User talk:Владимир Долгов
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 08:22, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 08:41, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Наумахия в начале XX века. На заднем плане виден Мост-руина..jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Наумахия в начале XX века. На заднем плане виден Мост-руина..jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Art-top (talk) 19:37, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
File:Парк Сильвия.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Art-top (talk) 19:41, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Филькино озеро до революции. Купальни..jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Филькино озеро до революции. Купальни..jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Филькино озеро до революции. Купальни..jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Art-top (talk) 19:42, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
File:Помощник ПВО Эстония.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Art-top (talk) 19:51, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
File:Офицер 20-й дивизии СС.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Pibwl (talk) 14:50, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
- Spasibo za otvet. Vam nado bylo prosto napisat' v nachalye, chto eto re-enactment, a nie skanirovany WW2 snimok ;-) Pibwl (talk) 16:02, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Марка с РТО-4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Philafrenzy (talk) 13:53, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.Stuchka (talk) 00:50, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
День добрый. Подскажите хоть, откуда снимок. Спасибо! Stuchka (talk) 00:50, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
File:И-16 у ангара 1926 года постройки, Красногвардейск.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Uli Elch (talk) 14:07, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Better source request for your uploads
[edit]
File:Грот "Эхо", дореволюционная открытка.jpg --Jarash (talk) 11:00, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
File:И-16 у перед ангаром 1926 г., Красногвардейск.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sealle (talk) 12:41, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
File:Местонахождение Плоского моста.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Sealle (talk) 12:45, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
File:Эстонские помощники ПВО.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sealle (talk) 12:59, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 11:26, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Вопрос: где вы здесь видите "нарушение авторских прав"? Кто их у меня отобрал? Я - автор этих изображений. Это мои собственные работы. Прочитайте описание снимка File:Элемент плана Красногвардейска 1939 года на экране монитора.JPG.:
Question: where you see "copyright infringement" here? Who took away them from me? I am an author of these images. These are my own works. Read the description of a picture
Русский: Элемент плана города Красногвардейск (состояние местности 1939 года) в программе AutoCAD 2005 на экране монитора моего компьютера. Снимок предоставлен по следующему вопросу. Некоторые не могут себе представить, что человек, занимающийся разработкой топографических документов и сам выполняющий сверку на местности, а также, последующую распечатку, может выставить своё произведение в качестве иллюстрации для статьи "Википедии". Вот и предоставляю доказательство того, что и среди топографов есть люди, интересующиеся историей родных мест.
English: City map element Krasnogvardeysk (a condition of the district of 1939) in the AutoCAD 2005 program on the screen of the monitor of my computer. The picture is provided on the following question. Some can't imagine that the person who is engaged in development of topographical documents and carrying out verification on the district, and also, the subsequent listing, can expose the work by way of illustration for the article "Wikipedias". Here also I provide the proof of that, as among topographers there are people who are interested in history of native places.
Неужели не понятно, что там написано? Или вы действительно не можете поверить, что топограф может выставить свою работу бесплатно в качестве иллюстрации? Или уже есть кто-то, заявивший, что это он - автор этих изображений? Назовите этого самозванца. Пусть попытается доказать своё авторство. Я привёл доказательство - снимок с монитора моего компьютера. Никто больше не может показать это изображение в программе AutoCAD 2005.
Что вы ответите? Жду.
Really it isn't clear, what there it is written? Or you can't really believe, what the topographer can expose the work free of charge by way of illustration? Or already there is someone, declared, what it he is an author of these images? Call this impostor. Let will try to prove the authorship. I provided the proof - a picture from the monitor of my computer. Anybody can't show this image in the AutoCAD 2005 program any more. What will you answer? I wait.
--Владимир Долгов (talk) 12:40, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violations
[edit]
Hello Владимир Долгов.
You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful. This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions. |
Yann (talk) 11:27, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Вопрос: где вы здесь видите "нарушение авторских прав"? Кто их у меня отобрал? Я - автор этих изображений. Это мои собственные работы. Прочитайте описание снимка File:Элемент плана Красногвардейска 1939 года на экране монитора.JPG.:
Question: where you see "copyright infringement" here? Who took away them from me? I am an author of these images. These are my own works. Read the description of a picture
Русский: Элемент плана города Красногвардейск (состояние местности 1939 года) в программе AutoCAD 2005 на экране монитора моего компьютера. Снимок предоставлен по следующему вопросу. Некоторые не могут себе представить, что человек, занимающийся разработкой топографических документов и сам выполняющий сверку на местности, а также, последующую распечатку, может выставить своё произведение в качестве иллюстрации для статьи "Википедии". Вот и предоставляю доказательство того, что и среди топографов есть люди, интересующиеся историей родных мест.
English: City map element Krasnogvardeysk (a condition of the district of 1939) in the AutoCAD 2005 program on the screen of the monitor of my computer. The picture is provided on the following question. Some can't imagine that the person who is engaged in development of topographical documents and carrying out verification on the district, and also, the subsequent listing, can expose the work by way of illustration for the article "Wikipedias". Here also I provide the proof of that, as among topographers there are people who are interested in history of native places.
