spammy and unhelpful to put the "license review" template on dozens of my uploads in quick succession. If you think there is likely to be an issue, you can easily check some random examples with the links I provided which clearly show that these files have the license indicated. As a result of your additions I apparently can no longer use CropTool on these images until they are reviewed - and given that there are 11 000 pictures in that category, the first few of which I checked having been there for weeks to months, that seems unlikely to happen anytime soon.

This section was archived on a request by: (｀・ω・´) (talk) 01:13, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Shahram jazaery arab 2016.jpeg.jpg

I took this photo in 2016 for him, you can find that on google search because that photo used by him o social media. I can verify that with identity documents. also, I'm his manager to manage his official site, social media, ...

This section was archived on a request by: (｀・ω・´) (talk) 01:13, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Copyrighted images

Hello there,

sorry for the images, did not notice that problem. All marked images removed from the subject page. Please delete the files.

/Honza

This section was archived on a request by: (｀・ω・´) (talk) 01:13, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Courtne Smith.jpg and File:Courtne Smith Speaking.jpg

Hi, this is Beanbagearth the person who uploaded the images to wiki. I also found this to be suspicious at first however I did contact the company prior to uploading to make sure. NewNew confirmed that indeed these are their images and their Flickr account. Please feel free to contact them at media@newnew.co (NewNew is the company owned by Courtne Smith...the person in the photo). It is also the company that holds rights to both flagged photos. Thanks!

This section was archived on a request by: (｀・ω・´) (talk) 01:13, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Autotranslate

Bonjour akko, je ne comprend rien à votre bannière Autotranslate premièrement car il n'est pas traduit en français après internationalisation de la page explicative. Deuxièmement la bannière invoque la tranduction alors que sur l'image il est question du droit d'auteur ? Lors du versement j'utilise la license proposée en premier par l'assistant de versement. Que faut-il donc faire, à part supprimer les images ? Gérald Garitan (talk) 10:09, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

@Gérald Garitan Your talk page has too much content, so it takes a while to load the template information. For image copyright issues, please refer to COM:DW. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 14:19, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Gérald Garitan

Hi, You should not tag as "speedy deletion" old images. See User talk:Gérald_Garitan#File:Ambulances du 1 52.jpg. Most of these images are probably OK with the proper information. Please create a regular deletion request instead. Could you please do that? Also this user doesn't speak English. Regards, Yann (talk) 23:10, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Okay, I will pay attention next time. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 23:59, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

If you need help with old images, ask me - I would be happy to help. I just spent an hour straightening out all these speedy deletions - which weren't. Thanks! Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:05, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Sorry to trouble you. I took a few samples to check and found that there were problems, and marked the files with [[:Template:|{{}}]] in the user's contribution as copyvio. Next time, I will give priority to DR. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 00:14, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

No "no source"

Dear -akko,
you have recently proceeded this. You have marked several files with "no source". For all these files, the copyright has long since expired. It is therefore of no value to claim a source. Especially since the presumed online library source is given anyway. The correct way would be, when you revert your no-source-tags. Best regards, Mosbatho (talk) 13:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

-akko, can you please comment on the above statement? --Mosbatho (talk) 18:26, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

I don't understand what's wrong, the source can't find the picture. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 00:01, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

For such images that are obviously in the public domain, it is not important to provide an exact Internet source. It is obvious that they are in the public domain due to their age. Please remove your "no source" tags immediately in order to keep those valuable images. --Mosbatho (talk) 08:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

This flle copy from other website. Per Commons:EI: "If you are uploading a file that originally came from an external website, you should provide at least a link to the web page (i.e., the url) on which the image or file is displayed (that is, not the web address of the file itself, but rather the web page containing the file)." It can be seen that requesting the specific URL of the source is not unreasonable. In addition, these images have not been seen to be used on any wiki, so they are not necessarily "valuable". (｀・ω・´) (talk) 08:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

No, per Commons:EI: "If you are uploading content that you are certain is in the public domain by virtue of its copyright having expired, it will be important to know the date the content was first published (as entered in the date= field) to assess this." The dates were given. --Mosbatho (talk) 09:07, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Well, I think you should request the deletion of delete the source of the file whose copyright has expired because "the copyright has long since expired. It is therefore of no value to claim a source" . (｀・ω・´) (talk) 09:20, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

I think COM:EI has explained clearly that marking the correct date for PD files is only part of the process of "perfecting PD files copy from other websites". So please don't be too subjective. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 09:25, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Public domain in this case has nothing to do with subjective interpretation of rules. You seem to have misinterpreted the rules or not understood them. User_talk:-akko#Gérald_Garitan shows that there are already problems with your labeling. There, you actually stated that you want to be more cooperative in such cases. Thus, it would have made more sense for you to submit a deletion request for these files instead of having them removed this way. --Mosbatho (talk) 09:33, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, I should link Commons:PD_files#Guidelines. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 09:59, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Great, then everything is fine. Those guidelines show exactly that all relevant information was given. --Mosbatho (talk) 10:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

In addition to the correct URL. I think my attitude has always been clear: I will unconditionally support retention & restoration after the source is fixed. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 11:14, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cour proche basilique 1004304.jpg

Hi, Please do not create deletion requests for such simple texts. This gives unnecessary work to admins. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:56, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

@Yann I was using regex to search for files whose source is {{Own}}, so many files that can be kept by changing the template were involved. Now it seems too rough. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 15:01, 18 February 2021 (UTC)