Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 24 2014

• 
  • Nomination Bell tower at the church of saints James and Agnes in Nysa 2 --Jacek Halicki 22:02, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 23:27, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saints James and Agnes Basilica in Nysa 4 --Jacek Halicki 22:02, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 23:27, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Belfry of the church of Cedeira above the rooftops, Galicia -C23 --Lmbuga 19:34, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:42, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bandstand in Cedeira, Galicia (Spain) -C27 --Lmbuga 19:34, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:42, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bandstand in Cedeira, Galicia (Spain) -C28 --Lmbuga 19:34, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:46, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eiffel Tower (by DXR) --Paris 16 19:33, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:45, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination PSG's team photo --Pyb 18:55, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion excellent, IMO. Ibra is perfect--Jebulon 19:09, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Renom after a withdrawn for corrections Archaeology in the Alcazaba, Almeria, Andalusia, Spain.--Jebulon 18:27, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:13, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Altes Rathaus, Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 18:01, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:10, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Automatic teller machine, Gniezno, Poland --Poco a poco 18:01, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI -- Spurzem 18:17, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cornfield, Walker, Indiana, USA --Poco a poco 18:01, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:45, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chair by Vincent Van Gogh, National Gallery, London, England --Poco a poco 18:01, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:45, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sagadi manor, Estonia --Poco a poco 18:01, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:44, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stonehenge, Wiltshire, England --Poco a poco 18:01, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:40, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination National Theatre, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia --Poco a poco 18:01, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:43, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Erigeron karvinskianus. Cheerful summer flowering. Flower diameter only 18 mm.
    Famberhorst 17:56, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Not a QI, sorry, it lacks detail --Poco a poco 19:20, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Parish church St. Andrew and church of Our Lady in Kitzbühel, Tyrol --Uoaei1 17:48, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:00, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wind turbine near the Pumping Station Reservoir. Jakec 17:29, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Simply overexposed. --Alchemist-hp 19:00, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Catawissa Creek near Brandonville, Pennsylvania. Jakec 17:26, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI -- Spurzem 18:10, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The canyon of the rio Alhama, Alhama de Granada, Andalusia, Spain.--Jebulon 17:13, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Pretty good quality, excellent subject. Jakec 17:24, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bolshaya Konushennaya Street in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 16:48, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:43, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meltzer's Apartment House at Bolshaya Konushennaya Street in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 16:48, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 17:55, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arkady Raikin Variety Theatre in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 16:48, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:13, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Traditional village house still in use, near road D 24, Salles-Lavalette, Charente, France. --JLPC 16:44, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 17:50, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nursery school sign, Salles-Lavalette, Charente, France. --JLPC 16:44, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 17:50, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Town hall of Salles-Lavalette, Charente, France. --JLPC 16:44, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 17:50, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Residential house, Vyazma, Russia --Max Ryazanov 16:38, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok --Poco a poco 19:05, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination European larch (Larix decidua) along the footpath between Grimentz and Vercorin.
    Famberhorst 15:28, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:18, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Country roadscape in upstate NY --Daniel Case 14:57, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 15:08, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the eastern summit of Fremington Edge to the north-west into Arkengarthdale --Kreuzschnabel 14:30, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:13, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Robin Hood’s Bay seen from the shore --Kreuzschnabel 14:30, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Right side of the images is blurred. Sorry --Halavar 15:07, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Victoriahamnen (Victoria habour) in Luleå, Sweden. By User:Tortap --ArildV 11:52, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:20, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination FIS Sommer Grand Prix 2014 - 20140809 - Thomas Diethart --Pleclown 11:49, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:08, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The roof of Lloyd's building atrium. --Colin 11:39, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:42, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A chandelier in the Adam Room in the Lloyd's Building. --Colin 11:39, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:08, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Germany, Trier, Ecke Moltkestraße - Kürenzerstraße, eheml. Post --Berthold Werner 10:44, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:46, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Panorama of Gruinard Bay looking down onto the beach --Synchronium 10:37, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good --Jacek Halicki 10:46, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Old church St. Ibb in Landskrona, Sweden. By User:C-M --Smial 10:18, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, I like it! --Hubertl 11:00, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Ibb church, Ven, Landskrona Municipality, Skåne, Sweden, with remains of a burial mound. By User:C-M --Smial 10:18, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good and nice composition and light.