Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 21 2014

• 
  • Nomination Ria of Cedeira, Cedeira, Galicia (Spain) -C17 --Lmbuga 23:27, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:38, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cross in the facade of the church of Saint Mary of the Sea, Cedeira, Galicia, Spain -C21 --Lmbuga 23:25, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:38, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eurasian eagle-owl (Bubo bubo sibiricus) in captivity. --Kadellar 22:35, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good and very nice -- Spurzem 22:39, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Cansles peaks and Muntijela in the Puez-Geisler Nature Park (Dolomites). --Moroder 22:18, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 22:41, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Iberian wolf (Canis lupus signatus). --Kadellar 21:59, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good -- Spurzem 22:13, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój 1 --Jacek Halicki 21:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 22:15, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój 3 --Jacek Halicki 21:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:03, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój 5 --Jacek Halicki 21:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Kadellar 22:42, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój 6 --Jacek Halicki 21:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:06, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kościelna Street in Lądek-Zdrój 1 --Jacek Halicki 21:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 23:30, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kościelna Street in Lądek-Zdrój 2 --Jacek Halicki 21:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 23:34, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sign at Vestre Landsret, Viborg, Denmark --Slaunger 21:30, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:59, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Beach of Cedeira, Galicia (Spain). Mouth of Condomiñas river -C19 --Lmbuga 20:47, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:28, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cedeira beach at low tide and mouth of the river Condomiña, Cedeira, Galicia -C20 --Lmbuga 20:47, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:28, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Loodi manor barn (by A.palu) Kruusamägi 20:18, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline unsharp, sorry. --Hubertl 20:34, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Office and storage building "Förseglet 1", house 5. --ArildV 20:10, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn  Comment Sorry, I like your pictures, but in this one I don't like the composition: I can not see the building entrance, the flag pole on the left is very annoying--Lmbuga 21:04, 18 October 2014 (UTC) Thank you for reviewing. I understand your point.--ArildV 21:39, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Skarpnäck metro station, Stockholm. --ArildV 20:10, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion really good quality! --Hubertl 20:15, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of Holy Mary in Monserrat of the Spaniards - Altar --Livioandronico2013 19:02, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:59, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Giordano Bruno in Campo de' fiori --Livioandronico2013 18:37, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good --Lmbuga 21:24, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Madonna in Trastevere --Livioandronico2013 17:48, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn unsharp --Hubertl 18:47, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
    Other please --Livioandronico2013 18:55, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
    Unsharp, tilted, too tight crop (and lack of detail due to NR?) Sorry. --Kadellar 22:06, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
    You have already two declines, no need to go to CR. --Kadellar 22:41, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
    Who are you to decide ??? Where is it written that after 2 votes, there is no discussion ??? Read the rules before amounts! --Livioandronico2013 22:59, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
    I pointed FOUR different problems with the picture, not QI. In any case, it is not you who decides whether to go on CR or not, it is someone who supports the image (and now you'd need three to pass QIC). You asked for one more opinion, and that's fine, and then you got it. You can't continue doing the same without end. CR is for cases where we have doubts, you'll probably get a CR like Moro_in_Fontana_del_Moro.jpg. --Kadellar 23:52, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Helenium 'El Dorado'. Location: garden Sanctuary Jonkervallei.
    Famberhorst 17:40, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 17:49, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Washrooms in Patterson Creek Pavilion, Ottawa --MB-one 16:49, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:57, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of Holy Mary in Monserrat of the Spaniards --Livioandronico2013 16:35, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:14, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The windmills of La Paille (18th century), near road D 46, Bessac, Charente, France. --JLPC 16:31, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very nice --Livioandronico2013 16:38, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The windmill of La Paille, near road D 46, Bessac, Charente, France. --JLPC 16:31, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 16:41, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Plaque of death on Saint Mary of the Prayer and Death --Livioandronico2013 16:14, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:25, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Protected building Tånggården, Sjurberg, Sweden.--V-wolf 16:13, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:14, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Protected building Tånggården, Sjurberg, Sweden.--V-wolf 16:08, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Slaunger 21:34, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination European larch (Larix decidua) in the Alps Orzival (2100 m).
    Famberhorst 15:45, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. even when its a little oversharpened. --Hubertl 20:29, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Granadella Beach, Javea, Spain --Poco a poco 14:56, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 17:22, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arch of Hadrian, Jerash, Jordan --Poco a poco 14:56, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 20:19, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Finestrat Beach, Finestrat, Spain --Poco a poco 14:56, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice.--Famberhorst 15:49, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pumpkins, Botanic Conservatory, Fort Wayne, USA --Poco a poco 14:56, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:57, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Baphuon, Angkor Thom, Cambodia --Poco a poco 14:56, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 17:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Buddhists in Mexico City, Mexico --Poco a poco 14:56, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:25, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Goat (Capra aegagrus hircus), Ho Chi Minh City Zoo, Vietnam --Poco a poco 14:56, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality and nice -- Spurzem 16:11, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of Ioannes Paulus II and Aqueduct of San Sebastian, Coimbra, Portugal (note:nominated but unassessed before)) --Poco a poco 14:56, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:57, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gonfalone at the procession of the Sacred Heart in Urtijei Gröden --Moroder 13:46, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 20:29, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Lilium bulbiferum, common names orange lily, fire lily or tiger lily on the "Mont dal ega" in Gröden, (Dolomites) --Moroder 12:46, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:11, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stella alpina (Leontopodium alpinum) sull'alpe di Cisles in Val Gardena - in ladino: "stëila da mont" o "stëila dla elpes"Deutsch: Edelweiss (Leontopodium alpinum) auf der Cisles Alm in Gröden - auf Ladinisch: "stëila da mont" oder "stëila dla elpes" --Moroder 12:46, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. Sharp enough. --Hubertl 18:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Copenhagen Havnebus "Nyhavn". --Julian Herzog 12:37, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:27, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Den Sorte Diamant ("the black diamond") of the Royal Danish Library. --Julian Herzog 12:37, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:25, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The HDMS Peder Skram (F352) museum ship. --Julian Herzog 12:37, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:27, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bicycle, Juist, Lower Saxonia, Germany --XRay 11:42, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Florstein 12:13, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Peter's Square, Vatican --XRay 11:42, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Perhaps FP, but not QI IMO: tilted, perspective distortion, too dark, ...--Lmbuga 00:00, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Germany, Schwetzingen, Hebelstraße 3 --Berthold Werner 10:31, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:38, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rapunzel tower in Amönau. --Hydro 10:10, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 20:29, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sofia skola (school). --ArildV 09:57, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:25, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Peyne River, Pézenas --Christian Ferrer 09:30, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--ArildV 10:15, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint George church in Kamienica 1 --Jacek Halicki 09:17, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Florstein 12:13, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint George church in Kamienica 2 --Jacek Halicki 09:17, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Florstein 12:13, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint George church in Kamienica 4 --Jacek Halicki 09:17, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:11, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint George church in Kamienica 6 --Jacek Halicki 09:17, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:11, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building at Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój --Jacek Halicki 09:17, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion --ArildV 09:23, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dancehall, theatre etc. Rättviksparken, Sweden.--V-wolf 09:08, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality but why not crop some foreground? --ArildV 09:23, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
