Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 05 2020

• 
  • Nomination Russisch-orthodox klooster (Hemelum) Pictures behind a window.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:46, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:49, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Branch of the Seebach stream near Mallnitz, High Tauern National Park, Carinthia, Austria --Uoaei1 03:57, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:47, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Madonna and Child at the high altar of the subsidiary church St. Peter and Paul in Lavant, East Tyrol, Austria --Uoaei1 03:57, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:41, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shooting range at the ammunition depot in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:45, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bunker 21 in the ammunition depot in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:45, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sterntor in Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:45, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cooling pond at Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Duisburg, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:45, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bells of the Saint Vikor Church in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:45, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination House of the Gurk Cathedral Chapter on Dr.-Herrmann-Gasse, inner city, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 03:02, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Western portal of the house of the Gurk Cathedral Chapter on Dr.-Herrmann-Gasse, inner city, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 03:02, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Middle-class house on Viktringer Ring #5, 7th district «Viktringer Vorstadt», Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:47, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Windows at the residential building, late historicist architecture, on Viktringer Ring #7, 7th district «Viktringer Vorstadt», Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 03:02, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lake villa Samek on Wörthersee-Süduferstrasse in Maiernigg, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:48, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sculpture of Madonna and Child, Plazoleta Del Carmen, Villa de Leyva, Colombia --Bgag 02:33, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:55, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church tower of Iglesia de Nuestra Señora del Carmen, Villa de Leyva, Colombia --Bgag 02:33, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:55, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Del Carmen Museum, Villa de Leyva, Colombia --Bgag 02:33, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:55, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Antonio Ricaurte Park, Villa de Leyva, Colombia --Bgag 02:33, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:48, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fresco with Holy Trinity Saint Bartholomew and Saint Andrew in the Santuario del Carmine church San Felice del Benaco. --Moroder 01:22, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:01, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Part of Annunciation in the Santa Lucia church in Balbiana. --Moroder 01:22, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:01, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eine Mitfahrbank in Nutteln --Nightflyer 21:28, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Halavar 00:43, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2 Mark "Notgeld" banknote of Sörup (1920s). --Palauenc05 20:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:44, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A memorial for the victims of the “Mühlviertel manhunt” (1945) , Wartberg ob der Aist, Upper Austria --Isiwal 18:46, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, I like the artistic composition --Michielverbeek 19:47, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Calvary Chapel of Wartberg ob der Aist, Upper Austria --Isiwal 18:46, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --ArildV 18:59, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Way of the Cross and Calvary Chapel of Wartberg ob der Aist, Upper Austria --Isiwal 18:46, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --ArildV 18:58, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Protected landscape Feldaist valley, Upper Austrian Mühlviertel --Isiwal 18:46, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Halavar 19:54, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Footbridge in protected landscape Feldaist valley, Upper Austrian Mühlviertel --Isiwal 18:46, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Halavar 19:54, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The stone arch bridge of Elassona, Greece. --C messier 18:19, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:02, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The tower in Giannoudi, Rethymno, Greece. --C messier 18:19, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --ArildV 19:00, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Steering wheel and dashboard of Horch 853 Sport Cabriolet from 1937 in the museum mobile in Ingolstadt -- Spurzem 15:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 16:36, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Horch 853 Sport Cabriolet from 1937 in a showcase of the museum mobile in Ingolstadt -- Spurzem 14:33, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 16:36, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Catholic temple, El Señor de Tila, Balancan, Tabasco, Mexico --Cvmontuy 14:12, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Halavar 14:28, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lan Ha Bay, Viet Nam. --Velvet 13:49, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cvmontuy 14:24, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The