Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Chaklalajob
Chaklalajob
[edit]- Chaklalajob (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Suspected related users
[edit]- Benhur101 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Corona2215 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Dindallas (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Simongreenwich (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Swiss3312 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Trinitysky (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Wolverine20009 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Chaklalajob (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Amandacelles (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Bostonbetty (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Mariatelstoy (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Moonandthegirl (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Vegaslot (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale
[edit]Results
[edit]The cited investigation on WP:EN suggests that this might or might not be a high school class who are actually different people. Since they have not created any significant disruption on Commons (one DR and two deleted copyvios), I have not blocked any of them.
The following are not registered Commons users:
- Trinitysky
- Bostonbetty
The following are Likely related to each other. There is no obvious reason to suggest that they are related to the others. The accounts exist on Commons, but have no edits here:
- Moonandthegirl
- Vegaslot
- Amandacelles
The following are Likely related to each other. There is no obvious reason to suggest that they are related to the others. The accounts exist on Commons, but have no edits here:
- Swiss3312
- CaliforniaSun2013
The following are Likely related to each other:
- Wolverine20009 -- no Commons edits
- Corona2215 -- one deleted upload, three other uploads
- Simongreenwich -- no Commons edits
- Benhur101 -- one upload with a current DR on it.
- Chaklalajob -- Likely connected on WP:EN, no obvious connections on Commons. Four Commons uploads, no deletions.
The following have no obvious relationships on Commons:
- Dindallas -- one deleted upload
- Mariatelstoy -- one upload
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:09, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- Actually, we think that the "high school" thing is bogus; I'm told CU does not support this at all, and the behavior does not match that either. We think this is Morning277. --Rschen7754 05:33, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- And we think that most of the rest of the uploads are logos that we have no permission for. --Rschen7754 05:54, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
As somebody highly familiar with the Morning case on enwiki, and who has checked the case, there is nothing to suggest this is for a class, and via a couple degrees of separation, as well as some instinct on my part I'm almost certain they are Morning277 socks. NativeForeigner 토론 (talk) 05:04, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
- FYI: en:Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Morning277. Trijnsteltalk 16:15, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
- Also, User:Corona2215 has uploaded a bunch of copyright violations. Can an admin please take care of blocking the accounts? --Rschen7754 09:15, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- I blocked all accounts confirmed by Jim (except Dindallas, Mariatelstoy, Trinitysky, Bostonbetty). Yann (talk) 06:01, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- Also, User:Corona2215 has uploaded a bunch of copyright violations. Can an admin please take care of blocking the accounts? --Rschen7754 09:15, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.