Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 25 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Bacardi_Spiced_Rum_01.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Bacardi Spiced Rum 750ml: --Indrajitdas 12:44, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Disturbing element at the bottom left, it needs a perspective correcion the upper part of the bottle is wider than the lower part --Poco a poco 15:23, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the input and it's been corrected according to your input. - ~~~~ --Indrajitdas 21:46, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Bottom edges of the bottle aren't sharp. --Sebring12Hrs 09:51, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The bottle was photographed from a very unfavourable angle and apparently from a short distance. This makes the neck of the bottle appear too wide and looks as if it is bent backwards. -- Spurzem 21:38, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Spurzem, too short distance, with a result not adequate for a studio shot. --Plozessor 04:13, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 06:30, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Close_wing_Nectering_of_Danaus_genutia_(Cramer,_1779)_-_Striped_Tiger_WLB.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Close wing Nectering of Danaus genutia (Cramer, 1779) - Striped Tiger. By User:Anitava Roy --Atudu 15:05, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --RockyMasum 06:33, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. The head is blurry and the other parts of the butterfly are almost without any detail. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 15:40, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Completly blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 09:50, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Only few halfway sharp areas, majority is blurred / out of focus. --Plozessor 04:15, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 06:30, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Neo_Gothic_Church_in_Murten_Switzerland_by_Robbie_Conceptuel.png_

[edit]

  • Nomination Neo Gothic Church in Murten in Switzerland Conceptuel 14:13, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 07:40, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I think that it lacks details. --Екатерина Борисова 01:20, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I agree. --Sebring12Hrs 07:14, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak support Indeed, the weather vane is cut off, and the cropping at the bottom is also very tight. But otherwise I think the picture is very good and I don't miss any details. Therefore my weak "pro". -- Spurzem 10:43, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not sharp and cropped too tightly. --Benjism89 17:57, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overall quality is borderline in the first place (we don't have EXIF data but it looks like a smartphone picture taken under non-ideal weather conditions). Then it's slightly distorted (see the door of the church) and then there's the tight crop. --Plozessor 04:18, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 06:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)