--ArildV 10:53, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Town hall, Slezská Ostrava, Ostrava. Moravian-Silesian Region, Czech Republic. --Halavar 09:46, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:46, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Mosque of Gazi Mehmed Pasha, Prizren --Pudelek 09:27, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Harsh shadows, but ok --Poco a poco 19:05, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Butrint (Buthrotum) - Ancient Greek theatre --Pudelek 09:27, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:20, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of the Holy Cross in Nysa 1 --Jacek Halicki 09:24, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:43, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of the Holy Cross in Nysa 3 --Jacek Halicki 09:24, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:42, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of the Holy Cross in Nysa 5 --Jacek Halicki 09:24, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 09:38, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of the Holy Cross in Nysa 6 --Jacek Halicki 09:24, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:08, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of the Holy Cross in Nysa 7 --Jacek Halicki 09:24, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:20, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Germany, Schwetzingen, Evangelische Stadtkirche --Berthold Werner 09:24, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:10, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Labeled panoramic view over large parts of Hesse --Milseburg 07:59, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. Very interesting and informative! Schön zu sehen, dass jeder winzige Hubbel auch einen Namen hat. --Hubertl 13:38, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Towers of St. Elizabeth's Church in Marburg. --Hydro 07:35, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 17:39, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saloon car racing at Castle Combe. Mattbuck 06:58, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Not sharp. No QI. -- Spurzem 17:22, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination First Great Western HST carriage. Mattbuck 06:58, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The site of Christon Bank railway station. Mattbuck 06:58, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion ok --Taxiarchos228 08:15, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Beadnell harbour. Mattbuck 06:58, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 92214 at Grosmont. Mattbuck 06:58, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pulpit of parish church St. Andrew in Kitzbühel, Tyrol --Uoaei1 06:09, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 06:29, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Altars of parish church St. Andrew in Kitzbühel, Tyrol --Uoaei1 06:09, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 06:29, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Basel: Bank for International Settlements --Taxiarchos228 05:45, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 06:29, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Basel minster --Taxiarchos228 05:45, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:09, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lenzburg Castle, detail of east bastion --Taxiarchos228 05:45, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 06:33, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lenzburg Castle --Taxiarchos228 05:45, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 06:33, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lenzburg Castle --Taxiarchos228 05:45, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 06:33, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination TV Tower St. Chrischona, platform --Taxiarchos228 05:45, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rue Paul Cuny, Murviel-lès-Béziers --Christian Ferrer 05:21, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very nice. --Livioandronico2013 07:43, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Distorsio septemdentata, Stone City Beds, Texas --Llez 04:45, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 06:33, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fuchsia 'Cymon'.
    Famberhorst 04:41, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very nice. --Livioandronico2013 07:43, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Museum ehem. Heeresversuchsanstalt, Peenemünde, Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Germany --XRay 03:31, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Austria - Iceland football match in Innsbruck, Austria on 2014-05-30. --Church of emacs 23:48, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:17, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Remaining snow in July on the Padjelantaleden trail in Sweden --Church of emacs 23:48, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:17, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination City Scales House in Nysa 2 --Jacek Halicki 22:26, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:30, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Townhouse, 41 Zámecké náměstí street, Frýdek-Místek. Moravian-Silesian Region, Czech Republic. --Halavar 19:44, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:30, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pavlovsk. Mariental park. --Александров 17:06, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Unsharp, tilted CCW, clouds blown --Kreuzschnabel 14:52, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pavlovsk, Mariental. --Александров 17:06, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Blown sky, and at least the tower on the left is definitely unsharp (camera shake I suppose) --Kreuzschnabel 19:53, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pavlovsk, Mariental pond. --Александров 17:06, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Tilted CCW, and sharpness problems (esp. trees on the left). --Kreuzschnabel 19:59, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pavlovsk. Mariental park. --Александров 17:06, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Blown sky, sharpness problems, noise --Kreuzschnabel 19:59, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Madonna in front of Caritas in via Giulia in Roma --Livioandronico2013 16:57, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Bad composition, because of too tight crop below. And the categorization is frankly horrible.--Jebulon 19:32, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jeasus on Caritas in Via Giulia in Rome --Livioandronico2013 16:19, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 05:40, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Buildings in Hallunda, Botkyrka municipality (Stockholm County). --ArildV 10:45, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Hazzy at top, and too dark in general. Sorry.--Jebulon 19:17, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aston Martin V12 Vantage. Mattbuck 09:07, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Noise, DOF, distracting background. --Smial 10:59, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rough knob-tailed gecko (Nephrurus amyae), Sydney's WildLife Zoo, Australia --Poco a poco 08:38, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Unfortunate lighting, DOF. --Smial 10:59, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The hamlet of La Chardie and access road as seen from road D 46, Bessac,, Charente, France. --JLPC 16:31, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn  Comment A bit unsharp in almost all areas. And I'm afraid sharpening will not really help. --P e z i 13:36, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