    Thanks. Different crop uploaded. --V-wolf 15:56, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination "DLT" Department Store at Bolshaya Konushennaya Street in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 08:57, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good qualiy --ArildV 09:16, 18 October 2014 (UTC)maybe crop the car?
• 
  • Nomination "DLT" Department Store at Bolshaya Konushennaya Street in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 08:57, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--ArildV 09:16, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bridge at Narroways Junction, Bristol. Mattbuck 08:58, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:43, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bamburgh Castle. Mattbuck 08:58, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline No sharp --Livioandronico2013 18:17, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 142092 at Darlington. Mattbuck 08:58, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok.--ArildV 09:19, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palace of Westminster. Mattbuck 08:58, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good.--ArildV 09:19, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Devil's Dyke. Mattbuck 08:58, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 20:29, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stereophonics in concert. Mattbuck 08:58, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:43, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 170637 at Nuneaton. Mattbuck 08:58, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:43, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gatchina. Karpin pond.--GAlexandrova 07:56, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:54, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gatchina. Palace Park. white Lake--GAlexandrova 07:45, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Sky is overexposed --Jacek Halicki 08:54, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Window of a shop in the Old Town, San Diego, California, USA --XRay 05:56, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:52, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tower of Engelsburg, Recklinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:56, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Top part far too noisy --Poco a poco 15:11, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Prefettura della Casa Pontificia, Saint Peter's Square, Vatican --XRay 05:56, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:52, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gargoyle at the Cathedrale, Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:56, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:52, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fuchsia 'Ciske De Rat'
    Famberhorst 04:53, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:55, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shell of a Coralline Cerith, Cerithium coralium --Llez 04:25, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:15, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Charity shop in Avenham, a city-centre suburb of Preston, UK. --Baresi franco 00:19, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--ArildV 10:15, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Аполлон Бельведерский, Летний сад, СПб. --Max A. Khlopov 12:23, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Statue out of focus. --Florstein 09:09, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Летний сад, СПб. --Max A. Khlopov 12:23, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Statue out of focus. --Florstein 09:09, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Летний сад, СПб. --Max A. Khlopov 12:23, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Statue out of focus. --Florstein 09:09, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Летний сад, СПб. --Max A. Khlopov 12:23, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Florstein 09:09, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Летний сад, СПб. --Max A. Khlopov 12:23, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --MB-one 16:49, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sculpture to the fisherman woman. Port of Cedeira. Galicia (Spain) -C13 --Lmbuga 22:46, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:04, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kooli Street, Tallinn, Estonia --Poco a poco 18:17, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--ArildV 09:32, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lloyd's building exterior staircase --Colin 17:28, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--ArildV 09:32, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Donut Eatery at Bolshaya Konushennaya Street in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 17:23, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Technical quality is OK, but I find the crop is rather arbitrary with the car at the left and the transition to a second building to the right. --Slaunger 21:41, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Office and storage building "Förseglet 1", house 5. --ArildV 16:02, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality . Only one slight problem (see note). --JLPC 17:10, 17 October 2014 (UTC) Done Thank you for note.--ArildV 09:38, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The strait between Långholmen and Södermalm. --ArildV 16:02, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
    Tilted ccw Poco a poco 18:36, 17 October 2014 (UTC)  DoneThank you --ArildV 09:54, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:15, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grand Hôtel, Stockholm --ArildV 14:41, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
    Tilted in cw direction Poco a poco 20:31, 16 October 2014 (UTC)  DoneThank you --ArildV 09:51, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Would have preferred a corrected perspective, but good to me --Poco a poco 15:17, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kleiner Sonnenröschen-Bläuling - Aricia agestis --Hockei 20:43, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
    At the same time that you nominate pictures here and expect others to review them, have you considered to review other people's nominations? Poco a poco 20:52, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment See the answer per email. This is not the right place for this I find. --Hockei 18:00, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
     Comment I did. Thanks for the good contact. --Hockei 21:01, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
    Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:09, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kleiner Sonnenröschen-Bläuling - Aricia agestis --Hockei 20:43, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:09, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination University of Birmingham. Mattbuck 06:56, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Needs demagentifying --Kreuzschnabel 08:05, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
     Disenmagentafactionified Mattbuck 17:56, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
    No sharp,tree very disturbing --Livioandronico2013 18:21, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Town hall/Office building, Lüdinghausen, Germany --XRay 03:22, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Kaiserpfalz, Goslar, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 03:22, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: The ash at the memorial to the fallen of World Wars in Büttel --Nightflyer 22:27, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Blizne, Poland - old wooden buildings --Pudelek 20:44, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment Image is too dark. Would be good to add some lights and brightness. --Halavar 22:18, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Butterfly at Chester Zoo. --Mike Peel 19:17, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Blaue Federlibelle - Platycnemis pennipes, Weibchen (female) --Hockei 18:22, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Veränderliche Krabbenspinne - Misumena vatia, Weibchen mit Beute (female with prey). --Hockei 17:43, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Veränderliche Krabbenspinne - Misumena vatia, Weibchen mit Beute (female with prey). --Hockei 17:43, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Veränderliche Krabbenspinne - Misumena vatia, Weibchen mit Beute (female with prey). --Hockei 17:43, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Veränderliche Krabbenspinne - Misumena vatia, Weibchen mit Beute (female with prey). --Hockei 17:43, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination British Embassy, Stockholm. --ArildV 23:05, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mattbuck 22:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wodna Gate in Bystrzyca Kłodzka 1 --Jacek Halicki 22:51, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
    Slightly tilted to the right Poco a poco 19:41, 14 October 2014 (UTC)  Done--Jacek Halicki 21:09, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:21, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wodna Gate in Bystrzyca Kłodzka 2 --Jacek Halicki 22:51, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mattbuck 22:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wodna Gate in Bystrzyca Kłodzka 3 --Jacek Halicki 22:51, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mattbuck 22:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of the Assumption of the Virgin Mary, Třebovice, Ostrava. Moravian-Silesian Region, Czech Republic. --Halavar 20:30, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Lacks contrast, blurry. --Mattbuck 22:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The interior of the Greenbank Drive Synagogue in Liverpool. By User:Msemmett --Lewis Hulbert 18:32, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Why not higher resolution. Villy Fink Isaksen 20:07, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
