Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 16 2019
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Detail eines Objektes in der Kellergasse „Pinkelstein“ in Raschala (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:08, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail eines Objektes in der Kellergasse „Pinkelstein“ in Raschala (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:08, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eine Kellergassenführerin in der Kellergasse „Pinkelstein“ in Raschala (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:08, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Beginn einer Kellergassenführung in die Kellergasse „Pinkelstein“ in Raschala (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:08, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Teilnehmer an einer Kellergassenführung in der Kellergasse „Pinkelstein“ in Raschala (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:08, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wolfsberg Alpine hut at the Saualpe, Wolfsberg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:40, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:12, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plaque for the buildmaster Jos. Urbani at the Wolfsberg Alpine hut at the Saualpe, Wolfsberg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:40, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:13, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plaque at the Wofsberg Alpine hut at the Saualpe, Wolfsberg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:40, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:16, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wolfsberg Alpine hut at the Saualpe, Wolfsberg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:40, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:16, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Window shutters at the Wolfsberg Alpine hut at the Saualpe, Wolfsberg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:40, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:16, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grade II listed pub in Birkenhead. Rodhullandemu 21:10, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:08, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Majestic Ballroom, Birkenhead, where The Beatles played 17 times in 1962 and 63. Rodhullandemu 21:09, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:08, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Kiev Street Theatre Highlights in the show "Dance Pageant" at 31. ULICA – The International Festival of Street Theatres in Kraków --Jakubhal 18:20, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:10, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Kiev Street Theatre Highlights in the show "Dance Pageant" at 31. ULICA – The International Festival of Street Theatres in Kraków --Jakubhal 18:20, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:10, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bunge kyrka (church). --ArildV 15:51, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 15:53, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Batteri Arholma is a former (1968-2000) Swedish coastal battery on the island Arholma in Stockholm archipelago. --ArildV 15:51, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:10, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rute kyrka (church) is a medieval parish church. --ArildV 15:51, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:12, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Johan Målares hus is a historic residential building in Visby,. --ArildV 15:51, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:12, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lateral mark in the Port of Hamburg --MB-one 15:19, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 15:55, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bratislava - St. Martins Cathedral from other side of Danube river --Imehling 14:00, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 14:38, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palacio de los Castejones, Ágreda, Spain --Poco a poco 12:30, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:40, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palacio de los Castejones, Ágreda, Spain --Poco a poco 12:30, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:40, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Olympiaturm, Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 12:30, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 12:40, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Olympiaturm, Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 12:30, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:46, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dimmed view of a sunset in Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 13:11, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Dost spot in the sky. --Steindy 12:28, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Done Thanks for the review, dust spot removed. --PantheraLeo1359531 13:35, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Okay Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:43, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The port of Kloster as seen from a boat. --PantheraLeo1359531 13:03, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Decline Two walking people in right bottom corner are spoiling the composition. If you would have wait a while you would have got a much better photo --Michielverbeek 12:59, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A black Chinese SUV —User3204 11:54, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, focus adequate --PantheraLeo1359531 13:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination African leopard near Okevi waterhole, Etosha, Namibia --Axel Tschentscher 09:56, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:01, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hamburg-Barmbek-Nord, residential building Rübenkamp/Wassmannstraße --Dirtsc 09:47, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --PantheraLeo1359531 12:31, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hamburg-Barmbek-Nord, residential building Rübenkamp/Wassmannstraße --Dirtsc 09:47, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Axel Tschentscher 09:51, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Watermills of Maroilles Abbaye in Nord, France. --Pierre André Leclercq 09:16, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 09:40, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Greece, Mycenae, Treasury