    Thanks, Pezi, I withdraw it. --JLPC 16:24, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination European route E4 in Salem, south of central Stockholm. --ArildV 14:41, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Too dark, sorry.--Jebulon 19:54, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Defensive walls in Radków 2 --Jacek Halicki 19:36, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Bit of the top of the wall cropped off and distracting foreground shadow --Daniel Case 03:41, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Defensive walls in Radków 3 --Jacek Halicki 19:36, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion A little blurry and distorted near the corners, but otherwise OK --Daniel Case 03:32, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 4ème manche du championnat suisse de Pony games 2013 - 25082013 - Laconnex --Pleclown 11:56, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline With such a shallow DOF, this much blurred background is a distraction --Daniel Case 03:38, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Inside an old Radar base, Belfort, France. --ComputerHotline 10:32, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support good quality --C messier 13:21, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Manor in Krosnowice 4 --Jacek Halicki 08:47, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Wire and blown cloud above don't work for me. --Daniel Case 03:22, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Weir and church in Amönau. --Hydro 08:28, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Crisp detail all around --Daniel Case 03:19, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Billings Bridge in Ottawa --MB-one 06:51, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Just barely; avoided seriously blown highlights on the clouds in what was a tricky exposure --Daniel Case 03:09, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Olustvere manor servants house (by A.palu) Kruusamägi 01:11, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good exposure, crisp detail and nice DOF --Daniel Case 03:05, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ford Fiesta parked in Pinamar, Argentina --Ezarate 23:35, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. IMO the crop could be better. The light spot bottom right is disturbing. --XRay 16:12, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta --Livioandronico2013 21:31, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Weak  Support Good quality. A symmetric view would be better. --XRay 16:12, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the Hallgrímskirkja cathedral, June 2014 Jakec 20:04, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support QI for me --C messier 12:53, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Monastyrka River in Saint Petersburg (by Pavlikhin) --Florstein 18:25, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment The trees are noisy. --C messier 12:53, 21 October 2014 (UTC) Support acceptable, even good with these conditions IMO --Christian Ferrer 19:22, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St Mary Basilica, Elche, Spain --Poco a poco 18:19, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion It's tilted clockwise (see horizon) --C messier 14:06, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
    C messier  Done, Poco a poco 20:10, 17 October 2014 (UTC) Weak  Support. It 's of nice quality, but I feel that there is something in the composition that could be better (light or a different lens). --C messier 12:53, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Roman Baths, Bath, England (new nomination) --Poco a poco 18:19, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose the same that the lasr time you nominated it : Details lost due to the overexposition on the churh. --Christian Ferrer 19:16, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Town Hall, Tallinn, Estonia --Poco a poco 18:19, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support QI for me --C messier 12:53, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Olustvere manor stables (by A.palu) Kruusamägi 13:24, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose too much contrasted, not fixable here IMO --Christian Ferrer 19:18, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta - Dolphins Fountain --Livioandronico2013 11:35, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose the motion blur of the water is a bit disturbing and the right of the image is a bit unsharp and also maybe a bit overexposed --Christian Ferrer 19:11, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bunkeranlage, Kap Arkona, Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Germany --XRay 03:27, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose overexposed, CAs --Christian Ferrer 19:01, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Woman selling food oil in the market in Ethiopia. By User:Natnael Tadele --JurgenNL 18:45, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:01, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Nikolaos chapel in Voutes, Crete --C messier 18:34, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality. Sorry. The main object - the chapel - isn't sharp enough. --XRay 15:58, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St. Francis Xavier chapel in Bystrzyca Kłodzka 2 --Jacek Halicki 18:28, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:01, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination half Sainte-Maure de touraine (goat's milk cheese) --Coyau 17:29, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:06, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Menacing clouds parties over the western part of the Rhone Valley.
    Famberhorst 15:26, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. CAs on the left, bottom left too dark. --XRay 16:09, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Iisaku cemetery (by Amadvr) Kruusamägi 11:29, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very weak  Support Good quality. Description is very short and should be better. --XRay 16:09, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tugboat in the port of Aqaba, Jordan. --CHK46 11:10, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Underexposed, overprocessed and slightly distorted --Daniel Case 15:10, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination CLA Building, California. By User:Justass --Elekhh 10:04, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:09, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination wayside cross Bergweg-Mühlweg --F. Riedelio 09:20, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice composition and detail --Daniel Case 15:05, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Interior of Vienna central graveyard church Saint Karl Borromaeus, side entrance --Uoaei1 06:13, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice detail; properly exposed --Daniel Case 15:03, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The details of Saint Sebastian's martyrdom. 1655. Vienna, Kunsthistorisches Museum --AnatolyPm 15:21, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
    Not very sharp, too dark. Mattbuck 18:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Noisy, unsharp. --Smial 11:45, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of Saint Catherine, Vendryně. Moravian-Silesian Region, Czech Republic. --Halavar 14:44, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
    It's leaning in a bit. Mattbuck 21:57, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
     Done New, fixed version uploaded. Hope it's better now. --Halavar 11:17, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Unsharp in upper parts due to perspective correction. --Smial 11:31, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The National House, Frýdek-Místek. Moravian-Silesian Region, Czech Republic. --Halavar 08:47, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
     Comment It's tilted CCW and DoF could be better.--XRay 17:04, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Unsharp margins, tilt, imo not fixable. --Smial 11:37, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Rievaulx Abbey MMB 16.jpg