    OK. Mattbuck 22:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Looking across Swaledale to Blea Barf --Kreuzschnabel 17:32, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Foreground too blurry. --Mattbuck 22:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pikva manor barn and carriage house (by A.palu) Kruusamägi 16:46, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Overexposed a bit, strange fuzz in sky top left, tilt. --Mattbuck 22:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jäneda manor park (by A.palu) Kruusamägi 16:46, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Overexposed sky. --Mattbuck 22:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jäneda manor stable (by A.palu) Kruusamägi 16:46, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Cyanotic sky. --Mattbuck 22:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Broiled sanma. --Ocdp 12:53, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mattbuck 22:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bożków Palace 4 --Jacek Halicki 11:14, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
    Most of the picture is underexposed Poco a poco 12:36, 11 October 2014 (UTC)  Done--Jacek Halicki 10:19, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
    No improvement, you need to brigthen the shadows and not darken the whole picture Poco a poco 20:38, 16 October 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 22:36, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok --Poco a poco 15:23, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Office wing of Villa Erskine. Home and office for architect Ralph Erskine. Built 1963. --ArildV 09:28, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Messy composition, subject mostly obscured. --Mattbuck 22:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Evangelical Church of Christ, Moravská Ostrava, Českobratrská street, Ostrava. Moravian-Silesian Region, Czech Republic. --Halavar 08:55, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Noisy, blurred at top right. --Mattbuck 22:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Most Miloše Sýkory, Moravská Ostrava and Slezská Ostrava, over the Ostravice river, Ostrava. Moravian-Silesian Region, Czech Republic. --Halavar 08:55, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline In my opinion tilt on the left --Livioandronico2013 09:18, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
     Done Thanks, you were right. I uploaded new, fixed version. Please take a look again. --Halavar 14:51, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
    The tilt is the same... --Livioandronico2013 19:13, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
    Noisy. Mattbuck 22:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lorenkenturm, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:13, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 13:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination мост через реку Неву в Санкт-Петербурге - Большеохтинский мост, the bridge over the river Neva in St. Petersburg - Bolsheokhtinsky bridge.
    Max A. Khlopov 11:58, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Overexposed. --Mattbuck 22:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Торговый дом «Братья Елисеевы» Санкт-Петербург, Trading house "Eliseyev Brothers" St. Petersburg.
    Max A. Khlopov 11:59, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Tilted on the left. --Livioandronico2013 08:52, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
     Not done Mattbuck 22:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination один из четырех горельефов на постаменте памятника Николаю I, one of the four reliefs on the pedestal of the monument to Nicholas I.
    Max A. Khlopov 12:01, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
    It needs a vertical perspective correction Poco a poco 12:43, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
     Not done Mattbuck 22:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline {{{2}}}
• 
  • Nomination Вид на Стрелку Васильевского острова, View of the Arrow of Vasilevsky island.
    Max A. Khlopov 12:01, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Tilted, noisy, lots of empty space. --Mattbuck 22:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cemetery chapel in Jaszkowa Dolna 7 --Jacek Halicki 22:44, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality. Sorry. The top is disturbing and IMO too noisy. --XRay 07:11, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cemetery chapel in Jaszkowa Dolna 8 --Jacek Halicki 22:44, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. IMO the noise is acceptable. --XRay 07:11, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Penampang, Sabah: The head of State Juhar Mahiruddin (right), Chief minister Musa Aman (middle) and Maximus Johnity Ongkili, Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation of Malaysia during the opening ceremony of Kaamatan 2014 at Hongkod Koisaan, the unity hall of KDCA --Cccefalon 21:14, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality. Sorry. The two unsharp persons top right and left are too disturbing. --XRay 07:11, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination FIS Sommer Grand Prix 2014 - 20140809 - Mikhail Maksimochkin --Pleclown 20:21, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK. --Mattbuck 18:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination FIS Sommer Grand Prix 2014 - 20140809 - Manuel Fettner --Pleclown 20:21, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
    @Pleclown: Suggestion: clone out the distracting foreground element. -- Slaunger 22:41, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
     Done Pleclown 17:58, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mattbuck 18:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination USO-SFP - 20140830 --Pleclown 20:21, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
    Needs a better description. Mattbuck 18:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:26, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Audience at Donauinselfest 2014 --Tsui 19:47, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Pretty, but the focus is on the hammock, not the people. --Mattbuck 18:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Holy Trinity column in Linz, Austria --Tsui 19:47, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Significant blur. --Mattbuck 18:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Heidi Dokalik (Clara Luzia) --Tsui 19:47, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Blurry at bottom. --Mattbuck 18:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of a saint near church of the Nativity of the Virgin Mary, Orlová. Moravian-Silesian Region, Czech Republic. --Halavar 19:10, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Blurry at top. --Mattbuck 18:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Evangelical Church of Christ, Moravská Ostrava, Českobratrská street, Ostrava. Moravian-Silesian Region, Czech Republic. --Halavar 19:10, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Wire across it. --Mattbuck 18:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hufeisenklee-Widderchen - Zygaena transalpina --Hockei 18:51, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Lack of fine detail IMO. --Mattbuck 18:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Krabbenspinne - Thomisus onustus, Weibchen (female) --Hockei 15:37, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Lack of fine detail IMO. --Mattbuck 18:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC) --Mattbuck 18:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Krabbenspinne - Thomisus onustus, Weibchen (female) --Hockei 15:37, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Lack of fine detail IMO. --Mattbuck 18:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC) --Mattbuck 18:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Boats in Paphos harbour, Cyprus. --AnatolyPm 15:15, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mattbuck 18:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination собор Воскресенский (Спасский) (Нижегородская область, Арзамас, Соборная площадь, стр. 19). By User:Komadoze --Rubin16 11:15, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality. Noisy and overprocessed imo, nice composition --Moroder 12:53, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Monument at the defunct synagogue in Klodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 10:29, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Overexposed. --Mattbuck 18:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Monument at the defunct synagogue in Klodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 10:29, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Not crisp. --Mattbuck 18:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Monument at the defunct synagogue in Klodzko 3 --Jacek Halicki 10:29, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Not crisp. --Mattbuck 18:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St. George church in Długopole Dolne 5 --Jacek Halicki 10:29, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Subject mostly in shadow --Mattbuck 18:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Overhead power line at Ekerö. --ArildV 08:15, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. A little bit noisy, but IMO acceptable. --XRay 07:07, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Seaplane Hangars in Tallinn (by A.palu) Kruusamägi 06:54, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality. Sorry. Too much sky, noisy and IMO too unsharp. --XRay 07:07, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta - Aeolus Fountain --Livioandronico2013 08:30, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
     Comment Not really sharp. Pleclown 10:59, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Done Thanks for review Pleclown more sharp --Livioandronico2013 20:44, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
    I feel there's not much fine detail in this. Mattbuck 17:51, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination viewpoint "Wehlstein" in Elbe Sandstone Mountains, Saxon Switzerland, Germany --Tobi 87 08:22, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion It's a very nice photo, but remarkable parts of the sky (top right) are burnt. Could you reconver something from RAW? --Tuxyso 08:25, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
     Done I tried my best ... now it is up to you to decide;) -- Tobi 87 23:58, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
    OK. Mattbuck 17:51, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of Exaltation of the Holy Cross, Kunín. Moravian-Silesian Region, Czech Republic. --Halavar 22:08, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment IMO too noisy.--XRay 08:10, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
    I concur. Mattbuck 17:44, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of Exaltation of the Holy Cross, Kunín. Moravian-Silesian Region, Czech Republic. --Halavar 22:08, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment IMO too noisy. --XRay 08:11, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
    I concur. Mattbuck 17:44, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kostivere manor granary (by A.palu) Kruusamägi 01:20, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Comment a slight left-turn and less saturation in dark areas (foreground wall and tree) would be fine --Hubertl 16:54, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
    I concur. Mattbuck 17:44, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Brixen_Pfaundlerhaus.JPG

