Commons:Requests and votes/Filnik

Filnik

 Support = 36;  Oppose = 1;  Neutral = 0 - 97.3% EugeneZelenko 16:02, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Links for Filnik: Filnik (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)

Dear community. I would like to suppose you Filnik as a new commons sysop. He has not got as many edits, but he is a high-trusted user in many wikimedia wikis, for example italian Wikipedia, where he is a sysop.
He has got a bot, User:Filbot, wich is tagging all the new, untagged images if they are not manually reviewed after a cupple of time. And as many newbies asks him because of this sysop tools would be a great addition for his dayly work.
He accepted his nomination. ^{__ ABF __} ϑ 14:35, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Really thanks ABF, I do the same in the italian wikipedia since months and I think that it is not so different on commons. Although here I have not so many edits (I usually only respond to the questions) I have already over 12.000 edits on it.wikipedia ;-). Forgot: I accept, thanks ABF! --Filnik 14:38, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Votes

• strong  Support ^{__ ABF __} ϑ 14:35, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support very helpfull user, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið _{(:> )=|} ∇ 14:54, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
• Really does come under the heading of "I thought you were one"! Good languages, helpful, good contributor - thanks for being prepared to help --Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:59, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
• Strong  Support Majorly (talk) 16:26, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
• Automatic  Support. Another Italian keen multiwiki tinkering egghead is warmly welcome! Go Fil Go! - εΔω 17:14, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Absolutely (and yes, I thought you were :P) --Christian Nurtsch^TM 17:18, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support--FiloSottile 17:18, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support--Senpaiottolo 17:19, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Ramac 20:14, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Ahonc (talk) 21:35, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
• + Mønobi 23:20, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
• ...wait, why wasn't he one yet?  Support — Giggy 00:58, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
• Support. I'm one of those people scratching their heads and thinking he was already an admin. Arria Belli | parlami 12:18, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Ireas ^{talk•de•en} 13:13, 24 January 2008 (UTC) although I think he doesn't need my vote any more ;)
•  Support good decision. — Manecke 14:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --S^[1] 15:48, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Johney (talk) 18:12, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Known enough (Isn't he already admin? :)), Commons really needs new active admins.--OsamaK 19:20, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Freegiampi 19:30, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Great addition to the admin team. FloNight♥♥♥ 23:54, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Ok, not to sound cliché but I really did think he was one. Like this the first time that has ever happened to me on Commons. Maybe it was the awesome bot account that made me think that, I don't know, but I totally support Filnik. Rocket000 04:46, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Another "Surprised that he wasn't already" yes. Cary Bass ^demandez 18:15, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Natural candidate. -- Cat ^ちぃ？ 18:31, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Bryan (talk to me) 18:33, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Supporto con molto piacere. Filnik è un ottimo utente e sono sicuro possa essere un ottimo sysop. RedCoat 19:12, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --.snoopy. 12:06, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Wim b you also answer to me here 20:06, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Cowardly Lion 18:03, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support per nomination ChristianBier 20:02, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support - should be very good as an admin. - Anonymous Dissident^Talk 08:33, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Victuallers 11:50, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support EugeneZelenko 16:56, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Looks good.--Londoneye 23:43, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Szczepan talk  14:50, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
• support. Sure, why not ? Darkoneko 15:26, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support for his useful robot and his friendly answers --Horstbu 11:01, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose he doesn't know the difference between CC-BY-NC and CC-BY-ND --valepert 13:48, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Comments

•  Comment Can you enable email please. Thanks --Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:44, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

   Done (I thought to have done it, because it was already enabled for Filbot :-)). Thanks, --Filnik 14:47, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

• (Comment to valepert's vote:) "NC" means "No Commercial", "ND" means "No derivative works". What's the problem?--Filnik^Rock! 14:02, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

and without ask to someone? --valepert 14:09, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Minor information (I guess many admin don't know what's the different). No reason to opposing.--OsamaK 14:18, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Usually you don't see only nc or nd, but there's also an explanation. So I have never learned that nc is that and nd the other (I know that there are licenses of that type, but I have never liked so much abbreviations), so I have made a mistake thinking that nc was nd (a, b, c, d...). But I have always in my bookmarks the list of licenses (and if I'm not sure I will check it). In this case the user wanted to test me, so I haven't taken a look. Just that. --Filnik^Rock! 14:26, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

He knows those licenses are not permitted on commons and thats it. ^{__ ABF __} ϑ 15:47, 30 January 2008 (UTC)