Template talk:Il
What is the (red and strangely named) Category:Pages that use Template:iL good for? If I want to know which pages use this template (and why should I??), I could use Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:il. Any objections if I just remove it from the template? --Mormegil 12:54, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- I have now created this category, I'm sorry I neglected to do so previously. This category lists pages that use Template:iL AKA Template:Il to list Image Lineitems or provide Image Links, as recommended by Help:Mass deletion request, and pages that transclude such pages. Most of such pages are mass deletion requests. This category is named strangely because of the similarity between the uppercase "i" and the lowercase "L". Yes I would object if you were to "just remove it from the template". — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 20:20, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
I understand it is recommended to use this template, and I understand what does the template do. I don’t understand why the category. I have found no mention of the category on that help page and I cannot imagine what is it good for. We don’t have e.g. Category:Pages that use Template:TL and why should we? If I want a list of pages that use Template:IL, I can use the abovementioned Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Il. What is the reason for the category – why did you create it in the first place? --Mormegil 09:03, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- I created it for a number of reasons:
- I wanted to see who was using the template.
- I typically create categories for templates I create.
- I wanted an easy way to find mass deletion requests.
- Gotta run! — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 13:01, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
- As I said: you can use Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Il for that.
- “I typically create” is a weak reason, IMHO. There are many templates on Commons, and this is definitely not a standard thing, AFAICT.
- In addition to the Whatlinkshere tool, this is not very exact: the template can be used in many other ways, you cannot distinguish mass deletion request by such universal template.
--Mormegil 23:07, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- I agree. The category is pointless. Not everyone that makes mass deletion requests use this, and not everyone that uses this makes mass deletion requests. A easy way to find mass DRs is to simply scroll through COM:DEL. They're not that hard to miss. Or add something to one of those templates. Is it ok if I remove and delete the category or should I list it for deletion? Rocket000 18:07, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Image -> File
[edit]Could the Image: prefix be replaced by a File: prefix? Thanks in advance. --Eusebius (talk) 12:23, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Remove
[edit]{{Edit request}} Hello,
Can someone remove this part :
· [{{fullurl:tools:~daniel/WikiSense/CommonSense.php|i={{urlencode:{{{1|Example.jpg}}}}}&go-clean=yes}} find cats]
The tool has been discontinued...
--Scoopfinder(d) 13:27, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Add Commons Delinker log
[edit]{{Edit protected}}
Let's add link to Commons Delinker log, as it could be very handy when restoring files. I have no clear idea how to implement it (I mean cutting the "File:/Image:" prefix). Here's the desired URI scheme:
https://tools.wmflabs.org/commons-delinquent/?image={filename-minus-'File:'-prefix}
--Rezonansowy (talk) 14:46, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Done --Jarekt (talk) 01:52, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
plainlinksneverexpand
[edit]{{Edit request}}
Please replace plainlinksneverexpand with plainlinks. The former is a deprecated class: MediaWiki talk:Common.css#Removing deprecated classes. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:47, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- The fact that something has been deprecated (even almost 10 years ago) does not mean that it isn't depended upon. This template is transcluded ~3600 times on this wiki, so the ramifications of this change should be examined in detail before it is carried out. I've added the
technical=yesparameter to the edit request. Storkk (talk) 11:59, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Support, as the links are ugly with plainlinksneverexpand. In my defense, when I designed this template in 2007, plainlinksneverexpand was just as pretty as plainlinks is now. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:29, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
- Meh, I think I agree - any tool that breaks because of this change is probably easy to fix, and the existence of such a tool is only theoretical anyway. I think my initial reaction was coming from my dayjob mindset where introducing breaking changes is a heinous sin. Storkk (talk) 16:22, 19 July 2018 (UTC)