Неужели не понятно, что там написано? Или вы действительно не можете поверить, что топограф может выставить свою работу бесплатно в качестве иллюстрации? Или уже есть кто-то, заявивший, что это он - автор этих изображений? Назовите этого самозванца. Пусть попытается доказать своё авторство. Я привёл доказательство - снимок с монитора моего компьютера. Никто больше не может показать это изображение в программе AutoCAD 2005.
Что вы ответите? Жду. --Владимир Долгов (talk) 12:42, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Really it isn't clear, what there it is written? Or you can't really believe, what the topographer can expose the work free of charge by way of illustration? Or already there is someone, declared, what it he is an author of these images? Call this impostor. Let will try to prove the authorship. I provided the proof - a picture from the monitor of my computer. Anybody can't show this image in the AutoCAD 2005 program any more. What will you answer? I wait.
Not delete other message
[edit]Hello, can you be careful and don't delete message of other people ? Thanks [1] Olivier LPB (talk) 16:47, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Извините, если что-то удалил. Здесь вопрос об удалении моих работ, которые, неизвестно, на каких основаниях, объявляют "чужими" и заявляют о "нарушении авторских прав". Где же "презумпция невиновности"?
Sorry, if I removed something. Here a question of removal of my works which, it isn't known, on what bases, declare "others" and declare "copyright infringement". Where "innocence presumption"? --Владимир Долгов (talk) 17:02, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Предупреждение 25.10.2015
[edit]Поскольку усилиями коллег вскрыт ещё один случай загрузки Вами фиктивного изображения с подложными авторством, лицензией и описанием, а именно грубой переработки в графическом редакторе фотографии, размещённой, в частности, здесь, предупреждаю Вас, что дальнейшие подобные действия приведут к блокировке Вашей учётной записи вплоть до бессрочной. Sealle (talk) 20:45, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, INeverCry 03:38, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:O-35. TAPS вырезка.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:O-35. TAPS вырезка.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:26, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
File:O-35. TAPS вырезка.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 22:04, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:21, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Элемент плана Красногвардейска 1939 года на экране монитора.JPG
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Элемент плана Красногвардейска 1939 года на экране монитора.JPG, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Jcb (talk) 16:23, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
File:Элемент плана Красногвардейска 1939 года на экране монитора.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Incnis Mrsi (talk) 16:46, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
File:Элемент плана Красногвардейска 1939 года на экране монитора.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:16, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Что-то не так с фотографией
[edit]Уважаемый Владимир, добрый день! Вы загрузили работу File:Капитан ВВС РККА у СБ.jpg. Скажите, пожалуйста, это Вы на фотографии? Если да, то кто автор этой фотографии и почему она загружена в зеркальном виде? Где она была опубликована (это снимок снимка журнала)? С уважением, — Niklitov (talk) 14:21, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
На фотографии -я. Автор этой фотографии - я: снимок был сделан мной автоспуском фотоаппарата. Снимок загружен не в зеркальном виде; загляните в справочники по обмундированию Рабоче-Крестьянской Красной Армии и посмотрите на фотографии Красной Армии конца 1930-х и начала 1940-х годов - Вы в этом убедитесь. Ни в каком журнале этот снимок не публиковался. User:Владимир Долгов
File:Плоский мост, Дворцовый парк, Гатчина.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
PlanespotterA320 (talk) 00:14, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- Думаю, можно загрузить взамен вот это фото (И. О. Сосфенов умер в 1941 году, и все его работы уже в ОД). --Kaganer (talk) 20:33, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- PS: пруфлинк на год смерти. --Kaganer (talk) 20:38, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Капитан ВВС РККА у СБ.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Капитан ВВС РККА у СБ.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Капитан ВВС РККА у СБ.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Masur (talk) 12:05, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
На странице описания изображения есть и источник и авторство и лицензия! Если не можете поверить, что это может один живой человек сделать; искренне вам сочувствую...
Это я сфотографировал, я обработал:
Краткое описание Описание Deutsch: Hauptmann/ Militärpilot der Luftstreitkräfte der Roten Armee, Uniform und Distinktionsabzeichen um 1935/40. English: Captain/ military pilot of the Red Army´s Air Force, uniform and rank insignias as to 1935/40. Русский: Капитан ВВС РККА в летней повседневной форме одежды образца 1935/40 гг. Петлицы - с золотой окантовкой и шевроны, введённого в 1940 году образца - командный состав. Вышитая нарукавная эмблема - лётного командного состава. Дата 12 августа 2009, 17:29:59 Источник собственная работа Автор Владимир Долгов Лицензирование Я, владелец авторских прав на это произведение, добровольно публикую его на условиях следующей лицензии: w:ru:Creative Commons атрибуция распространение на тех же условиях
Этот файл доступен по лицензии Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported Вы можете свободно: делиться произведением – копировать, распространять и передавать данное произведение. создавать производные – переделывать данное произведение При соблюдении следующих условий: атрибуция – Вы должны указать авторство, предоставить ссылку на лицензию и указать, внёс ли автор какие-либо изменения. Это можно сделать любым разумным способом, но не создавая впечатление, что лицензиат поддерживает вас или использование вами данного произведения. распространение на тех же условиях – Если вы изменяете, преобразуете или создаёте иное произведение на основе данного, то обязаны использовать лицензию исходного произведения или лицензию, совместимую с исходной. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Владимир Долгов (talk • contribs) 16:49, 23 July 2020 (UTC)