Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Biopics

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Biopics}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Biopics

[edit]

Status: open • view • edit • history • watch
Filed: 14:29, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

[edit]

Rationale updated

[edit]

Reason: Biopics is abusing multiple accounts to evade his block. Have a look here in 2015 and now here in 2019.
Edits:
[1] [2] [3] [4]
--George Chernilevsky talk 12:37, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rationale

[edit]

Reason: Biopics is abusing multiple accounts to evade his block. Have a look here in 2015 and now here in 2019.
George Chernilevsky talk 14:29, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Declined - Per COM:RFCU: "Evidence is required. When you request a check, you must include a rationale that demonstrates (e.g., by including diffs) what the disruption to the project is, and why you believe the accounts are related" (emphasis in original) and "Include the diffs or links required to support the request and reason for it." It is not up to checkusers to establish a rationale for you. Эlcobbola talk 15:28, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Those diffs show only that Vulphere, Boothsift, and A-wiki-guest-user each opposed an FPC. Where is evidence they are Biopics? Where is evidence they are related to each other? Cart, Cmao20, Lucasbosch, and Daniel Case all opposed as well - why are they different? If A-wiki-guest-user is a sock of Boothsift, why did the latter call out the former for an inadequate !vote? Vulphere has existed since February 2014 - why do you think that account was missed in the June 2015 RFCU below? You will need to provide actual evidence of a relationship. Эlcobbola talk 16:42, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cart, Cmao20, Lucasbosch, and Daniel Case is users who I know as a good users. More reasons about my request.
1. Biopics personally hates me. I am an administrator who recognized and blocked Biopics's sock few years ago. I don't know another user who really wanted to harm me.
2. Biopics repeatedly used multiple sock's voting on FP candidates against people he doesn’t like (typical Modus operandi). Biopics (a.k.a. Lycaon) was active since 2011 and almost all time used socks. User Mbz1 was retired after Biopics's attack.
3. Vulphere and Boothsift has similar voting and similar design of self signature.
4. A-wiki-guest-user is just a new user, who make first voting on FP candidate. -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:10, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nos 1 and 2 are not reasons for a check. No. 3 has no evidence - please provide diffs showing their vote stacking. No. 4: A-wiki-guest-user probably is a reincarnation of someone (this would not be the first edit of a genuine newbie), but we need evidence of whom. A-wiki-guest-user has extensively edited ta.wiki, which Biopics, known socks, Vulphere and Boothsift have not. And, again, why did Boothsift call out A-wiki-guest-user if the latter is a sock? (This edit, which you provided, is evidence against being a sock, unless you can also provide diffs where Biopics has previously used socks to talk to each other and undermine each other as a ruse to avoid detection.) Again, you need to provide actual evidence--diffs and analysis of similarities--not unsubstantiated or irrelevant (nos. 1 and 2) statements. Эlcobbola talk 20:28, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, Biopics has previously used socks to talk to each other, see Biopics early user page as a sample --George Chernilevsky talk 20:45, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
At this point, I feel I have been quite clear in what is needed from you. Diffs have not been forthcoming, and my questions have not been answered. I would encourage you to re-read and contemplate the above because, right now, your rationale is tantamount to "Biopics hates me and uses negative FPC votes to enact revenage. These users voted against my nomination and, since I don't personally know them, they must be Biopics." If you're not prepared to make a reasonable case supported by evidence, this check will not be run. Also consider than both Vulphere and Boothsift are active in the FPC/FVC process and regularly !vote contrary to each other; for example:
  • OK. Thank you for your time and detailed answer. Please close this request. Respectfully -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:58, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
    Subsequent requests related to this user should be made     above, in a new section.
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Biopics

[edit]
[edit]

Rationale

[edit]
  • Reason: Biopics is abusing multiple accounts to evade his block. The accounts listed above are his accounts (would be nice if someone can look into it). Maybe there are more sleeper accounts. Steinsplitter (talk) 07:25, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Results

[edit]
  • The following are Confirmed socks:
  • I took a good look at Moros y Christianos before posting these results. Not only is the technical data an exact match there is editing overlap [5], [6] and Moros y Christianos shares similar uploads with Biopics (bugs, spiders, etc) with their first upload being File:Dicranodromia mahieuxii.jpg. After a careful review of all of the evidence, I am more than satisfied they are a sock of Biopics. Tiptoety talk 07:31, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I blocked Moros y Christianos and removed his userrights. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:34, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I striked that vote. Voting by socks is unacceptable. Yann (talk) 15:56, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Biopics&oldid=696660751"