• Nomination Rievaulx Abbey. Mattbuck 06:55, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
• Withdrawn Good quality. --Smial 10:18, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
   Oppose Big blurred areas see notes (provided that Mattbuck doesn't erase ) --Livioandronico2013 12:40, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  Livioandronico2013 is right. Mattbuck 17:52, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Mont_de_Seuc_y_l_Saslong.jpg

• Nomination The Seiser Alm in South Tyrol, with the mountains of Langkofel group in the background --Moroder 09:02, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  SupportGood quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:13, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Is there another opinion concerning the blur in the backround? --Ehsc 11:45, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Request Could you be more specific, please --Moroder 05:46, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
    
•  Support Nice. --Famberhorst (talk) 05:12, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality --Halavar 14:54, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Not good, but excellent. Please go to support in FPC, thanks.--Jebulon 16:57, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Very good composition and atmospheric lighting. -- Spurzem 17:45, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Jebulon 10:28, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Garden_Lizard.jpg

• Nomination A common animal of Bangladesh it is found bushes. --Aftab1995 13:33, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
• Decline  Oppose too blurred, noise, and missing species (+category) --A.Savin 15:48, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support The face of the animal is sharp and impressive. Noise is due to the high ISO of 2000. QI for me. I see no reason for decline. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 22:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  Please do not overload the CR without necessity! This image is already automatically disqualified as QI because of missing categorization and species. Concerning the noise, you may want to read the third row on Commons:Image guidelines; the photographer's choice of ISO value is not my problem, but only those of the photographer. Thanks --A.Savin 00:08, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  OK! You are the great master and I the stupid apprentice. Nevertheless I ask for discussion. I think it is allowed. -- Spurzem 12:06, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  Stupid? I don't know. Childish? For sure. --A.Savin 14:31, 20 October 2014 (UTC) Danke für die Beleidigung. Von Ihnen nehme ich so etwas gern hin. -- Spurzem 17:52, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Poor quality and description. Yann 16:19, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

I read that it is an garden lizard of Bangladesh. Do we need the zoological name to judge the image? -- Spurzem 17:52, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per others--Lmbuga 20:16, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose For me it is not sharp enough. And it has overexposed parts.--Hockei 20:26, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 20:45, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Penampang_Sabah_Kaamatan-Celebrations-2014-01.jpg

• Nomination Penampang, Sabah: The male and female bobohizan - traditional priests and priestess of the Dusun people - perform the magavau, a ritual dance of the Harvest Festival Rituals. --Cccefalon 20:00, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion Noticable noise and posterisation. --Mattbuck 18:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  I cannot second "posterization". I also think that there is not too much noise, considering the fact, that the photo was shot in a dimmed location with ISO 640 (which in fact causes a certain granulation). Also, the background perhaps on the fist glance looks like noise, but this is just the matrix of the projection of a nightly sky. --Cccefalon 12:52, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me. Yann 10:00, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support. Good quality. Ich kann die oben geäußerte Kritik nicht verstehen. Mehr will ich dazu nicht sagen, sonst handele ich mir möglicherweise einen Ordnungsruf ein. -- Spurzem 10:29, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 20:44, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Building_55_CEF_Ottawa.jpg