beach of Petit-Fort-Philippe and the Gravelines Nuclear Power Station, France. --Velvet 12:27, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:37, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mercedes-Benz 540 K Spezialroadster at Techno-Classica 2018, Essen --MB-one 11:00, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Someone will probably oppose because of the reflections, the people or whatever, but I think it's a beautiful car and a nice photo. -- Ikan Kekek 11:40, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cabin of an Embraer Phenom 300 at EBACE 2019, Palexpo, Switzerland. Crop by User:Marc Lacoste --MB-one 11:00, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cvmontuy 12:23, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination BMW i3s, IAA 2017 --MB-one 11:00, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, although some perspective correction could be applied to the sides. --Peulle 11:55, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Michael Archangel church. Kończyce Wielkie, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 10:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Isiwal 18:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Holy Family chapel. Olza, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 10:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 14:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Kończyce Małe, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 10:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality. Church not very clear, and pixelated --Vincent60030 18:14, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castle Łomnica (Lomnitz), Lower Silesia --Pudelek 10:18, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 10:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Zgorzelec (Görlitz) - Daszyński street and bridge Altstadtbrücke/Most Staromiejski. View from Germany. --Pudelek 10:18, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:58, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Zgorzelec (Görlitz) - Daszyńskiego street. View from Germany. --Pudelek 10:18, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Isiwal 18:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 3-spots damselfish (Dascyllus trimaculatus) FredD 09:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Unfortunately below 2 MPx --Poco a poco 09:38, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Basilica, Ottobeuren, Germany --Poco a poco 09:04, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:58, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Basilica, Ottobeuren, Germany --Poco a poco 09:04, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 11:00, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Basilica, Ottobeuren, Germany --Poco a poco 09:04, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:58, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Basilica, Ottobeuren, Germany --Poco a poco 09:04, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Main altar in Basilica, Ottobeuren, Germany --Poco a poco 09:04, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion A bit dis­tor­ted due to the short lens but nevertheless beau­tiful and good -- Spurzem 10:55, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Campo del Sole-Tuoro sul Trasimeno- Trasimeno Lake. --PROPOLI87 10:09, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality: poor detail and sharpness. --Peulle 08:33, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Campo del Sole-Tuoro sul Trasimeno- Trasimeno Lake. --PROPOLI87 10:09, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality: poor detail and sharpness. --Peulle 08:33, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Campo del Sole-Tuoro sul Trasimeno- Trasimeno Lake. The column depicts a huge, domestic, rural fascina that, if on one hand it recalls the same arboreal origin of the column, it alludes more generally to an anthropology of agrarian familiarity (1989). By Annibale Oste --PROPOLI87 10:09, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline This doesn't look natural. The columns look like they're made of rubber and the general detail in the image is not QI level. --Peulle 08:30, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Campo del Sole-Tuoro sul Trasimeno- Trasimeno Lake. Table-desk by Pietro Cascella surrounded by some cubic seats and surmounted by a solar symbol (1985) --PROPOLI87 10:09, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality: poor detail and sharpness. --Peulle 08:33, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Visby Cathedral. --ArildV 07:13, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bondans is a historic farm on the island Fårö. --ArildV 07:13, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:32, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nynäshamns kyrka (church) built 1930. --ArildV 07:13, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building in Lauter, Fårö. --ArildV 07:13, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:26, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chloephaga picta. By User:Godot13 --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:04, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:32, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eudyptes chrysocome head. By User:Godot13 --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:04, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:32, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Black-browed albatross (Thalassarche melanophris) chick. By User:Godot13 --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:04, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:19, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coastal landscape, Saunders Island, off West Falkland. By User:Godot13 --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:04, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:29, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Black-browed albatross (Thalassarche melanophris), West Point Island, off West Falkland. By User:Godot13 --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:04, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 11:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Door of the evangelic-lutheran parish church St. Maria --Ermell 06:35, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:19, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Door of the Protestant Church in Köslau --Ermell 06:35, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Memorial plaque in memory of the victims of Kirchahorn during World War I --Ermell 06:35, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Halavar 11:00, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Greater one-horned rhinoceros at Chitwan.By User:Paladitya --Bijay chaurasia 06:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Blurry vegetation in the foreground is a bit distracting, but the rhinos are very sharp. Congratulations, User:Paladitya! -- Ikan Kekek 11:50, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Budding flower bud of an Anemone 'Eugenie'. Focus stack of 12 photos.
    --Famberhorst 06:04, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:13, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shell of a Grove snail, Cepaea nemoralis --Llez 05:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:06, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coast at São Vicente, Madeira --Llez 05:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:08, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lake Oberwald, Oberwald, Karlsruhe, Germany --Llez 05:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 06:07, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bathing beach Adametz in Krumpendorf am Wörthersee, Carinthia, Austria --Uoaei1 04:57, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:19, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Yellow Water-Lily (Nuphar lutea) in Krumpendorf am Wörthersee, Carinthia, Austria --Uoaei1 04:57, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:19, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Paul at the high altar of the subsidiary church St. Peter and Paul in Lavant, East Tyrol, Austria --Uoaei1 04:57, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:00, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Peter at the high altar of the subsidiary church St. Peter and Paul in Lavant, East Tyrol, Austria --Uoaei1 04:57, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:00, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nature trail in the Seebach Valley near Mallnitz, High Tauern National Park, Carinthia, Austria --Uoaei1 04:57, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:59, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Westpolderbrêge. A new bridge over Broeresleat, will be realized in 2020.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:59, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. Wonderful. I love this kind of images. --XRay 04:59, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Russisch-orthodox klooster (Hemelum) Information board.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:59, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:59, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination WakeBoarding on Stawiki Pond in Sosnowiec --Stimoroll 21:05, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Unfortunatly very strong posterization. Pity --MB-one 21:08, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bondans is a historic farm on the island Fårö (Gotland county). --ArildV 14:48, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Dust spot that should be removed (see the note) --Halavar 15:10, 1 September 2020 (UTC) Done Thanks for review.--ArildV 13:42, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good now. QI for me. --Halavar 14:26, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Porsche 911 2.0 Coupé at Geneva International Motor Show 2019, Le Grand-Saconnex --MB-one 10:35, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 18:50, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The castel Wolkenstein. --Moroder 01:29, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
    The sky is ver bright and there are a lot of CAs at the tree. --XRay 04:27, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The castel Wolkenstein in Gherdëina, South Tyrol. --Moroder 01:29, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
    The sky is ver bright and there are a lot of CAs at the tree. --XRay 04:27, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Halebeniyot (cooling towers of Haifa oil refineries). By User:Akiiva --Andrew J.Kurbiko 05:27, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Halebeniyot (cooling towers of Haifa oil refineries). By User:Akiiva --Andrew J.Kurbiko 05:27, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: The Choir by Ofra Zimbalista. By User:LizzyShaanan --Andrew J.Kurbiko 05:27, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Glider used by Nazi in Vassieux en Vercors--Celeda 08:09, 24 August 2020 (UTC) 2 categories have been added --Celeda 10:07, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
    Important categories missing --MB-one 09:17, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
    And perspective correction needed, furthermore the glider is distorted due to the close shot and wide angle view --Poco a poco 18:02, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Baroque Pulpit with Sculptures in Sts Peter and Paul Church, Vilnius --Scotch Mist 05:43, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
    null --Augustgeyler 09:43, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
     Comment @Augustgeyler: Is this intended to be a helpful review? --Scotch Mist 14:32, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Ford in Ardèche--Celeda 08:03, 17 August 2020 (UTC) According to me there is no distortion. In this place blows a strong North wind. Everything leans toward the South. If you look at the pipes, they are perfectly circular and aligned.--Celeda 08:00, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
    looks like there is some hard distortion --Augustgeyler 09:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Georgsmarienhütte-Oesede,_die_Sankt_Peter_und_Paul_Kirche_IMG_6801_2020-07-31_09.48.jpg