of Atreus --Berthold Werner 08:40, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 09:40, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sapphire Radeon R9 290X --D-Kuru 08:09, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:40, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trip hammer of forge and grinding workshop "zum König", Trattenbach, Upper Austria --Isiwal 07:48, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 09:54, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tapestry in the church of Kremsmünster abbey --Isiwal 07:48, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 09:56, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grinding of knife blades, workshop of forge "zum König", Trattenbach, Upper Austria) --Isiwal 07:48, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 09:56, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mystery Lake, Canterbury, New Zealand --Podzemnik 06:27, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:28, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Harburg port lock, Harburg, Hamburg, Germany --XRay 06:12, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:23, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Historic cranes at Lotsekai, Harburg, Hamburg, Germany --XRay 06:12, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Axel Tschentscher 09:50, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination House 6 and 8 at the Kanalplatz, Harburg, Hamburg, Germany --XRay 06:12, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Axel Tschentscher 09:52, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Catholic Church St Kilian, Kolonat and Totnan in Fabrikschleichach --Ermell 06:08, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:25, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portal of the Villa Liegnitz in Potsdam, Brandenburg, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:53, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:26, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lake Rotoroa in Nelson Lakes NP, South Island of New Zealand. --Tournasol7 05:53, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:00, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mercedes AMG GT 53 4MATIC+ at the car exhibition on the potato market in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:01, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tower of the Civil Hospital of Strasbourg in France. --Chabe01 23:28, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:01, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marko Grujić, player of Hertha BSC Berlin. --Steindy 10:48, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Oppose Sorry but it's not very sharp, especially compared to your other portraits --Podzemnik 03:46, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Correct, I'm withdrawing the nomination. --Steindy 12:53, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stockholm - Boat --Liridon 19:10, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion It needs a small rotation ccw --Michielverbeek 20:31, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Tilted in cw direction --Poco a poco 20:39, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Made some changes. --Liridon 19:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC) Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:41, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Buildings at 9-10 Place de Conques in Villeneuve, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:26, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:53, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sharp Top and Abbott Lake, Peaks of Otter, Virginia at sunrise --Acroterion 02:51, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
IMO the photograph is too dark, especially the trees. --XRay 02:58, 11 September 2019 (UTC) Done Adjusted up level in the trees that the sun had not yet reached as far as I dare. Acroterion 01:38, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Support A little bit noisy, but acceptable. --XRay 05:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Industrial building in Johnstown, Pennsylvania --Acroterion 02:51, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
The building is leaning in. Please fix the perspective. --XRay 02:56, 11 September 2019 (UTC) Done Adjusted perspective a little more. Acroterion 01:38, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Support A little bit oversharpened, but acceptable. --XRay 05:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Park in Bardo 4 --Jacek Halicki 23:11, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 10:07, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A depth map (nearer areas to viewer are darker) of a Quaternion (number with 4 dimensions) Mandelbrot set. --PantheraLeo1359531 19:29, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --D-Kuru 15:19, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Military orchestra in front of the Stockholm Palace - piccolo player --Kritzolina 09:45, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Only the glove is sharp on the photo. --Steindy 13:29, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Military orchestra in front of the Stockholm Palace - french horn player --Kritzolina 09:45, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose For a group photo, the depth of field is far too low. In addition, the visitor disturbs in the background. Something like that could easily be avoided. --Steindy 13:29, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Red admiral (Vanessa atalanta) --Charlesjsharp 09:05, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Blurred body, blurred wings, missing outline in the dark area. --Steindy 13:41, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: A cellar with a little aperture (high expsed image). --PantheraLeo1359531 21:22, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Compagnie Albedo in the show "Les Bigbrôzeurs (Big Brothers)" at 31. ULICA – The International Festival of Street Theatres in Kraków --Jakubhal 20:08, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Funny scene, good quality. --Palauenc05 07:11, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: The Seed Dance Project Group in the show "Interaction" at 31. ULICA – The International Festival of Street Theatres in Kraków --Jakubhal 20:08, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: The Seed Dance Project Group in the show "Interaction" at 31. ULICA – The International Festival of Street Theatres in Kraków --Jakubhal 20:08, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Sarcopoterium spinosum --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:48, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Swans and geese in the River park in Drammen.