Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 23 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Sony_A7RMII.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Sony A7RII camera --Denis Barthel 21:49, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. This is a great camera! There is some dust on the camera but it's hard to avoid. Dllu 23:26, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

*  Oppose Very sharp, but the object is very dirty. Seems tilted cw IMO. Some blue fringe around the handle at right.--Jebulon 23:54, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

  • Thank you, Jebulon, ✓ Done, I fixed the tilt and dust spots and I hope it's better now? The object has been cleaned before photographing, but there always drops some new dust during the session and some corners cannot be reached for cleaning. Combined with a high resolution and sharpness I don't know how to avoid that, the same happened recently with the Milvus-take. Ah and can you tell me exactly, where there is blue fringing, I don't see any. Thx, Denis Barthel 08:26, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment The subject itself is sharp, but as a studiowork, it needs some cleaning. Also there are some faults in the underlaying cloth which is used. There is a mirroring but also a cloth structure. Was this mirroring from a normal glass with a white cloth underlaying? --Hubertl 06:20, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Hubertl, yes it was. The distance between the glass and the underlying cloth such causes a distance which helps to get the background out of DOF, but as it is just a few cm, the cloth is not invisible. So probably you mean some dust on the glass, as the cloth is below it. Denis Barthel 08:26, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Tipp: Ikea. They have two seizes of almost really white glasses (for closets), one is 50x70cm, the other one is 50x160cm. I suggest the bigger one, so you can work with bigger items > 15cm up 30cm, so you can get it with a smaller angle. The glasses are pretty cheap and don´t waste space. --Hubertl 08:44, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Thank you, Hubertl. That's an excellent solution.Denis Barthel 09:17, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The image looks dirty indeed. Probably not due to dust bu fixable in the lab room anyway, with a little patience. Alvesgaspar 09:56, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Thanks Jebulon, Hubertl and especially Alvesgaspar, did the retouching now and hope it fits now? Denis Barthel 11:57, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support OK now. Alvesgaspar 12:44, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support I strike my oppose, but I don't support, because the correction of the blue fringe is too visible. Good work nevertheless.--Jebulon 23:12, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Thank you, Jebulon, for striking the oppose. I must admit, that I'd still appreciate to know, what you see there. I took a look at the RAW again and even in it's "rawest" version I do not see any BF and as such I never used any correction (it would be hard to cause some with that lens though). In case you might drop me a note still, I'd be grateful. Denis Barthel 07:16, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, I don't understand what happens, I don't see any fringe or fringe correction anymore (I use a different monitor now). So, don't care of my opinion ! Sorry again for trouble...--Jebulon 17:08, 20 October 2015 (UTC)No visible problem with a HANNS-G/19 monitor, still visible problem with my Ipad and my Imac/27.--Jebulon 14:00, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Hubertl 10:19, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 10:19, 22 October 2015 (UTC)