• Nomination Pfaundlerhaus in Brixen, South Tyrol --Uoaei1 04:33, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose its pretty unsharp! --Hubertl 17:09, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Question Pls. add a note where it is unsharp! --Uoaei1 19:28, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very(!) unsharp and CA. --Steindy 21:58, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 08:37, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Archeology in Alcazaba 1, Almeria, Spain.jpg

• Nomination Archeological site in the upper part of the Alcazaba, Almeria, Spain.--Jebulon 19:25, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
•  Comment Croping misstake at the top.--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 22:17, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Done Of course, thank you.Tobias "ToMar" Maier, better ?--Jebulon 17:48, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
    • The cloud and the right side wall edges seem to be unnaturally soft to me. Mattbuck 21:27, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
      • Sorry, I don't understand.--Jebulon 14:10, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
        • I have highlighted a few examples. Bits seem to be surprisingly even. Due to noise reduction in the sky going to far maybe? Mattbuck 20:04, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
          • No, due to bad digital manipulation -shame on me- I'm afraid (for the cloud. Nothing to say for the other part you annotated, I'll try to correct.)--Jebulon 16:06, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
            •  Oppose  Not done Mattbuck 11:44, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Ok --Livioandronico2013 07:17, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • not sure - I´d like to have more opinions? --Ehsc 10:21, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
    