--Peulle 11:43, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: AMD CrossFireX bridge connector --D-Kuru 11:29, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: AMD CrossFireX bridge connector --D-Kuru 11:29, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Banská Bystrica - Marian Column, Clock Tower at SNP Square --Imehling 11:26, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Bangladesh Railway Museum, Chattogram. --Moheen 10:06, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Inflatable kayak at OutDoor 2018, Friedrichshafen --MB-one 07:54, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Historic farm building in Broa, Fårö (Gotland). --ArildV 07:08, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:38, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lesser purple emperor (Apatura ilia ilia f. clytie) --Charlesjsharp 15:24, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- Decline It's too blurry. Sorry. --Imehling 15:03, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of San Andrés, Calatayud, Spain --Poco a poco 10:24, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 15:11, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Michelfeld Monastery --Ermell 06:58, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Beautiful, but the vertical lines of the lower monastery building seem to lean out at the left and right; too much perspective correction? Or is the building itself leaning? --Aristeas 07:25, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Difficult. The tower tapers upwards. As a reference I took the windows and doors. Looks crooked but I think it's deceptive. --Ermell 12:41, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Yes, in images like this it is always very difficult to decide what to take for reference. Looking at the flag pole and the leftmost windows I would think it would be better to sacrifice some of the appearent verticality of the tower (i.e., to let the tower taper more) in order to get left part of the building upright. Ich wollte Dich ja nicht ärgern, sondern mit dem Hinweis wirklich nur helfen. ;–) This is a difficult case. What do other people think? --Aristeas 09:57, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Support Sorry Aristeas! In my opinion, this is a great photo. Good quality, nice composition. The bow creates additional tension, which wins the picture. --Steindy 13:56, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination French Trotter gelding, bay coat color, Baccarat Tejy, with an overcheck, at Saint-Jean-des-Prés racecource, Guillac, France, 2019. --Tsaag Valren 20:05, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- Decline Question Great picture full of tension, but I do not understand why the background at ISO 100 so rushes. --Steindy 11:15, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Oppose No reaction within eight days although the user made several edits. So contra. Pity about the beautiful photo. --Steindy 14:08, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A P Tureaud Sr House, New Orleans. By User:Jeffrey_Beall --Infrogmation 15:20, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Vertical correction needed. --Manfred Kuzel 05:10, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Oppose No answer in a week. Also, I think there won't be enoughg space for correction anyway --Podzemnik 10:11, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Common ostrich (struthio camelus) near Okaukuejo in Etosha --Axel Tschentscher 23:02, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Any chance to get more space on the left? The crop is very tight --Podzemnik 18:40, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Comment No, unfortunately not, --Axel Tschentscher 19:43, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Oppose Then sorry, I think this is just too tight and spoils it for me --Podzemnik 10:03, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: White-backed vulture (gyps africanus) near Okaukuejo in Etosha National Park, Namibia --Axel Tschentscher 18:05, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Review
It is quite posterised. Fixable? --C messier 12:13, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Done Avoided posterization, less processing, cropped bottom --Axel Tschentscher 20:27, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Manchester Central Library in Manchester, England --Mdbeckwith 14:28, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Review
Can you try a perspective correctio? --C messier 11:28, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Olympic Park, Munich, Germany: --Poco a poco 11:45, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
CommentPlease remove the dust spot I marked in the file description :) --PantheraLeo1359531 14:25, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Will do so in a few days --Poco a poco 15:01, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Done --Poco a poco 21:35, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
GQ now --PantheraLeo1359531 12:53, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]==
[edit]- Nomination Saint Basil's Cathedral --大诺史 09:24, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Strong distortion --George Chernilevsky 10:33, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support Perspective looks natural but dramatic, and the composition and colours are beautiful. --Bobulous 17:56, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Blurry and very distorted. Also there is noise on sky --Nino Verde (talk) 07:13, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose The noise level is still OK for me, but I would correct the perspective (vertical lines are leaning in, they should be vertical). In addition, the image seems somewhat overprocessed: Too much saturation, probably too much clarity and/or other effects applied --Aristeas 09:24, 13 September 2019 (UTC) And there is an irritating area at the left of the left-most church tower. Seems that something was removed here from the photo, but the area needs more work. --Aristeas (talk) 09:31, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Seven Pandas 15:38, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
File:Visby_domkyrka_July_2019_02.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Visby Cathedral --ArildV 04:20, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
