User:ArthurMcGill/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

2011

[edit]

Hallo ArthurMcGill, ich wusste ja garnicht, dass ich mehrere Baudenkmäler aufgenommen habe. Danke für die Kategorisierung. Lebst du in Aachen oder Umgebung? Falls ja (sonst natürlich auch), kannst du gerne zu unserem nächsten Wikip/media-Treffen in Aachen kommen. --Túrelio (talk) 07:47, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Turelio, danke für Deine Hinweise. Das mit den Baudenkmälern ist ein derzeigtes Projekt, welches Peter Tritthardt mit seinen Listen angestoßen hat [1], Ich unterstütze ihn als alter und übezeugter Aachener durch Zugabe einiger Fotos und Sortierung der zahllosen Aufnahmen, die in Commons vorhanden sind, so dass diese nachher mit den Listen übereinstimmen. Da ist aber noch viel zu tun und es wird noch dauern und wir sind für jede Hilfe dankbar. Bezüglich des Stammtisches muss ich überlegen, da ich andersweitig derzeit ziemlich eingespannt bin. Werde mich aber hoffentlich rechtzeitig dazu äußern. viele Grüße, ArthurMcGill (talk) 07:56, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Capitol-Kino Aachen.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 08:58, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Hallo ArthurMcGill, obiges Panoramio-Foto ist vom Urheber auf "Keine kommerzielle Nutzung-Keine Bearbeitung" eingeschränkt, was auf Commons nicht erlaubt ist. Du könntest ihn kontaktieren und fragen, ob er es unter CC-BY-SA freigibt, sonst muss es leider weg. --Túrelio (talk) 09:08, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, habe ich übersehen, lösche es, ich mache in Kürze ein eigenes Foto. Gruß ArthurMcGill (talk) 15:12, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Category:Baudenkmal Aachen-Mitte

[edit]

Hallo ArthurMcGill, Baudenkmäler werden in Commons unter "Cultural heritage monuments" kategorisiert, siehe z.B. die Oberkategorie Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Germany. Da Baudenkmäler nicht unbedingt Bauwerke sind, werden sie auch parallel zu "Buildings in" kategorisiert und nicht als Unterkategorie. Für Aachen Mitte existierte auch schon die Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Aachen-Mitte, das habe ich mal umgeräumt. Würdest du das bitte für die anderen Stadtteile auch so machen? Grüße --Bjs (talk) 06:14, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis und Deine enormen Bemühungen, war mir nicht bekannt; Mach' ich gerne aber sicherheitshalber nachgefragt, verstehe ich es also richtig, dass demnach auch die anderen Kategorien "Baudenkmal xy" verschoben werden sollen auf "Cultural heritage ..in xy" mit entsprechender Änderung bei den einzelnen Dateien? Im Voraus vielen Dank für eine Antwort, Grüße ArthurMcGill (talk) 06:34, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

2012

[edit]

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 08:00, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Indeweg

[edit]

Lieg ich hier richtig? --Gödeke (talk) 16:24, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

ja! ArthurMcGill (talk) 18:08, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Danke --Gödeke (talk) 19:43, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Brand oder Burtscheid?

[edit]

File:Viertelmeilenstein Brand.JPG Gruß --Gödeke (talk) 22:28, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Brand, Gruß --ArthurMcGill (talk) 06:26, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Dann steht der wohl an der Trierer Straße? --Gödeke (talk) 11:32, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Ja, Ortsausgang links, Richtung Kornelimünster --ArthurMcGill (talk) 14:52, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Danke --Gödeke (talk) 19:02, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Kalköfen

[edit]

Ich hab hier zwei Kalköfen, aber nur einen in der Liste:

Das sind doch verschiedene? --Gödeke (talk) 21:30, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

richtig gesehen, ich war mir anfangs nicht sicher, welcher von beiden denkmalgeschützt ist, aber es ist der linke Ofen, ich habe daraufhin bereits die Kat. rechts geändert. Danke für den Hinweis --ArthurMcGill (talk) 06:27, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

2013

[edit]

externe Bildnutzungen

[edit]

--Túrelio (talk) 20:45, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

2016

[edit]

externe Bildnutzungen

[edit]

--Túrelio (talk) 10:04, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Mangold-Foto

[edit]

Leider immer noch nichts passiert[2]. --Túrelio (talk) 11:16, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Danke für die Info, vielleicht wird's irgendwann mal, Gruß --ArthurMcGill (talk) 11:49, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
File:Ruprecht von Mangoldt.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Storkk (talk) 14:56, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Stolperstein Hermann Levy - Aachen (2).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:52, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Danke für die Info, habe die Lizenz jetzt nachgetragen, Gruß, --ArthurMcGill (talk) 07:42, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

2017

[edit]

Skulptur "Europa-Sterne"

[edit]

