Template talk:Civertan license

Please contact grin@huwp instead of (or along with) Civertan if you have any questions or requests, they are not that good in wikisyntax and English. :) --grin ✎ 08:46, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Autotranslate

{{Editprotected}} Please use autotranslate:

{{autotranslate|base=Civertan license}}
<includeonly>[[Category:Aerial photographs by Civertan Grafikai Stúdió]]</includeonly><noinclude>
{{documentation}}
</noinclude>

(I've done subpages.) Thanks! tacsipacsi (talk) 15:16, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi. [1] When I made the change, a template loop was detected. It looks like the license tag template uses autotranslate and things got wacky. Do you mind fixing that and then re-enabling the edit request? Thank you! Killiondude (talk) 04:52, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Then this is a way without {{Autotranslate}}:

{{Civertan license/{{Fallback|Civertan license}} }}
<includeonly>[[Category:Aerial photographs by Civertan Grafikai Stúdió]]</includeonly><noinclude>
{{documentation}}
</noinclude>

It doesn't cause template loop. tacsipacsi (talk) 16:26, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I have put that in place. Killiondude (talk) 22:10, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

The categories can removed too. tacsipacsi (talk) 11:02, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

 Done Killiondude (talk) 17:26, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

 Not done, I thought only the <noinclude> part, but with {{DEFAULTSORT:…}}. tacsipacsi (talk) 09:38, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Now correct? -- Rillke^(q?) 22:29, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

@Jarekt: Please revert, still causes template loop. Or you can try adding the standard lang parameter to {{PermissionOTRS}}, maybe that helps (and even if not, it’s useful, so that such templates as this can use one language). —Tacsipacsi (talk) 08:06, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Tacsipacsi I fixed it by using Template:Autotranslate/clone 1. --Jarekt (talk) 11:34, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Nasty hack… There should be no template loop detected. But I don’t plan to rewrite the parser, so we don’t have a better choice. —Tacsipacsi (talk) 11:44, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

I agree, It is a problem with the parser flagging pages that are fine. I will check if that issue was reported before. --Jarekt (talk) 12:34, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

don't lose the license

Please take care not to lose the license definition again. This template should include the license, and the images should not have any additional license definition by themselves. The original license was "cc by sa 2.5+", see history. --grin ✎ 08:11, 5 September 2016 (UTC)