• Nomination Georgsmarienhütte-Oesede in Lower Saxony Osnabrück, church: the Sankt Peter und Paul Kirche --Michielverbeek 20:18, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Insufficient DOF, sorry --Cvmontuy 01:52, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment I don't agree, everything is sharp enough --Michielverbeek 06:16, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment The church is somewhat soft, of course; I am undecided whether it is still OK or too soft. Maybe a little bit (not too much) more sharpening and clarity would help? But I doubt that this is caused by insufficient DoF: On this camera with its 1″ sensor, a smaller aperture could even increase softness (due to diffraction). --Aristeas 09:21, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

   Comment The top part of the tower looks like out of focus --Cvmontuy 10:30, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Good enough. @Michielverbeek: You can not support your own image. I changed "support" to "comment" --Smial 13:12, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support May be the picture can be considered as a bit soft, but it obviously is in "the quality zone". The tower top - in comparison with the façade - is not as good as it is desired (the sharpness falls from the level of the clock), but this shortcoming does not disturb eyes, and do not ruin the photo. IMHO, a "sharpening" tool can be moderately applied, but only to the roofing of the tower. --Dmitry Ivanov 13:48, 1 September 2020 (UTC).
•  Support Good for me -- Spurzem 19:08, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 07:33, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

File:El_Zacatal_bridge,_Ciudad_del_Carmen_2020p5.jpg

• Nomination Old dock, Ciudad del carmen, Campeche, Mexico --Cvmontuy 03:30, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree , no DoF, blurried specially the bridge --Celeda 14:46, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support In this photo, the bridge isn't really the subject; it's just in the background. Therefore, I think it's fine that it's not so sharp. -- Ikan Kekek 05:21, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Completely per Ikan Kekek. The ruined wooden structure and the birds are within DoF, they are entirely sharp and details are good. May be the picture is a very little bit soft, but this softness - let's suppose it is - works well on this image. The bridge in the background on the left is the background and has not to be sharp: the sharp background will spoil the picture. --Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 07:36, 1 September 2020 (UTC).
•  Support Main motif is sharp. Images with such lighting often appear "too soft" compared to sunny scenes with high contrast. This is often confused in judgements. --Smial 13:18, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 07:32, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Gayhurst_Road,_Dallington,_Christchurch,_Canterbury,_New_Zealand.jpg

• Nomination Gayhurst Road, Dallington --Podzemnik 08:39, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --C messier 16:28, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree , weak, bad composition, foreground empty --Celeda 15:09, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Perfectly fine. It's a photo of a street. -- Ikan Kekek 05:23, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support The photo is not wow at all, but it doesn’t claim an art photo and as an informational photograph it is quite satisfactory. The technical quality is good. --Dmitry Ivanov 07:16, 1 September 2020 (UTC).
•  Question Slight barrel distortion on the left street light pole?--Peulle 08:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment I suppose, this wooden pole is distorted in reality, for the pole with the plate "Coopers Rd" nearby doesn't look distorted. --Dmitry Ivanov 09:47, 2 September 2020 (UTC).
•  Oppose Perspective kind of off if it is meant to depict a street. --Vincent60030 18:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   XRay 04:54, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Grey_headed_Starling_fem_Mulberry_Himachal_D72_14654nx.jpg

• Nomination Female grey-headed starling foraging for half-ripe fruits in a mulberry tree, Himachal, India. —Tagooty 10:12, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:39, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. blurred --Charlesjsharp 18:05, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Good for me and nice -- Spurzem 06:46, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice picture, but I think Charles is right about the standard for QI bird pictures. -- Ikan Kekek 08:43, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Please indicate the specific areas that show deficiencies. Tagooty 13:51, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

• Charlesjsharp, do you want to take this? I think his answer will be that none of the feathers has enough definition. However, in taking another look at this today and reading in w:Chestnut-tailed starling that their total adult length is about 20 cm, I think it may be sharp enough and will strike out my opposition. -- Ikan Kekek 16:27, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

•  Support --Moroder 00:10, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 06:30, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

File:IIT_Mandi_Campus_from_Griffon_Peak_Jan_2020_D72_13785.jpg

• Nomination Looking down on Campus from Griffon Peak, in the Shivalik Range of the Himalayas. Comment in QIC on the previous version: “It needs a perspective correction and I'd reduce the haze —User:Poco a poco".  Done both changes in this version —Tagooty 09:11, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose No perspective correction was applied, see the buildings on the left, now they are leaning out more than before. Furthermore there is now CA and the sharpness got worse. --Poco a poco 16:49, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

•  Done Improved CA, PC and haze. User:Poco a poco Please review current version. --Tagooty 05:44, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

• You will not fix the perspective issues just tilting the image, you have to apply a vertical perspective correction --Poco a poco 10:10, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

• User:Poco a poco I have applied a combination of vertical PC and tilt, to reduce the leaning while retaining the centre foreground. Full vertical PC causes cropping of the buildings in centre foreground. --Tagooty 14:45, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

• Can I give it a try? Poco a poco 19:06, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

• Yes, thanks. See new topic in User_talk:Poco_a_poco --Tagooty 01:45, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 06:30, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Fête_médiévale_de_Cruas,_France._Le_loup.jpg