Hallo! Du hast bei meinem Bild File:Aachen, Hermann-Heusch-Platz, Europa -- 2016 -- 2795.jpg (nicht nur die einzige Kategorie mit direktem Bezug zu Aachen, sondern auch) die Kategorien mit Bezug auf die Skulpturen entfernt. Zu sehen ist allerdings eine Skulptur, denn die Europa-Sterne am Hermann-Heusch-Platz sind doch eine. Sie ist zwar an der Wand montiert, aber es ist eine. Statt sie zu entfernen hätte ich eher eine passendere Einordnung erwartet. Das Entfernen allein ist meist eher kontraproduktiv - klar, es gibt auch dafür Gründe. Aber da ich dir halt gerade schreibe und du Aachen wohl deutlich besser kennst als ich: Kannst du mir mit dem Namen des Künstlers weiterhelfen? Den suche ich nämlich schon länger. Ich gebe gerne den Künstler und auch das Entstehungsjahr an, aber bei dieser Skulptur komme ich nicht weiter. Für einen Tipp bin daher dankbar. Grüße aus den Norden unseres Bundeslandes! --XRay talk 16:06, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, ich habe dies mit dem benachbarten Podest verwechselt, auf dem die Büste von Hermann Heusch montiert ist. Ich dachte, dies ware der Sockel ohne die Büste. Ich muss mich bzgl des Künstlers und der Entstehungszeit noch schlau machen. Melde mich dann wieder, Gruß aus Aachen, --ArthurMcGill (talk) 16:09, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Danke! BTW: Als Münsterländer muss ich zugeben, dass es nicht einfach war, den Ort zu finden. Ich habe eigentlich nur ein wenig Wartezeit vertrödelt. Den Tipp gab mir eine sehr nette Aachenerin, die mich angesichts meiner Fotoambitionen angesprochen hatte. --XRay talk 16:19, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Ich hab's. Die "Europaspirale" ist von de:Manfred Bredohl, bekannter Kunst-Schmied aus Aachen (Seite 14, Nr. 7), Erstellungsjahr lässt sich nicht exakt finden, wird aber in den 1980er-Jahren gewesen sein, als die kleine Straße hergerichtet wurde. Ich hoffe, die Angaben reichen Dir, Viele Grüße, --ArthurMcGill (talk) 16:28, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Das ging ja fix. Ich hatte schon lange gesucht. Danke! --XRay talk 16:44, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

2018

[edit]

Hallo ArthurMcGill,

"und es wird hierfür wohl auch keinen Bedarf geben." Vermutlich noch nicht. Hystrix (talk) 17:45, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Ich habs nochmal versucht: Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Ticket:2018020710009647. --Túrelio (talk) 13:19, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

keine FoP

[edit]

Hallo ArthurMcGill, bei den folgenden beiden Fotos ist, da im Innenraum aufgenommen, leider kein Rückgriff auf die Panoramafreiheit möglich:

Willst du versuchen, Herrn Sous und Hubertus Förster zu kontaktieren? --Túrelio (talk) 08:41, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio, danke für die Info, Sous oder Förster zu kontaktieren ist etwas schwierig, dann können die Bilder halt gelöscht werden. Es sind genug Ersatzbilder auf Commons vorhanden, zur Not kann ich auch welche nachmachen, die den Anforderungen entsprechen. Gruß, --ArthurMcGill (talk) 10:33, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

2019

[edit]
File:Hl. Antonius - St. Gregius-Aachen.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 21:48, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Marienfigur St. Gregorius-Aachen.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:04, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Noach-Bilderzyklus (Arche Noach).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:05, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Noach-Bilderzyklus St. Gregorius Aachen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:05, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

File:St. Gregorius-Aachen (Tabernakel).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:07, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

File:St. Gregorius Aachen - Osterkerze und Tabernakel.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:07, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

File:St. Gregorius Aachen - Madonna.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:08, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

File:St. Gregorius Aachen - Hängekreuz.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:08, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Maria mit Kind - St. Gregorius-Aachen .jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:09, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Hängekreuz St. Gregorius-Aachen-Burtscheid.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:13, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:17, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:07, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

2020

[edit]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:07, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:21, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Stolperstein Adolf Rosenthal, Aachen (2).JPG

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Stolperstein Adolf Rosenthal, Aachen (2).JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:06, 4 November 2020 (UTC)


Hallo ArthurMcGill, das Problem (du hattest wohl einfach den Lizenzbaustein vergessen) ist erledigt, weil die Datei eh ein Duplikat von File:Stolperstein Adolf Rosenthal, Aachen.JPG war. --Túrelio (talk) 19:06, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio, danke für die Information, in der Tat vergaß ich den Lizenzbaustein und holte dies bereits nach. VG und bleib gesund, ArthurMcGill (talk) 07:58, 5 November 2020 (UTC)