• Nomination Horticulture Building (Building 55) at Central Experimental Farm in Ottawa --MB-one 11:10, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
• Decline Unsharp, dark, perspective. --Mattbuck 18:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  Can we discuss please? --MB-one 09:49, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

 Comment. Dass ausgerechnet jemand „dark“ beanstandet, der selbst sehr viele dunkle Bilder liefert – gewissermaßen Nachtaufnahmen bei Sonnenschein –, verstehe ich nicht. Außerdem erkenne ich nicht, was an der Perspektive zu bemängeln sein sollte, und die Schärfe erscheint mir ausreichend. Lediglich die leichten CAs an dem Laub sollten vielleicht reduziert warden. -- Spurzem 10:39, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment cropped to exclude CAs (thank @Spurzem: ) --MB-one 21:27, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but for me it is not sharp enough. Only some parts. Maybe due to lack of dof? --Hockei 20:01, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 20:41, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Kirchspiel_(Dülmen),_Rödder,_St.-Michael-Kapelle_--_2014_--_3070.jpg

• Nomination Saint Michael chapel, Rödder, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:13, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
•  Support Good quality. --Moroder 13:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose I'm not convinced by this one - the top's a bit unsharp, and the perspective correction is IMO too great, making it look very unnatural. --Mattbuck 22:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Mattbuck --Jebulon 15:51, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Mattbuck. --Alchemist-hp 19:52, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
•  CommentThanks for your reviews.--XRay 15:46, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Championnat_de_France_de_cyclisme_handisport_-_20140615_-_Contre_la_montre_68.jpg

• Nomination Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140615 - Contre la montre. --Pleclown 11:14, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:37, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
   Oppose Poor image description. No indication who the athletes pictured. This image use is impossible. Also the face is not to see. --Steindy 18:43, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
  @Steindy: I really don't understand the point you're trying to make.... Pleclown 20:45, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

 Support Good quality --Livioandronico2013 08:48, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per Steindy and the guidelines.--Jebulon 17:23, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support QI -- Spurzem 21:50, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 20:38, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Championnat_de_France_de_cyclisme_handisport_-_20140615_-_Contre_la_montre_84.jpg

• Nomination Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140615 - Contre la montre. --Pleclown 11:56, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion * Support Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:59, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
   Oppose Poor image description. No indication who the athletes pictured. This image use is impossible. --Steindy 18:51, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support OK. Yann 16:15, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Steindy and the guidelines.--Jebulon 17:22, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Spurzem 21:51, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 20:36, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Dülmen,_Kreuzkapelle_--_2014_--_2713.jpg

• Nomination Holy Cross chapel, Dülmen, Germany --XRay 06:02, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose overexposed --Christian Ferrer 17:04, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Fixed The image is now darker (except the shadows). Please check the image again. Thank you.--XRay 17:48, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
    • the sky is burned out --Christian Ferrer 04:50, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 08:53, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Fontana_alla_Bocca_della_Verità-Rome.jpg

• Nomination Good composition with quite good quality, made by Yair-haklai, nominated by --Hubertl 19:35, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• Decline
•  OpposeOverexposed areas --Livioandronico2013 19:47, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • obviously a return-foul. --Hubertl 20:06, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Hubertl Try to be more respectful of the work of others, however, the base is overexposed it is easily seen --Livioandronico2013 20:29, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not overexposed, but not drawn areas. Maybe when editing something was going wrong. --Steindy 21:43, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Please check annotations--Jebulon 15:42, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Perspective issues, high contrast not well handled. -- Smial 12:15, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 08:51, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Kościół_w_Idzikowie_02.JPG

• Nomination Church of the Assumption in Idzików 2 --Jacek Halicki 19:19, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support QI for me --Halavar 19:24, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose A good photo, but the power wires are too disturbing. For a QI, the compositions should fit. --Steindy 23:07, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• Sure  Support --Livioandronico2013 23:27, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Steindy --Uoaei1 07:53, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support I don't like it when people oppose over power lines. They're very common it's almost impossible to take certain pictures without some getting in the picture. Also, this recently promoted QI has telephone wires. Jakec 18:45, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose per STeindy --Hubertl 20:44, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose as per others. Yann 20:29, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose as per others.--Lmbuga 23:00, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Decline?   --Alchemist-hp 07:46, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Championnat_de_France_de_cyclisme_handisport_-_20140615_-_Contre_la_montre_83.jpg