• Nomination Medieval festival, the wolf--Celeda 07:11, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Subject is looking away --Podzemnik 01:43, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
• I disagree ,Is it "un clin d'oeil" as we say in French ? For MB-one, The composition is an artistic choice. No element is missing. I, only, regret the presence of the fence but it was there. For Ikan Kekek : The dog is a WOLF. Not a dead wolf as you can see in museums. A wolf that moves very fast. A wolf with spiky hairs. --Celeda 07:30, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't mind the subject's viewing angle, but the composition is lacking here. Important elements are cropped in. --MB-one 11:29, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Dog is weirdly noisy, such that I thought this was a cellphone pic until I checked. Also per MB-one. -- Ikan Kekek 08:48, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Heavily overprocessed, and weird composition. --Smial 12:46, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 06:29, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Καλάθενες_0884.jpg

• Nomination Venetian villa in Kalathenes, Crete. --C messier 16:11, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality -- Spurzem 17:29, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. Sky too oversatured --Elryck 17:44, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Moroder 05:40, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I agree that the sky seems very blue ;–), but the sky can be that blue in reality, so IMHO the photo is OK. --Aristeas 08:35, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too much noise. Sebring12Hrs (talk) 17:04, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

 Comment I can only wonder about some contrasting voices. -- Spurzem 20:17, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

 Comment I can only agree to you, Lothar. --Aristeas 09:15, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Seems quite OK to me. The noise in the sky is quite gentle. -- Ikan Kekek 10:34, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 06:28, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Viaduc_du_Viaur,_entre_Tarn_et_Aveyron_10.jpg

• Nomination The Viaur viaduc in the early morning--Celeda 08:49, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support GQ --Palauenc05 09:48, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Lacks sharpness. Sorry.--Ermell 14:09, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ermell, though it's a very nice composition. -- Ikan Kekek 07:01, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful photo, and given the distance of the shot, it is normal that the background is a little blurry. But the colors are beautiful, no saturation, and very good level of ppp.(Sorry, --Elryck 15:52, 31 August 2020 (UTC) )
•  Comment Thanks for your positive opinion, but you forgot to sign--Celeda 06:57, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Interesting image. Sharp enough for me -- Spurzem 09:55, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment JPG Compression artifacts. I would support a less compressed version. --Smial 18:48, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Ikan Poco a poco 19:09, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Thank you Smial for your informative comments, i will try to use it for future photos --Celeda 05:22, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others.--Peulle 08:46, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 10:11, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Третьяковская_галерея_Люстра.jpg

• Nomination Люстра. Chandelier. Здание Третьяковской галереи: Лаврушинский пер., дом 10, строение 4, Якиманка, Центральный округ, МоскваЭто фотография памятника культурного наследия России c номеромЯ, владелец авторских прав на это произведение, добровольно публикую его на условиях следующей лицензии:Это изображение было загружено в рамках соревнования Вики любит памятники — 2018. --Ulaisaeva 17:01, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. Image spectaculaire, la gestion du contre-jour est bien faite avec un iso adapté, le sujet est bien placé avec une perspective qui le met en valeur --Elryck 07:13, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not good quality for me, the white balance is off. --A.Savin 11:44, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Yes, because i suppose he used a yellow filter to make the photo or a filter by software. Usually, I'm not a fan of major computer retouching but I think it's successful here.--Elryck (talk) 18:43, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment filters and computer retouches were not used, such lighting in the Tretyakov gallery
•  Support --Moroder 01:40, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   XRay 04:55, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Stadshuset,_Stockholm_(P1090573).jpg

• Nomination Stockholm City Hall from Centralbron --MB-one 09:15, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose main object in shadow --Augustgeyler 10:32, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I disagree. Light situation and resolution could be better. But overall well and autentically presented. --Milseburg 14:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• Weak  Support I feel like it's good enough, though a bit small. -- Ikan Kekek 06:08, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Neutral IMO there are still issues. The church is too dark and at the bottom is too much water. --XRay 08:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Landscape photos should have at least 6 MPixels nowadays. Composition and lighting are ok. --Smial 11:25, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Smial: Increasing the pixel limit for QI has been extensively discussed without any result so far (Commons_talk:Quality_images_candidates/Archive_20#Increase_minimum_resolution_to_4K?). If you want to reopen that discussion, I'm all for it. --MB-one 18:24, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

• I think Smial was referring to the Guidelines' statement: "For "easy to take" images, reviewers may choose to demand more if the image would benefit from it".--Peulle 07:39, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

