Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Massimilianogalardi

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Massimilianogalardi}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Massimilianogalardi

[edit]
[edit]

Rationale, discussion and results

[edit]

Reason: When I was patrolling using RTRC, I saw a user which seems to be contributing constructively, which is Zebra48bo. I requested at COM:RFR to give them autopatrol, but INeverCry said that they are possible sock, which is said by an itwiki sysop Threecharlie. Could a CU check if Massimilianogalardi=Tuscanycalling=Zebra48bo? Thanks. Poké95 02:24, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Link to alleged sockpuppetry: User talk:Zebra48bo#A volte ritornano (Italian) Poké95 02:29, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I pinged A.Savin on this at RFR since the two accounts mentioned by Threecharlie are stale as far as CU goes. This would have to be based on behavior, and Savin's opinion would be best probably, as he's the blocking admin for the account that's blocked here. I would find it hard to set aside a statement made by an experienced Italian Wiki admin like Threecharlie. INeverCry 02:34, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your confidence in me INeverCry; in the amount of many images uploaded by user certainly the most of his work are useful to Wikimedia projects, but being grossly categorized in practice are not traceable at an searching exclusively for municipality categories. If in addition to this is also the creator of unnecessary dirty work its problematic is also evident in addition to sockpuppeting. Sorry for my terrifying English :-D--Threecharlie (talk) 12:46, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I also still support an indefblock of this user + both sockpuppets, as they still create only a mess with their poorly categorized low-quality uploads. --A.Savin 13:05, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Results are Inconclusive. --Krd 22:00, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.