•  Support For me OK. --Hockei 19:09, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  I withdraw my nomination Thanks and sorry for supporters, but opposers are right. This pic will be back soon after a more decent rework.--Jebulon (talk) 15:28, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --LC-de 08:10, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:London MMB »1D0 Central St Martin's College of Art and Design.jpg

• Nomination Fountains in London. Mattbuck 07:01, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Nice but blurry --Uoaei1 19:17, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • The top is blurred due to long exposure, but the bottom is sharp. I'd appreciate a second opinion on this one. --Mattbuck 20:59, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support OK for QI --MB-one 07:39, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me. Yann 20:51, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support QI for me. -- Spurzem 17:25, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --LC-de 08:07, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Nuneaton railway station MMB 18.jpg

• Nomination Nuneaton railway station. Mattbuck 07:01, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support - Good quality. --Code 07:48, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose - I disagree, pic is not well exposed and has less dynamic --Ehsc 15:20, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
• The shadows at left are a bit dark and all the vertical at right are leaning in. --Christian Ferrer 17:16, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

   Done Mattbuck 21:02, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

   Support --Christian Ferrer 10:36, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Support For me is it a good photo and QI. --Steindy 21:14, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support QI for me too!--Hubertl 20:47, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --LC-de 08:01, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Fuchsia 'The Doctor'.JPG

• Nomination Fuchsia 'The Doctor'.
  Famberhorst 04:42, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:38, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Foreground and Background not clear differentiated. --Ehsc 15:24, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support acceptable IMO --Christian Ferrer 17:14, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Livioandronico2013 20:47, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support. Good and nice photo. What should be bad? -- Spurzem 11:13, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --LC-de 08:00, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Mayadevi Temple, Konârak 07.jpg

• Nomination Artwork in Mayadevi Temple, Konârak, India --Bgag 17:54, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion
• The central part is very nice, but I think that DOF is too shallow and objects at the periphery are out of focus. More opinions please. --C messier 14:30, 14 October 2014 (UTC) PS: However, i like it  Support. --C messier 14:59, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → More votes?   --LC-de 07:53, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Saha kabel, 15.saj..JPG

• Nomination Saha Chapel (by A.palu) Kruusamägi 03:35, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion
• See note, please. --Johanning 12:47, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Done Kruusamägi 17:02, 11 October 2014 (UTC).
    •  Support ok then --Johanning 11:44, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose until a more accurate description --Christian Ferrer 18:12, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Done Kruusamägi 00:40, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

   Support ok --Christian Ferrer 04:48, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --LC-de 07:48, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Upper_Garden_of_Peterhof_03.jpg

• Nomination Statue in the Upper Gardens of Peterhof --Florstein 17:15, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Chrumps 17:42, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unnatural colors, looks overprocessed --Uoaei1 19:25, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Quality and colors OK for me. --A.Savin 09:32, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support The lighting is slightly awkward, but its good enough for me. --PointsofNoReturn 22:33, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support I encountered light conditions like this severeal times before, and sometimes much more strange than here. QI to me and IMO pretty good --DKrieger 21:26, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --LC-de 07:46, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Clevedon MMB B3 Pier.jpg

• Nomination Clevedon Pier. Mattbuck 07:02, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Noise,not sharp. --Livioandronico2013 07:13, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  • It's not as sharp as others, but I think this is sufficient for QI. --Mattbuck 19:56, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support I agree with Mattbuck. QI for me. --Steindy 10:56, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
• weak  Support even a bit oversharpened --Christian Ferrer 04:52, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support as Christian Ferrer --Hubertl 20:55, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --LC-de 07:38, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Kylemore October 2014-1a.jpg

• Nomination Kylemore Abbey, Irelad -- Alvesgaspar 21:41, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Poor quality. All the left is blurred, anyway irelad would be ireland? --Livioandronico2013 23:08, 11 October 2014 (UTC) --
•  Comment A second opinion, please. The subject is sharp. Thanks for noticing the typo, but would be much easier to correct than to comment on it. Also, please notice that it is "poor quality", not "poorquality"; and "Ireland", instead of "ireland" Alvesgaspar 23:13, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Reread what you write at least irelad is Ireland for you?--Livioandronico2013 23:26, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Agreed for the blurred left. --Christian Ferrer 05:52, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose I do not know what happened to the image at the left side, but the doubled and blurred contours are very disturbing. -- Smial 21:32, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 07:33, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Angehaltene_Bewegung_-_Kleinknecht_-_1976-77_Regensburg.JPG

