Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 30 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Houses_in_Zabux_village,_August_2024.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination View of the village of Zabux in the Laçın District of Azerbaijan --Golden 22:06, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • It needs more sharpness, I think. --Milseburg 14:42, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Lack of DoF (majority not sharp), also a bit distorted. --Plozessor 05:07, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I'm afraid, Plozessor is right. It lacks detail in full resolution. --Milseburg 14:09, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:49, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per others, I don't understand how it can be QI. --Sebring12Hrs 06:36, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:24, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Jens_Voigt,_Velo_24,_Berlin_(VB243609).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Jens Voigt being interviewed by Katia Berg during VELOBerlin 2024 at Tempelhofer Feld, Berlin --MB-one 12:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Face is not sharp --Plozessor 04:54, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
  • I disagree here. IMO the face is shown in sufficient detail --MB-one 12:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
 Comment The face is sharp enough as I think. But the composition with the overexposed background is not the best. -- Spurzem 08:00, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose When I think about how many stage photos, sports photos and other action shots that were taken under really difficult lighting conditions have been rejected here at QIC in the past because they showed minimal defects found by pixel peeping, this photo is unlikely to become QI, sorry. Possibly VI. --Smial 11:19, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:22, 29 September 2024 (UTC)