• Nomination Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140615 - Contre la montre. --Pleclown 16:46, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:31, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Poor image description. No indication who the athletes pictured. This image use is impossible. --~~~~
  •  Comment I do not agree. The description is accurate, it's a participant of the race during the french disabled cycling championship. This is not a superstar, just a normal person. Pleclown 11:45, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
    •  Comment Pleclown, every athlete has a starting number and the start lists and result lists can these names read. If you write that it is insignificant athletes, where should because then the images so well these are also used in Wikipedia? --Steindy 20:20, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
      • I don't understand you. We have a lot of files and QI that are depicting "nobodies" (see File:4ème manche du championnat suisse de Pony games 2013 - 25082013 - Laconnex 50.jpg for example). The fact that the person depicted is not named is not relevant here.
        • As for the educational value, and the possible use in Wikipedia, if this is relevant, use your imagination. A disabled person on a handbike... Where can this kind of picture be used in Wikipedia ? Pleclown 06:40, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 12:26, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Impressive! -- Spurzem 21:56, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support as others. Yann 09:50, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   Yann 09:50, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Championnat_de_France_de_cyclisme_handisport_-_20140615_-_Contre_la_montre_66.jpg

• Nomination Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140615 - Contre la montre. --Pleclown 11:45, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  SupportGood quality. --Livioandronico2013 12:17, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Poor image description. No indication who the athletes pictured. This image use is impossible. --Steindy 23:28, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment I do not agree. The description is accurate, it's a participant of the race during the french disabled cycling championship. This is not a superstar, just a normal person. Pleclown 11:46, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
    •  Comment Pleclown, every athlete has a starting number and the start lists and result lists can these names read. If you write that it is insignificant athletes, where should because then the images so well these are also used in Wikipedia? --Steindy 20:22, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
      • The fact that the person depicted is not named is not relevant here.
      • As for the educational value, and the possible use in Wikipedia, if this is relevant, use your imagination. A disabled person on a handbike... Where can this kind of picture be used in Wikipedia ? Pleclown 20:40, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Spurzem 21:58, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support OK. Yann 09:53, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   Yann 09:53, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Championnat_de_France_de_cyclisme_handisport_-_20140614_-_Course_en_ligne_handbike_20.jpg

• Nomination Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140614 - Course en ligne handbike. --Pleclown 11:45, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  SupportGood quality.--ArildV 13:43, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Poor image description. No indication who the athletes pictured. This image use is impossible. Also the face is not to see. --Steindy 23:28, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Livioandronico2013 23:46, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment I do not agree. The description is accurate, it's a participant of the race during the french disabled cycling championship. This is not a superstar, just a normal person. Pleclown 11:47, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment Pleclown, every athlete has a starting number and the start lists and result lists can these names read. If you write that it is insignificant athletes, where should because then the images so well these are also used in Wikipedia? --Steindy 20:24, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Good photo! -- Spurzem 22:01, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Livioandronico2013 07:56, 23 October 2014 (UTC))

File:ExCeL Centre MMB 37 Thameslink Desiro City Mockup.jpg

• Nomination: Thameslink "Desiro City" mockup. Mattbuck 07:01, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
• Review
• Too much magenta. --Cccefalon 07:21, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

  Actually that was the lighting in the venue. Mattbuck 22:14, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

  I trust this. However, isn't it the good right of a photographer to tweak the WB to remove such disturbing colour effects? I just think, this photo could have a fine EV but everyone will think: "Why all this magenta?". For me, it is rather disturbing --Cccefalon 14:07, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

   Done Mattbuck 20:30, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Support ok IMO --Christian Ferrer 17:54, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose - I disagree, I consider the tone disturbes for a QI --194.39.218.10 09:50, 15 October 2014 (UTC) Onlöy registered reviewers allowed --LC-de 08:17, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Whitebalance not very well --Ehsc 10:27, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --A.Savin 20:33, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2011_Ochryda,_Twierdza_cara_Samuela_(03).jpg

• Nomination Samuil's Fortress, Ohrid. Ohrid, Macedonia. --Halavar 20:10, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:24, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose unsharp --A.Savin 09:56, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment It's not true. I've added sharpness before. We need more opinions. --Halavar 12:45, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
    
•  Oppose Sorry, you can see the unsharpness and the noise especially on the right site. --Hockei 20:41, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me. Support removed. Yann 20:38, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:46, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Unsharp, oversharpened, noisy, blurry, perspective issues. Mattbuck 11:39, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overprocessed, chroma noise. Don't use blurring denoising tools and try to sharpen afterwards. --Smial 12:03, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   Yann 16:09, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2011_Ochryda,_Cerkiew_św._Jana_Teologa_w_Kaneo_(11).jpg

• Nomination Church of St. John at Kaneo. Ohrid, Macedonia. --Halavar 20:10, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose poor quality: artefacts everywhere but esp. on the water --A.Savin 09:54, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment These are not artifacts, but sharpness added by me. We need more opinions. --Halavar 12:45, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me. Support removed. Yann 20:41, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

@Yann: Please, elaborate what should be "quality" on this image. Have you looked at it in full view? Your POINTy votes on QIC and on RfD's damage Commons! --A.Savin 09:09, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I checked it in full size. I think it is very inappropriate to link QIC votes and opinions in RfD. I expect better from an experienced user like you. Regards, Yann 09:28, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

I've noted that you cannot explain what qualifies this image for QI, thanks. --A.Savin 09:35, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

The composition and exposition are good, and sharpness is acceptable. Is that enough? Yann 09:51, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Wrong! The sharpness is not acceptable here. But it's useless, I give up. --A.Savin 10:29, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Support OK for me. --Jacek Halicki 11:40, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose - per A.Savin, no way is this QI. Mattbuck 11:38, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Livioandronico2013 15:49, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Not enough that you spam QIC daily with your low-quality shots, you also consider it necessary to promote low-quality shots by other people in order to buy their support for future nominations. People like you are the real gravediggers of this project. --A.Savin 16:21, 20 October 2014 (UTC

Are you talking to me? --Livioandronico2013 12:45, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Oppose The photo is massively overprocessed. But A.Savin, is such a personal attack really necessary? I do not know if there is a case history I am not aware of. But if you think Livioandronico2013 is wrong you can just argue against his opinion instead of attack his photos and reviews in such a personal way. --Tuxyso 13:17, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overprocessed. -- Smial 12:05, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   Tuxyso (talk) 13:18, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Metro_SPB_Line2_Udelnaya_Platform.jpg

• Nomination Udelnaya subway station in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 09:07, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose lacks sharpness --MB-one 20:11, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Strangely, it seemed to me that sharpness is enouth for such dark hall, shooting without a tripod. Sadly, I was wrong. --Florstein 17:25, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support sharp enough --Christian Ferrer 16:23, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me. Yann 20:59, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose due to high iso rather noisy - whitebalance could be overworked ? --Ehsc 10:34, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me.--Hubertl 12:59, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
• Weak  Support Somewhat low DOF, noise level is acceptable. -- Smial 11:13, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --LC-de 07:40, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Canada Water station MMB 12.jpg

• Nomination Canada Water station. Mattbuck 07:02, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  OpposeToo much noise. --Livioandronico2013 07:13, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  • I don't think it's that bad... --Mattbuck 19:56, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support QI for me. --Steindy 10:54, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support QI for me. --Hubertl 20:59, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case 15:15, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   Yann 20:43, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2011 Butrint 17 - Minerva Temple.jpg

• Nomination Ruins, Buthrotum, Vlorë County, Albania. --Halavar 12:38, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:17, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose 1/3 top is blurred + unsharp areas --Christian Ferrer 16:45, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Christian. Mattbuck 11:26, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   Mattbuck 11:26, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

File:African Monarch (Danaus chrysippus) 1.JPG

• Nomination: Wing upperside of a female African monarch (Danaus chrysippus). --Zeynel Cebeci 17:52, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
• Review
• Like the wing and lower body but the non repeating features are too unsharp. But I will consider it QI if you rename it to "African Monarch (Danaus chrysippus) Wing upperside"--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 18:10, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Name and quality OK. --Yann 15:35, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose I don't like the unsharp head. Otherwise I would support it. I wonder where it was sitting. --Hockei 18:20, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose perhaps you can reprocess to get better sharpness? --Ehsc 10:42, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --LC-de 07:04, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Lac de Moiry, (2250 m) Grimentz, Stuwdam.JPG

• Nomination Lac de Moiry, (2250 m) Grimentz, Barrage.
  Famberhorst 15:06, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
• Decline Over sharpened, leading to odd artifacts in the water --Generic1139 21:31, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
   Done. Less sharp.
  Note: the lake is known for its ever changing colors of the water.--Famberhorst 15:41, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Ok for me --Livioandronico2013 20:44, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose This is not sharp enough for QI, and I think there's some perspective distortion too. Mattbuck 19:22, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too obvious artifacts in the water and barrage. Interesting composition though. -- Alvesgaspar 12:53, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 21:09, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Steckfrisur.JPG

• Nomination Headdress, cosplayer at Leipzig book fair 2014. By User:Lesekreis --Brateevsky 10:04, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
• Decline
• While the overall quality is ok, there is too few space left on the right side. Is it possible to widen the crop? --Cccefalon 12:04, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, composition. Too tight (as Cccefalon)--Lmbuga 22:14, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support In my eyes the composition is good because the object are the hairs. --Ralf Roletschek 08:33, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support as Ralf. -- Spurzem 19:00, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Wrong crop --Cccefalon 04:21, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose The subject is the headdress, which includes the lace on the flower, which is partially cropped off on the right. --Generic1139 (talk) 14:22, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Crop is tight but this is focusing on the headdress so that's permissible. I assume User:Lesekreis doesn't have a larger crop. -- Colin 15:19, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment If the subject was the hair, hair should be complete. The hair is cropped at bottom and the face is too tight--Lmbuga 17:50, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • I suggest Cccefalon, Lmbuga, Generic1139, Mattbuck do a Google Images search for "portrait photography", "hair photography" or even "fascinator photography" and look at the number of professional photographs where the crop is tight and not all the subject is there. We are perhaps on Commons, too used to some kind of encyclopaedic requirement that a subject must be whole and isolated all round. I'm not saying this image is perfect, but goodness me, it is far better than many dull QI on this page, where we seem to have forgotten that good light and an interesting subject is necessary. -- Colin 19:21, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

    I don't require that a subject be whole and with significant border - composition is an art rather than a science, and in some cases a tight crop looks good. Here it does not. Mattbuck 20:23, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

@Colin, I took your advice. I did look in google. Yes, cropping off parts of the head are sometimes suggested in modern times. I didn't see anything, however, that suggesting running your model's nose into a wall. I saw several articles that suggest leaving even more room in the direction the model is looking. Yes, QI is more of a technical category than a fine art category and is somewhat more "rules" based. I've uploaded a version File:Steckfrisur-ps.jpg of the file to show what even a little improvement in the crop of the left (and some blurring) can do for this image. I'm not very good at this, I'd need to spend some time refining the mask, I'm just trying to make a point. --Generic1139 21:46, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Generic1139, I agree with you that the space in front of her nose isn't ideal but most of the comments concerned the crop on the right/hair/fascinator, which I think is reasonable to crop. Your idea of extending the left is a good one, and pretty well done. Note: per CC rules, you should mention this is your modification of Lesekreis's image and say what you changed -- it isn't acceptable to claim Lesekreis created this alone [consider if you made a change he would be embarrased to be credited with]. You can also use the other versions field to link them both. -- Colin 07:19, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Colin, I made the changes to the credits you suggested. I'm not intending that my version be used for anything other than this discussion. --Generic1139 13:51, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Oppose - The crop as is is a too-tight portrait shot which happens to contain a fascinator, it's not focussed on the fascinator. Mattbuck 18:50, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support As for colin. Very good snap shot. Only the background could have been somewhat more blurred. -- Smial 20:58, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support The hairstyle is mapped perfectly. If something bothers me, it's the almost severed nose. --Steindy 17:28, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Crop too tight. --Hockei 20:50, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me. Yann 21:03, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• Sorry but  Oppose Per Cccefalon and Mattbuck--Livioandronico2013 12:27, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support as per the other pros --CHK46 21:28, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose because of the crop. --Kadellar 23:58, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unfortunate crop -- Alvesgaspar 12:46, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not that sharp (flower, lower part of the picture), tight frame, unfortunate crop, maybe chromatic noise.--Jebulon 15:15, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 7 support (excluding the nominator), 9 oppose → Decline?   --Kadellar 23:58, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Tarucus balkanicus - Balkan kaplanı - Little Tiger Blue.jpg

• Nomination Little Tiger Blue (Tarucus balkanicus). Mersin - Turkey.--Zeynel Cebeci 19:56, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:58, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, this is not QI to me. --P e z i 10:58, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Livioandronico2013 21:40, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too dark! Improvable.--Lmbuga 17:30, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Strange color, but OK for me. --Hockei 20:46, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Lmbuga, and blueish cast. --Kreuzschnabel 09:38, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others, far from the QI bar for insects -- Alvesgaspar 12:44, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 14:47, 13 October 2014 (UTC)