• Nomination Sculpture by Hermann Kleinknecht, Campus University of Regensburg, Germany. --Johanning 16:55, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose The distortion of the perspective of the background is very disturbing IMO. I think that it's not improvable--Lmbuga 16:28, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • I imaged in advance that at least some of you would not like it. However, in this case perspective and distortion are willfully - if not skillfully - chosen. The sculpture - seen as some kind of planet or star - dwarves its surronding and distorts it in its gravity. As far as I know, we judge technical quality and not photographers intentions. Other votes, please. --Johanning 18:35, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Always oppose to the artistic shots,here.Distortion are not required,Lmbuga gave you constructive criticism,I suggest you listen to him because he certainly knows more than you and me together.Regards --Livioandronico2013 20:29, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Sorry, distortion is disturbing, see note, please. Perhaps the distorion is normal with 12mm., but not QI for me in this case. Others can think--Lmbuga 01:36, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks for the comments, especially for the note. So be it. --Johanning 08:30, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support In this case, distortion is OK. Yann 10:37, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose The whole photo looks unnatural distorted what the extreme wide-angle lens is to blame. Since no coordinates are given, I can not judge whether the extreme wide angle was required. --Steindy 22:14, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 07:20, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Robert Malm and Philippe Hinschberger 2.jpg

• Nomination Créteil vs Châteauroux. Interview for beIN Sports --Pyb 21:43, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
• Decline
•  SupportGood quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:23, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not sharp. --Steindy 20:03, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unsharp Alvesgaspar 13:13, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 07:17, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:20140808_-_Ligue_2_-_Créteil-Châteauroux_008_(cropped).jpg

• Nomination Créteil vs Châteauroux, warm up --Pyb 21:43, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
• Decline
•  SupportGood quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:23, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not sharp. --Steindy 20:03, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not sharp, per Steindy--Lmbuga 22:14, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 07:16, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Berlin_Großer_Tiergarten_Platanenallee.jpg

• Nomination Platanenallee Großer Tiergarten Berlin. --Code 21:02, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
• Decline
•  OpposeThis looks strange, especially the bright areas. Jpeg artifacts, overprocessed? --Uoaei1 06:27, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • I did no processing besides brightness decrease and moderate sharpening. I can't see any JPEG artefacts. "Looks strange" is not a criteria for QI. Other opinions? --Code 07:45, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Lack of highlights because of the decrease of brightness certainly because of an overexposion --Christian Ferrer 05:47, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment Could you please explain what you mean with "Lack of highlights"? Thank you. --Code 19:24, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
    • I mean the colors of the trees and foliage are washed-out by a too much big decrease of the brightness. --Christian Ferrer 04:58, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Image is low contrast leading to an unnatural appearance, possibly due to the brightness decrease mentioned above. --Generic1139 (talk) 16:33, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 07:15, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Thrifty ice cream - Circus Animal Cookies on cake cone.jpg

• Nomination Thrifty ice cream, cylindrical scoop on cake cone --Raphaelled 10:53, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
• Decline
•  OpposeDisturbing background, also lacks contrast. --MB-one 10:17, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Hi MB-one, thanks for the review. This photo isn't pretty, but was meant to realistically portray Thrifty ice cream in its natural environment. The background conveys the standard Thrifty setup: company logo and menu at top, dual cake cone dispensers (left), and a sugar cone box (bottom right). In this case, doesn't the background support the subject? As for contrast, I used available light... would a QI require an external strobe or dark color of ice cream? Thanks! --Raphaelled 19:51, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not enough depth of field. It is not even mapped the ice cream sharp. --Steindy 22:21, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment Hi Steindy, it's true there are no sharp edges in the ice cream, however the camera cannot see sharpness that does not exist. The ice cream is smooth and beginning to melt. Can you examine the cone, label, and top of the ice cream, where we can see definition in the ice crystals? I think the depth of field covers most of the subject, except of course the edges, which recede far into the background. Thanks! --Raphaelled 03:54, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 07:11, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Sète_and_the_Étang_de_Thau.jpg

• Nomination Sète and the Étang de Thau --Christian Ferrer 11:50, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
• Decline Insufficient quality. Sorry, IMO too hazy. --XRay 06:19, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  acceptable IMO --Christian Ferrer 10:51, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose lacks contrast. --MB-one 19:44, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Done MB-one, XRay, new version contrasted --Christian Ferrer 04:55, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Neutral it's better now. --MB-one (talk) 10:21, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Neutral It's better now, but it still looks hazy and a little bit unsharp. Additionaly there is a touch of green in the sky. --XRay 16:50, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose too bluish IMHO --Ehsc 10:00, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 07:06, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Monopteros_Hain_Bamberg.JPG