- Please remove a dust spot (I have marked it with a image note). Personally, I would also make the area around the portal a bit darker (decrease exposure locally). The perspective of the tower is a bit extreme, but it is completely according to our usual requirement of perspective correction, so it’s fine. --Aristeas 07:42, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for review, new version uploaded (dust spots and locally exposure correction). It´s almost no perspective correction here (vertical -3 in lightroom) but the images is taken with a ultra wide lense (12mm, full frame), there is a narrow space around the church and and tall trees. --ArildV 16:17, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective adjustment feels too severe. --Bobulous 19:00, 12 September 2019 (UTC) />
- Comment I strongly disagree (see above, almost no perspective adjustment and the only way to show the church from this angle!) Please read above and see the [original file]. No severe adjustment here. --ArildV 20:26, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support @ArildV: Thank you for the adjustments! IMHO very good now. – Of course I understand that the extreme perspective of the tower may look strange. But this is not due to excessive correction, it is just the natural perspective which is unavoidable if one stands so near to a building; that’s just reality. And if there is narrow space around a building, then one must stand so near to the building if he/she has to take a photo of it. So the extreme perspective is unavoidable. The only alternative would be to tilt the camera. But this would, given that one must stand so near to the building, result in really very falling lines, which would look extreme, too, and I doubt that this would be better. According to our usual recommendations for taking photographs of buildings, Arild has done everything right, and it would be unfair to punish him for doing so by declining this photo. --Aristeas 09:11, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose too strong distorted --Ralf Roletschek 18:07, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Too distorted -- Spurzem 19:11, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Seven Pandas 15:38, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
File:Ladybird.tif
[edit]- Nomination Ladybird by User:RSC-KWC --D-Kuru 09:33, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose shame, not in focus at all --Charlesjsharp 10:42, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
How is the hair on the back not in focus? --D-Kuru 13:30, 11 September 2019 (UTC) - Weak Support Somewhat low DOF and focus should have been more precisely on the head, but good enough for A4 print. --Smial 07:12, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality, good perspective. --Steindy 12:44, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Seven Pandas 15:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
File:Tulln_Gartenbaumesse_Feuerwerk_20190831_04.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Fireworks on the occasion of the horticultural fair 2019 in Tulln, Lower Austria --Uoaei1 03:55, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:05, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Does not capture the fireworks at maximum size, brightness, and color. --Senator2029 11:05, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support same as above --Smial 09:30, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:48, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Seven Pandas 15:36, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
File:2019-07-20_Lennon_Wall_in_Hong_Kong_book_fair(1).jpg
[edit]- Nomination A part of Lennon Wall in Hong Kong book fair. --SCP-2000 03:01, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Insufficient quality. Please don't nominate your photos again unless the issues mentioned in the previous nomination were resolved --Podzemnik 04:55, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Podzemnik --Cvmontuy 03:06, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- I disagree. --SCP-2000 05:17, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I took a lok at the archive page, and it seems that this image was never reviewed, is that right? Now it was renominated. As far as the rules go, I can't see anything in the guidelines against this; if an image was previously declined, it is not to be renominated without making the needed changes, but what if the image was left unreviewed in the first instance? I can see this becoming a nuisance if nominators simply renominate any and all images that are not reviewed, as the lack of a review might be a statement in itself, but on the other hand I don't think it's against the rules...--Peulle 10:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I don't think the lack of a review is a statement itself. If an image isn't good enough, it should be declined. If it was ignored, renomination is imho fine. -- Smial 16:02, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Smial @Peulle I agree with you both that renominating a file that hasn't been reviewed is fine. However, the full story is that the user nominated similar images before - most of them were declined, some of them also discussed - see eg. here or here. This file is from the same series so I'd say that what was said about previous nominations, is valid here too, even though this particular image hasn't been reviewed. This nomination kind of feels like in a try-error style and I think we shouldn't encourage these types of nominations. Just my opinion though, feel free to disagree or support the photo :) Regards, --Podzemnik 00:31, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Seven Pandas 15:32, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
File:Kapu_Beach_Lighthouse_.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Kapu Beach Lighthouse, India by KshitizBathwal --IM3847 17:22, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support The colours on the right side in the water are a bit noisy, but overall it's up to QI IMO --D-Kuru 18:10, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose The file was nominated for deletion. Let's wait for the DR to be over, then you can nominate the photo again --Podzemnik 05:01, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Comment The DR is almost closed. OTRS mail was sent and just waits for processing. --D-Kuru 07:56, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support assuming the uploader is the person who took the picture and OTRS will be processed soon. --Kritzolina 07:19, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --OTRS Processed. Seven Pandas 15:31, 15 September 2019 (UTC)