Commons:Valued image candidates/Mammal kidneys- FMVZ USP-21.jpg/Archive of previous reviews 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  •  Comment - @Ikan Kekek: ; @El Grafo: -- Horadrim (talk) 17:37, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose The name of the species must be referenced in the scope.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:49, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support with a similar reasoning as here. Yes, it would be nice to know what kind of mammal this came from. But we don't need to know the exact species to use this to demonstrate how the general vascular structure of a mammal's kidney looks like. If the Museum of Veterinary Anatomy in São Paulo uses it for that purpose we can certainly do so as well. Imho, this image is much more valuable than the umpteenth "north-west view of house No. 234 in XYZ" (which probably not even the locals really care about) exactly because it can be used on a more general level. --El Grafo (talk) 18:22, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Agreed to abandon the idea of giving the name of the species in the scope. But this devalues the image. There is another problem is that only the arteries were injected, the venous system did not. We see only half the subject announced in the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the scope would be acceptable.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:14, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates/Mammal_kidneys-_FMVZ_USP-21.jpg/Archive_of_previous_reviews_2&oldid=236674092"