• Nomination Monopteros in the park Hain, Bamberg --J. Lunau 13:14, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
• Decline
•  OpposeLacks sharpness, sorry --Poco a poco 22:00, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Done Thanks for review, I replaced image with one, more detail and clarity --J. Lunau 08:36, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
    • The new version is better, but not sure whether it is a QI. Sharpness is just ok, but there is also clipping (loss of detail due to overexposure in some areas). Feel free to go for discussion if you want to hear more opinions. Poco a poco 22:48, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
      • Thank you Poco a poco, let us hear more opinions. --J. Lunau 05:21, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
• Nice subject, but  Oppose per Poco, sorry. --MB-one 19:48, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 07:02, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Hagerhaus Kefermarkt 2.JPG

• Nomination Architectural Shot of an newly restored former evangel. Building in Kefermarkt, Austria --Florian Voggeneder 23:24, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
• Decline
•  SupportGood quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:33, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
•  OpposeNoticable CA, right side seems to be leaning in. --Mattbuck 23:55, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with Mattbuck. --Steindy 22:26, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 06:56, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Moro_in_Fontana_del_Moro.jpg

• Nomination Moro in Fontana del Moro --Livioandronico2013 20:19, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
•  Oppose Insufficient quality. I'm really sorry. The image is unsharp. Everything OK with your lens? --XRay 13:52, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • I don't think that is unsharp, then I have promoted other 24 photos, I think lenses are ok. --Livioandronico2013 14:25, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose - it is not sharp. Mattbuck 16:14, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not sharp. --Steindy 11:06, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose not sharp. It’s not the lens, it’s camera shake. White areas overexposed – sorry to repeat this. --Kreuzschnabel 21:24, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose as Kreuzschnabel.--Hubertl 21:09, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 06:54, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2014 Frydek-Mistek, Bazylika Nawiedzenia NMP 08.jpg

• Nomination Basilica of the Visitation of Our Lady, Mariánské náměstí, Frýdek-Místek. Moravian-Silesian Region, Czech Republic. --Halavar 15:47, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
  There's some sort of horizontal graining, especially visible in the sky. Mattbuck 10:14, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support for me QI --Hubertl 10:11, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose due to horizontal grain/banding. Mattbuck 20:25, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Nice --Livioandronico2013 20:35, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose per mattbuck. --A.Savin 09:37, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Done New fixed version uploaded. --Halavar 22:05, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me. --Jacek Halicki 11:46, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support For me it's okay. --Steindy 22:34, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- I see no banding in the sky. Good enough for me. Alvesgaspar 12:56, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --LC-de 21:11, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Pensiangan_Sabah_Sapulut-Pensiangan_Road-02.jpg

• Nomination Pensiangan, Sabah, Malaysia: Ford Ranger passing a land slide striken part of the Sapulut-Pensiangan Road --Cccefalon 04:09, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
• Decline Decline perhaps would be too hard. But this short focal distance is not a good kind to photograph a car. I ask for discussion. -- Spurzem 05:03, 7 October 2014 (UTC) Further the crop at the left is too tight. -- Spurzem 22:18, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose as for the reasons aöready given by Spurzem --LC-de 21:07, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Too tight crop, extreme distortion -- Alvesgaspar 12:51, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support it is about the road and car together. No wide Angle, not much of a road.--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 22:02, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 21:07, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Amiens_France_Hotel-de-Ville-02.jpg

• Nomination Amiens, France: Entrance to the Hôtel de ville --Cccefalon 11:07, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Perspective issues - roof and other horizontal elements are not horizontal --Uoaei1 12:21, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment While the criteria "not rectilinear" can be a reason to decline, there is no reason to complain horizontal lines as this heavily depends on the location of the tripod. --Cccefalon 13:41, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
•  OpposeI presume that a straight frontal view was intended here, so the viewing position should be carefully chosen. But we can discuss. --Uoaei1 08:59, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

double voting --Livioandronico2013 20:13, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

• • I disagree - let us discuss it --Villy Fink Isaksen 10:02, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

 Comment Shouldn't we have a QIC rule, which tripod position is allowed when standing in front of symmetrical or near-symmetrical objects? (scnr) --Cccefalon 10:28, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Support -In my opinion this is a QI but not a "Featured Image". A Featured Image should be symmetrical if posible, unless it is not intended. But it is a question when to seek symmetry and when not to. Here it looks like symmetry is the goal. Villy Fink Isaksen 17:37, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me. Yann 22:38, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Me too --Livioandronico2013 20:13, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --LC-de 08:12, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Malachit-Eisvogel-Serengeti.jpg

• Nomination Malachite kingfisher (Alcedo cristata), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Tobi 87 17:49, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support QI --Rjcastillo 18:04, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose With less of 2,5 megapixels it's a bit noisy. Blown out areas IMO--Lmbuga 18:17, 6 October 2014 (UTC) The bird is a bit little in the picture, but the composition is good--Lmbuga 18:19, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Definitely QI for me --Johanning 19:10, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Good to me. --Hockei 20:58, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose I'm with Lmbuga on this one. Cute image but not enough quality: noise, unsharpness, lack of detail -- Alvesgaspar 12:49, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --LC-de 20:48, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Southampton Central railway station MMB 12 444020 444003.jpg

• Nomination 444s at Southampton Central. Mattbuck 07:01, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion Sorry, should be sharper. Driver does not seem to like pictures being taken. -Johanning 16:55, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
  Sharpened, perspective corrected and CA removed. Also the driver is waving to me. --Mattbuck 12:38, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
   Comment greetings to the driver, not completely convinced I leave the decision to others -Johanning 19:14, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Quality seems ok to me, I think he said hello. --Christian Ferrer 04:52, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Livioandronico2013 16:30, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

