Commons:Valued image candidates/Retrato de Morelos, 1813.png/Archive of previous reviews

Comment A scope is imperative. Get inspired by those you can read in the contest. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Ok for the scope. But the category he designates must contain the image, this is not the case. Geocoding is also necessary in the caption.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A. Please link the Commons category that includes this photo. B. Is this photo by Colección Museo de Historia Mexicana or by some photographer who didn't work at the museum? Who took the photo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:25, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment And again, you should act on the remarks you got in the previous reviews. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:26, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 0 support, 0 oppose => undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 0 support, 0 oppose => undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose No new element since the previous appointments. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Archaeodontosaurus: Whoever understands it, really say something logical.--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 14:25, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Nobody was interested enough in the previous nomination to support it. Renominating the image without any additional information is unlikely to change that, and indeed may be counter-productive. I have removed {{Institution}} as it's not part of the scope. Rodhullandemu (talk) 20:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Rodhullandemu: Ready, I have already placed the scopes, now can you make my image valuable?--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 15:19, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have no opinion either way on the merits of the image. Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:32, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Archaeodontosaurus: Scope is now in line with normal VI rules.--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 18:55, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think the scope you really want is José María Morelos, portrait. That said, there are several portraits in scope, and I really have no idea which one is best. How are you determining which one you think is best? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:52, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: It is determined because this is the only image signed by José María Morelos and if you think very well it must be valuable to have an image signed by one of the most important heroes of the Independence of Mexico.--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 14:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: It may even be the only one--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 14:03, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Then make your scope "José María Morelos, signed portrait". Don't use parentheses on any part of the scope - you need all of it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:58, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek: Ready, I have already placed José María Morelos, signed portrait, as you told me-- Aurelio de Sandoval (talk)17:01, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Now it makes sense to Support, as it's unique in its scope. However, Archaeodontosaurus has said that you need to put the geographic coordinates of the museum in your caption. Did I understand that correctly, Archaeo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:26, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Everyone sets up the geographic coordinates correctly there is no exception. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment OK, Aurelio de Sandoval, please add geographic coordinates for the museum in your file's caption, or I will have to revert to opposing the nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:13, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek: I already placed the geocoding, have I done it right? If that is not the case, could you give me an image that has the geocoding so that it serves as an example please?--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 14:26, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Ikan Kekek: I did it well?-- Aurelio de Sandoval (talk)16:10, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Info@Ikan Kekek and Archaeodontosaurus: I did a survey of how different uploaders handle geocoordinates when the "Artwork template" is used on VIs. Apart from User:Archaeodontosaurus nobody who used the "Artwork" template replicated the art gallery coordinates in the "caption". Martinvl (talk) 19:59, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm just going by what Archaeo says. Aurelio de Sandoval, you need to put the coordinates in the caption on your file page, not in the scope of this nomination. Please remove that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:32, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose => undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu