Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 23 2019

• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from S-charl a place in the Swiss canton Graubünden to Alp Sesvenna. View of the mountains from Alp Sesvenna.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 04:43, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sent (German: Sins ) a place in the Swiss canton Graubünden Restored house in the old core of Sent. (Detail).
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 04:42, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bargerveen Meerstalblok. Peat lake with growing peat bog.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 04:41, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sent (German: Sins ) a place in the Swiss canton Graubünden View of the tower of the Reformierte Kirche Sent.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 04:39, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Zeiselberg (Mount Zeisel), Magdalensberg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:58, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wayside shrine on Görtschitztal Straße, at the branch of St. Thomaser Straße, Magdalensberg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:58, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 04:28, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fresco of Saint Lawrence at the wayside shrine on Görtschitztal Straße, at the branch of St. Thomaser Straße, Magdalensberg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:58, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wayside shrine on Görtschitztal Straße, at the branch of St. Thomaser Straße, Magdalensberg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:58, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fresco of Margaret the Virgin at the wayside shrine on Görtschitztal Straße, at the branch of St. Thomaser Straße, Magdalensberg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:58, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 04:28, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ceiling at the Masonic Hall in New York City --Rhododendrites 00:15, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:27, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Decorative organ pipes at the Masonic Hall in New York City --Rhododendrites 00:15, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:27, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hudson Yards viewed from the top of Hudson Commons (6 image panorama) --Rhododendrites 00:15, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:30, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wall detail at the Masonic Hall in New York City --Rhododendrites 00:15, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:27, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stained glass door at the Masonic Hall in New York City --Rhododendrites 00:15, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:30, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Luan Leite da Silva, player of SKN St. Pölten. --Steindy 00:00, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 04:29, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Luan Leite da Silva, player of SKN St. Pölten. --Steindy 00:00, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 04:29, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hippos by Marlies Poss in Bad Wörishofen -- Spurzem 19:01, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 20:24, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Small library, installation by Anne and Peter Knoll in Bad Wörishofen Spurzem 19:01, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality: focus on name. --Axel Tschentscher 20:16, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Home of Nirmalendu Goon. --RockyMasum 18:37, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose The image is grainy, not a QI, sorry --Poco a poco 21:18, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of Charity in the Santissimo Sacramento chapel Brescia --Moroder 17:41, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:14, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of Faith in the Santissimo Sacramento chapel Brescia --Moroder 17:29, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:14, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of Maximilian von Hamilton in Hukvaldy --Jakubhal 17:22, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 17:42, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Altar in the Santissimo Sacramento chapel in the Sant'Agata church in Brescia. --Moroder 16:40, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality but very tight crop above. And why such a large file? I can not open it in 100 %. -- Spurzem 17:15, 20 October 2019 (UTC) Comment Thanks for the review. It is the sensor size and I already downsized a bit--Moroder 17:29, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Antependium in the Santissimo Sacramento chapel in Brescia --Moroder 16:40, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:22, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Two bronze mascarons on the gate to the Santissimo Sacramento chapel Brescia. --Moroder 16:40, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:23, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Štramberk --Jakubhal 16:06, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 16:41, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Štramberk from Štramberk Castle --Jakubhal 15:45, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 16:01, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St. Mary in Siebenbäumen, view from the south-east --Dirtsc 14:13, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 14:53, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cethosia cyane Drury (1773) - Leopard lacewing eggs on host plant Passiflora foetida. (by Dipanjali Biswas) --Atudu 14:05, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Axel Tschentscher 20:17, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination [edit] A windmill from Nurove, Balakliia Raion, Kharkiv Oblast (now in outdoor Museum of Folk Architecture and Life of Ukraine in Pyrohiv, Kyiv, Ukraine). By User:SNCH --Antanana 13:48, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 14:21, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination [edit] Monument to Volodymyr the Great, Kyiv, Ukraine. By User:Алексей Косенко --Antanana 13:48, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Unusual, but well done. Something is different and should be rewarded. --Steindy 14:38, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Joanna Senyszyn. By User:Foto-AG Gymnasium Melle --Andrew J.Kurbiko 13:24, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:30, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination SL ferry M/S Guli in Nacka, Sweden --MB-one 12:04, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 12:11, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination AEG-Fabriken Humboldthain, Berlin --MB-one 12:04, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Axel Tschentscher 12:57, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wayside cross (1855) in Vergisson, France. Rock of Vergisson in the background. --Palauenc05 11:57, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 12:09, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:10, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Keystone (1756) above the main entrance of Ulrepforte, Cologne. --Palauenc05 09:16, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 12:10, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oberalp Mountain pass road --JoachimKohler-HB 09:09, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:11, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mangalica in winter --JoachimKohler-HB 09:09, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Great. --ArildV 09:15, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Restaurant Obermühle Schönenberg --JoachimKohler-HB 09:09, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:27, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Former Swedish destroyer HMS Småland. --ArildV 08:55, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:05, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sjömanskyrkan (Sailor's church), a church in Gothenburg, Sweden. --ArildV 08:51, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 09:08, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Remains of the shipping port for the former Norsholmen kalkbruk. --ArildV 08:51, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Axel Tschentscher 12:57, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Sagunto, Spain --Poco a poco 08:29, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:52, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Alicante, Spain --Poco a poco 08:29, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 09:08, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Shade House, City of Arts and Sciences, Valencia, Spain --Poco a poco 08:29, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality (maybe a very small ccw tilt) --ArildV 08:58, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Panoramic view of Calatayud, Spain --Poco a poco 08:29, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:14, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Panneau de l'Avenue du Docteur Paul Fournial sur le campus à Pessac et panneau itinéraire cyclable. --Benoît Prieur 08:18, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:34, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Cape Of Good Hope pub in Oxford. UK --Ввласенко 07:35, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:46, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Entrance to the Bodleian Library. Statue of the third Earl of Pembroke. Oxford, UK --Ввласенко 07:35, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:34, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bell tower of the Saints Peter and Paul church of Biesles, Haute-Marne, France. --Tournasol7 07:25, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:46, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Holy Trinity Church in Camburg, Thuringia, Germany. --Tournasol7 07:25, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:46, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Egg carton with chicken eggs. --Tournasol7 07:25, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:34, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cathedral Cove on Coromandel Peninsula, North Island of New Zealand. --Tournasol7 07:25, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:46, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rue Arsene Vermenouze in Aurillac, Cantal, France. --Tournasol7 07:25, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:34, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chapel of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Służejów --Jacek Halicki 07:20, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:26, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Monastery in Henryków 1 --Jacek Halicki 07:20, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:34, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Monastery in Henryków 2 --Jacek Halicki 07:20, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:26, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Monastery in Henryków 3 --Jacek Halicki 07:20, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:26, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Monastery in Henryków 4 --Jacek Halicki 07:20, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:34, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A south view of Mizuya, Taiyū-in, Nikko --DXR 07:10, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality --Tournasol7 07:28, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A southeast view of Mitomo Shrine, Futarasan, Nikko --DXR 07:10, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:36, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:58, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A view of Nikkō Kaidō, Nikko, near the Gokomachi neighbourhood --DXR 07:10, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:28, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A southwest view of Kamijinko, Tōshō-gū, Nikko --DXR 07:10, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:28, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cellar entrance in the Kellergasse in Unterhaid (Oberhaid) am Main --Ermell 06:43, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:11, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cellar entrance in the Kellergasse in Unterhaid (Oberhaid) am Main --Ermell 06:43, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:12, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bowling alley in the open-air museum Oberpfalz in Neusath --Ermell 06:43, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:13, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paulerverl BJ.1697 from Pavelsbach in the open-air museum Oberpfalz in Neusath --Ermell 06:43, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --DXR 07:12, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Door of the former monastery church in Münchaurach --Ermell 06:43, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:55, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lori Berd Fortress. By User:Armineaghayan --Armenak Margarian 06:36, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:40, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Michael the Archangel's church in Gyumri, Armenia. --Armenak Margarian 06:36, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:34, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Leisach-Gries in East Tyrol, the Drau --Michielverbeek 06:38, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:34, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination near Thal-Wilfern in East Tyrol, the Drau --Michielverbeek 06:38, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --DXR 07:12, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination near Mittewald in East Tyrol, the Drau --Michielverbeek 06:38, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:36, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:52, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination between Hof and Abfaltersbach in East Tyrol, the Drau --Michielverbeek 06:38, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:36, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:50, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination near Strassen in East Tyrol, the Drau --Michielverbeek 06:38, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    The river is tilted --Poco a poco 08:34, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:50, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from Lavin through Val Lavinuoz to Alp d'Immez (2025m.) Braiding stream on glacier bottom.
    --Famberhorst 06:12, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:20, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from S-charl a place in the Swiss canton Graubünden to Alp Sesvenna. Rapids in the Clemgia, tributary of the Inn.
    --Famberhorst 06:12, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:21, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from Lavin through Val Lavinuoz to Alp d'Immez (2025m.) Falling down rock (gneiss) from the unstable slope of Piz Linard.
    --Famberhorst 06:12, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:22, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rainy Chestnut Parasol Fungus (Lepiota castanea) in decline. Deadly Toxic.
    --Famberhorst 06:12, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:23, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Birch mushrooms (Piptoporus betulinus) on the trunk of a birch.
    --Famberhorst 06:12, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:24, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hukvaldy Castle --Jakubhal 06:04, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:06, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Objekt auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 05:20, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline Stripes in the sky again... please stop nominating these images. --Peulle 06:32, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Objekt auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 05:20, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline Stripes in the sky again... please stop nominating these images. --Peulle 06:32, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Objekt auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 05:20, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline Stripes in the sky again... please stop nominating these images. --Peulle 06:32, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
    I also see stripes in the sky. I advise you to use a much lower f-value, f/5 is more than enough. Also ISO100 would have been much better for the sky --Michielverbeek 06:47, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Objekt auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 05:20, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline Stripes in the sky again... please stop nominating these images. --Peulle 06:32, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cap des Frères between La Franqui and Leucate beach, France --Llez 05:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:06, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sémaphore du Cap Leucate, France --Llez 05:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:07, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination TV-transmitter, Cap Leucate, France --Llez 05:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:09, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Quilt in the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S. By User:Daderot --Another Believer 02:05, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:38, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of Robert Burns by Henry Hudson Kitson, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S. By User:Daderot --Another Believer 02:05, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Insufficient level of details and sharpness imo. --ArildV 08:59, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Side chair in the Chazen Museum of Art, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S. By User:Daderot --Another Believer 02:05, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:28, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Relief on the Salada Tea Building, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S. By User:Daderot --Another Believer 02:05, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:38, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Justice for All relief, Suffolk County Courthouse, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S. By User:Daderot --Another Believer 02:05, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:31, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oil products tanker, KEILIR, departing the harbor at Reykjavik, Iceland --GRDN711 01:44, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:27, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oil products tanker, KEILIR, coming into the harbor at Reykjavik, Iceland --GRDN711 01:44, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:11, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eldis Bajrami, player of SKN St. Pölten. --Steindy 00:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 08:01, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination David Stec, player of SKN St. Pölten. --Steindy 00:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:38, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination David Stec, player of SKN St. Pölten. --Steindy 00:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:38, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Belém Tower, Lisbon, Portugal --Poco a poco 08:02, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:02, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pheasant Coucal (Centropus phasianinus) --Bald white guy 06:01, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:02, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tatev Monastery, Armenia --Poco a poco 18:19, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Dirtsc 17:03, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sanahin Monastery, Armenia --Poco a poco 18:19, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Dirtsc 17:03, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Manuel Martic, player of SKN St. Pölten. --Steindy 00:00, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:02, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Šnipiškės (a neighbourhood in Vilnius) in the 19th century (by Kazimier Lachnovič) Pofka 10:48, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Is this a photo or a scan? Who made it? Did the uploader create this version or took it from the web? Since that is not clear, I tend to oppose for regulatory reasons. --Tsungam 08:55, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
    @Tsungam: The author is unknown. This Wikipedian uploaded it to Wikipedia. Pofka 19:24, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hamburg-Eißendorf, Mehringweg 7, part of protected ensemble 31208 (Adolf-von-Elm-Hof/Mehringweg) --KaiBorgeest 21:32, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline The sky is too bright and the DOF is too low. --Dirtsc 17:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church St. Maria in Siebenbäumen, western view --Dirtsc 10:41, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 17:44, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Wreck of a traditional dugout left to beach in Benin --Adoscam 10:22, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Review
    WB looks off --Poco a poco 17:35, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Magdeburg Green Citadel (a Hundertwasser building), the uneven windows mirror the sky --Axel Tschentscher 11:43, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 16:45, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rock Ptarmigan,taxidermied specimen - Lagopède des Pyrénées,Spécimen naturalisé --Ercé 11:50, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 16:43, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hamburg-Barmbek-Nord, residential building along the Otto-Speckter-Straße --Dirtsc 07:15, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Comment The building is good quality, but there seems to be some disturbing CA around the trees, especially the right one. --Domob 09:04, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
     CommentI'm not able to see the mentioned CA at my home PC. I applied a correction for CA. All I notice is an unsharpness of the right tree due to perspective correction. Feel free to decline the nomination, if you find any faults. Greetings --Dirtsc 20:57, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
     Support I think it is ok. --Domob 07:58, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hamburg-Barmbek-Nord, residential building along the Otto-Speckter-Straße --Dirtsc 07:15, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Comment Looks good to me in general, but the verticals seem leaning out (e.g. on the tower in the background). Can you please try to fix the perspective accordingly? --Domob 09:04, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
     Comment I'll try to find a perspective correction that fits better. But I checked the verticals of the tower in the background and they are straight and downright vertical. But you're right, it "seems" as if the lines are leaning out, a common problem when one follow the rule of the "straight verticals" as it is interpreted here. ;-) Greetings --Dirtsc 08:01, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
     Comment I personally think that the perspective is overdone; if you reduce it somewhat, I will support this image as QI. But if others think the amount is good as it is, I won't object if they promote the image as it is. --Domob 08:42, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
    I made a new version, with a less aggressive perspective correction. Please take a look. --Dirtsc 20:57, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
     Support Thanks, good quality. --Domob 07:58, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:2007-04-07_07_Achilles-Sport_175,_Bj._1955,_front_(Foto_Spu).jpg

• Nomination Scooter Achilles-Sport from 1955 -- Spurzem 17:34, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
• Why have you cutted the blue motorcycle? --Steindy 20:47, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

• @Steindy: ... because then both would have been shown rather small. But such a photo exists, even with a Heinkel scooter. -- Spurzem 21:10, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose So I do not like the photo with the cut off wheel, sorry! --Steindy 21:30, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

• The blue scooter is background. I ask to discuss. -- Spurzem 22:52, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Support - Acceptable, IMO, per Spurzem. -- Ikan Kekek 03:04, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry but I must oppose on compositional grounds: the wide crop on the right shows that you had space to aim further left, possibly getting the whole blue bike in the frame as well.--Peulle 06:33, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

@Peulle: It's clear that you vote against the image. Still, I wanted to present this bronze colored scooter as the main object and put it in the middle. Also, have you never seen a photo rated as a high-quality image that does not quite show the complete objects in the background? I even remember pictures of automobiles with posters in the windshield that were found to be good. But a photo taken by Spurzem can not be good in your eyes. Regards -- Spurzem 15:42, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

I withdraw and put the picture back to the former crop. -- Spurzem 16:13, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Support IMHO the tight crop is ok for QI. --Berthold Werner 17:56, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Seven Pandas 21:49, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Ellerholzdamm,_Pallets,_WPAhoi,_Hamburg_(P1080334).jpg

• Nomination Stacks of wooden pallets near Reiherstieg, Hamburg --MB-one 08:01, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
   Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:03, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
   Oppose That's too bright, especially the background. Look at the balcony at the left. I ask to discuss. -- Spurzem 11:19, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Spurzem. --Smial 07:59, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:17, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Mannersdorf_Rochusberg_62.jpg

• Nomination Objekt auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:15, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. Patterns in the sky. Sorry. Maybe you could pick the blue color and try to soften or blur it. --Ermell 16:02, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose +1.--Peulle 08:23, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Moroder 21:59, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 12:07, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

File:An-107-Yanarraju.jpg

• Nomination AN-107 departmental route in northwestern Peru By User:Lamder --LLs 22:57, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:02, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. 960 × 640 is not enough. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 15:03, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Andrew. Hard limit. --Smial 08:01, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose 2 megapixels is minimum. --Peulle 08:21, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too small. --Steindy 14:24, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 16:15, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Mannersdorf_Rochusberg_71.jpg

• Nomination Objekt auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 05:44, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Sensor stripes left and right in the sky. --Steindy 09:36, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment The camera was from 24.9. until 18.10.2019 at the Nikon-Service. Diagnosis (costs 64.62 €): Camera and sensor in perfect condition. I do not understand why only some, and not all, who rate my photos, find flaws. --Manfred Kuzel 05:35, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose Even if the sensor is not the problem, can you not see that there is a problem? Can you not see the stripes in the sky, and that this is abnormal? You keep getting these images declined at CR, is that enough of an indication?--Peulle 08:12, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I think your only problem are the pixelviewers and they discourage all work on Commons. BTW a perfect photo does not exist and never existed --Moroder 21:56, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:16, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Mannersdorf_Rochusberg_70.jpg

• Nomination Objekt auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 05:44, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Sensor stripes in the sky. --Steindy 09:39, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment The camera was from 24.9. until 18.10.2019 at the Nikon-Service. Diagnosis (costs 64.62 €): Camera and sensor in perfect condition. I do not understand why only some, and not all, who rate my photos, find flaws. --Manfred Kuzel 05:42, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose Even if the sensor is not the problem, can you not see that there is a problem? Can you not see the stripes in the sky, and that this is abnormal? You keep getting these images declined at CR, is that enough of an indication?--Peulle 08:11, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I don't understand what "stripes in the sky" means. I guess it is not a technical expression, maybe it is some sick impression of pixelviewers --Moroder 21:53, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:16, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Mannersdorf_Rochusberg_67.jpg

• Nomination Objekt auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:28, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality --Llez 04:46, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose I disagree. Pattern in the sky. Sorry. --Ermell 06:10, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose I also think that with the pattern in the sky it shouldn't be promoted. Curious, though. Nikon D5300 is a decent camera. Is it due to some heavy post processing? --Tupungato 07:22, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Comment The camera was from 24.9. until 18.10.2019 at the Nikon-Service. Diagnosis (costs 64.62 €): Camera and sensor in perfect condition. I do not understand why only some, and not all, who rate my photos, find flaws. --Manfred Kuzel 14:03, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose This image was shot in March, before the problem was fixed, so of course the photo is getting declined. I think all images shot before the service will have this problem. May I suggest you don't nominate those for QI? They're just filling up QIC and they're all getting declined. I would suggest you start nominating images taken after 18.10.19.--Peulle 07:41, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

• Once again: The diagnosis has shown that there was no sensor problem that could be resolved !!! --Manfred Kuzel 05:29, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

• Whatever the cause, you must see that there is a problem; so far, all these images have been declined. Are you the only one who can't see it?--Peulle 08:09, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment I have been looking to your photos and until now I have only seen you install your camera the same way ISO200 en f/11. You are using ISO200 while the sky is beautiful blue, ISO100 is much better. I use ISO200 when it is cloudy and a little bit more light is necessay. Generally a higher ISO gives also more noise. I would use f/11 if the differences between the several objects is very large and f/4 if I want to focus one object (like you mostly do). Just play more with your camera to find out how your camera works. And, yo ucan always look to other people. --Michielverbeek 07:16, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• * Support I don't see any reason to reject images with ISO 200 on a Nikon camera in any light condition. It obviously gives you the chance to reduce aperture and have a sharper image with no relevant increase of noise. BTW I don't understand what "pattern in the sky" means. I guess it is not a technical expression, maybe it is some sick impression of pixelviewers --Moroder 21:46, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 06:26, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Dassault Falcon 2000, EBACE 2018, Le Grand-Saconnex (BL7C0628).jpg

• Nomination Dassault Falcon 2000 on static display at EBACE 2018, Le Grand-Saconnex --MB-one 17:24, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
  
•  Oppose Sorry! The photo is confusing. The fuselage of the aircraft in the background is too disturbing. Likewise the wing and the elevator. For the main object, the wing end is missing. No good composition IMO. --Steindy 18:27, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
  
  •  CommentI thought QI is only about the technical quality. --Ermell 06:16, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
    
    • @Ermell: Technische Qualität des Fotos und ins­besondere Schärfe allein sollten für eine positive Bewertung nicht genügen. Mir schmetterte zum Beispiel jemand kürzlich ein Bild ab, weil es den Eindruck vermittele, das ab­ge­bildete Schiff fahre bergan. Ur­sache für diesen Eindruck war der tiefe Kamera­stand­punkt. -- Spurzem 10:09, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
      
• Ermell basically you are right, but is not the image design quality too? If not, we can also tag photos of people who have a head cutting, or cars that have their tires cut off. I myself was recently refused a photo(!) because the foot of a player who was not the main motive was cut off. Stands also in COM:QIC#Composition and lighting. --Steindy 22:02, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose In this case, I agree the background is disturbing. In particular, the horizontal stabilizer.--Peulle 16:33, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others --GRDN711 19:02, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 06:26, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Taj_Mahal_-Agra_-Uttar_Pradesh-DSC_7827.jpg

• Nomination A musical artist playing Veena in front of Taj Mahal. By User:Arunsaha2 --Bodhisattwa 13:44, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Comment This photo we had at October 10 with the vote "Decline". --Steindy 17:03, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
  
  • The reasons which were given for declining before have been noted and taken care of. --Bodhisattwa 17:40, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
    
•  Oppose The description is surely better now but I think that the vignetting is a bit too much here --Podzemnik 20:44, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry but this has way too much vignetting, the colours look unnatural, there are chromatic aberrations on the left and the tower is warped.--Peulle 07:31, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose unausgewogene Bildbearbeitung, das ginge wesentlich besser. --Ralf Roletschek 11:51, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others, but I also still want to know if this is a composite of more than one photo. -- Ikan Kekek 04:12, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 06:25, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Dormition_and_Refectory_Churches_Lavra.jpg

• Nomination Dormition Cathedral and Refectory Church in the Kiev Pechersk Lavra monastery --Domob 14:01, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
  
•  Support Exposure somewhat low, but golden tower effect and wide fisheye perspective are great. --Axel Tschentscher 15:21, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Horizon unnaturally arched. Needs correction. Not a QI for me yet. --Milseburg 16:11, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment The curved perspective comes from the stitching projection. I also tried a rectilinear panorama, but to me the current version looked more balanced. --Domob (talk) 07:30, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose - OK, but it looks too weird to me. I haven't always opposed fisheye perspectives, but if it looks too unnatural like this really strong curve for a panorama, I don't think it's the best way to represent a motif. -- Ikan Kekek (talk)
•  Comment Thanks for the feedback! I've redone the panorama now with a rectilinear projection. Milseburg and Ikan Kekek, what do you think now? --Domob 07:32, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Better, but still bulged. What projection was it before? Btw I´ve found and marked a little stitching problem. --Milseburg 13:21, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

It was equirectangular before. Good catch with the error, should be fixed now. --Domob 15:24, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Support - It still looks slightly curvy to me, but I think it's acceptable and a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 18:22, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan --Smial 08:12, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 21:42, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

File:2019_Dwór_w_Służejowie_1.jpg

• Nomination Manor in Słuzejów 1 --Jacek Halicki 07:56, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
  Good quality, but I think it would be better without the upper leaves on the left side. --Steindy 12:29, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
   Support The dark green nicely frames the light building and makes the whole image more alife. --Axel Tschentscher 21:34, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment - Same question here: The whites on the upper reaches of the tower look blown to me. -- Ikan Kekek 04:06, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Not to me ;-)--Moroder 17:37, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I stay with it. No good picture composition. I am disturbed by the leaves hanging out of nowhere. --Steindy 14:32, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 21:42, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

File:MS_Empress_of_Ottawa.JPG

• Nomination Excursion ship Empress of Ottawa. --The Cosmonaut 01:42, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:11, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very unfavorable shadow, no QI for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 11:31, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support OK for QI. --A.Savin 13:47, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Main object is hidden in the shadow. Sorry, not quite QI. --Axel Tschentscher 06:42, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Odd lighting. White areas on the bow of the ship are fine but the rest seems too dark. Cropping could be tighter to the ship. IMO overall not QI. --GRDN711 18:41, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Don't see any light problems, even the shadowed parts are well lit, so what?--Moroder 21:37, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 06:24, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Mannersdorf_Rochusberg_103.jpg

• Nomination: Objekt auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 03:49, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:57, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
   OpposeSorry! Sensor pattern on the door. --Steindy 10:05, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
• stimmt, starke Sensorstörungen. --Ralf Roletschek 20:31, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
• kann es nicht sein, daß das die Struktur der Blechtür ist? Was anderes sehe ich nicht.--Manfred Kuzel 05:10, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Ich sehe Sensorstörungen, ich bin aber nicht allwissend, deshalb kein Votum von mir. Bitte weitere Minungen. --Ralf Roletschek 20:42, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Steindy. --Peulle 10:05, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Moroder 13:56, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
• The camera was from 24.9. until 18.10.2019 at the Nikon-Service. Diagnosis (cost € 64.62): Camera and sensor in perfect condition. --Manfred Kuzel 13:28, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

• If your camera was on service, two questions arise for me: 1. Is this an authorized service company? 2. Did you include the lens too? Maybe the result of the interaction between the camera and the lens? Anyway, I would complain there immediately and provide as proof of some of these photos. --Steindy 21:25, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

• Die Kamera wurde von Hartlauer komplett (also samt Objektiv) an Nikon-Service zum Check geschickt und kam von dort mit dem Befund “alles in einwandfreiem Zustand” zurück. Auch an der Nachbearbeitungssoftware kann es nicht liegen, weil ich diese schon immer benutzt habe, die Probleme aber erstmals vor 2 Jahren (zunächst in Einzelfällen, dann immer öfter) aufgetreten sind. Da ich selbst (wie übrigens einige andere Benutzer auch, die zunächst positiv bewertet haben, ehe ein anderer User disqualifiziert hat) bei keinem einzigen der beanstandeten Fotos den Fehler sehen kann, versuche ich nun, die Aufnahmedaten dieser Fotos zu analysieren, weil ich mir nur noch vorstellen kann, daß eine zu hohe ISO zu einem Bildrauschen geführt hat. --Manfred Kuzel 06:12, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

• Das ist kein Bildrauschen, sondern ein Abbildungfehler, der auch nicht an einer zu hohen ISO-Zahl liegen kann. Ich würde es einmal bei diesem autorisierten Fachservice direkt versuchen, wo Sie die Probleme schildern und zeigen können. So weit weg ist das ja von Ihnen nicht und kann mit einem Ausflug nach Baden oder in die SCS verbunden werden. --Steindy 09:43, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 06:24, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

• Review needed

File:Telfs,_Pfarrkirche_Sankt_Peter_und_Paul_Dm64879_IMG_0729_2019-07-30_14.19.jpg

• Nomination Telfs in Tyrol, church: Pfarrkirche Sankt Peter und Paul --Michielverbeek 18:49, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
  Needs perspective correction. --Steindy 20:56, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
  I don't agree. It is acceptable that the verticals are not totally straight when you take a photo from a short distance of such a high building --Michielverbeek 17:46, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
  * In this case, the distance is large enough to require horizontal edges. --Manfred Kuzel 04:29, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
   Comment As said before: the perspective correction should be easy here, Greetings --Dirtsc 07:42, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

 Comment The image has already been stretched. With 100% verticals the upper parts get rather unsharp. This can not be avoided. --Smial 14:18, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Weak support then. I agree with Smial that the perspective could not be stretched further without destroying a good image. Greetings --Dirtsc 15:40, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Whatever the technical reasons for it, the radically different angles of the crosses on top of the steeples are really bothersome. I can't support this. -- Ikan Kekek 17:51, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I agree that we should be less uncompromising when the picture is being taken from below--Moroder 20:20, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
• I have now unsuccessfully tried to correct the photo. Something is always not exactly right. Therefore  Support. --Steindy 22:45, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment - To me, your efforts show that this shot couldn't have been successful from that distance and angle, not that this level of jarring distortion is acceptable (unless it's done specifically in order to disturb the viewer). -- Ikan Kekek 06:12, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per Ikan, Tournasol7 19:19, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Not every perspective needs to be corrected. --Axel Tschentscher 06:37, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support völlig ok so, 100%ig vertikal sieht fast jedes Motiv unnatürlich aus. --Ralf Roletschek 11:58, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment - Having the crosses in such different angles is what I'd call unnatürlich. -- Ikan Kekek 04:18, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment - If I would have made the photo from a larger distance I would have seen only the top of the church, so I have tried it like this and nominate it for QI. --Michielverbeek 07:27, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment@Ikan Kekek: Today I had the time to browse through the images in the Category and they (especially this one: File:Telfs 2.JPG) confirmed my suspicion, that the two crosses on the towers in fact don't have the same orientation. So their look in our disputed image is perfectly "natural" ;-) Greetings --Dirtsc 17:39, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Support - I also did a wider image search. I'm convinced and end my opposition. -- Ikan Kekek 18:27, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 06:23, 22 October 2019 (UTC)