 Comment Just that. At the time I was strictly against raising the hard limit beyond 2 MPixels, and I haven't changed my mind. Photos taken under difficult conditions, non-reproducible snapshots or similar may have a relatively low resolution as long as it is more than 2 MPixels. But for landscapes or architecture photos I expect 6 MPixels or more today. This is the DSLR standard from 2005. I expressly do not expect that photos always and necessarily have to be uploaded with the native resolution of the camera sensor, because there are numerous technical reasons for moderate downscaling, for example in perspective corrections.--Smial 09:13, 28 August 2020 (UTC) Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

• Weak  Support per Ikan and Milseburg. Yes, more resolution would be great, but IMHO it is often difficult to determine what is an “easy to take” image; we should clarify the wording of that rule. @MB-one: Is there any chance to upload this photo in higher resultion? ;–) --Aristeas 09:00, 30 August 2020 (UTC) — Update: Strinking out the “weak” thanks to increased resolution. --Aristeas 07:46, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
  • @Aristeas: Thank you for the nudge to double check. Also, apologies to @Smial: I have indeed failed to provide the full resolution during the original upload process(smart previews in Lightroom, ugh). Fixed that now. --MB-one (talk) 11:26, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
    • @MB-one: Thank you! :–) --Aristeas 07:46, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support changed vote. --Smial 18:48, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 06:27, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Münster,_Promenade,_"Münster_bekennt_Farbe"_--_2020_--_7980.jpg

• Nomination Flower bed “Münster bekannt Farbe” at Kanonengraben (Promenade) in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:40, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose the sky is blowen out --Augustgeyler 10:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment The sky is bright, but not blown out. It's typical for these kind of clouds. Not every cloud has a good visible structure. Just check, the brightness is between 97 and 99.5 % of the maximum. --XRay 14:06, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment I agree with you XRay. There is still information in the sky. I thought it over, but still staying at my vote because the lights ar not as good as they should be. The same scene could have been taken on better conditions.--Augustgeyler 08:11, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose After thinking about it, I'm going to go with Augustgeyler here.--Peulle 08:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 10:10, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Colorado_-_Grand_Canyon_West.jpg

• Nomination A view of the cliffs overlooking the Colorado River in the western part of the Grand Canyon. --Indies1 13:31, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Fischer.H 17:14, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Indies1, I think the sky may be too noisy for QI. Could you please de-noise it? -- Ikan Kekek 21:16, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

 Comment Indies1 told me s/he doesn't know how to denoise. Any advice for him/her? I should oppose if this is not denoised. -- Ikan Kekek 22:33, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

 Oppose per above - let's move this to Consensual Review while hopefully someone comes to offer Indies1 some advice. -- Ikan Kekek 05:36, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose I think it's a bit too noisy, and also that the general detail level of the cliffside is not good enough, even for 2016. As I scrolled down the file page, I was not surprised to see what sort of camera was used.--Peulle 08:42, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 10:10, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

File:War_cemetery_for_World_war_II_on_the_cemetery_Rodaun_in_Vienna,_Austria-center_full_PNr°0588.jpg

• Nomination The cemetry for the fallen russian soldiers of the second world war on the cemetery Rodaun in Vienna, Austria --D-Kuru 22:47, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Comment leaning very little, but the foreground is blurred--Celeda 06:31, 22 August 2020 (UTC)  Oppose leaning to the left --Celeda 16:22, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

• @Celeda: Again the same question: How is this image leaning to the left? I also rechecked this image and the gravestone in the background is level in GIMP (looking at iron decoration at the bottom and it's tip. The hedge was not cut level in real life) --D-Kuru 20:27, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

•  Support ok for me.--Ermell 21:32, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose grave in the foreground his hiding a part of the main object and daytime / sunlight is very uncomfortable--Augustgeyler 08:33, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose There is no lean/tilt. But the shadows on the main subject are too disturbing in my eyes, and the gravestone in foreground is too prominent for being unsharp. --Johannes Robalotoff 07:32, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support The artistic approach is arguable, but it's certainly defensible. -- Ikan Kekek 04:56, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose There is no tilt that I can see, but since the OOF gravestone in the foreground partly obscures the subject, I feel that it counts as a disturbing foreground object.--Peulle 08:40, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 10:09, 4 September 2020 (UTC)