  Could you explain what you find lacking? Mattbuck 19:18, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

  Sure,not enough sharp --Livioandronico2013 22:01, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

  The image looks generally rather sharp to me - which bit do you think isn't sharp? Mattbuck 18:46, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

  Oh very sorry Mattbuck,I saw it just now (maybe next time put the notification so I can see). However, the right one with the blue roof.Do you want me to put a note? Regards.--Livioandronico2013 11:45, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Like Christian Ferrer. --undefined 22:23, 10 October 2014 (UTC) Sorry, login lost. --Steindy 22:26, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Noise and CAs--Lmbuga 17:58, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support QI.--P e z i 22:35, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl 21:15, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --LC-de 20:46, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Odles_est_y_Fermedes.jpg

• Nomination The Geisler Group in the Dolomites --Moroder 17:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
• Decline  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:16, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
   OpposeUnsharp --Jacek Halicki 21:43, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

 Oppose As per Jacek. Probably the summits got unsharp as a result of untilting. --Cccefalon 05:56, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

 Comment "unsharp as a result of untilting" makes technically no sense. I still believe we are, unfortunately, in the region of pixelnerds ...--Moroder 23:53, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

 Comment Sharpness is OK for me, but it is a bit overexposed IMO (clouds, white stones). Regards, Yann 11:20, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

 Comment Thanks for the hint, I uploaded a new version. --Moroder 15:29, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Oppose DoF too low for such a shot. Sorry --MB-one 00:07, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
• Weak  Support. Looks like very slight motion blur. DOF is ok. Image stabilization aktivated with short exposure time? This sometimes leads to unexpected results, not easy reproducable. -- Smial 19:31, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Sorry I don't understand exactly what you mean by "Image stabilization aktivated with short exposure time". I did not have a tripod this time. I'm glad thet you confirmed that f/5,6 and DOF shouldn't be an issue since the object is hundreds of meters away, cheers --Moroder 18:42, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
    • No, I did not mean the tripod effect, which is well known and detected by some newer lenses and cameras, so they turn IS off automatically. Not so well known is the fact, that IS in some cases can produce unsharpness with short exposure times, which normally are expected to be safe even hand held with deactivated IS. I don't have the sources at hand, will look for it later. -- Smial 14:36, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
      • Thanks, btw this lens AF-S NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8G ED does not have an IS device --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:51, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support OK now. Yann 22:45, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose really nice composition - but blur is disturbing me --Ehsc 10:43, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Without regard to why it is blurred, this image is blurred, especially on the left. My guess as to why we see it here - the resolution of the D800. When pixel peeping, any blur is accentuated. Looking at this image at 1:1 puts an otherwise great image at a disadvantage over a camera with less resolution. Not that I'm suggesting it, but downsampling this one does improve the apparent sharpness at 1:1. Why more blur on the left? Atmosphere, minor tilt in one of the lens elements, who knows --Generic1139 15:52, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose because of the blur. In my eyes it’s motion blur, especially visible at the summits. Being at least 5 pixels wide, you don’t need a pixelpeeper to discover it; in fact you have to scale the image down to 20 per cent to make it disappear! --Kreuzschnabel 09:46, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose → Decline?   Yann 19:36, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Forchtenstein - Pfarrkirche Maria Himmelfahrt (03).jpg

• Nomination Parish church „Assumption of Mary“ in Forchtenstein, Burgenland, Austria --Steindy 20:36, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
• Decline Some chromatic noise, easy to fix. see note. --Cccefalon 20:44, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
  Thank you, but sorry, I don't see any chromatic noise. The color differences are also present original in the sandstone. They are in other photos of this object the same. Maybe there are metallic inclusions. --Steindy 21:38, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
   Oppose Perhaps I have the wrong understanding of chromatic noise. We better let the experts add their opinions. --Cccefalon 09:36, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support. For me the chromatic noise here is negligible. -- Spurzem 21:13, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose For me the chromatic noise here is improvable--Lmbuga 23:46, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support per Spurzem. --MB-one 13:39, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Yes, there is plenty of chromatic noise. It can be fixed though Alvesgaspar 21:55, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose @Alvesgaspar: If you want to see "plenty" of vlf chromatic noise, have a look at this example. But, yes, it should be fixed. Can be done e.g. with NeatImage without loosing sharpness. -- Smial 19:16, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment @ Cccefalon, Lmbuga, Alvesgaspar, Smial: I have twice been nominated four photos for judging. Seven of them were not evaluated, but just in this photo has a chromatic noise found, which does not exist. Image forgeries I will not run, this is me not worth the award. I'd rather lose it. My photos are „what you see is what you get“. Obviously, it's not about the photos, but about who has the better image editing programs. Many thanks! --Steindy 19:51, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Sorry, I have not seen the other photos as I did not have the time to do so in the past days. Denoising is not rocket science. You should know that I'm not a friend of too strong image manipulation and nitpicking. I also do not decline images because of noise that is inevitable. But this is a static motive where rather low ISO setting is possible and the removing of this kind of noise is rather simple. On the other hand: If you do not wish to accept any aid to improve, then you'll just have to live with rejections. NeatImage is available without cost in an only slightly crippled evaluation version (no batch processing, no TIFF processing, fixed, but not too bad jpg quality settings when saving the result). Check it out. -- Smial 20:18, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Answer at your disc. --Steindy (talk) 23:37, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --LC-de 14:32, 13 October 2014 (UTC)